Skip to main content
PMC home page
The BMJ logoLink to The BMJ
. 1994 Jul 23;309(6949):241–248. doi: 10.1136/bmj.309.6949.241

Cancer prevention in primary care. Screening for cervical cancer.

J Austoker 1
PMCID: PMC2540751  PMID: 7980803

Abstract

Cervical screening has been shown to be effective in several countries, although not by means of randomised controlled trials. A screening programme has been in operation in the United Kingdom since 1964, but it has, in the past, been beset with problems of organisation, accountability, and commitment. The introduction in 1988 of a systematic call and recall introduction in 1988 of a systematic call and recall system and the setting up of an NHS cervical screening programme national coordinating network has brought a greater sense of coherence. Coverage of the target population in England between 1989-90 and 1992-3 increased from 61% to 83%, and there is a strong indication that cervical screening is now beginning to reach those most at risk--namely, older women from lower social classes. Primary care is central to the overall success of the cervical screening programme. General practitioners are in a unique position to invite women for a smear test, to take smears, to ensure that abnormal smear test results are followed up, and to check on reasons for non-attendance. Numerous studies have looked at the involvement of general practice in cervical screening, identifying many ways in which the programme can be improved. Many practices are now running well organised and effective programmes.

Full text

PDF
246

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Beardow R., Oerton J., Victor C. Evaluation of the cervical cytology screening programme in an inner city health district. BMJ. 1989 Jul 8;299(6691):98–100. doi: 10.1136/bmj.299.6691.98. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Ellman R. Problems of follow-up for abnormal cervical smears: discussion paper. J R Soc Med. 1990 Feb;83(2):94–95. doi: 10.1177/014107689008300213. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Hakama M., Louhivuori K. A screening programme for cervical cancer that worked. Cancer Surv. 1988;7(3):403–416. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Havelock C. M. Cervical screening performance in general practice. An evaluation in a single health district. Cytopathology. 1990;1(2):59–64. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2303.1990.tb00329.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Lără E., Day N. E., Hakama M. Trends in mortality from cervical cancer in the Nordic countries: association with organised screening programmes. Lancet. 1987 May 30;1(8544):1247–1249. doi: 10.1016/s0140-6736(87)92695-x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Meadows P. Study of the women overdue for a smear test in a general practice cervical screening programme. J R Coll Gen Pract. 1987 Nov;37(304):500–503. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Nathoo V. Investigation of non-responders at a cervical cancer screening clinic in Manchester. Br Med J (Clin Res Ed) 1988 Apr 9;296(6628):1041–1042. doi: 10.1136/bmj.296.6628.1041. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Nichols S. Women's preferences for sex of doctor: a postal survey. J R Coll Gen Pract. 1987 Dec;37(305):540–543. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Pierce M., Lundy S., Palanisamy A., Winning S., King J. Prospective randomised controlled trial of methods of call and recall for cervical cytology screening. BMJ. 1989 Jul 15;299(6692):160–162. doi: 10.1136/bmj.299.6692.160. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Sasieni P. Trends in cervical cancer mortality. Lancet. 1991 Sep 28;338(8770):818–819. doi: 10.1016/0140-6736(91)90701-p. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Shafi M. I., Luesley D. M., Jordan J. A. Mild cervical cytological abnormalities. BMJ. 1992 Oct 31;305(6861):1040–1041. doi: 10.1136/bmj.305.6861.1040. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Shroff K. J., Corrigan A. M., Bosher M., Edmonds M. P., Sacks D., Coleman D. V. Cervical screening in an inner city area: response to a call system in general practice. BMJ. 1988 Nov 19;297(6659):1317–1318. doi: 10.1136/bmj.297.6659.1317. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Sigurdsson K. Effect of organized screening on the risk of cervical cancer. Evaluation of screening activity in Iceland, 1964-1991. Int J Cancer. 1993 Jun 19;54(4):563–570. doi: 10.1002/ijc.2910540408. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Soutter W. P., Fletcher A. Invasive cancer of the cervix in women with mild dyskaryosis followed up cytologically. BMJ. 1994 May 28;308(6941):1421–1423. doi: 10.1136/bmj.308.6941.1421. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Wilkinson C. Abnormal cervical smear test results: old dilemmas and new directions. Br J Gen Pract. 1992 Aug;42(361):336–339. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Wilkinson C., Jones J. M., McBride J. Anxiety caused by abnormal result of cervical smear test: a controlled trial. BMJ. 1990 Feb 17;300(6722):440–440. doi: 10.1136/bmj.300.6722.440. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Wilson A., Leeming A. Cervical cytology screening: a comparison of two call systems. Br Med J (Clin Res Ed) 1987 Jul 18;295(6591):181–182. doi: 10.1136/bmj.295.6591.181-a. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from BMJ : British Medical Journal are provided here courtesy of BMJ Publishing Group

RESOURCES