Skip to main content
Bulletin of the World Health Organization logoLink to Bulletin of the World Health Organization
. 1953;9(1):39–57.

Inactivation of DDT deposits on mud surfaces*,

E Bordas, W G Downs, L Navarro
PMCID: PMC2542110  PMID: 13082389

Abstract

The problem of the inactivation of DDT deposits on dry mud surfaces is presented and its causes outlined. The phenomenon is found to be due to adsorption of the DDT crystals present on the surface; this adsorption appears to be the initial step in the catalytic decomposition of DDT by the iron oxides present in soils, since there is a direct relation between the amount of oxides present and their capacity to inactivate DDT deposits.

The DDT-inactivating capacity of soils can be determined by testing them for catalytic activity in the thermal decomposition of DDT.

The adsorption of DDT by soil is influenced by environmental relative humidity. Inactivated deposits may be reactivated by increase of the atmospheric humidity.

Several substances proposed for the protection of the DDT deposit from inactivation were tested without success. Reference is made, however, to the encouraging findings of some other workers. Limewashing is recommended for the protection of DDT deposits.

Full text

PDF
40

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. DOWNS W. G., BORDAS E. Control of Anopheles pseudopunctipennis in Mexico with DDT residual sprays applied in buildings. Part V. Effectiveness of residual applications of DDT and gammexane up to one year after application under controlled conditions. Am J Hyg. 1951 Jul;54(1):150–156. doi: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.aje.a119466. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. DOWNS W. G., BORDAS E., NAVARRO L. Duration of action of residual DDT deposits on adobe surfaces. Science. 1951 Sep 7;114(2958):259–262. doi: 10.1126/science.114.2958.259. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. HADAWAY A. B., BARLOW F. Sorption of solid insecticides by dried mud. Nature. 1951 May 26;167(4256):854–854. doi: 10.1038/167854a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. KRUSE C. W., DAYANANDA KONCHADY Some considerations on indoor residual spraying for malaria control in rural India. Indian J Malariol. 1950 Sep;4(3):267–279. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. MAES H. Phosphorus as a factor preventing DDT-dehydrochlorination. Nature. 1952 Aug 23;170(4321):328–328. doi: 10.1038/170328a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. MAIER J., RENDTORFF R. C., SUAREZ M. The duration of residual effect of DDT sprays on building materials used in rural Venezuela. Am J Trop Med Hyg. 1948 Nov;28(6):889–894. doi: 10.4269/ajtmh.1948.s1-28.889. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. SWELLENGREBEL N. H., LODENS J. G. Anopheles aconitus and DDT spraying. Doc Neerl Indones Morbis Trop. 1949 Sep;1(3):245–254. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. WHARTON R. H., REID J. A. D.D.T. and gammexane as residual insecticides against Anopheles maculatus in Malaya. Nature. 1950 Jan 7;165(4184):28–28. doi: 10.1038/165028b0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Bulletin of the World Health Organization are provided here courtesy of World Health Organization

RESOURCES