Skip to main content

. 1988 Mar 12;296(6624):774–777. doi: 10.1136/bmj.296.6624.774

Research Policy: Problems with peer review and alternatives

PMCID: PMC2545379 PMID: 3126969

777

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

Altman L., Melcher L. Fraud in science. Br Med J (Clin Res Ed) 1983 Jun 25;286(6383):2003–2006. doi: 10.1136/bmj.286.6383.2003. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Anderson J., Evered D. C. Why do research on research? Lancet. 1986 Oct 4;2(8510):799–802. doi: 10.1016/s0140-6736(86)90312-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Cole S., Cole J. R., Simon G. A. Chance and consensus in peer review. Science. 1981 Nov 20;214(4523):881–886. doi: 10.1126/science.7302566. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Jost D. T., Gäggeler H. W., Baltensperger U., Zinder B., Haller P. Chernobyl fallout in size-fractionated aerosol. Nature. 1986 Nov 6;324(6092):22–23. doi: 10.1038/324022a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Lock S. Fraud in medicine. Br Med J (Clin Res Ed) 1988 Feb 6;296(6619):376–377. doi: 10.1136/bmj.296.6619.376. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Roy R. An alternative funding mechanism. Science. 1981 Mar 27;211(4489):1377–1377. doi: 10.1126/science.211.4489.1377. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

ACTIONS

RESOURCES