Skip to main content
The BMJ logoLink to The BMJ
. 1995 Jun 17;310(6994):1547–1548. doi: 10.1136/bmj.310.6994.1547

Lessons from the Pearce affair: handling scientific fraud.

S Lock
PMCID: PMC2549935  PMID: 7787632

Full text

PDF
1548

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Dingell J. D. Shattuck Lecture--misconduct in medical research. N Engl J Med. 1993 Jun 3;328(22):1610–1615. doi: 10.1056/NEJM199306033282207. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Dyer O. Consultant struck off for fraudulent claims. BMJ. 1995 Jun 17;310(6994):1554–1555. doi: 10.1136/bmj.310.6994.1554a. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Evered D., Lazar P. Misconduct in medical research. Lancet. 1995 May 6;345(8958):1161–1162. doi: 10.1016/s0140-6736(95)90984-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Friedman P. J. Correcting the literature following fraudulent publication. JAMA. 1990 Mar 9;263(10):1416–1419. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Hamilton David P. In the trenches, doubts about scientific integrity. Science. 1992 Mar 27;255(5052):1636–1636. doi: 10.1126/science.11642983. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Knox R. The Harvard fraud case: where does the problem lie? JAMA. 1983 Apr 8;249(14):1797-99, 1802-7. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Lock S. Misconduct in medical research: does it exist in Britain? BMJ. 1988 Dec 10;297(6662):1531–1535. doi: 10.1136/bmj.297.6662.1531. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. No need for a dry run. Lancet. 1994 Jul 2;344(8914):1–2. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Relman A. S. Lessons from the Darsee affair. N Engl J Med. 1983 Jun 9;308(23):1415–1417. doi: 10.1056/NEJM198306093082311. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Rennie D. Editors and auditors. JAMA. 1989 May 5;261(17):2543–2545. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from BMJ : British Medical Journal are provided here courtesy of BMJ Publishing Group

RESOURCES