Skip to main content
The BMJ logoLink to The BMJ
. 1995 Jul 8;311(6997):86–88. doi: 10.1136/bmj.311.6997.86

Birth weights of infants of first generation Asian women in Britain compared with second generation Asian women.

S Dhawan 1
PMCID: PMC2550148  PMID: 7613407

Abstract

OBJECTIVES--To compare birth weights of infants of first generation Asian women (women born in the Indian subcontinent) with those of infants of second generation Asian women (born in the United Kingdom). DESIGN--Retrospective case note study. SETTING--Bolton District General Hospital. SUBJECTS--331 Asian women who gave birth between January 1989 and December 1989: 220 of these women were first generation Asians and 111 were second generation Asians. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE--Birth weights of babies born to first and second generation Asian women. RESULTS--At all gestational ages at delivery, babies born to second generation Asian women were heavier than those born to first generation women. The mean birth weight for babies of second generation women was 3196 g, 249 g more than the mean birth weight of 2946 g of babies of first generation women (P < 0.001). After a stepwise multiple regression analysis was carried out the adjusted difference in birth weights was 280 g, greater than the crude difference. CONCLUSION--Birth weights are important in relation to perinatal mortality, which is notoriously high among Asians. The results of this study indicate that there is hope for lowering of perinatal mortality and improving postnatal growth in babies of second generation Asians.

Full text

PDF
86

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Bhargava S. K., Ramji S., Sachdev H. P., Iyer P. U. Delivery of perinatal care in India: priorities and policies. Ann Trop Paediatr. 1986 Dec;6(4):225–231. doi: 10.1080/02724936.1986.11748446. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Brooke O. G., Wood C. Growth in British Asians: longitudinal data in the first year. J Hum Nutr. 1980 Oct;34(5):355–359. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Davies D. P., Senior N., Cole G., Blass D., Simpson K. Size at birth of Asian and white Caucasian babies born in Leicester: implications for obstetric and paediatric practices. Early Hum Dev. 1982 Jul;6(3):257–263. doi: 10.1016/0378-3782(82)90119-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Dawson I., Golder R. Y., Jonas E. G. Birthweight by gestational age and its effect on perinatal mortality in white and in Punjabi births: experience at a district general hospital in West London 1967-1975. Br J Obstet Gynaecol. 1982 Nov;89(11):896–899. doi: 10.1111/j.1471-0528.1982.tb05053.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Terry P. B., Condie R. G., Settatree R. S. Analysis of ethnic differences in perinatal statistics. Br Med J. 1980 Nov 15;281(6251):1307–1308. doi: 10.1136/bmj.281.6251.1307. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Tuck S. M., Cardozo L. D., Studd J. W., Gibb D. M., Cooper D. J. Obstetric characteristics in different racial groups. Br J Obstet Gynaecol. 1983 Oct;90(10):892–897. doi: 10.1111/j.1471-0528.1983.tb06759.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from BMJ : British Medical Journal are provided here courtesy of BMJ Publishing Group

RESOURCES