Skip to main content
Proceedings of the Annual Symposium on Computer Application in Medical Care logoLink to Proceedings of the Annual Symposium on Computer Application in Medical Care
. 1995:824–828.

Computers in the examining room: the patient's perspective.

C E Aydin 1, P N Rosen 1, S M Jewell 1, V J Felitti 1
PMCID: PMC2579209  PMID: 8563407

Abstract

CompuHx* is an Interactive Health Appraisal System (IHAPS) used in the examining room at Kaiser-Permanente's San Diego Department of Preventive Medicine to record patient information, assist in diagnosis, and provide a legible summary of findings. The purpose of the present project was to examine the impact of computer use in the examining room on patient satisfaction with the Health Appraisal experience. Survey results showed no significant differences in patient satisfaction between patients whose examiners used CompuHx and those whose examiners did not. These findings indicate that, in the eyes of the patients surveyed, clinician use of a computer in the examining room did not depersonalize their relationship with the clinician, nor did it enhance satisfaction with the thoroughness of the exam or confidence in the examiner's findings.

Full text

PDF
826

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Brownbridge G., Herzmark G. A., Wall T. D. Patient reactions to doctors' computer use in general practice consultations. Soc Sci Med. 1985;20(1):47–52. doi: 10.1016/0277-9536(85)90310-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Brownbridge G., Lilford R. J., Tindale-Biscoe S. Use of a computer to take booking histories in a hospital antenatal clinic. Acceptability to midwives and patients and effects on the midwife-patient interaction. Med Care. 1988 May;26(5):474–487. doi: 10.1097/00005650-198805000-00004. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Cruickshank P. J. Patient stress and the computer in the consulting room. Soc Sci Med. 1982;16(14):1371–1376. doi: 10.1016/0277-9536(82)90034-x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Herzmark G., Brownbridge G., Fitter M., Evans A. Consultation use of a computer by general practitioners. J R Coll Gen Pract. 1984 Dec;34(269):649–654. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Kincey J., Bradshaw P., Ley P. Patients' satisfaction and reported acceptance of advice in general practice. J R Coll Gen Pract. 1975 Aug;25(157):558–566. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Lewis J. R. Patient views on quality care in general practice: literature review. Soc Sci Med. 1994 Sep;39(5):655–670. doi: 10.1016/0277-9536(94)90022-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Stead W. W. JAMIA--why? J Am Med Inform Assoc. 1994 Jan-Feb;1(1):75–76. doi: 10.1136/jamia.1994.95236138. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Wolf M. H., Putnam S. M., James S. A., Stiles W. B. The Medical Interview Satisfaction Scale: development of a scale to measure patient perceptions of physician behavior. J Behav Med. 1978 Dec;1(4):391–401. doi: 10.1007/BF00846695. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Proceedings of the Annual Symposium on Computer Application in Medical Care are provided here courtesy of American Medical Informatics Association

RESOURCES