Skip to main content
NIHPA Author Manuscripts logoLink to NIHPA Author Manuscripts
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2008 Dec 5.
Published in final edited form as: Vet Microbiol. 2005 Jun 15;108(1-2):133–139. doi: 10.1016/j.vetmic.2005.04.003

Molecular characterization of Helicobacter pylori strains isolated from cynomolgus monkeys (M. fascicularis)

Sonia Q Doi a, Tara Kimbason a, James Reindel b, Andre Dubois a,*
PMCID: PMC2596641  NIHMSID: NIHMS71690  PMID: 15885930

Abstract

We recently reported the occurrence of natural infection with H. pylori in a group of cynomolgus monkeys with chronic active gastritis and gastric erosions. The goal of the present study was to characterize and to compare strains isolated from animals originating from two different geographical areas. Gross and microscopic pathology determined at the time of necropsy was similar in all animals. H. pylori were isolated from specimens harvested in five monkeys (four from Vietnam and one from the Philippines) with gastritis. Isolates from monkeys bred in Vietnam had a similar DNA fingerprint pattern, which was distinct from that of isolates from a monkey bred in the Philippines. All strains were of the s1a vacA subtype, but all the ‘Vietnamese’ strains were cagA+ and all but one were iceA1 whereas the ‘Philippino’ strains were cagA and iceA2. The sequences of the 16S rRNA of the Vietnamese and Philippino strains shared 98% homology and both clustered with H. pylori sequences present in the NCBI database. In conclusion, cynomolgus monkeys can be naturally colonized by H. pylori, and the strains isolated from these animals appear to vary according to the geographical origin, thus indicating probable infection prior to importation. Since some of the cynomolgus monkeys developed antral erosions during natural infection, we propose that this animal model may be used to investigate the role of H. pylori in ulcerogenesis.

Keywords: Nonhuman primate, Cynomolgus monkey, Gastritis, Gastric erosions, 16S ribosomal RNA, Helicobacter pylori, DNA fingerprinting, DNA sequencing, Genotyping, Stomach, Animal model

1. Introduction

Helicobacter pylori persistently colonizes the stomach of over half of humans worldwide, is consistently associated with chronic active gastritis (Dubois et al., 2000) and is as a major risk factor for peptic ulcer disease (Anon, 1994) and distal gastric cancer (Wong et al., 2004). The natural reservoir for H. pylori is believed to be limited to humans, certain macaques (M. mulatta, M. fascicularis, and M. nemestrinae) (Dubois et al., 1995; Reindel et al., 1999; Suerbaum et al., 2002), and cats (Handt et al., 1994).

The high prevalence of H. pylori and its potential pathogenicity stimulated the development of specific and sensitive methods for the detection of this microorganism. Culture of H. pylori, complemented by polymerase chain reaction (PCR) amplification has been a useful identification tool. A PCR-based DNA fingerprinting method termed random amplified polymorphic DNA (RAPD) allows tracing of an infecting strain in a given individual or among multiple subjects (Akopyants et al., 1992). Additional characterization of H. pylori strains by genotyping has demonstrated an association between some of the virulence genes and pathogenicity (Cover et al., 1997). However, using PCR for genotyping may be difficult due to the extensive polymorphism of many H. pylori genes and the absence of specific virulence genes in some strains. The sequencing of the 16S rRNA gene offers an alternative step in the sensitive detection and precise identification of H. pylori. In addition, the 16S rRNA gene sequence was used as a tool for detection and identification of H. pylori and other Helicobacter organisms especially from animal sources (Ho et al., 1991; Drazek et al., 1994; Fox et al., 1998).

The goal of the present study was to characterize and to compare strains isolated from animals with gastritis and mucosal erosions and originating from two different geographical areas. We genotyped H. pylori strains recovered from naturally-infected cynomolgus monkeys originating in Vietnam and the Philippines using RAPD and PCR techniques. Two 16S rRNA sequences representing one strain from the Philippines and one from Vietnam were decoded and aligned to determine the degree of identity between them. Each 16S rRNA sequence was also aligned to other sequences with the highest degree of homology available in the National Center for Biotechnology Information (NCBI) nucleotide database to identify a clustering group.

2. Methods

2.1. H. pylori strains

Isolates used in the present study were cultured from 5 colony-bred, 2.5–3.5 years old, cynomolgus monkeys (Macaca fascicularis) that had been obtained from Hazelton Research Products Inc., and kept in individual cages at an AALAC-accredited laboratory. One of the animals (no. 1200), originated from the Phillipines and was among the 63 monkeys that were the subject of a previous report (Reindel et al., 1999). The other four animals (nos. 1205, 1207, 1224 and 1225) were from Vietnam and had been found to present with gastritis at necropsy. All animals were kept in individual cages in our facility at all times.

The health status of the monkeys was monitored routinely as described and none of the animals displayed signs of disease (Reindel et al., 1999). Following euthanasia, all animals were subjected to necropsy and specimens from the antro-pyloric mucosa were collected, cultured, isolated, and stored as described (Dubois et al., 1999). The remainder of each stomach was fixed in 10% neutral buffered formalin and processed as described (Reindel et al., 1999).

2.2. DNA extraction

DNA was extracted from each isolate collected in TE buffer as published (Atherton et al., 1997).

2.3. Random amplification of polymorphic DNA (RAPD)

DNA fingerprinting by RAPD was performed to compare the isolates using a set of five different 10-mer primers as previously published (Akopyants et al., 1992).

2.4. Genotyping

DNA from each H. pylori isolate was subjected to typing for vacA and cagA genes, using standard PCR amplification and specific primer sets for each target gene (Atherton et al., 1997; Cover et al., 1994).

2.5. 16S rRNA amplification and sequencing

The 16S rRNA gene of isolates collected from the Philippino monkey (1200) and the Vietnamese monkey (1205) were PCR-amplified with primers according to a previously published procedure (Eckloff et al., 1994). The ethidium bromide stained-DNA band visualized by UV transillumination was cut out from the agarose gel and purified using a GlasPac/GS QuicKit (National Scientific Supply Company Inc., San Rafael, CA). The sequence of the purified 16S rRNA gene was determined using sets of overlapping primers (Eckloff et al., 1994), a dye terminator reagent (PE Applied Biosystems, Foster City, CA) and an automated DNA sequencer (PE Applied Biosystems, Foster City, CA). The Gene Jockey Sequence Processor software (Biosoft, Cambridge, UK) was used to align the overlapping sequenced segments of the 16S rRNA gene. For the other three isolates, approximately 400 bases downstream from the 3′ and upstream from the 5′ ends were sequenced for comparison.

2.6. Alignment of the two decoded 16S rRNA sequences to each other and to other NCBI sequences

Homology between the two sequences (isolates from monkeys 1200 and 1205) and between each sequence and those currently available in the NCBI database was assessed using the Basic Local Alignment Search Tool (BLAST, National Center for Biotechnology Information, NIH, http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/BLAST) score system. The scores assigned in a BLAST search have a well-defined statistical interpretation, making real matches easier to distinguish from random background hits. This scoring system also takes into account the total number of bases in the sequence analyzed. Therefore, scores from different BLAST searches are not comparable if the query sequences have different number of nucleotides.

3. Results

3.1. Microbiological characterization of H. pylori isolated from cynomolgus monkeys

Gram negative, curved, spiral or ‘gull-wing’-shaped bacteria grew in cultures from all 5 animals within 7–10 days, forming pinhead-sized colonies with ‘water-spray’ morphology. Bacteria measured 3–6 μm in length and were positive for urease, oxidase, and catalase activity. A total of 19 single colony isolates [from the Philippino monkey, no. 1200 (n = 2), and from Vietnamese animals, no. 1205 (n = 5), 1207 (n = 4), 1224 (n = 4) and 1225 (n = 4)] were collected and further characterized at the molecular level.

Histologic lesions consisting of erosions and variable degrees of mucosal inflammation were as previously described (Reindel et al., 1999). No differences were noted between the monkeys from Vietnam and the Philippines.

3.2. DNA fingerprinting

RAPD fingerprinting analysis was performed to study the genomic diversity among the 19 isolates. The patterns of the two isolates from animal 1200 were identical in regard to all five primers used for RAPD. In contrast, the pattern of 17 isolates collected from the other four animals, although similar to each other, were quite different from the pattern found in the isolates of monkey 1200 (Fig. 1). Therefore, we identified two groups of isolates according to RAPD pattern variations: one from monkeys bred in Vietnam and the other from the monkey bred in the Philippines.

Fig. 1.

Fig. 1

Representative DNA fingerprinting (RAPD) of H. pylori isolates. Animal 1200 originated from the Philippines, and the other four animals originated from Vietnam. Note that the two isolates from animal 1200 have identical RAPD. The pattern of the isolates from the other four animals, although similar to each other, were quite different from that of the isolates from monkey 1200.

3.3. Genotyping

PCR amplification of vacA and cagA genes was performed to examine the pattern of expression of these genes among the isolates. The two isolates from monkey 1200 were of the vacA-s1a genotype, and were negative for cagA and for the m1/m2 vacA subtype. All single colony isolates from the other four animals were cagA positive, of the s1a/m2 vacA subtype. These results were also consistent with divergence between the two groups of isolates.

3.4. Sequencing and comparison between 16S rRNA sequences of two strains with divergent genetic patterns

The 16S rRNA sequences of strain 1200 and 1205 were decoded and registered in the GenBank nucleotide database under accession number AY155586 and AY155587, respectively. These strains were distinct from one another based on RAPD pattern and type of virulence genes.

Alignment of the 16S rRNA sequence of strain from animal 1200 (1448 bases) against that of isolate from monkey 1205 (1340 bases) showed an identity of 98%. As mismatches between these 16S rRNA sequences were found to be clustered toward the 5′and 3′ ends, we sequenced both ends of the 16S rRNA (∼400 bases at each end) of representative isolates from three other cynomolgus monkeys (1207, 1224, and 1225). There was a complete identity between these three sequences and that of strain 1205.

3.5. Comparative alignment with other H. pylori 16S rRNA sequences

A BLAST search for the 16S rRNA sequence of strain 1205 listed 34 sequences sharing ≥98% homology with the query (Table 1). These strains were all H. pylori, and strain 1200 was listed as number 26 in descending order of identity, further supporting that although both strains 1200 and 1205 clustered with those of H. pylori, they were quite distinct from one another. Interestingly, the highest identity score for strain 1205 identified H. pylori strains isolated from a Rhesus monkey originating in India (GenBank accession no. U00679) previously studied in our laboratory (Drazek et al., 1994) and from a M. nemestrinae (GenBank accession no. AF348617) originally named H. nemestrinae and now recognized to be H. pylori (Suerbaum et al., 2002). In contrast, the highest identity score for strain 1200 listed H. pylori of human origin and these two isolates from macaques showed a lower degree of identity.

Table 1.

Results from a BLAST search using 16S rRNA sequence of strain 1205 (AY155587) as a query

GenBank accession number Blast score (bits)
1 U00679 2569
2 AF348617a 2569
3 AF363064a 2565
4 AF512997 2553
5 Z25742 2553
6 U01331 2553
7 U01328 2553
8 U01332 2545
9 AF535196 2543
10 AY062898 2537
11 U01330 2537
12 AF535198 2535
13 AF535197 2535
14 AY366421 2531
15 AY366424 2529
16 AF302106 2529
17 AY366422 2524
18 Z25741 2522
19 AF361935 2518
20 U01329 2514
21 AY062899 2506
22 AE001556 2506
23 AF535194 2504
24 AE000644 2504
25 AE000620 2502
26 AY155586b 2494
27 AF535195 2488
28 AY366423 2486
29 AY364440 2486
30 M88157 2486
31 AY364438 2470
32 AY456638 2462
33 U08906 2456
34 AY364439 2418

Among the first 34 genes listed, only sequences of H. pylori 16S rRNA were identified.

a

Sequences deposited in GenBank as 16S rRNA of H. nemestrinae, now H. pylori (Suerbaum et al., 2002).

b

Strain 1200.

4. Discussion

In the present study, we characterized H. pylori isolates collected from naturally-infected cynomolgus monkeys originating from two different countries (Vietnam and the Philippines). Both morphological and enzymatic properties were consistent with H. pylori for all the isolates studied, but strains isolated from animals from Vietnam and from the Philippines differed at the molecular level. Geographical variations of H. pylori strains also have been reported in humans (Falush et al., 2003).

First, the pattern of RAPD fingerprinting analyzed by four different primers was similar among the isolates from the Philippines, but quite distinct from that of the monkeys from Vietnam. The strains also differed in that only strains from Vietnam were positive for the cytotoxin-associated gene (cagA). Although cagA+ strains are more frequent in patients with peptic ulcer disease (Censini et al., 1996), the nature and degree of gastric inflammation or erosions was similar in cynomolgus monkeys from these two countries. This lack of correlation between pathological findings and expression of the cagA H. pylori virulence gene suggests that, as has been reported in humans (Monack et al., 2004), the macaque host response may overcome bacterial virulence factors. Finally, alignment of the 16S rRNA sequences of strains 1200 and 1205 revealed a number of mismatches (approximately 2%), and the lists of sequences in descending order of identity relative to each individual strain (1200 and 1205) were quite different.

H. pylori was first identified as the Helicobacter species that infected primarily humans while other Helicobacter species (H. felis, H. rappini, etc) infected animals. However, among the large number of H. pylori strains recently identified, several were found in macaques (Dubois et al., 1995; Handt et al., 1994; Reindel et al., 1999). Some of those strains were first classified as a different species (e.g. H. nemestrinae) and later recognized to be H. pylori (Suerbaum et al., 2002). It is important to note that the revised GenBank description of the strain H. nemestrinae under ‘source’ and ‘organism’ reflects the correction, although the former name of H. nemestrinae associated with the accession number still remains. One of the major elements used for identification was the 16S rRNA sequence. Finally, two of the strains that best matched strain 1205 were published in GenBank as Helicobacter sp. ‘liver’ (AF142583 and AF142585) although the phylogenetic tree subsequently demonstrated that they were in fact H. pylori (Avenaud et al., 2000).

The source of H. pylori isolated from macaques has not been established. In our previous study (Drazek et al., 1994), the close match between the 16S rRNA sequence of a rhesus monkey isolate and that of isolates from humans led us to conclude that cross-transmission had occurred at some point in the past. We propose that cross-transmission also occurred in M. fascicularis. Humans, other macaques, or the environment would be considered possible sources of infection. Animal handling practices of non-human primates in the United States make human-to-monkey transmission of these bacteria highly unlikely in this series. The potential in-house spread of infection amongst cynomolgus monkeys was not determined, but is possible. Natural transmission at our facility was unlikely as animals were housed in individual cages upon arrival, cages were cleaned daily, and individual food dishes were not shared and were regularly sanitized. However, we cannot exclude that accidental transmission occurred during administration of dosing suspensions via the use of gastric gavage tubes and oral speculae. Although common gavage tubes were used for dosing monkeys in each individual dose group and transfer of saliva and gastric contents were therefore possible within each treatment group, not all animals within specific dose groups had identifiable infections or gastric lesions.

The present findings have relevance for toxicity testing in non-human primates since cynomolgus monkeys now are routinely used for safety evaluation of drug candidates. In such studies, gastritis and erosions induced by H. pylori can be problematic and confound diagnosis of potential compound-related toxicity to the gastric mucosa. Recognition of H. pylori infection and associated gastritis is important to prevent inadvertent ascription of gastric inflammation as a compound effect. Furthermore, once infection is identified, steps can be taken to eliminate infection and associated gastritis in the colony (Dubois et al., 1998).

In summary, cynomolgus monkeys can be naturally colonized by H. pylori, and the strains isolated from these animals appear to vary according to the geographical origin. We conclude that cross-infection between macaques and humans may have occurred at some point either during breeding or in previous generations of animals.

Acknowledgements

This work was supported in part by NIH grant R01-CA082312 and by USUHS grant R0-83GM. The authors thank J. Mysore, D. Altrogge, A. Fitzerald, D. Paterson, L. Dillon, and G. Kim for veterinary and technical support during the studies.

Footnotes

The experiments reported herein were conducted according to the principles set forth in the “Guide for the Care and Use of Laboratory Animals”, Institute of Laboratory Animal Resources, National Research Council, HHS/NIH Publ. no. 85–23. The opinions and assertions contained herein are the private ones of the authors and are not to be construed as official or reflecting the views of the Department of Defense, the Uniformed Services University of the Health Sciences.

References

  1. Anon Helicobacter pylori in peptic ulcer disease. NIH consensus conference. JAMA. 1994;272:65–69. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Akopyants N, Bukanov NO, Westblom TU, Berg DE. PCR-based RFLP analysis of DNA sequence diversity in the gastric pathogen Helicobacter pylori. Nucl. Acids Res. 1992;20:6221–6225. doi: 10.1093/nar/20.23.6221. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Atherton JC. Molecular methods for detecting ulcerogenic strains of H. pylori. In: Clayton CL, Mobley HLT, editors. Helicobacter pylori Protocols. Humana Press; Totowa, NJ: 1997. pp. 133–143. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Avenaud P, Marais A, Monteiro L, Le Bail B, Bioulac SP, Balabaud C, Megraud F. Detection of Helicobacter species in the liver of patients with and without primary liver carcinoma. Cancer. 2000;89:1431–1439. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Censini S, Lange C, Xiang Z, Crabtree JE, Ghiara P, Borodovsky M, Rappuoli R, Covacci A. cag, a pathogenicity island of Helicobacter pylori, encodes type I-specific and disease-associated virulence factors. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 1996;93:14648–14653. doi: 10.1073/pnas.93.25.14648. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Cover TL, Berg DE, Blaser MJ. VacA and the cag pathogenicity island of Helicobacter pylori. In: Ernst PB, Michetti P, Smith, editors. The Immunobiology of H. pylori: from Pathogenesis to Prevention. P.D. Lippincott-Raven; Philadelphia, PA: 1997. [Google Scholar]
  7. Cover TL, Tummuru MK, Cao P, Thompson SA, Blaser MJ. Divergence of genetic sequences for the vacuolating cytotoxin among Helicobacter pylori strains. J. Biol. Chem. 1994;269:10566–10573. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Drazek ES, Dubois A, Holmes RK. Characterization and presumptive identification of Helicobacter pylori isolates from rhesus monkeys. J. Clin. Microbiol. 1994;32:1799–1804. doi: 10.1128/jcm.32.7.1799-1804.1994. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Dubois A, Berg D, Incecik E, Fiala N, Heman Ackah L, Yang M, Wirth H, Perez-Perez GI, Blaser MJ. Host specificity of Helicobacter pylori strains and host responses in experimentally challenged nonhuman primates. Gastroenterology. 1999;116:90–96. doi: 10.1016/s0016-5085(99)70232-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Dubois A, Berg DE, Fiala N, Heman-Ackah LM, Perez-Perez GI, Blaser MJ. Cure of Helicobacter pylori infection by omeprazole-clarithromycin-based therapy in non-human primates. J. Gastroenterol. 1998;33:18–22. doi: 10.1007/pl00009961. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Dubois A, Fiala N, Weichbrod RH, Ward GS, Nix M, Mehlman PT, Taub DM, Perez-Perez GI, Blaser MJ. Seroepizootiology of Helicobacter pylori gastric infection in socially-housed rhesus monkeys. J. Clin. Microbiol. 1995;33:1492–1495. doi: 10.1128/jcm.33.6.1492-1495.1995. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Dubois A, Welch A, Berg DE, Blaser MJ. Helicobacter pylori. In: Nataro JP, Blaser MJ, Cunningham-Rundles S, editors. Persistent Bacterial Infections. American Society of Microbiology Press; 2000. pp. 263–280. [Google Scholar]
  13. Eckloff BW, Podzorski RP, Kline BC, Cockerill FR. A comparison of 16S ribosomal DNA sequences from five isolates of Helicobacter pylori. Int. J. Syst. Bacteriol. 1994;44:320–323. doi: 10.1099/00207713-44-2-320. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Falush D, Wirth T, Linz B, Pritchard JK, Stephens M, Kidd M, Blaser MJ, Graham DY, Vacher S, Perez-Perez GI, Yamaoka Y, Megraud F, Otto K, Reichard U, Katzowitsch E, Wang X, Achtman M, Suerbaum S. Traces of human migrations in Helicobacter pylori populations. Science. 2003;299:1582–1585. doi: 10.1126/science.1080857. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Fox JG, Dewhirst FE, Shen Z, Feng Y, Taylor NS, Paster BJ, Ericson RL, Lau CN, Correa P, Araya JC, Roa I. Hepatic Helicobacter species identified in bile and gall-bladder tissue from Chileans with chronic cholecystitis. Gastroenterology. 1998;114:755–763. doi: 10.1016/s0016-5085(98)70589-x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Handt LK, Fox JG, Dewhirst FE, Fraser GJ, Paster BJ, Yan LL, Rozmiarek H, Rufo R, Stalis IH. Helicobacter pylori isolated from the domestic cat: public health implications. Infect. Immun. 1994;62:2367–2374. doi: 10.1128/iai.62.6.2367-2374.1994. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Ho SA, Hoyle JA, Lewis FA, Secker AD, Cross D, Map-stone NP, Dixon MF, Wyatt JI, Tompkins DS, Taylor GR. Direct polymerase chain reaction test for detection of Helicobacter pylori in humans and animals. J. Clin. Microbiol. 1991;29:2543–2549. doi: 10.1128/jcm.29.11.2543-2549.1991. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Monack DM, Mueller A, Falkow S. Persistent bacterial infections: the interface of the pathogen and the host immune system. Nat. Rev. Microbiol. 2004;2:747–765. doi: 10.1038/nrmicro955. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Reindel JF, Fitzgerald AL, Breider MA, Gough AW, Mysore JV, Dubois A. An epizootic of lymphoplasmacytic gastritis attributed to Helicobacter pylori infection in cynomolgus monkeys (Macaca fascicularis) Veterinary Pathol. 1999;36:1–13. doi: 10.1354/vp.36-1-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. Suerbaum S, Kraft C, Dewhirst FE, Fox JG. Helicobacter nemestrinae ATCC 49396T is a strain of Helicobacter pylori (Marshall et al., 1985) Goodwin et al. (1989) and Helicobacter nemestrinae Bronsdon et al. (1991) is therefore a junior heterotypic synonym of Helicobacter pylori. Int. J. Syst. Evol. Microbiol. 2002;52:437–439. doi: 10.1099/00207713-52-2-437. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. Wong BC, Lam SK, Wong WM, Chen JS, Zheng TT, Feng RE, Lai KC, Hu WH, Yuen ST, Leung SY, Fong DY, Ho J, Ching CK, Chen JS. Helicobacter pylori eradication to prevent gastric cancer in a high-risk region of China: a randomized controlled trial. JAMA. 2004;291:187–194. doi: 10.1001/jama.291.2.187. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

RESOURCES