Skip to main content
Infection and Immunity logoLink to Infection and Immunity
. 1987 May;55(5):1037–1041. doi: 10.1128/iai.55.5.1037-1041.1987

Phenotypes and protein-epitope phenotypic variation among fresh isolates of Trichomonas vaginalis.

J F Alderete, P Demĕs, A Gombosová, M Valent, A Yánoska, H Fabusová, L Kasmala, G E Garza, E C Metcalfe
PMCID: PMC260464  PMID: 2437029

Abstract

Fresh isolates of Trichomonas vaginalis were examined for reactions to a panel of five monoclonal antibodies (MAbs). Four MAbs (C20A3, DM126, DM116, and C55) were to distinct surface immunogens and one MAb (L64) was to a cytoplasmic component. The fresh isolates were evaluated by indirect immunofluorescence (IF), immunoblotting, and radioimmunoprecipitation. IF assay with C20A3 MAb gave isolates which were homogeneous nonstaining (negative [Neg] phenotype) and isolates which were heterogeneous staining and nonstaining (positive [Pos] and Neg phenotype, respectively) organisms. Immunoblotting and radioimmunoprecipitation assays revealed that surface phenotypic heterogeneity among isolates with C20A3 MAb was due to the presence or absence of the immunogen from the parasite surface. IF assay with DM126 MAb also gave Pos and Neg phenotypes among parasites of some isolates. All of the isolates were always Neg phenotype with DM116 and C55 MAbs. The occurrence of Neg phenotype organisms with DM126, DM116, and C55 was due to epitope inaccessibility to their respective MAbs and not to the absence of the immunogen from trichomonal membranes. All isolates possessed the cytoplasmic protein recognized by L64 MAb. Paired isolates (taken 5 to 6 days apart) from 24 women were also studied. Four of the 24 paired isolates (16%) had different phenotype distributions at the two timepoints for C20A3. Fresh isolates also underwent phenotypic variation during in vitro growth and multiplication, as determined with C20A3. Also, 7 of the 24 paired isolates demonstrated dramatic changes in the accessibility of DM126 MAb to epitope binding. Lastly, 55 (90%) of 60 serum samples from patients with trichomoniasis evaluated in this study possessed antibody to the C20A3 reactive molecule. The data show that the fresh T. vaginalis isolates were predominantly Neg phenotype and confirm the occurrence of protein and epitope phenotypic variation for major immunogens among fresh isolates of the pathogenic human trichomonads.

Full text

PDF
1039

Images in this article

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Alderete J. F. Enzyme linked immunosorbent assay for detecting antibody to Trichomonas vaginalis: use of whole cells and aqueous extract as antigen. Br J Vener Dis. 1984 Jun;60(3):164–170. doi: 10.1136/sti.60.3.164. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Alderete J. F., Garza G. E. Specific nature of Trichomonas vaginalis parasitism of host cell surfaces. Infect Immun. 1985 Dec;50(3):701–708. doi: 10.1128/iai.50.3.701-708.1985. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Alderete J. F., Garza G., Smith J., Spence M. Trichomonas vaginalis: electrophoretic analysis and heterogeneity among isolates due to high-molecular-weight trichomonad proteins. Exp Parasitol. 1986 Apr;61(2):244–251. doi: 10.1016/0014-4894(86)90158-x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Alderete J. F. Identification of immunogenic and antibody-binding membrane proteins of pathogenic Trichomonas vaginalis. Infect Immun. 1983 Apr;40(1):284–291. doi: 10.1128/iai.40.1.284-291.1983. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Alderete J. F., Kasmala L., Metcalfe E., Garza G. E. Phenotypic variation and diversity among Trichomonas vaginalis isolates and correlation of phenotype with trichomonal virulence determinants. Infect Immun. 1986 Aug;53(2):285–293. doi: 10.1128/iai.53.2.285-293.1986. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Alderete J. F., Kasmala L. Monoclonal antibody to a major glycoprotein immunogen mediates differential complement-independent lysis of Trichomonas vaginalis. Infect Immun. 1986 Sep;53(3):697–699. doi: 10.1128/iai.53.3.697-699.1986. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Alderete J. F., Suprun-Brown L., Kasmala L. Monoclonal antibody to a major surface glycoprotein immunogen differentiates isolates and subpopulations of Trichomonas vaginalis. Infect Immun. 1986 Apr;52(1):70–75. doi: 10.1128/iai.52.1.70-75.1986. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Alderete J. F., Suprun-Brown L., Kasmala L., Smith J., Spence M. Heterogeneity of Trichomonas vaginalis and discrimination among trichomonal isolates and subpopulations with sera of patients and experimentally infected mice. Infect Immun. 1985 Sep;49(3):463–468. doi: 10.1128/iai.49.3.463-468.1985. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Diamond L. S. Techniques of axenic cultivation of Entamoeba histolytica Schaudinn, 1903 and E. histolytica-like amebae. J Parasitol. 1968 Oct;54(5):1047–1056. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Dwyer D. M. Isolation and partial characterization of surface membranes from Leishmania donovani promastigotes. J Protozool. 1980 May;27(2):176–182. doi: 10.1111/j.1550-7408.1980.tb04676.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Krieger J. N., Holmes K. K., Spence M. R., Rein M. F., McCormack W. M., Tam M. R. Geographic variation among isolates of Trichomonas vaginalis: demonstration of antigenic heterogeneity by using monoclonal antibodies and the indirect immunofluorescence technique. J Infect Dis. 1985 Nov;152(5):979–984. doi: 10.1093/infdis/152.5.979. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Peterson K. M., Alderete J. F. Host plasma proteins on the surface of pathogenic Trichomonas vaginalis. Infect Immun. 1982 Aug;37(2):755–762. doi: 10.1128/iai.37.2.755-762.1982. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Peterson K. M., Alderete J. F. Iron uptake and increased intracellular enzyme activity follow host lactoferrin binding by Trichomonas vaginalis receptors. J Exp Med. 1984 Aug 1;160(2):398–410. doi: 10.1084/jem.160.2.398. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Peterson K. M., Alderete J. F. Selective acquisition of plasma proteins by Trichomonas vaginalis and human lipoproteins as a growth requirement for this species. Mol Biochem Parasitol. 1984 May;12(1):37–48. doi: 10.1016/0166-6851(84)90042-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Peterson K. M., Alderete J. F. Trichomonas vaginalis is dependent on uptake and degradation of human low density lipoproteins. J Exp Med. 1984 Nov 1;160(5):1261–1272. doi: 10.1084/jem.160.5.1261. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Street D. A., Taylor-Robinson D., Ackers J. P., Hanna N. F., McMillan A. Evaluation of an enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay for the detection of antibody to Trichomonas vaginalis in sera and vaginal secretions. Br J Vener Dis. 1982 Oct;58(5):330–333. doi: 10.1136/sti.58.5.330. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Su-Lin K. E., Honigberg B. M. Antigenic analysis of Trichomonas vaginalis strains by quantitative fluorescent antibody methods. Z Parasitenkd. 1983;69(2):161–181. doi: 10.1007/BF00926952. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Su K. E. Antibody to Trichomonas vaginalis in human cervicovaginal secretions. Infect Immun. 1982 Sep;37(3):852–857. doi: 10.1128/iai.37.3.852-857.1982. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Torian B. E., Connelly R. J., Stephens R. S., Stibbs H. H. Specific and common antigens of Trichomonas vaginalis detected by monoclonal antibodies. Infect Immun. 1984 Jan;43(1):270–275. doi: 10.1128/iai.43.1.270-275.1984. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. Towbin H., Staehelin T., Gordon J. Electrophoretic transfer of proteins from polyacrylamide gels to nitrocellulose sheets: procedure and some applications. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1979 Sep;76(9):4350–4354. doi: 10.1073/pnas.76.9.4350. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Infection and Immunity are provided here courtesy of American Society for Microbiology (ASM)

RESOURCES