Abstract
The continued existence of boxing as an accepted sport in civilized society has been long debated. The position of the American Medical Association (AMA) has evolved from promoting increased safety and medical reform to recommending total abolition of both amateur and professional boxing. In response to the AMA opposition to boxing, the boxing community has attempted to increase the safeguards in amateur and professional boxing.
The United States of America Amateur Boxing Federation, which is the national regulatory agency for all amateur boxing in the United States, has taken several actions to prevent the occurrence of acute brain injury and is currently conducting epidemiologic studies to assess the long-term neuropsychologic consequences of amateur boxing. In professional boxing, state regulatory agencies such as the New York State Athletic Commission have introduced several medical interventions to prevent and reduce neurologic injury. The lack of a national regulatory agency to govern professional boxing has stimulated the formation of the Association of Boxing Commissions and potential legislation for the federal regulation of professional boxing by a federally chartered organization called the United States Boxing Commission. The AMA's opposition to boxing and the medical and safety reforms implemented by the proponents of boxing are discussed.
Full text
PDF
Selected References
These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.
- Jordan B. D. Neurologic aspects of boxing. Arch Neurol. 1987 Apr;44(4):453–459. doi: 10.1001/archneur.1987.00520160083020. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Lundberg G. D. Boxing should be banned in civilized countries--round 3. JAMA. 1986 May 9;255(18):2483–2485. doi: 10.1001/jama.255.18.2483. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Morrison R. G. Medical and public health aspects of boxing. JAMA. 1986 May 9;255(18):2475–2480. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]