Skip to main content
Journal of Clinical Microbiology logoLink to Journal of Clinical Microbiology
. 1993 Feb;31(2):255–259. doi: 10.1128/jcm.31.2.255-259.1993

Comparison of DNA fingerprinting and serotyping for identification of avian Pasteurella multocida isolates.

M A Wilson 1, M J Morgan 1, G E Barger 1
PMCID: PMC262745  PMID: 8432810

Abstract

The DNA fingerprint profiles and serotypes of 63 avian Pasteurella multocida field isolates, 13 attenuated vaccine isolates (propagated from vaccines manufactured by five companies), and 16 somatic reference strains were compared. DNA fingerprinting established the relationship of isolates that could not be distinguished by serotyping. Of the 76 isolates, 28 DNA fingerprint profiles and 12 somatic types were recognized. One isolate was nonreactive with 16 reference somatic and 5 reference capsule-type antisera. Thirty-one field isolates and seven vaccine isolates were identified as capsule type A. Twenty-nine field isolates and six vaccine isolates were nonencapsulated. Three field isolates were capsule type F. Isolates of capsule types B, D, and E were not found. One field isolate, identified as somatic type 7, had a DNA fingerprint identical to that of the somatic reference type 6 profile. Twelve field isolates had profiles identical to the somatic reference type 3 strain profile; 11 of these were identified as somatic type 3, 4, and 1 was identified as somatic type 3. The DNA fingerprint profiles of 50 field isolates and 13 attenuated vaccine isolates did not match profiles of the 16 somatic type reference strains. Twenty-five DNA fingerprint profiles were recognized from 30 of these field isolates. The DNA fingerprint profiles of 20 field isolates and 13 attenuated vaccine isolates were identical. Three somatic types (3; 3,4; and 4,16) were identified from the field isolates, and two somatic types (3 and 3,4) were identified from the attenuated vaccine isolates. DNA fingerprinting is useful for accurate identification and epidemiologic study of P. multocida isolates.

Full text

PDF
256

Images in this article

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Bhasin J. L. Serological types of Pasteurella multocida isolated from turkeys and chickens in Canada. Can J Microbiol. 1982 Sep;28(9):1078–1080. doi: 10.1139/m82-160. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. CARTER G. R. Studies on Pasteurella multocida. I. A hemagglutination test for the identification of serological types. Am J Vet Res. 1955 Jul;16(60):481–484. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Heddleston K. L., Gallagher J. E., Rebers P. A. Fowl cholera: gel diffusion precipitin test for serotyping Pasteruella multocida from avian species. Avian Dis. 1972 Jul-Sep;16(4):925–936. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Hofacre C. L., Glisson J. R. A serotypic survey of Pasteurella multocida isolated from poultry. Avian Dis. 1986 Jul-Sep;30(3):632–633. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Kim C. J., Nagaraja K. V. DNA fingerprinting for differentiation of field isolates from reference vaccine strains of Pasteurella multocida in turkeys. Am J Vet Res. 1990 Feb;51(2):207–210. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Lee M. D., Wooley R. E., Glisson J. R., Brown J. Comparison of Pasteurella multocida serotype 3,4 isolates from turkeys with fowl cholera. Avian Dis. 1988 Jul-Sep;32(3):501–508. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Rhoades K. R., Rimler R. B. Capsular groups of Pasteurella multocida isolated from avian hosts. Avian Dis. 1987 Oct-Dec;31(4):895–898. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Rhoades K. R., Rimler R. B. Somatic serotypes of Pasteurella multocida strains isolated from avian hosts (1976-1988). Avian Dis. 1990 Jan-Mar;34(1):193–195. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Rhoades K. R., Rimler R. B. Virulence and toxigenicity of capsular serogroup D Pasteurella multocida strains isolated from avian hosts. Avian Dis. 1990 Apr-Jun;34(2):384–388. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Rimler R. B., Angus R. D., Phillips M. Evaluation of the specificity of Pasteurella multocida somatic antigen-typing antisera prepared in chickens, using ribosome-lipopolysaccharide complexes as inocula. Am J Vet Res. 1989 Jan;50(1):29–31. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Rimler R. B., Brogden K. A. Pasteurella multocida isolated from rabbits and swine: serologic types and toxin production. Am J Vet Res. 1986 Apr;47(4):730–737. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Rimler R. B., Rhoades K. R. Serogroup F, a new capsule serogroup of Pasteurella multocida. J Clin Microbiol. 1987 Apr;25(4):615–618. doi: 10.1128/jcm.25.4.615-618.1987. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Snipes K. P., Hirsh D. C., Kasten R. W., Carpenter T. E., Hird D. W., McCapes R. H. Differentiation of field isolates of Pasteurella multocida serotype 3,4 from live vaccine strain by genotypic characterization. Avian Dis. 1990 Apr-Jun;34(2):419–424. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Snipes K. P., Hirsh D. C., Kasten R. W., Carpenter T. E., Hird D. W., McCapes R. H. Homogeneity of characteristics of Pasteurella multocida isolated from turkeys and wildlife in California, 1985-88. Avian Dis. 1990 Apr-Jun;34(2):315–320. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Snipes K. P., Hirsh D. C., Kasten R. W., Hansen L. M., Hird D. W., Carpenter T. E., McCapes R. H. Use of an rRNA probe and restriction endonuclease analysis to fingerprint Pasteurella multocida isolated from turkeys and wildlife. J Clin Microbiol. 1989 Aug;27(8):1847–1853. doi: 10.1128/jcm.27.8.1847-1853.1989. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Wilson M. A., Rimler R. B., Hoffman L. J. Comparison of DNA fingerprints and somatic serotypes of serogroup B and E Pasteurella multocida isolates. J Clin Microbiol. 1992 Jun;30(6):1518–1524. doi: 10.1128/jcm.30.6.1518-1524.1992. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Journal of Clinical Microbiology are provided here courtesy of American Society for Microbiology (ASM)

RESOURCES