Skip to main content
Plant Signaling & Behavior logoLink to Plant Signaling & Behavior
. 2008 Dec;3(12):1091–1092. doi: 10.4161/psb.3.12.6907

Peptide signals for plant defense display a more universal role

Gregory Pearce 1, Ramcharan Bhattacharya 2, Yu-Chi Chen 3,
PMCID: PMC2634463  PMID: 19704502

Abstract

Hydroxyproline-rich systemins (HypSys) are small defense signaling glycopeptides found within the Solanaceae family that until recently were thought to only induce defense genes to herbivore attack. The glycopeptides are processed from larger proproteins with up to 3 different glycopeptides being processed out of a single precursor protein. A conserved central hydroxyproline motif within each HypSys is the site of pentose sugar attachment. Recently, it was found that in Petunia hybrida, these defense signaling glycopeptides did not induce protease inhibitor but instead, increased levels of defensin, a gene that is involved in pathogen attack. More recently, a HypSys peptide was isolated from Ipomoea batatas (sweet potato) of the Convolvulaceae family and found to induce sporamin. The proprotein precursor contained six putative peptide signals and had a propeptidase processing region with homology to solanaceous proHypSys. Thus, the HypSys defense peptides are no longer confined to defense against herbivory or exclusivity to the Solanaceae family, redefining both function and dispersion.

Key words: systemin, hydroxyproline-rich systemin glycopeptides, HypSys, plant defense, proteinase inhibitors


Plants have evolved an arsenal of defense mechanisms for survival against the wide array of predators and pathogens that they encounter. Each species has evolved within its unique environment and the protective defense mechanisms must evolve and refine over time to allow a plant to compete in its niche.1 Plant peptide signals have recently been discovered that induce defense genes for protection against both herbivores and pathogens.2 This raises the issue of how these peptides, their receptors, signaling pathways, and the downstream regulated defense proteins and compounds have evolved to meet the unique and specific needs of each plant. Our recent papers3,4 reveal that these defense signaling peptides are not confined to a single family of plants and that the end products of the signaling pathway may be more diverse than expected.

Systemin was the first peptide signal discovered in plants.5 The 18 amino acid peptide is processed from the C-terminal of a 200 amino acid precursor; prosystemin.6 Although lacking a signal sequence, prosystemin reaches the apoplast and the mature peptide is processed upon insect attack, signaling downstream events leading to the production of defense proteins, such as polyphenol oxidase and protease inhibitors.7 Systemin has only been found in the Solanaceae family and more specifically, only in the subfamily Solanoideae, which contains tomato, potato, nightshade and pepper.

The hydroxyproline-rich systemin glycopeptides are similar to systemin in size (18–20 amino acids in length) and, like systemin, are processed from larger precursors.2,8 Both systemin and HypSys induce the production of methyl jasmonate and function to amplify the defense response. Each HypSys peptide contains a hydroxyproline-rich inner core that is the site of glycosylation and both the peptide backbone and the carbohydrate moieties are important for receptor recognition (Table 1). The HypSys precursors, unlike prosystemin, contain a signal sequence, which, along with the post-translational modifications, indicate that they are secreted to the apoplast. Both systemin and HypSys have been localized to the plant vasculature.9,10 Although there is no sequence similarity between prosystemin and hydroxyproline-rich systemins, it has been suggested that because of their size, structure and functional similarities, they should be classified together.11

Table 1.

Comparisons of the amino acid sequences of isolated and putative Systemin and HypSys peptides

graphic file with name psb0312_1091_fig001.jpg

Tomato systemin was aligned with the putative homologs from potato (St systemin I and II, Solanum tuberosum), nightshade (Sn systemin, Solanum nigrum), and pepper systemin (Ca systemin, Capsicum annuum). HypSys peptide from tobacco (NtHypSys I and II), tomato (SlHypSys I, II and III), petunia (PhHypSys I, II and III, Petunia hybrida), nightshade (SnHypSys I, II and III), and sweet potato (IbHypSys IV, Ipomoea batatas), and the putative peptides encoded in the precursor protein deduced from the cDNA of sweet potato (IbHypSys I, II, III, V, and VI) were aligned by the hydroxyproline/proline central motif. The poplar (PtHypSys I and II, Populus trichocarpa) sequences were deduced from Map Viewer Gnomon model: hmm3236034, and the coffee (CcHypSys I, II and III, Coffea canephora) sequences were deduced from Unigene SGN-U311058 in the Sol Genomics Network (http://sgn.cornell.edu). The hydroxyproline-rich regions of the isolated peptides are red and the proline-rich regions of the systemins and the putative HypSys peptides are blue. The isolated peptides are marked with a star.

A second defense peptide family, the AtPeps, was recently discovered in Arabidopsis and like systemin, the precursors lack a signal sequence but the mature peptide interacts with the extracellular domain of a membrane bound receptor.3,12 The active peptides are 23 amino acids in length and like systemin, processed from the extreme C-terminus. One of the major induced defense genes of the AtPeps is defensin and the AtPeps have been found to protect the plant from pathogen attack.12 AtPep orthologs have been found in many of the major crop plants.

The precursors for HypSys peptides, unlike prosystemin, were found in a wider range of Solanaceous plants including the Cestroideae subfamily that includes tobacco and petunia. Each precursor contained multiple peptide signals; for instance, tobacco contained 2 HypSys peptides per precursor,13 tomato with 3 HypSys peptides,14 nightshade with 3 HypSys peptides,15 potato with 3 HypSys peptides,16 and most recently petunia with 3 and possibly 4 HypSys peptides per precursor.5 Surprisingly, the petunia HypSys peptides were found to induce the pathogen defense gene, defensin, like the AtPeps, rather than proteinase inhibitors. This expands the known role of HypSys peptides from exclusive involvement in protection from herbivory to broader defense responses, including pathogen defense.

A second major finding was the isolation of the first non-solanaceous HypSys peptide from sweet potato, a member of the Convolvulaceae family.4 The precursor was larger than any found within the Solanaceae (291 amino acids in length), and contained a surprising 6 putative signaling peptides. The precursor contained a signal sequence and a propeptidase splicing region with homology to the Solanaceae precursors. Since the discovery of the sweet potato proHypSys, candidate proHypSys genes have been found in nucleotide data bases of other non-solanaceous plants, including poplar and coffee (Table 1). Cumulatively, these findings indicate that the HypSys peptide defense system may be utilized by a wide variety of plants and may elicit a defense response against either herbivores or pathogens or possibly both.

These recent findings have revealed two peptide signaling systems that work through a receptor mediated cascade to produce defense proteins. Future work will elucidate which peptide signal is working in which plants, whether HypSys and AtPep homologs might work together within the same plant, and whether there are other plant defense peptide systems yet to be discovered.

Addendum to: Chen YC, Siems WF, Pearce G, Ryan CA. Six peptide wound signals derived from a single precursor protein in Ipomoea batatas leaves activate the expression of the defense gene sporamin. J Biol Chem. 2008;283:11469–11476. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M709002200.

Footnotes

Previously published online as a Plant Signaling & Behavior E-publication: http://www.landesbioscience.com/journals/psb/article/6907

References

  • 1.Walling LL. The myriad plant responses to herbivores. J Plant Growth Reg. 2000;19:195–216. doi: 10.1007/s003440000026. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Narvaez-Vasquez J, Orozco-Cardenas ML. Systemins and AtPeps: Defense-related peptide signals. In: Schaller A, editor. Induced plant resistance to herbivory. Springer Science; 2008. pp. 313–328. [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Pearce G, Siems WF, Bhattacharya R, Chen Y-C, Ryan CA. Three hydroxyproline-rich glycopeptides derived from a single petunia polyprotein precursor activate defensin I, a pathogen defense response gene. J Biol Chem. 2007;282:17777–17784. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M701543200. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Chen Y-C, Siems WF, Pearce G, Ryan CA. Six peptide wound signals derived from a single precursor protein in Ipomoea batatas leaves activate the expression of the defense gene sporamin. J Biol Chem. 2008;283:11469–11476. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M709002200. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Pearce G, Strydom D, Johnson S, Ryan CA. A polypeptide from tomato leaves activates the expression of proteinase inhibitor genes. Science. 1991;253:895–897. doi: 10.1126/science.253.5022.895. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.McGurl B, Pearce G, Orozco-Cardenas M, Ryan CA. Structure, expression and antisense inhibition of the systemin precursor gene. Science. 1992;255:1570–1573. doi: 10.1126/science.1549783. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Bergey D, Howe G, Ryan CA. Polypeptide signaling for plant defensive genes exhibits analogies to defense signaling in animals. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 1996;93:12053–12058. doi: 10.1073/pnas.93.22.12053. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Ryan CA, Pearce G, Moura D, Scheer J. Polypeptide hormones. Plant Cell. 2002;14:251–264. doi: 10.1105/tpc.010484. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Narváez-Vásquez J, Ryan CA. The cellular localization of prosystemin: a functional role for phloem parenchyma in systemic wound signaling. Planta. 2004;218:360–369. doi: 10.1007/s00425-003-1115-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Narváez-Vásquez J, Pearce G, Ryan CA. The plant cell wall matrix harbors a precursor of defense signaling peptides. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2005;102:12974–12977. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0505248102. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Pearce G, Narvaez-Vasquez J, Ryan CA. Systemins. In: Kastin AJ, editor. Handbook of Biologically Active Peptides. Academic Press; 2006. pp. 49–54. [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Huffaker A, Pearce G, Ryan CA. An endogenous peptide signal in Arabidopsis activates components of the innate immune response. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2006;103:10098–10103. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0603727103. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Yamaguchi Y, Pearce G, Ryan CA. The cell surface leucine-rich repeat receptor for AtPep1, an endogenous elicitor in Arabidopsis, is functional in transgenic tobacco cells. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2006;103:10104–10109. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0603729103. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Pearce G, Moura DS, Stratmann J, Ryan CA. Production of multiple plant hormones from a single polyprotein precursor. Nature. 2001;411:817–820. doi: 10.1038/35081107. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Pearce G, Ryan CA. Systemic signaling in tomato plants for defense against herbivores: Isolation and characterization of three novel defense-signaling glycopeptide hormones coded in a single precursor gene. J Biol Chem. 2003;278:30044–30050. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M304159200. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Pearce G, Bhattacharya R, Chen Y-C, Siems WF, Ryan CA. GenBank Ascession #EU482410. 2008 manuscript in preparation.
  • 17.Bhattacharya R, Pearce G, Ryan CA. GenBank Ascession #EU482409. 2008

Articles from Plant Signaling & Behavior are provided here courtesy of Taylor & Francis

RESOURCES