Skip to main content
The BMJ logoLink to The BMJ
. 2001 Mar 3;322(7285):524–525. doi: 10.1136/bmj.322.7285.524

Violence by clients towards female prostitutes in different work settings: questionnaire survey

Stephanie Church a, Marion Henderson b, Marina Barnard a, Graham Hart b
PMCID: PMC26557  PMID: 11230067

Violence by clients towards prostitutes has seldom been the focus of public and academic interest, yet it is a major health issue.1,2 Concern has mostly focused on the potential of prostitutes to transmit sexual infections, notably HIV, to their clients and subsequently partners.3 Features of female prostitution that have a direct impact on the health of prostitutes but not the health of others have therefore tended to be overlooked. The scant research that is available on violence by clients shows that prostitutes who work outdoors in particular routinely confront clients who are verbally, sexually, and physically violent towards them.4,5 We report on the prevalence of violence by clients against female prostitutes working either outdoors or indoors in three major British cities.

Methods and results

During 1999 three female researchers (SC, MB, and Catherine Benso) contacted 240 female prostitutes; 115 worked outdoors (40 in Leeds, 75 in Glasgow) and 125 worked indoors in saunas or flats (50 in Leeds, 75 in Edinburgh). We designed a structured questionnaire using previously validated measures to record personal characteristics, working patterns, drug and alcohol use (in the past six months), type and frequency of violence by clients (ever or in the past six months), and levels of attack reported to police. We contacted 156 (65%) prostitutes in their place of work and 84 (35%) through drop-in centres. We used SPSS to test for significance, and multivariate binary logistic regression analysis to identify variables most strongly associated with violence experienced ever or in the past six months.

The table shows that prostitutes working outdoors were younger, involved in prostitution at an earlier age, reported more illegal drug use, and experienced significantly more violence from their clients than those working indoors (81% (93 of 115) v 48% (60 of 125), χ2=29.2, df=1, P<0.0001). Prostitutes working outdoors most frequently reported being slapped, punched, or kicked, whereas prostitutes working indoors cited attempted rape. Multiple logistic regression showed that working outdoors rather than indoors was associated with higher levels of violence by clients than was the city, drug use, and duration of, or age that women began, prostitution. Prostitutes working outdoors in Glasgow were six times more likely to have experienced recent violence by clients than those working indoors in Edinburgh. Only 34% (52/153) of prostitutes who had experienced violence by clients reported it to the police, and this was reported more often by prostitutes working outdoors than indoors (44% (41of 93) v 18% (11 of 60), χ2=10.4, df=1, P<0.0012).

Comment

Half of prostitutes working outdoors and over a quarter of those working indoors reported some form of violence by clients in the past six months. These levels of violence need to be addressed and reported attacks responded to more effectively in terms of service provision, police intervention, and judicial processes. Recognising that violence by clients occurs to women working both indoors and outdoors would be an important step towards preventing or reducing the incidence of violence.

The sexual health of prostitutes is just one element of service need in circumstances where they confront potentially abusive clients. The range and content of comprehensive health services for prostitutes is an area that should be addressed with some urgency if levels of morbidity and mortality from violence by clients is to be reduced.

Table.

Personal characteristics, drug use, and experience of client violence by prostitutes working indoors or outdoors. Values are numbers (percentages) of prostitutes unless stated otherwise

Variable Work setting
P value
Outdoors (n=115) Indoors (n=125)
Mean (SD) age 25.7 (6.7) 28.4 (6.9)  0.002
Mean (SD) age first paid for sex 19.6 (5.1) 22.7 (5.9) <0.001
Mean (SD) years in prostitution  4.8 (5.0)  4.3 (4.9)  0.440
Main reason for prostitution:
 Household expenses and children 32 (28) 93 (74) <0.001
 To pay for drugs 72 (63) 1 (1) <0.001
 To save up for something 5 (4) 23 (18)  0.001
 Other 6 (5) 8 (6)  0.696
Illegal drug used in past six months 107 (93) 86 (69) <0.001
Type of illegal drug used:
 Heroin 90 (78) 6 (5) <0.001
 Other opiate 45 (39) 12 (10) <0.001
 Tranquillisers 43 (37) 99 (79) <0.001
 Crack cocaine 37 (32) 5 (4) <0.001
 Amphetamine 13 (11) 38 (30) <0.001
 Cocaine 20 (17) 19 (15)  0.646
 Cannabis 70 (61) 62 (50)  0.080
Injected drugs in past month 56 (49) 4 (3) <0.001
Ever experienced client violence 93 (81) 60 (48) <0.001
Experienced violence in past six months 58 (50) 32 (26) <0.001
Type of violence ever experienced:
 Slapped, punched, or kicked 54 (47) 17 (14) <0.001
 Threatened with physical violence 45 (39) 18 (14) <0.001
 Robbery 42 (37) 12 (10) <0.001
 Attempted robbery 30 (26) 6 (5) <0.001
 Beaten 31 (27) 1 (1) <0.001
 Threatened with weapon 28 (24) 8 (6) <0.001
 Held against will 29 (25) 19 (15)  0.053
 Attempted rape (vaginal or anal) 32 (28) 21 (17)  0.040
 Strangulation 23 (20) 7 (6)  0.001
 Kidnapped 23 (20) 3 (2) <0.001
 Forced to give client oral sex 20 (17) 4 (3) <0.001
 Raped (vaginal) 25 (22) 2 (2) <0.001
 Attempted kidnap 14 (12) 1 (1) <0.001
 Slashed or stabbed 8 (7) 0  0.003
 Raped (anal) 6 (5) 8 (6)  0.696
Reported at least one incident of client violence to police 41/93 (44) 11/60 (18) <0.001

Acknowledgments

We thank all the women that participated in the study, the staff of the three outreach services in Glasgow, Edinburgh, and Leeds, and Catherine Benson for her contribution to the design of the questionnaire, data collection, and data entry.

Footnotes

Funding: Economic and Social Research Council (L133251025; Violence Research Programme).

Competing interests: None declared.

References

  • 1.Lowman J, Fraser L. Violence against persons who prostitute: the experience in British Columbia. Vancouver: Simon Fraser University; 1995. [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Gilchrist G, Taylor A, Goldberg D, Mackie C, Denovan A, Green S. Behavioural and lifestyle study of women using a drop-in centre for female street sex workers in Glasgow, Scotland: a 10-year comparative study. Addict Res (in press).
  • 3.Ward H, Day S, Mezzone J, Dunlop L, Donegan C, Farrar S. Prostitution and risk of HIV: female prostitutes in London. BMJ. 1993;307:356–358. doi: 10.1136/bmj.307.6900.356. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.McKeganey N, Barnard M. Sex work on the streets, prostitutes and their clients. Buckingham: Open University Press; 1996. [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Phoenix P. Prostitute identities: men, money and violence. Br J Criminol. 1999;40:37–55. [Google Scholar]

Articles from BMJ : British Medical Journal are provided here courtesy of BMJ Publishing Group

RESOURCES