Skip to main content
PMC home page
Journal of Clinical Microbiology logoLink to Journal of Clinical Microbiology
. 1989 May;27(5):1077–1080. doi: 10.1128/jcm.27.5.1077-1080.1989

Semisolid blood-free selective-motility medium for the isolation of campylobacters from stool specimens.

H Goossens 1, L Vlaes 1, I Galand 1, C Van den Borre 1, J P Butzler 1
PMCID: PMC267486  PMID: 2745681

Abstract

Isolation of Campylobacter jejuni and C. coli from stool specimens is done by growing campylobacter colonies on solid selective media with or without blood. However, recognition of these colonies can be difficult. Therefore, we decided to evaluate an isolation procedure based on the swarming of campylobacters through a semisolid medium. We developed a semisolid blood-free selective motility (SSM) medium which is composed of Mueller-Hinton broth with 0.4% agar and supplemented with cefoperazone (30 micrograms/ml) and trimethoprim (50 micrograms/ml). The SSM medium was compared with our previously described Butzler Medium Virion (Goossens et al., J. Clin. Microbiol. 24:840-843, 1986) and blood-free medium (Bolton and Coates, J. Appl. Bacteriol. 54:115-125, 1983) with cefoperazone (32 micrograms/ml) (Bolton et al., J. Clin. Pathol. 37:956-957, 1986). Of 1,890 routine stool specimens tested, 100 were found to be positive for campylobacters: 95 were recovered with the SSM medium, 94 with the Virion medium, and 90 with the blood-free medium. The SSM medium performed equally well whether it was incubated in the special incubator or the candle jar. Only 4.4 and 7.3% of the plates grew contaminating fecal flora when incubated in the special incubator and the candle jar, respectively. Clearly the SSM medium is easy, quick, cheap, sensitive, and more selective than any other medium which has been developed so far and does not require the addition of blood. We believe that this medium has a future in the routine microbiology laboratory in developed as well as in developing countries.

Full text

PDF
1078

Images in this article

1079Image
on p.1079

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Blaser M. J., Berkowitz I. D., LaForce F. M., Cravens J., Reller L. B., Wang W. L. Campylobacter enteritis: clinical and epidemiologic features. Ann Intern Med. 1979 Aug;91(2):179–185. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-91-2-179. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Bolton F. J., Coates D. Development of a blood-free Campylobacter medium: screening tests on basal media and supplements, and the ability of selected supplements to facilitate aerotolerance. J Appl Bacteriol. 1983 Feb;54(1):115–125. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2672.1983.tb01308.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Bolton F. J., Robertson L. A selective medium for isolating Campylobacter jejuni/coli. J Clin Pathol. 1982 Apr;35(4):462–467. doi: 10.1136/jcp.35.4.462. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Dekeyser P., Gossuin-Detrain M., Butzler J. P., Sternon J. Acute enteritis due to related vibrio: first positive stool cultures. J Infect Dis. 1972 Apr;125(4):390–392. doi: 10.1093/infdis/125.4.390. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Goossens H., De Boeck M., Butzler J. P. A new selective medium for the isolation of Campylobacter jejuni from human faeces. Eur J Clin Microbiol. 1983 Aug;2(4):389–393. doi: 10.1007/BF02019476. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Goossens H., De Boeck M., Coignau H., Vlaes L., Van den Borre C., Butzler J. P. Modified selective medium for isolation of Campylobacter spp. from feces: comparison with Preston medium, a blood-free medium, and a filtration system. J Clin Microbiol. 1986 Nov;24(5):840–843. doi: 10.1128/jcm.24.5.840-843.1986. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Karmali M. A., Fleming P. C. Campylobacter enteritis in children. J Pediatr. 1979 Apr;94(4):527–533. doi: 10.1016/s0022-3476(79)80004-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Karmali M. A., Simor A. E., Roscoe M., Fleming P. C., Smith S. S., Lane J. Evaluation of a blood-free, charcoal-based, selective medium for the isolation of Campylobacter organisms from feces. J Clin Microbiol. 1986 Mar;23(3):456–459. doi: 10.1128/jcm.23.3.456-459.1986. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Lauwers S., De Boeck M., Butzler J. P. Campylobacter enteritis in Brussels. Lancet. 1978 Mar 18;1(8064):604–605. doi: 10.1016/s0140-6736(78)91045-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Lior H. New, extended biotyping scheme for Campylobacter jejuni, Campylobacter coli, and "Campylobacter laridis". J Clin Microbiol. 1984 Oct;20(4):636–640. doi: 10.1128/jcm.20.4.636-640.1984. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Ng L. K., Stiles M. E., Taylor D. E. Inhibition of Campylobacter coli and Campylobacter jejuni by antibiotics used in selective growth media. J Clin Microbiol. 1985 Oct;22(4):510–514. doi: 10.1128/jcm.22.4.510-514.1985. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Skirrow M. B. Campylobacter enteritis: a "new" disease. Br Med J. 1977 Jul 2;2(6078):9–11. doi: 10.1136/bmj.2.6078.9. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Journal of Clinical Microbiology are provided here courtesy of American Society for Microbiology (ASM)

RESOURCES