Abstract
A new miniaturized 4-h method for the identification of anaerobic bacteria, ATB 32 A (API System SA, Montalieu Vercieu, France), was evaluated against conventional methods of identification. The evaluation was done by using 260 recent clinical isolates and 21 reference strains of anaerobic bacteria. All reference strains were correctly identified and did not figure in the detailed analysis. Of the 140 gram-negative bacilli, 90.6% of Bacteroides spp. and 95.5% of Fusobacterium spp. were correctly identified to the species level, with an additional 8.4% of the Bacteroides spp. being identified to the genus level. Clostridia were correctly identified in 85.9% of cases, with an additional 9.9% being identified to the genus level. Peptostreptococci were correctly identified in 91.6% of cases. The 4 strains of Actinomyces spp. were all identified correctly, as were 10 of the 11 strains of Propionibacterium spp. A total of 3.1% of strains were not identified by ATB 32 A, while for 1.9% of strains, completely false identifications were obtained. Estimation of the individual preformed enzyme results may pose problems, although these decrease with familiarity with the system. With certain enzyme profiles, additional testing was necessary to arrive at an identification; however, there was no requirement for gas-liquid chromatography. If certain additions are made to the data base and the difficulties of determination of organisms to the species level among the non-Bacteroides fragilis (sensu stricto) members of the B. fragilis group can be reduced, this system holds promise as a reliable standardized alternative for the identification of anaerobic bacteria in clinical laboratories.
Full text
PDF
Selected References
These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.
- Al-Jumaili I. J., Bint A. J. Simple method for isolation and presumptive identification of Clostridium difficile. Zentralbl Bakteriol Mikrobiol Hyg A. 1981;250(1-2):142–146. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Hofstad T. Evaluation of the API ZYM system for identification of Bacteroides and Fusobacterium species. Med Microbiol Immunol. 1980;168(3):173–177. doi: 10.1007/BF02122851. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Kilian M. Rapid identification of Actinomycetaceae and related bacteria. J Clin Microbiol. 1978 Aug;8(2):127–133. doi: 10.1128/jcm.8.2.127-133.1978. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Laughon B. E., Syed S. A., Loesche W. J. API ZYM system for identification of Bacteroides spp., Capnocytophaga spp., and spirochetes of oral origin. J Clin Microbiol. 1982 Jan;15(1):97–102. doi: 10.1128/jcm.15.1.97-102.1982. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Marler L., Allen S., Siders J. Rapid enzymatic characterization of clinically encountered anaerobic bacteria with the API ZYM system. Eur J Clin Microbiol. 1984 Aug;3(4):294–300. doi: 10.1007/BF01977476. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Murdoch D. A., Mitchelmore I. J., Tabaqchali S. Identification of gram-positive anaerobic cocci by use of systems for detecting pre-formed enzymes. J Med Microbiol. 1988 Apr;25(4):289–293. doi: 10.1099/00222615-25-4-289. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Tharagonnet D., Sisson P. R., Roxby C. M., Ingham H. R., Selkon J. B. The API ZYM system in the identification of Gram-negative anaerobes. J Clin Pathol. 1977 Jun;30(6):505–509. doi: 10.1136/jcp.30.6.505. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- van Winkelhoff A. J., Clement M., de Graaff J. Rapid characterization of oral and nonoral pigmented Bacteroides species with the ATB Anaerobes ID system. J Clin Microbiol. 1988 May;26(5):1063–1065. doi: 10.1128/jcm.26.5.1063-1065.1988. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- van Winkelhoff A. J., van Steenbergen T. J., Kippuw N., de Graaff J. Enzymatic characterization of oral and non-oral black-pigmented Bacteroides species. Antonie Van Leeuwenhoek. 1986;52(2):163–171. doi: 10.1007/BF00429320. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]