Skip to main content
Journal of Clinical Microbiology logoLink to Journal of Clinical Microbiology
. 1990 Jul;28(7):1586–1590. doi: 10.1128/jcm.28.7.1586-1590.1990

Comparative evaluation of nonradiometric BACTEC and improved oxoid signal blood culture systems in a clinical laboratory.

C Daley 1, I Lim 1, J Modra 1, I Wilkinson 1
PMCID: PMC267993  PMID: 2116450

Abstract

The BACTEC NR660 blood culture system, which uses infrared spectroscopy to detect carbon dioxide generated by bacterial growth, was compared with the new medium formulation of the Oxoid Signal system. Two trials were conducted: a comparative study of 88 organisms in simulated blood cultures and a clinical trial of 3,321 paired patient blood culture samples. Both trials showed that overall the BACTEC system performed better in the recovery of organisms. The Oxoid system was unable to detect by signal the growth of the majority of yeasts, nonfermentative gram-negative bacilli, Neisseria meningitidis, Nocardia spp., and Corynebacterium jeikeium. There were no significant differences in the yield of Staphylococcus spp., members of the family Enterobacteriaceae, Streptococcus spp., or anaerobic organisms. BACTEC detected growth more quickly than did the Oxoid system; 61% of the isolates were detected by BACTEC at 24 h, while 49% of the isolates were detected by Oxoid. The Oxoid system had a high proportion (58.5%) of false-positives, compared with 7.7% for the BACTEC system. Despite the new medium formulation of the Oxoid system, its performance is still not equivalent to that of the BACTEC system.

Full text

PDF
1588

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. DeLand F. H., Wagner H. N., Jr Early detection of bacterial growth, with carbon-14-labeled glucose. Radiology. 1969 Jan;92(1):154–155. doi: 10.1148/92.1.154. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Jungkind D., Millan J., Allen S., Dyke J., Hill E. Clinical comparison of a new automated infrared blood culture system with the BACTEC 460 system. J Clin Microbiol. 1986 Feb;23(2):262–266. doi: 10.1128/jcm.23.2.262-266.1986. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Murray P. R., Niles A. C., Heeren R. L., Curren M. M., James L. E., Hoppe-Bauer J. E. Comparative evaluation of the oxoid signal and Roche Septi-Chek blood culture systems. J Clin Microbiol. 1988 Dec;26(12):2526–2530. doi: 10.1128/jcm.26.12.2526-2530.1988. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Rimmer K., Cabot M. Comparison of Bactec NR-660 and Signal systems. J Clin Pathol. 1988 Jun;41(6):676–678. doi: 10.1136/jcp.41.6.676. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Sliva H. S., Washington J. A., 2nd Optimal time for routine early subculture of blood cultures. J Clin Microbiol. 1980 Sep;12(3):445–446. doi: 10.1128/jcm.12.3.445-446.1980. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Trombley C., Anderson J. D. SIGNAL blood culture system for detection of bacteremia in neonates. J Clin Microbiol. 1987 Nov;25(11):2098–2101. doi: 10.1128/jcm.25.11.2098-2101.1987. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Weinstein M. P., Mirrett S., Reimer L. G., Reller L. B. Effect of agitation and terminal subcultures on yield and speed of detection of the Oxoid Signal blood culture system versus the BACTEC radiometric system. J Clin Microbiol. 1989 Mar;27(3):427–430. doi: 10.1128/jcm.27.3.427-430.1989. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Weinstein M. P., Mirrett S., Reller L. B. Comparative evaluation of Oxoid Signal and BACTEC radiometric blood culture systems for the detection of bacteremia and fungemia. J Clin Microbiol. 1988 May;26(5):962–964. doi: 10.1128/jcm.26.5.962-964.1988. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Journal of Clinical Microbiology are provided here courtesy of American Society for Microbiology (ASM)

RESOURCES