Skip to main content
PMC home page
Journal of Clinical Microbiology logoLink to Journal of Clinical Microbiology
. 1990 Nov;28(11):2514–2519. doi: 10.1128/jcm.28.11.2514-2519.1990

Enhanced radiometric detection of Mycobacterium paratuberculosis by using filter-concentrated bovine fecal specimens.

M T Collins 1, K B Kenefick 1, D C Sockett 1, R S Lambrecht 1, J McDonald 1, J B Jorgensen 1
PMCID: PMC268217  PMID: 2254428

Abstract

A commercial radiometric medium, BACTEC 12B, was modified by addition of mycobactin, egg yolk suspension, and antibiotics (vancomycin, amphotericin B, and nalidixic acid). Decontaminated bovine fecal specimens were filter concentrated by using 3-microns-pore-size, 13-mm-diameter polycarbonate filters, and the entire filter was placed into the radiometric broth. Comparison of the radiometric technique with conventional methods on 603 cattle from 9 Mycobacterium paratuberculosis-infected herds found that of 75 positive specimens, the radiometric technique detected 92% while conventional methods detected 60% (P less than 0.0005). Only 3.9% of radiometric cultures were contaminated. To measure the effect of filter concentration of specimens on the detection rate, 5 cattle with minimal and 5 with moderate ileum histopathology were sampled weekly for 3 weeks. M. paratuberculosis was detected in 33.3% of nonfiltered specimens and 76.7% of filtered specimens (P less than 0.005). Detection rates were directly correlated with the severity of disease, and the advantage of specimen concentration was greatest on fecal specimens from cattle with low-grade infections. Detection times were also correlated with infection severity: 13.4 +/- 5.9 days with smear-positive specimens, 27.9 +/- 8.7 days with feces from cows with typical subclinical infections, and 38.7 +/- 3.8 days with fecal specimens from cows with low-grade infections. Use of a cocktail of vancomycin, amphotericin B, and nalidixic acid for selective suppression of nonmycobacterial contaminants was better than the commercial product PANTA (Becton Dickinson Microbiologic Systems, Towson, Md.) only when specimens contained very low numbers of M. paratuberculosis. Radiometric culture of filter-concentrated specimens generally doubled the number of positive fecal specimens detected over conventional methods, making it a useful tool for diagnosis and control of bovine paratuberculosis.

Full text

PDF
2517

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Beerwerth W. Die Züchtung von Mykobakterien aus dem Kot der Haustiere und ihre Bedeutung für die Epidemiologie und Bekämpfung der Tuberkulose. Prax Pneumol. 1967 Apr;21(4):189–202. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Benedictus G., Dijkhuizen A. A., Stelwagen J. Economic losses due to paratuberculosis in dairy cattle. Vet Rec. 1987 Aug 15;121(7):142–146. doi: 10.1136/vr.121.7.142. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Braun R. K., Buergelt C. D., Littell R. C., Linda S. B., Simpson J. R. Use of an enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay to estimate prevalence of paratuberculosis in cattle of Florida. J Am Vet Med Assoc. 1990 Apr 15;196(8):1251–1254. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Chiodini R. J., Van Kruiningen H. J., Merkal R. S. Ruminant paratuberculosis (Johne's disease): the current status and future prospects. Cornell Vet. 1984 Jul;74(3):218–262. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Chiodini R. J., van Kruiningen H. J. The prevalence of paratuberculosis in culled New England cattle. Cornell Vet. 1986 Jan;76(1):91–104. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Damato J. J., Collins M. T. Growth of Mycobacterium paratuberculosis in radiometric, Middlebrook and egg-based media. Vet Microbiol. 1990 Mar;22(1):31–42. doi: 10.1016/0378-1135(90)90122-c. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Damato J. J., Collins M. T., Rothlauf M. V., McClatchy J. K. Detection of mycobacteria by radiometric and standard plate procedures. J Clin Microbiol. 1983 Jun;17(6):1066–1073. doi: 10.1128/jcm.17.6.1066-1073.1983. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Hoffner S. E., Hahn K., Pedersen A., Sandstedt K. Rapid radiometric detection of mycobacterial growth from smear-positive tissue samples from pigs. J Appl Bacteriol. 1989 Jan;66(1):65–67. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2672.1989.tb02455.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Jørgensen J. B. An improved medium for culture of Mycobacterium paratuberculosis from bovine faeces. Acta Vet Scand. 1982;23(3):325–335. doi: 10.1186/BF03546784. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Kiehn T. E., Cammarata R. Laboratory diagnosis of mycobacterial infections in patients with acquired immunodeficiency syndrome. J Clin Microbiol. 1986 Nov;24(5):708–711. doi: 10.1128/jcm.24.5.708-711.1986. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Kiehn T. E., Edwards F. F., Brannon P., Tsang A. Y., Maio M., Gold J. W., Whimbey E., Wong B., McClatchy J. K., Armstrong D. Infections caused by Mycobacterium avium complex in immunocompromised patients: diagnosis by blood culture and fecal examination, antimicrobial susceptibility tests, and morphological and seroagglutination characteristics. J Clin Microbiol. 1985 Feb;21(2):168–173. doi: 10.1128/jcm.21.2.168-173.1985. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Kim Y. G., Bech-Nielsen S., Gordon J. C., Slemons R. D., Spangler E. Comparison of two methods for isolation of Mycobacterium paratuberculosis from bovine fecal samples. Am J Vet Res. 1989 Jul;50(7):1110–1113. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Kononov Y., Ta K. D., Heifets L. Effect of egg yolk on growth of Mycobacterium tuberculosis in 7H12 liquid medium. J Clin Microbiol. 1988 Jul;26(7):1395–1397. doi: 10.1128/jcm.26.7.1395-1397.1988. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Lambrecht R. S., Carriere J. F., Collins M. T. A model for analyzing growth kinetics of a slowly growing Mycobacterium sp. Appl Environ Microbiol. 1988 Apr;54(4):910–916. doi: 10.1128/aem.54.4.910-916.1988. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. McClatchy J. K., Waggoner R. F., Kanes W., Cernich M. S., Bolton T. L. Isolation of mycobacteria from clinical specimens by use of selective 7H11 medium. Am J Clin Pathol. 1976 Mar;65(3):412–415. doi: 10.1093/ajcp/65.3.412. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Merkal R. S., Whipple D. L., Sacks J. M., Snyder G. R. Prevalence of Mycobacterium paratuberculosis in ileocecal lymph nodes of cattle culled in the United States. J Am Vet Med Assoc. 1987 Mar 15;190(6):676–680. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Middlebrook G., Reggiardo Z., Tigertt W. D. Automatable radiometric detection of growth of Mycobacterium tuberculosis in selective media. Am Rev Respir Dis. 1977 Jun;115(6):1066–1069. doi: 10.1164/arrd.1977.115.6.1066. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Milner A. R., Lepper A. W., Symonds W. N., Gruner E. Analysis by ELISA and Western blotting of antibody reactivities in cattle infected with Mycobacterium paratuberculosis after absorption of serum with M phlei. Res Vet Sci. 1987 Mar;42(2):140–144. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Morgan M. A., Horstmeier C. D., DeYoung D. R., Roberts G. D. Comparison of a radiometric method (BACTEC) and conventional culture media for recovery of mycobacteria from smear-negative specimens. J Clin Microbiol. 1983 Aug;18(2):384–388. doi: 10.1128/jcm.18.2.384-388.1983. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. Moyle A. I. Culture and cull procedure for control of paratuberculosis. J Am Vet Med Assoc. 1975 Apr 1;166(7):689–690. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. Richards W. D., Thoen C. O. Effect of freezing on the viability of Mycobacterium paratuberculosis in bovine feces. J Clin Microbiol. 1977 Oct;6(4):392–395. doi: 10.1128/jcm.6.4.392-395.1977. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  22. Riemann H. P., Abbas B. Diagnosis and control of bovine paratuberculosis (Johne's disease). Adv Vet Sci Comp Med. 1983;27:481–506. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  23. Takahashi H., Foster V. Detection and recovery of mycobacteria by a radiometric procedure. J Clin Microbiol. 1983 Feb;17(2):380–381. doi: 10.1128/jcm.17.2.380-381.1983. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  24. Thoen C. O., Muscoplat C. C. Recent developments in diagnosis of paratuberculosis (Johne's disease). J Am Vet Med Assoc. 1979 Apr 15;174(8):838–840. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  25. Vary P. H., Andersen P. R., Green E., Hermon-Taylor J., McFadden J. J. Use of highly specific DNA probes and the polymerase chain reaction to detect Mycobacterium paratuberculosis in Johne's disease. J Clin Microbiol. 1990 May;28(5):933–937. doi: 10.1128/jcm.28.5.933-937.1990. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  26. de Lisle G. W., Samagh B. S., Duncan J. R. Bovine paratuberculosis II. A comparison of fecal culture and the antibody response. Can J Comp Med. 1980 Apr;44(2):183–191. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Journal of Clinical Microbiology are provided here courtesy of American Society for Microbiology (ASM)

RESOURCES