Skip to main content
PMC home page
Journal of Clinical Microbiology logoLink to Journal of Clinical Microbiology
. 1985 Jul;22(1):62–67. doi: 10.1128/jcm.22.1.62-67.1985

Clinical evaluation of three rapid methods for the detection of significant bacteriuria.

E Bixler-Forell, M A Bertram, D A Bruckner
PMCID: PMC268322  PMID: 4019744

Abstract

Random urine specimens (848) were screened for significant bacteriuria by using the 30-min Lumac (3M, St. Paul, Minn.), the 2-min Bac-T-Screen (Marion Laboratories, Inc., Kansas City, Mo.), and the 13-h AutoMicrobic system (AMS) urine identification card (Vitek Systems, Inc., Hazelwood, Mo.). MacConkey and 5% sheep blood agar plates were inoculated with a 10(-4) dilution of urine and used for the reference method. Bac-T-Screen results were uninterpretable for 9.1% of the specimens owing to either urine sample pigmentation (5.3%) or clogging of the filter (3.8%). Screen-negative urine specimens made up 49.6, 57.2, and 48.5% of the total number of specimens evaluated with AMS, Lumac, and Bac-T-Screen, respectively. False-positive results with Lumac and Bac-T-Screen were 20.6 and 22.3%, respectively. False-negative results for cultures with greater than or equal to 10(4) CFU/ml were 22.0% with AMS, 29.4% with Lumac, and 25.5% with Bac-T-Screen, and false-negative results for cultures with greater than or equal to 10(5) CFU/ml were 29.6% with AMS, 9.9% with Lumac, and 7.0% with Bac-T-Screen. For each system, greater than 70% of false-negatives at greater than or equal to 10(5) CFU/ml consisted of mixed or pure cultures of common contaminants. With any of these screening methods, a clinically significant isolate at greater than or equal to 10(5) CFU/ml would rarely be missed (less than or equal to 1.7% for all systems). A cost-effective and rapid approach to urine microbiology could consist of screening out negative specimens by either Lumac or Bac-T-Screen and processing only screen-positive specimens by the AMS.

Full text

PDF
67

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Alexander M. K., Khan M. S., Dow C. S. Rapid screening for bacteriuria using a particle counter, pulse-height analyser, and computer. J Clin Pathol. 1981 Feb;34(2):194–198. doi: 10.1136/jcp.34.2.194. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. BRENNER B. M., GILBERT V. E. Elevated levels of lactic dehydrogenase, glutamic-oxalacetic transaminase, and catalase in infected urine. Am J Med Sci. 1963 Jan;245:31–42. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Brooks D., Maudar A. Pathogenesis of the urethral syndrome in women and its diagnosis in general practice. Lancet. 1972 Oct 28;2(7783):893–898. doi: 10.1016/s0140-6736(72)92532-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Cady P., Dufour S. W., Lawless P., Nunke B., Kraeger S. J. Impedimetric screening for bacteriuria. J Clin Microbiol. 1978 Mar;7(3):273–278. doi: 10.1128/jcm.7.3.273-278.1978. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Dow C. S., France A. D., Khan M. S., Johnson T. Particle size distribution analysis for the rapid detection of microbial infection of urine. J Clin Pathol. 1979 Apr;32(4):386–390. doi: 10.1136/jcp.32.4.386. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. GALLAGHER D. J., MONTGOMERIE J. Z., NORTH J. D. ACUTE INFECTIONS OF THE URINARY TRACT AND THE URETHRAL SYNDROME IN GENERAL PRACTICE. Br Med J. 1965 Mar 6;1(5435):622–626. doi: 10.1136/bmj.1.5435.622. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Hale D. C., Wright D. N., McKie J. E., Isenberg H. D., Jenkins R. D., Matsen J. M. Rapid screening for bacteriuria by light scatter photometry (Autobac): a collaborative study. J Clin Microbiol. 1981 Jan;13(1):147–150. doi: 10.1128/jcm.13.1.147-150.1981. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Heinze P. A., Thrupp L. D., Anselmo C. R. A rapid (4--6-hour) urine-culture system for direct identification and direct antimicrobial susceptibility testing. Am J Clin Pathol. 1979 Feb;71(2):177–183. doi: 10.1093/ajcp/71.2.177. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Hoyt S. M., Ellner P. D. Evaluation of the Bacteriuria Detection Device. J Clin Microbiol. 1983 Oct;18(4):882–884. doi: 10.1128/jcm.18.4.882-884.1983. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Johnston H. H., Mitchell C. J., Curtis G. D. An automated test for the detection of significant bacteriuria. Lancet. 1976 Aug 21;2(7982):400–402. doi: 10.1016/s0140-6736(76)92411-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Jorgensen J. H., Jones P. M. Comparative evaluation of the Limulus assay and the direct Gram stain for detection of significant bacteriuria. Am J Clin Pathol. 1975 Jan;63(1):142–148. doi: 10.1093/ajcp/63.3.142. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. KASS E. H. Asymptomatic infections of the urinary tract. Trans Assoc Am Physicians. 1956;69:56–64. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. KASS E. H. Bacteriuria and the diagnosis of infections of the urinary tract; with observations on the use of methionine as a urinary antiseptic. AMA Arch Intern Med. 1957 Nov;100(5):709–714. doi: 10.1001/archinte.1957.00260110025004. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Kelly M. T., Balfour L. C. Evaluation and optimization of urine screening by Autobac. J Clin Microbiol. 1981 Apr;13(4):677–680. doi: 10.1128/jcm.13.4.677-680.1981. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Lewis J. F., Alexander J. Microscopy of stained urine smears to determine the need for quantitative culture. J Clin Microbiol. 1976 Oct;4(4):372–374. doi: 10.1128/jcm.4.4.372-374.1976. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. MOND N. C., PERCIVAL A., WILLIAMS J. D., BRUMFITT W. PRESENTATION, DIAGNOSIS, AND TREATMENT OF URINARY-TRACT INFECTIONS IN GENERAL PRACTICE. Lancet. 1965 Mar 6;1(7384):514–516. doi: 10.1016/s0140-6736(65)92020-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. McGeachie J., Kennedy A. C. Simplified quantitative methods for bacteriuria and pyuria. J Clin Pathol. 1963 Jan;16(1):32–38. doi: 10.1136/jcp.16.1.32. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Nicholson D. P., Koepke J. A. The Automicrobic System for urines. J Clin Microbiol. 1979 Dec;10(6):823–833. doi: 10.1128/jcm.10.6.823-833.1979. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. PRYLES C. V., STEG N. L. Specimens of urine obtained from young girls by catheter versus voiding; a comparative study of bacterial cultures, gram stains and bacterial counts in paired specimens. Pediatrics. 1959 Mar;23(3):441–452. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. Pezzlo M. T., Tan G. L., Peterson E. M., de la Maza L. M. Screening of urine cultures by three automated systems. J Clin Microbiol. 1982 Mar;15(3):468–474. doi: 10.1128/jcm.15.3.468-474.1982. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. Pezzlo M. T., Wetkowski M. A., Peterson E. M., de la Maza L. M. Evaluation of a two-minute test for urine screening. J Clin Microbiol. 1983 Sep;18(3):697–701. doi: 10.1128/jcm.18.3.697-701.1983. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  22. Resnick B., Cella R. L., Soghikian K., Lieberman A. H., Weil E. Mass detection of significant bacteriuria. An improved triphenyltetrazolium chloride (TTC) technique. Arch Intern Med. 1969 Aug;124(2):165–169. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  23. Scherstén B., Dahlqvist A., Fritz H., Köhler L., Westlund L. Screening for bacteriuria with a tet paper for glucose. JAMA. 1968 Apr 15;204(3):205–208. doi: 10.1001/jama.1968.03140160015004. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  24. Smalley D. L., Dittmann A. N. Use of leukocyte esterase-nitrate activity as predictive assays of significant bacteriuria. J Clin Microbiol. 1983 Nov;18(5):1256–1257. doi: 10.1128/jcm.18.5.1256-1257.1983. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  25. Stamm W. E., Counts G. W., Running K. R., Fihn S., Turck M., Holmes K. K. Diagnosis of coliform infection in acutely dysuric women. N Engl J Med. 1982 Aug 19;307(8):463–468. doi: 10.1056/NEJM198208193070802. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  26. Stamm W. E., Wagner K. F., Amsel R., Alexander E. R., Turck M., Counts G. W., Holmes K. K. Causes of the acute urethral syndrome in women. N Engl J Med. 1980 Aug 21;303(8):409–415. doi: 10.1056/NEJM198008213030801. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  27. Thore A., Lundin A., Anséhn S. Firefly luciferase ATP assay as a screening method for bacteriuria. J Clin Microbiol. 1983 Feb;17(2):218–224. doi: 10.1128/jcm.17.2.218-224.1983. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Journal of Clinical Microbiology are provided here courtesy of American Society for Microbiology (ASM)

RESOURCES