Skip to main content
PMC home page
Journal of Clinical Microbiology logoLink to Journal of Clinical Microbiology
. 1986 May;23(5):916–919. doi: 10.1128/jcm.23.5.916-919.1986

Evaluation of rapid coagulase methods for the identification of Staphylococcus aureus.

A Berke, R C Tilton
PMCID: PMC268749  PMID: 3635533

Abstract

Four rapid latex agglutination assays, StaphAurex (Wellcome Diagnostics, Research Triangle Park, N.C.), Bacto Staph (Difco Laboratories, Detroit, Mich.), SeroSTAT (Scott Laboratories, Inc., Fiskeville, R.I.), Veri-Staph (Zeus Technologies, Raritan, N.J.), and two hemagglutination tests, Staphyloslide (BBL Microbiology Systems, Cockeysville, Md.) and Hemastaph (Remel, Lenexa, Kans.), were compared with the conventional slide coagulase, tube coagulase (TC), and thermonuclease (TNase) tests for the identification of Staphylococcus aureus. A total of 118 clinical isolates of S. aureus (52 methicillin resistant), 50 S. epidermidis, 5 S. capitis, 2 S. hominis, 3 S. simulans, 6 S. saprophyticus, and 2 S. warneri were tested. The slide coagulase, TC and TNase tests detected 115 (97.5%), 117 (99.2%), and 118 (100%) of the S. aureus isolates, respectively. All showed 100% specificity. The StaphAurex, Veri-Staph, Staphyloslide, Hemastaph, SeroSTAT, and Bacto Staph assays correctly identified 117 (99.2%), 117 (99.2%), 116 (98.3%), 110 (93.2%), 108 (91.5%), and 107 (90.7%) of the S. aureus isolates, respectively. For methicillin-resistant S. aureus isolates, StaphAurex, Veri-Staph, Staphyloslide, Hemastaph, SeroSTAT, and Bacto Staph showed 1 (2%), 1 (2%), 2 (4%), 7 (13.5%), 7 (13.5%), and 8 (15.4%) false-negative results, respectively. All the commercial agglutination assays demonstrated false-positive results with strains of S. capitis, S. saprophyticus and S. warneri. The overall accuracy of the commercial agglutination assays compared with TC and TNase ranged from 90.7 to 99.2%. We recommend that negative reactions with the rapid commercial test kits for methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus isolates be confirmed with the TC or TNase test.

Full text

PDF
918

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Aldridge K. E., Kogos C., Sanders C. V., Marier R. L. Comparison of rapid identification assays for Staphylococcus aureus. J Clin Microbiol. 1984 May;19(5):703–704. doi: 10.1128/jcm.19.5.703-704.1984. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Baker J. S., Bormann M. A., Boudreau D. H. Evaluation of various rapid agglutination methods for the identification of Staphylococcus aureus. J Clin Microbiol. 1985 May;21(5):726–729. doi: 10.1128/jcm.21.5.726-729.1985. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Barry A. L., Lachica R. V., Atchison F. W. Identification of Staphylococcus aureus by simultaneous use of tube coagulase and thermonuclease tests. Appl Microbiol. 1973 Mar;25(3):496–497. doi: 10.1128/am.25.3.496-497.1973. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Doern G. V. Evaluation of a commercial latex agglutination test for identification of Staphylococcus aureus. J Clin Microbiol. 1982 Mar;15(3):416–418. doi: 10.1128/jcm.15.3.416-418.1982. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Forsgren A. Significance of protein a production by staphylococci. Infect Immun. 1970 Nov;2(5):672–673. doi: 10.1128/iai.2.5.672-673.1970. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Kloos W. E., Schleifer K. H. Simplified scheme for routine identification of human Staphylococcus species. J Clin Microbiol. 1975 Jan;1(1):82–88. doi: 10.1128/jcm.1.1.82-88.1975. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Lachica R. V., Genigeorgis C., Hoeprich P. D. Metachromatic agar-diffusion methods for detecting staphylococcal nuclease activity. Appl Microbiol. 1971 Apr;21(4):585–587. doi: 10.1128/am.21.4.585-587.1971. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Maxim P. E., Mathews H. L., Mengoli H. F. Single-tube mixed agglutination test for the detection of staphylococcal protein A. J Clin Microbiol. 1976 Nov;4(5):418–422. doi: 10.1128/jcm.4.5.418-422.1976. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Menzies R. E. Comparison of coagulase, deoxyribonuclease (DNase), and heat-stable nuclease tests for identification of Staphylococcus aureus. J Clin Pathol. 1977 Jul;30(7):606–608. doi: 10.1136/jcp.30.7.606. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Myrick B. A., Ellner P. D. Evaluation of the latex slide agglutination test for identification of Staphylococcus aureus. J Clin Microbiol. 1982 Feb;15(2):275–277. doi: 10.1128/jcm.15.2.275-277.1982. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Sperber W. H., Tatini S. R. Interpretation of the tube coagulase test for identification of Staphylococcus aureus. Appl Microbiol. 1975 Apr;29(4):502–505. doi: 10.1128/am.29.4.502-505.1975. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Yrios J. W. Comparison of rabbit and pig plasma in the tube coagulase test. J Clin Microbiol. 1977 Feb;5(2):221–224. doi: 10.1128/jcm.5.2.221-224.1977. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Zarzour J. Y., Belle E. A. Evaluation of three test procedures for identification of Staphylococcus aureus from clinical sources. J Clin Microbiol. 1978 Feb;7(2):133–136. doi: 10.1128/jcm.7.2.133-136.1978. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Journal of Clinical Microbiology are provided here courtesy of American Society for Microbiology (ASM)

RESOURCES