Skip to main content
Journal of Clinical Microbiology logoLink to Journal of Clinical Microbiology
. 1986 Jul;24(1):26–29. doi: 10.1128/jcm.24.1.26-29.1986

Routine evaluation of the nonradiometric BACTEC NR 660 system.

R J Courcol, A Fruchart, M Roussel-Delvallez, G R Martin
PMCID: PMC268825  PMID: 3522625

Abstract

The present study compares the sensitivity, accuracy, and practicability of a nonradiometric blood culture system with those of the standard blood culture system in use in our laboratory. A total of 1,080 sets of four blood cultures bottles were compared, giving 143 positive aerobic-medium associations and 139 positive anaerobic-medium associations. The conventional system recovered 171 isolates, whereas the BACTEC NR 660 system (Johnston Laboratories, Towson, Md.) recovered 155 isolated. There were no significant differences in total isolates with either system (P more than 0.05). The BACTEC NR 660 system recovered a slightly lower number of Serratia marcescens and Streptococcus faecalis but a higher number of Pneumococcus spp. The mean detection times were 55.9 h with the conventional system and 31.6 h with the BACTEC NR 660 system (P less than 0.001). Our results demonstrate that the BACTEC NR 660 system is suitable for routine use.

Full text

PDF
27

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Bannatyne R. M., Harnett N. Radiometric detection of bacteremia in neonates. Appl Microbiol. 1974 Jun;27(6):1067–1069. doi: 10.1128/am.27.6.1067-1069.1974. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Finegold S. M., White M. L., Ziment I., Winn W. R. Rapid diagnosis of bacteremia. Appl Microbiol. 1969 Sep;18(3):458–463. doi: 10.1128/am.18.3.458-463.1969. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Griffin M. R., Miller A. D., Davis A. C. Blood culture cross contamination associated with a radiometric analyzer. J Clin Microbiol. 1982 Apr;15(4):567–570. doi: 10.1128/jcm.15.4.567-570.1982. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Ilstrup D. M., Washington J. A., 2nd The importance of volume of blood cultured in the detection of bacteremia and fungemia. Diagn Microbiol Infect Dis. 1983 Jun;1(2):107–110. doi: 10.1016/0732-8893(83)90039-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Larson S. M., Charache P., Chen M., Wagner H. N., Jr Automated detection of Haemophilus influenzae. Appl Microbiol. 1973 Jun;25(6):1011–1012. doi: 10.1128/am.25.6.1011-1012.1973. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Plorde J. J., Tenover F. C., Carlson L. G. Specimen volume versus yield in the BACTEC blood culture system. J Clin Microbiol. 1985 Aug;22(2):292–295. doi: 10.1128/jcm.22.2.292-295.1985. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Renner E. D., Gatheridge L. A., Washington J. A., 2nd Evaluation of radiometric system for detecting bacteremia. Appl Microbiol. 1973 Sep;26(3):368–372. doi: 10.1128/am.26.3.368-372.1973. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Rodriguez F., Lorian V. Antibacterial activity in blood cultures. J Clin Microbiol. 1985 Feb;21(2):262–263. doi: 10.1128/jcm.21.2.262-263.1985. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Thiemke W. A., Wicher K. Laboratory experience with a radiometric method for detecting bacteremia. J Clin Microbiol. 1975 Mar;1(3):302–308. doi: 10.1128/jcm.1.3.302-308.1975. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Journal of Clinical Microbiology are provided here courtesy of American Society for Microbiology (ASM)

RESOURCES