Skip to main content
Applied and Environmental Microbiology logoLink to Applied and Environmental Microbiology
. 2009 May 8;75(13):4473–4482. doi: 10.1128/AEM.02653-08

Transcriptomic Response of Lactococcus lactis in Mixed Culture with Staphylococcus aureus

Sébastien Nouaille 1,2,3,*, Sergine Even 4,5, Cathy Charlier 4,5, Yves Le Loir 4,5, Muriel Cocaign-Bousquet 1,2,3, Pascal Loubière 1,2,3
PMCID: PMC2704839  PMID: 19429566

Abstract

The mechanisms of interaction between Lactococcus lactis and the food pathogen Staphylococcus aureus are of crucial importance, as one major role of lactic acid bacteria (LAB) in fermented foods is to inhibit undesirable and pathogenic flora. It was never questioned if the presence of a pathogen can actively modify the gene expression patterns of LAB in a shared environment. In this study, transcriptome and biochemical analyses were combined to assess the dynamic response of L. lactis in a mixed culture with S. aureus. The presence of S. aureus hardly affected the growth of L. lactis but dramatically modified its gene expression profile. The main effect was related to earlier carbon limitation and a concomitantly lower growth rate in the mixed culture due to the consumption of glucose by both species. More specific responses involved diverse cellular functions. Genes associated with amino acid metabolism, ion transport, oxygen response, menaquinone metabolism, and cell surface and phage expression were differentially expressed in the mixed culture. This study led to new insights into possible mechanisms of interaction between L. lactis and S. aureus. Moreover, new and unexpected effects of L. lactis on the virulence of S. aureus were discovered, as described elsewhere (S. Even, C. Charlier, S. Nouaille, N. L. Ben Zakour, M. Cretenet, F. J. Cousin, M. Gautier, M. Cocaign-Bousquet, P. Loubière, and Y. Le Loir, Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 75:4459-4472, 2009).


Lactococcus lactis, the model organism of the lactic acid bacteria (LAB), is used extensively in numerous food fermentation processes, particularly in cheese production. While its main technological function is medium acidification, another important role is the inhibition of the growth of food pathogens or undesirable microorganisms, ensuring the safety and quality of the fermented products. Staphylococcus aureus is a major human pathogen causing a variety of infections, ranging from minor skin and wound infections to life-threatening diseases (26). In addition to its natural ecological niches, which are the nasal cavity and the skin, S. aureus can be a foodstuff-contaminating agent, leading to food poisoning through the production of staphylococcal enterotoxins (24). As S. aureus shares the same ecosystem with LAB, an increasing number of studies have focused on the inhibitory effects of LAB on S. aureus growth. The major parameters involved in bacterial growth inhibition reported so far are the pH decrease by the production of organic acid, nutrient competition, and hydrogen peroxide and antibiotic production (6). Most of the studies have been restricted to quantifying the potential of LAB for inhibiting pathogen growth, and little is known about the mechanisms leading to growth inhibition and whether other parameters may be associated with microbial interaction. The behavior of L. lactis in the presence of food pathogens, particularly S. aureus, has never been clearly analyzed. It is not known to date whether L. lactis can sense the partner organism and can actively modify its gene expression pattern to fight against the pathogen or just passively respond to the bacterial partner. Global approaches appear to be powerful tools to investigate multifactorial interactions. Microarrays have been employed largely to identify cellular responses, in both L. lactis and S. aureus, to different stress or environmental modifications (32, 37, 39, 41, 46), but a transcriptomic approach with mixed cultures of these two microorganisms has never been carried out.

In this study, we analyzed the transcriptomic response of a dairy strain of L. lactis in a mixed culture with S. aureus. Cultures were carried out in fermentors in a chemically defined medium (CDM) and at a constant pH to avoid acidification effects. To mimic the cheese-making industrial processes, no oxygen control was applied. The main response of L. lactis in the mixed culture could be attributed primarily to the earlier modification of the environmental composition imposed by the staphylococcal growth, but more specific cellular functions were also found to be modified, highlighting the interest of the transcriptome for the analysis of microbial interactions.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Bacterial strains and growth conditions.

L. lactis subsp. lactis biovar diacetylactis LD61 (kindly provided by R. Perrin, Soredab, La Boissière Ecole, France) and S. aureus MW2 (control cultures) and mixed cultures containing the two microorganisms were grown on CDM (22) at 30°C in 2-liter fermentors (Setric Génie Industriel, Toulouse, France) with an agitation speed of 200 rpm, and the pH was maintained at 6.6 by the automatic addition of KOH (10 N) to avoid the acidification of the medium by lactic acid produced mainly by L. lactis. Fermentations were carried out under oxygen-limiting conditions, with air in the gaseous phase but without air bubbling. Cultures were inoculated from precultures grown in tubes containing CDM at 30°C. Predetermined volumes of each exponentially growing preculture were added to mixed and control cultures to obtain initial cell concentrations of 106 CFU ml−1 for both S. aureus and L. lactis. For each condition (pure L. lactis culture, pure S. aureus culture, and mixed culture), three independent biological replicates were established.

Analytical methods.

Bacterial growth was estimated by spectrophotometric measurements at 580 nm with a Hitachi U1100 spectrophotometer (1 U of absorbance is equivalent to 0.3 g liter−1 for both L. lactis and S. aureus) and the determination of numbers of CFU by a micromethod as described previously (1). The populations of L. lactis and total flora were determined after growth on M17 (Difco) (44) agar plates supplemented with 0.5% glucose and incubated for 24 h at 30°C. The population of S. aureus was determined after growth on tryptic soy broth (AES, Combourg, France) agar plates supplemented with 6.5% NaCl and incubated for 24 h at 37°C. Glucose, lactate, acetate, citrate, pyruvate, formate, and ethanol concentrations in culture supernatants were measured by high-performance liquid chromatography with a 1200 series system (Agilent Technologies, Waldbronn, Germany) using an HPX87H+ Bio-Rad column and the following conditions: a temperature of 48°C, H2SO4 (5 mM) as the eluent at a flow rate of 0.5 ml min−1, and dual detection by refractometer and UV analyses. Amino acid concentrations in culture supernatants were measured via the AminoQuant HP1090 system (Agilent Technologies, Waldbronn, Germany). Proteins in the samples were precipitated by adding 4 volumes of methanol to 1 volume of the sample and incubating the mixture overnight on ice. The mixture was then centrifuged, and the supernatant was kept for amino acid analysis. The amino acids were automatically derived with ortho-phthalic aldehyde and 9-fluorenylmethyl chloroformate. The derivatives were separated on a Hypersil AA octyldecyl silane column (Agilent Technologies) at 40°C by using a linear gradient of acetate buffer (pH 7.2) with triethylamine (0.018%), tetrahydrofuran (0.3%), and acetonitrile. A diode array detector was used at 338 nm for ortho-phthalic aldehyde derivatives and at 262 nm for 9-fluorenylmethyl chloroformate derivatives.

Transcriptomic analysis.

Cells were collected at exponential growth phase, late exponential growth phase, early stationary phase, and stationary phase, at 5.0, 7.8, 9.0, and 11.1 h postinoculation, respectively, and immediately frozen in liquid nitrogen. After defrosting of the cells on ice, a volume corresponding to 6 mg (dry weight) of cells was centrifuged. Cells were broken at 4°C with a FastPrep-24 instrument (MP Biomedicals, Illkirch, France) by three cycles of 1 min interspaced with 2-min cooling periods. Total RNAs were extracted using an RNeasy midi kit (Qiagen) as described previously (39). RNAs were quantified at 260 nm, and RNA quality was controlled on an electrophoresis agarose gel under denaturing conditions. For cDNA synthesis, 20 μg of total RNA was retrotranscribed as described previously (39). S. aureus MW2 genomic DNA was extracted essentially as described previously (2) and digested with Sau3A (1 U/93 μg of DNA for 1 h at 37°C). Gene expression was measured using nylon arrays containing the PCR fragments (Eurogentec) of 1,948 genes of L. lactis IL1403 (4). Membrane spotting and analytical support were provided by the biochip platform of Genopole (Toulouse, France). Membrane preparation and hybridization conditions were similar to those described previously (39), with the sole modification of the addition of 40 μg of Sau3A-digested MW2 genomic DNA, denatured at 95°C for 10 min, to the hybridization buffer. Membranes were exposed to a phosphorimager screen for 3 days and scanned with a phosphofluoroimager (Storm 860; Molecular Dynamics).

Data analyses and statistical treatment.

Hybridization signals were quantified, assigned to gene names, and statistically evaluated with the Bioplot software (developed by S. Sokol of Plateforme Génomique, Toulouse [http://biopuce.insa-toulouse.fr]). Local background was removed, and signals were normalized according to the mean intensity of the membrane. Ratio calculations and statistical analyses were restricted to genes whose detected signal was above the cutoff level, defined as the mean of the signals detected for the 180 empty spots present on the membrane plus 2 standard deviations. For each culture, the expression ratios were calculated using the exponential phase (5 h) as the reference. Student tests were performed, and genes with false-discovery rates (FDR) of <3% were selected. These genes have P values under the threshold of 0.082, 0.023, 0.045, 0.017, 0.021, and 0.016 in pure (7.8 h), mixed (7.8 h), pure (9 h), mixed (9 h), pure (11.1 h), and mixed (11.1 h) cultures, respectively. To find cross-hybridizing genes, we used cDNA from the S. aureus pure culture. Genes whose signal was above the cutoff were designated cross-hybridizing genes. Genes exhibiting significant variations in signal intensities at the studied time points were selected by using a Student test. The distribution of the P values for this limited number of genes was not Gaussian, and it was not possible to calculate the FDR. A threshold P value of 0.05 was chosen for gene selection in this case.

Real-time PCR.

Samples of 10 μg of total mRNA were retrotranscribed exactly as described previously (27). Primers for real-time PCR (Table 1) were designed with Bio-Rad Beacon Designer software to have lengths of 20 to 24 bases, GC contents of more than 50%, and melting temperatures of about 60°C and to amplify PCR products of 90 to 150 bases long. The specificities of the primers for the genes of interest were controlled by using the L. lactis IL1403 genome with Vector NTI software (Invitrogen). Similarly, the absence of primer specificity for the S. aureus MW2 genome was controlled and confirmed by the lack of amplification of MW2 genomic DNA by PCR. Real-time PCR was carried out on a MyIQ unit with Sybr green supermix as described previously (27). The threshold was determined with a baseline at 125 relative fluorescence units above the background level. Three dilutions of the cDNA were performed to determine the PCR efficiency (ranging from 85 to 116%). The rcfA gene was chosen as an internal normalization control, as L. lactis pure-culture transcriptomic data showed that its expression remained constant throughout growth. The Pfaffl analysis method (34) was used to calculate the change in transcript levels between pure and mixed cultures. Each selected gene in three culture replicates was analyzed. For direct comparison with transcriptomic data, quantitative reverse transcription-PCR results were expressed as differences (n-fold) in transcript concentrations between the mixed and pure cultures, with correction by using the rcfA normalization ratio. Ratios of gene expression levels in mixed and pure cultures analyzed by quantitative reverse transcription-PCR (Table 1) agreed with differences observed by the transcriptomic approach.

TABLE 1.

Comparison of microarray and quantitative PCR (qPCR) data

Gene name Sequences of primer pairs for qPCR Ratioa of expression in mixed culture to that in pure culture as determined by:
Transcriptome analysis
qPCR
7.8 h 9 h 7.8 h 9 h
citD 5′-CGAGGCTACGGTGCGTCAAG-3′/5′-TTCCACTACCGCAATCGCTCTG-3′ 2.2 2.0 2.4 4.6
serS 5′-GCCATTGATGCTGAACTTGCTG-3′/5′-ACCAACACGACGAACCTCAAC-3′ 3.1 3.6 2.7 4.4
menX 5′-TCGTCCGCCCATTGAATAGCC-3′/5′-GGTCACGGTTCATCAGCAAAGC-3′ 1.9 1.1
msmK 5′-GCTTGACCGTAAACCTGCTGAC-3′/5′-ACTTTGGCATCACGGACAATCG-3′ 2.8 13.2
mtsA 5′-ACCTCAACTCCAGTGCTTACAG-3′/5′-ACTTGGAAACAGGTGGAAATGC-3′ 2.5 11.3
rbsK 5′-GGCTTGGTTCGCTCCTTTTCC-3′/5′-GAGTGCCGAATGCTGGAGAAAC-3′ 5.7 7.3
yahB 5′-CTGAGCAGGCAGAAGAAGCG-3′/5′-CTGGAATAGCTGGTGCAGGAAC-3′ 1.9 1.7
yobA 5′-AACTCCGCTTCAGACCATTGC-3′/5′-GTTCCTGTCGATGGTTCTGACC-3′ 4.4 7.3
ytgH 5′-GAGCATCATCGCCCATGTCATC-3′/5′-GCGCAGCTCAAACAACAGGG-3′ 2.6 3.2
rcfA 5′-CGGACAACTTTATGGTCAGGCC-3′/5′-GCTTGGTGCTCAGCAGCTAG-3′
a

Expression ratios in each type of culture were calculated relative to expression at the 5-h time point.

RESULTS AND DISCUSSION

L. lactis hardly affected the growth of S. aureus on CDM at a constant pH, and vice versa.

The kinetics of growth of pure and mixed cultures of L. lactis LD61 and S. aureus MW2 are presented in Fig. 1. The growth of L. lactis in the pure culture was exponential for the first 6 h, with a maximal rate of 1.05 h−1, which was followed by a growth deceleration phase to 8.2 h, and the culture reached a final population of 2 × 109 CFU ml−1 at 9 h (Fig. 1). After 9 h, the population decreased to 3 × 107 CFU ml−1 at 25 h (Fig. 1), which was associated with cell lysis (the optical density dropped from 6 to 2.5 between 9 and 25 h [data not shown]). In the mixed culture, a decrease in the L. lactis biomass was not detectable based on the total population, due to the growing S. aureus subpopulation. However, lysis occurred in the mixed culture also and was even more pronounced than that in the pure culture, as confirmed by sodium dodecyl sulfate-polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis, with the release of cellular protein into the culture supernatant (data not shown).

FIG. 1.

FIG. 1.

Kinetics of growth of L. lactis LD61 and S. aureus MW2 in pure and mixed cultures on CDM medium at 30°C and a constant pH. Growth curves for L. lactis LD61 in the pure culture (▪), the total population in the mixed culture (▴), S. aureus MW2 in the pure culture (□), and S. aureus MW2 in the mixed culture (▵) are shown.

The growth of S. aureus in the pure culture was exponential, with a maximal rate of 0.76 h−1 for the first 6 h, until the population reached 5 × 108 CFU ml−1. From 6 h to the entry into the stationary phase (at 11 h), a period of reduced growth (μ = 0.32 h−1) occurred (Fig. 1). This biphasic growth pattern may be related to nutrient exhaustion that led to metabolic adaptation (the induction of new metabolic pathways, transporters, and de novo biosynthesis pathways). The final S. aureus population after 25 h of culture was 3 × 109 CFU ml−1. Similar growth of S. aureus in the mixed culture with L. lactis, but with a lag phase between the two growth phases, was observed. Following an exponential phase of growth (μ = 0.70 h−1) of 5 h, similar to that in the pure culture, growth stopped for 3 h at an S. aureus population of 2 × 108 CFU ml−1. A second phase of growth (μ = 0.32 h−1) started after 8 h of culture. The entry into the stationary phase occurred earlier than that in the pure culture, an effect that may have been related to the anticipated exhaustion of nutrients due to competition with L. lactis. At 25 h, the S. aureus population in the mixed culture reached 109 CFU ml−1, which was only threefold lower than that in the pure culture. General growth profiles of S. aureus in pure and mixed cultures were similar but showed a delay in the mixed culture due to growth arrest between 5 and 8 h. S. aureus did not seem to take advantage of nutrients released by L. lactis cell lysis, as growth rates in the slow-growth phases of the pure and mixed cultures were similar.

Kinetic profiles of the substrate (glucose) and fermentation products were determined. The L. lactis pure culture presented a classical profile of glucose consumption concomitant with lactate production, with a global lactate yield (Ylactate/glucose) of 1.69 mol mol glucose−1 (Fig. 2A). Small amounts of formate (Yformate/glucose = 0.05 mol mol−1) and acetate (Yacetate/glucose = 0.08 mol mol−1) were also produced after 6 h (Fig. 2B and C). The complete glucose exhaustion occurring at 9 h correlated with the entry into the stationary phase. S. aureus in the pure culture consumed glucose at a lower rate. Less than half of the glucose was consumed within the first 12 h, and it was finally exhausted at 25 h (Fig. 2A). S. aureus produced lactate as the main fermentation product (Ylactate/glucose = 1.57 mol mol−1). After 4 h of growth, formate (Yformate/glucose = 0.07 mol mol−1) and acetate (Yacetate/glucose = 0.05 mol mol−1) were produced in addition to lactate. Finally, after 7 h, ethanol was also produced at significant levels (Yethanol/glucose = 0.22 mol mol−1) and reached a final concentration of 10.1 mM (Fig. 2B and C).

FIG. 2.

FIG. 2.

(A) Glucose consumption by L. lactis LD61 in the pure culture (glucose LD61) and the mixed culture (glucose MC) and by S. aureus MW2 in the pure culture (glucose MW2) and lactate production by L. lactis LD61 in the pure culture (lactate LD1) and the mixed culture (lactate MC) and by S. aureus MW2 in the pure culture (lactate MW2); (B) formate production by L. lactis LD61 in the pure culture (formate LD61) and the mixed culture (formate MC) and by S. aureus MW2 in the pure culture (formate MW2); (C) acetate production by L. lactis LD61 in the pure culture (acetate LD61) and the mixed culture (acetate MC) and by S. aureus MW2 in the pure culture (acetate MW2) and ethanol production by L. lactis LD61 in the pure culture (EtOH LD61) and the mixed culture (EtOH MC) and by S. aureus MW2 in the pure culture (EtOH MW2).

For the mixed culture, the glucose consumption profile was similar to that for the L. lactis pure culture, but glucose exhaustion occurred 1 h earlier in the mixed culture due to the concomitant consumption of glucose by both species. Similarly, the lactate concentration in the mixed culture was increased compared to its concentration in the L. lactis pure culture, but lactate production stopped earlier, when glucose was exhausted. The lactate concentration in the mixed culture then decreased, suggesting the consumption of lactate by S. aureus, as the lactate concentration in the L. lactis pure culture remained stable. The formate concentration in the mixed culture increased more rapidly than that in the S. aureus pure culture and reached 10 mM at the time of glucose exhaustion and 20 mM at 25 h. In contrast, ethanol production was delayed 1 h in the mixed culture compared to that in the S. aureus pure culture and started only after glucose exhaustion, with the ethanol concentration reaching a maximal level of 4.4 mM at 25 h, compared to 10.1 mM in the S. aureus pure culture. Finally, the fermented products excreted in the mixed culture were lactate, formate, acetate, and ethanol, produced with respective yields of 1.26, 0.41, 0.41, and 0.09 mol mol glucose−1. However, this overall balance should be divided into two distinct phases, the first one occurring at the expense of glucose consumed by both species and leading to the production of lactate, formate, and acetate and the second phase corresponding to lactate consumption by S. aureus and the production of formate, acetate, and ethanol, with global yields of 1.18, 1.25, and 0.29 mol mol lactate−1, respectively. The longer S. aureus lag phase observed in the mixed culture may represent the time required for metabolic adaptation to lactate consumption.

As expected, L. lactis LD61 demonstrated classical homolactic metabolism, with lactate as the main fermentation product. However, in the three types of cultures, formate, acetate, and ethanol were produced. In L. lactis, formate is an anaerobic product due to the strong sensitivity of pyruvate formate-lyase to oxygen (29). Similarly, the production of lactate, formate, and acetate was related to anaerobic metabolism in S. aureus (17, 45). An anaerobic environment underlies the accumulation of these products. Under our experimental conditions, oxygen was not supplied by aeration in the fermentor. The oxygen concentration was measured at ∼80% saturation at the inoculation time and rapidly dropped to an undetectable level after 4 h (data not shown). Formate production in the mixed culture, earlier and stronger than the cumulative production in pure cultures, revealed a more restricted oxygen condition in the mixed culture. This stronger formate production in the mixed culture was accentuated after glucose exhaustion due to the metabolic change in S. aureus toward lactate consumption to produce formate, acetate, and ethanol. The oxygen limitation did not have an impact on L. lactis growth, although it seemed to be responsible for the deceleration of S. aureus growth.

Transcriptomic design and analysis.

To obtain an overall view of the transcriptomic response of L. lactis to sharing its environment with S. aureus, four kinetic points in the two pure cultures and in the mixed culture were analyzed. They represented exponential, decelerating, early stationary, and late stationary growth phases, i.e., 5, 7.8, 9, and 11.1 h postinoculation, respectively. The array was designed on the basis of the L. lactis IL1403 genome sequence (4), was made of PCR fragments spotted onto a nylon membrane, and was employed previously for the analysis of the L. lactis LD61 strain (37). The major technical challenge in studying the L. lactis transcriptome in mixed cultures was to avoid cross hybridizations with cDNA from the S. aureus subpopulation in the mixed culture. Due to the phylogenetic proximity of L. lactis and S. aureus, about 80% of the array responded positively to the pure population of cDNA from S. aureus (data not shown). A previous study analyzing the L. lactis transcriptome in mixed cultures with Saccharomyces cerevisiae (27) showed that the addition of fragmentized genomic DNA from the microbial partner reduces cross hybridizations. A similar approach was employed in this study by adding S. aureus MW2 genomic DNA, which led to a substantial reduction in cross-hybridized signals, as 812 genes (42%, instead of 80%) cross hybridized at least once at the four studied points. Moreover, the cross hybridization was analyzed with S. aureus cDNA prepared from RNA in each of the growth kinetics samples, i.e., those from 5, 7.8, 9, and 11.1 h of culture. The vast majority of the 812 genes had constant signals all along the kinetics time course of the S. aureus pure culture. Indeed, only 39, 66, and 83 genes in the S. aureus pure culture at 7.8, 9, and 11.1 h, respectively, presented a varying signal. As these genes may influence the variations of L. lactis gene expression in the mixed culture, they were removed from further analysis. For all the remaining genes, we considered that the signal modifications during the dynamics in the mixed culture were not related to cross hybridizations, as cross hybridizations were constant. Dynamic analyses of pure and mixed cultures were then performed, and genes with significant variations were compared (see Materials and Methods).

Differential gene expression was considered to be specific when expression in the mixed culture (FDR < 3%) but not in the pure culture (FDR > 3%) varied significantly from the reference at a minimum of one point during the course of the culture dynamics. Compared to the levels of expression at 5 h, the expression of 100 genes (33 down- and 67 upregulated) at 7.8 h, 24 genes (12 down- and 12 upregulated) at 9 h, and 25 genes (13 down- and 12 upregulated) at 11.1 h demonstrated specific modifications in the mixed culture. Forty-nine genes with significant expression modifications in both the mixed culture and the pure culture but with opposite expression patterns or differences of more than twofold in expression levels in the mixed and pure cultures were also considered. This analysis led to the identification of 191 genes differentially expressed in the mixed culture at least once during the time course of the culture. In addition, many genes (216 genes) were differentially expressed in the L. lactis pure culture, although their expression was unmodified in the mixed culture. This finding is indirect evidence of an opposite expression pattern in L. lactis in the mixed culture. Altogether, these results indicated that a large proportion of lactococcal genes (356 genes) showed differential kinetics of expression in pure and mixed cultures (see Table S1 in the supplemental material for a list of all differentially expressed genes). This finding dramatically contrasted with the absence of major changes detected at the macroscopic level in L. lactis in the mixed culture and confirmed the interest of the transcriptomic approach for the study of interspecies bacterial interactions.

The effects of S. aureus on L. lactis were related mainly to nutritional competition.

Among the 191 genes displaying differential expression levels in the mixed culture, 48 genes had similar modifications in expression in the L. lactis pure culture, but later in growth. This delayed response did not represent a real cellular interaction but rather the earlier evolution of the medium composition in the mixed culture, particularly with respect to the glucose concentration. The changes in the expression of a majority of these genes (25) were likely related to earlier carbon limitation, as these genes overlapped with the previously described carbon starvation stimulon (39). The glucose concentration in the medium of the mixed culture at 7.8 h was only 3 mM, compared to 15 mM in the L. lactis pure culture at the same time point (see above). The L. lactis glucose limitation threshold was previously determined to be about 15 to 20 mM (39). In the pure culture, L. lactis had just entered or approached a state of glucose limitation at 7.8 h, whereas in the mixed culture, it faced clear glucose limitation at the same time point. L. lactis responded to this earlier glucose limitation by the induction of alternative sugar uptake and metabolism systems. Some of the corresponding genes (malQ and ypcG) were overexpressed earlier in the mixed culture than in the pure culture, and some (dhaM, glpF1, msmK, rbsC, rbsK, and ypcA) were expressed in both cultures but with more pronounced overexpression in the mixed culture (Table 2). Components of uncharacterized sugar ABC transporters (encoded by yngE, yngF, ypcG, and ypcH) were also upregulated in the mixed culture.

TABLE 2.

Genes discussed in this work that were differentially expressed in pure and mixed cultures over time

Function and gene Description of gene producta Ratiob of expression at 5 h to that at:
7.8 h
9 h
11.1 h
Pure culture Mixed culture Pure culture Mixed culture Pure culture Mixed culture
Amino acid biosynthesis
    serB Phosphoserine phosphatase 1.76
Transformation
    comEC Competence protein ComEC 1.41
    comGA Competence protein ComGA 1.59 1.89
    comGC Competence protein ComGC 1.23 1.49
    comGD Competence protein ComGD 2.03
Menaquinone biosynthesis
    ispA Farnesyl diphosphate synthase 1.2 0.6 0.57
    ispB Heptaprenyl diphosphate synthase component II 1.25
    menB Dihydroxynaphthonic acid synthase 0.7 0.49
    menD 2-Oxoglutarate decarboxylase 0.55
    menE O-Succinylbenzoic acid-CoA ligase 0.71
    menF Menaquinone-specific isochorismate synthase 0.44 0.28
    menX Protein in menaquinone biosynthesis pathway 0.54
    preA Prenyltransferase 0.76
Cell envelope
    acmB N-Acetylmuramidase 1.26 0.6 0.72
    acmD N-Acetylmuramidase 1.42 0.52
    apu Amylopullulanase 1.43 1.73 1.87
    xynD Endo-1,4-beta-xylanase D 0.53 0.39
Energy metabolism
    aldB Alpha-acetolactate decarboxylase 1.48
    mae Malate oxidoreductase 1.76 0.52
    rbsK Ribokinase 2.65 15.18
    ypcA Beta-glucosidase 2.3 2.99 1.85
    citB Aconitate hydratase 1.93 2.47
    citC Acetate-SH-citrate lyase ligase 1.94
    citD Citrate lyase acyl carrier protein 2.22 (0.04) 2.02 (0.072) 0.46
    citE Citrate lyase beta chain 2.1 (0.07) 2.37 (0.029) 0.59
    citF Citrate lyase alpha chain 1.92 (0.03) 2.19
    citR Citrate lyase regulator 1.7 0.34
Adaptation and responses to atypical conditions
    grpE Chaperone protein GrpE 0.49 0.47
    dnaJ Chaperone protein DnaJ 0.76
    yahB Universal stress protein 1.5 2.52 4.72 3.11 7.49
    yjaB Universal stress protein 2.47 3.73 4.8
    ymgG Putative general stress protein 24 4.06 4.41
    yobA Conserved protein 1.94 8.49 7.54
    ytaA Member of universal stress protein family 1.94 3.3 2.47 2.89
    ytgH Putative general stress protein 24 2.17 5.66 9.88
Purine, pyrimidine, nucleoside, and nucleotide metabolism
    carB Carbamoylphosphate synthetase 0.54 0.25 0.22
    dut Deoxyuridine 5′-triphosphate nucleotide hydrolase 0.63 0.54
    pydB Dihydroorotate dehydrogenase B 0.37
    pyrF Orotidine-phosphate decarboxylase 0.49 0.51 0.31
    pyrR Pyrimidine operon regulator 0.53
    pdp Pyrimidine-nucleoside phosphorylase 1.51 0.68
Regulatory functions
    copR Transcription regulator 1.82
    fur Ferric uptake regulator 2.3
    phoU Phosphate transport system regulator 1.93
DNA replication and repair
    mutS DNA mismatch repair protein 1.61 0.64
    mutX Mutator protein MutT 1.52
    ykjE MutT/Nudix family protein 0.55
    yqgC MutT/Nudix family protein 0.59 0.5
Translation
    rpmB 50S ribosomal protein L28 0.68 0.32 0.32
    rpmJ 50S ribosomal protein L36 0.43 0.22 0.33 0.17
    rpsJ 30S ribosomal protein S10 0.53 0.46 0.27 0.18
    rpsM 30S ribosomal protein S13 0.31 0.17 0.22
    rpsO 30S ribosomal protein S15 0.64 0.43 0.2
    rpsS 30S ribosomal protein S19 0.21 0.11
    argS Arginyl-tRNA synthetase 0.51 0.4 0.5 0.4
    aspS Aspartyl-tRNA synthetase 0.64 0.29
    glyS Glycyl-tRNA synthetase alpha chain 0.66 0.64 0.54
    ileS Isoleucyl-tRNA synthetase 0.59
    leuS Leucyl-tRNA synthetase 0.63 0.42 0.47
    lysS Lysyl-tRNA synthetase 0.75 0.33 0.23
    metS Methyonyl-tRNA synthetase 0.42
    pheT Phenylalanyl-tRNA synthetase beta chain 0.83 0.57
    serS Seryl-tRNA synthetase 0.73 2.28 3.64 0.68
    tyrS Tyrosyl-tRNA synthetase 1 0.46 0.36
    valS Valyl-tRNA synthetase 0.64 0.46
Transport
    glpF1 Glycerol uptake facilitator 8.33 15.47 7.01 10.14
    msmK Multiple-sugar ABC transporter ATP binding protein 2.84 7.86 1.92 3.3
    rbsC Ribose ABC transporter permease protein 1.63 6.36 1.55
    yngE Sugar ABC transporter ATP binding protein 1.58 0.28
    yngF Sugar ABC transporter permease protein 1.74 0.34
    ypcG Sugar ABC transporter substrate binding protein 1.8 2.78 7.01 2.61
    ypcH Sugar ABC transporter permease protein 2.33 5.19
    mtsA Manganese ABC transporter substrate binding protein 2.54 0.25
    mtsB Manganese ABC transporter ATP binding protein 2
    mtsC Manganese ABC transporter permease protein 2.43
    ykjB Putative manganese transporter 1.67
Unknown function
    yihF Putative glycerate kinase 2.44 2.45
    ymgH Unknown protein 3.43 3.8
    ymgI Unknown protein 3.66 2.81 3.98
    ymgJ Unknown protein 2.25 3.42 3.24 4.73
    ytgA Unknown protein 5.75 9.16
    ytgB Unknown protein 1.98 4.39 7.87
a

CoA, coenzyme A.

b

P values above the threshold are shown in parentheses.

In accordance with the earlier carbon starvation, we observed an advanced decrease in the expression of genes of the growth rate regulon, as about half (20 of 48) of the genes with differential expression belong to this regulon. One of the major cellular responses to growth rate limitation was the underexpression of ribosomal protein-encoding genes (10). As the mixed and pure cultures were in a growth deceleration phase at 9 and 11.1 h, we indeed observed massive underexpression of ribosomal protein-encoding genes (with 19 to 36 of such genes underexpressed). Furthermore, six genes (rpmB, rpmJ, rpsJ, rpsM, rpsO, and rpsS) of the growth rate stimulon were subjected to decreased expression in the mixed culture, suggesting that the L. lactis growth rate was reduced to a greater extent than the S. aureus growth rate in the mixed culture, although this pattern was not visible at the macroscopic level. These genes may be used as accurate sensors to detect slight reductions in the growth rate of L. lactis.

Ten genes encoding tRNA synthetases (argS, aspS, glyS, ileS, leuS, lysS, metS, pheT, tyrS, and valS) were underexpressed from 7.8 h in both pure and mixed cultures. Only the serS tRNA synthetase gene was overexpressed in the mixed culture at 7.8 h, and this upregulation was maintained at 9 h. All amino acids in the culture media were quantified. All but serine and threonine remained present at 25 h and were similarly consumed in the three types of cultures (data not shown). In the mixed culture, serine and threonine were exhausted at 8 h. This exhaustion resulted from the specific consumption by S. aureus, as these amino acids were similarly consumed in the S. aureus pure culture but only weakly consumed in the L. lactis pure culture (data not shown). Transcriptomic responses in serine metabolism, but not in threonine metabolism, were observed. In parallel to serine exhaustion, serB, encoding phosphoserine phosphatase, and yihF, encoding a putative glycerate kinase acting upstream of the serine biosynthesis pathway, were specifically overexpressed in the mixed culture. Thus, L. lactis responded specifically to nutritional modifications of the environment induced by S. aureus. While the decrease of expression of most aminoacyl-tRNA synthetase genes is related to the slowing down and arrest of growth (8, 13), the specific induction of serS was probably related to serine exhaustion.

Genes from the de novo pyrimidine biosynthetic pathway (carB, dut, pydB, pyrF, pyrZ, and pyrR) were specifically underexpressed in the mixed culture. In this pathway, only pdp, encoding a pyrimidine-nucleoside phosphorylase involved in cytosine-to-cytidine conversion, was specifically overexpressed in the mixed culture. In L. lactis grown in mixed cultures with S. cerevisiae, similar pyr gene downregulation due to the ethanol produced by the yeast was observed (27). One cannot exclude the possibility that the pyr gene underexpression observed in the mixed culture may be related to the ethanol produced by S. aureus.

Several regulators involved in copper, ferric, and phosphate transport (copR, fur, and phoU) were overexpressed in the mixed culture, but without clear repercussions on the expression of genes controlled by these regulators. A specific response in manganese transport was observed. Although the CDM used did not contain a specific manganese source, trace amounts were likely supplied by other chemical components. Manganese participates as a cofactor in several vital metabolic processes (7, 9). It is thus likely that L. lactis and S. aureus compete for the Mn2+ amounts present in the medium. The mtsABC genes, encoding manganese transport system components, were specifically overexpressed (by more than twofold) in the mixed culture at 7.8 h. Lactococcal mtsABC displays homologies to Bacillus subtilis mntABD and Lactobacillus plantarum mtsCBA, whose expression is strongly increased under conditions of manganese starvation (20). A second manganese transport system involving MntH in B. subtilis (36) and MntH1 and MntH2 in L. plantarum (20) has been described. These three proteins show homologies to the putative manganese transporter encoded by ykjB, which was also specifically overexpressed in the mixed culture at 7.8 h. The specific overexpression of genes involved in manganese uptake suggests that amounts of manganese present in the medium were sufficient for the L. lactis pure culture but led to competition for this cofactor in the mixed culture. Cellular functions in L. lactis and S. aureus that may be affected by the reduction of the manganese concentration in the mixed culture remain unidentified.

S. aureus did not induce a major stress response in L. lactis.

Under different stress conditions, L. lactis is able to activate the synthesis of general stress response proteins such as chaperones and proteases (15, 16, 23, 35). Only grpE and dnaJ were specifically underexpressed in the mixed culture at 9 h, suggesting that the presence of S. aureus did not represent a major stress stimulus for L. lactis. However, some putative universal stress protein-encoding genes (yahB, yjaB, ymgG, yobA, ytaA, and ytgH) with uncharacterized functions were specifically overexpressed or overexpressed to a greater extent in the mixed culture in stationary phase (9 and 11.1 h). Among them, both ymgG and ytgH show homologies to the Enterococcus faecalis gls24 gene, predicted to code for a general stress protein involved in survival and virulence and induced by different starvation conditions as well as chemical stresses (18, 43). ytgH, but not ymgG, was reported previously to respond to various environmental stress conditions (19). These genes form transcriptional units with upstream genes ymgHIJ and ytgAB, which were also all specifically overexpressed or expressed to a greater extent in the mixed culture. The biological functions of the gls24 family members remain unclear (19). Further analyses are required to determine whether the overexpression of those two operons was related to carbon starvation or to a stimulating molecule produced by S. aureus in the environment. Finally, some genes associated with DNA repair (mutS and mutX) were overexpressed, although ykjE and yqgC, two putative members of the Nudix family involved in the degradation of potentially mutagenic X-linked nucleotide diphosphates (3, 28), were underexpressed.

Taken together, these results clearly showed that the presence of S. aureus in the medium does not generate major stress for L. lactis. This outcome was expected, as most characterized stress-associated genes are generally regulated by massive environmental (temperature and pH, etc.) or medium composition modifications. In our model, the main stress-generating parameters were controlled, but minor and unidentified stresses may be triggered by S. aureus, directly or indirectly. The putative stress protein-encoding genes identified may then be involved in a specific response to interaction between the two microorganisms. Identifying their biological functions will facilitate the characterization of this interaction.

We have demonstrated that the oxygen level in the environment was rapidly reduced, as shown by the quantification of metabolites released into the medium. The overall response of L. lactis to oxygen limitation was not detected at the transcriptomic level. Genes whose expression is modified in the presence of oxygen have recently been described (32). Under our conditions, 82% of these oxygen-regulated genes had unmodified expression in pure and mixed cultures at 7.8 h. Furthermore, equal repartition of over- and underexpression was observed for the 18% of genes with varying expression. More particularly, genes directly involved in oxygen metabolism (pdhABCD, noxE, pfl, ahpCF, and sodA) had unmodified expression in the mixed culture compared to that in the L. lactis pure culture. Taken together, these results indicated that cells at the reference point (5 h) were already in a state of oxygen limitation or that, if further modifications existed, they were too minor to trigger significant transcriptomic rearrangements. Unexpectedly, the expression of genes associated with electron transfer in respiration chains in L. lactis was specifically modified in the mixed culture compared to that in the pure culture. The ispA and ispB genes, encoding isoprenyl diphosphate synthases involved in menaquinone side chain elongation (25), were specifically overexpressed in the mixed culture at 7.8 h, although the prenyltransferase gene preA was concomitantly underexpressed. In addition, cydA and many genes involved in menaquinone biosynthesis (menBDEFX) were specifically underexpressed in the pure culture at 7.8 h compared to expression at 5 h, although their expression was maintained in the mixed culture, suggesting that the menaquinone biosynthetic pathway was sustained in the mixed culture. An example of cellular communication between L. lactis and group B streptococci through menaquinone exchange, in which L. lactis can cross-feed menaquinones to streptococci through cell lysis or direct cell-cell interaction, has been described recently (40). A similar situation may occur with S. aureus. The signals and biological relevance of this interaction remain to be analyzed.

For intraspecies communication mechanisms, competency is controlled in many gram-positive bacteria by a quorum-sensing system activated by a competence-stimulating peptide (33, 42). L. lactis has never been identified as being able to develop a natural competence pathway, but genes required for late competence steps, such as DNA entry pore formation, are present (4). Under our conditions, the overexpression of those competence-related genes (comEC, comGA, comGC, and comGD) was observed in the pure culture, although not in the mixed culture. This specific downregulation of competence genes in the mixed culture remains unexplained and may be due to interference triggered by S. aureus.

Modulation of L. lactis genes associated with technological properties.

Citrate is present in many natural media, including milk, and can be used by lactococci as a carbon source. Citrate is converted to pyruvate, yielding the formation of acetolactate, acetoin, and diacetyl, components with flavor properties essential for the quality of some dairy products (12). L. lactis LD61 possesses the plasmidic citrate permease-encoding gene citP for efficient citrate uptake (11, 37). The citCDEF operon involved in citrate utilization, citB, and the citrate lyase regulator citR were globally overexpressed, with about twofold induction, in the mixed culture at 7.8 and 9 h. Genes encoding enzymes localized downstream of the pyruvate pool, such as malic enzyme (mae) and one enzyme involved in the diacetyl/acetoin pathway (aldB), were specifically overexpressed at 7.8 h. This finding suggests that the citrate pathway was activated at the transcriptomic level, directly or indirectly, by the presence of S. aureus in our model. Such interaction may have an impact on flavor compound formation in the food matrix.

The lysis of L. lactis in the mixed culture was more pronounced than that in the pure culture whatever the time point, as suggested by the sodium dodecyl sulfate-polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis profiles of culture supernatants (data not shown). This pattern was not linked to more pronounced overexpression of phage-associated genes in the mixed culture than in the pure culture. Among the 40 phage-related genes overexpressed in the pure culture, 20 had unmodified expression in the mixed culture. However, we cannot exclude the possibility that a phage repertoire different from that in L. lactis IL1403 is present in L. lactis LD61, which would in turn also contribute to the more pronounced lysis observed for this strain in mixed culture. The differential cell lysis in the mixed culture may also be related to the increased sensitivity in the mixed culture of L. lactis peptidoglycan, a major component of the gram-positive bacterial cell wall that ensures cell rigidity and stability. None of the genes involved in peptidoglycan biosynthesis were differentially expressed. Bacteria produce peptidoglycan hydrolases with large repertoires of cellular functions. Among the five peptidoglycan hydrolases in L. lactis identified so far (5, 21, 38), only two minor hydrolases, those encoded by acmB and acmD, were specifically overexpressed at 7.8 h in the mixed culture. The gene xynD (renamed pgdA), encoding a peptidoglycan N-acetylglucosamine deacetylase whose activity increases resistance to autolysis or exogenous muramidases (30), was underexpressed in the mixed culture. Inversely, apu, involved in the degradation of polysaccharide (30), was specifically overexpressed in the pure culture. The combined differential expression profiles of genes involved in peptidoglycan physiology may participate to some extent in the moderately increased cell lysis observed in the mixed culture.

Concluding remarks.

Our study demonstrated that L. lactis growth was hardly affected by the presence of S. aureus at the macroscopic level. However, the transcriptomic analysis detected a large set of genes that were differentially expressed, confirming the interest of such a global approach for the study of interspecies bacterial interactions. Several nutritional or trophic interactions were revealed or at least suggested by the transcriptomic analysis. Although the main transcriptomic repercussion in the mixed culture was the earlier evolution of the environmental composition, some responses likely reflect more specific phenomena of interaction between L. lactis and S. aureus. It has yet to be determined whether these modifications correspond to direct or indirect bacterial interaction and whether they are actively, or not, inflicted by S. aureus. Moreover, it remains to be seen if these modifications are specific to S. aureus or more generally linked to any bacterial partner. On the molecular scale, remarkable effects of L. lactis on S. aureus were demonstrated, with L. lactis dramatically influencing the expression patterns of various virulence-associated genes, as described elsewhere (14).

Supplementary Material

[Supplemental material]

Acknowledgments

Spotting and hybridization services were provided by the transcriptomic platform of Genopole Toulouse (Toulouse, France).

Cathy Charlier was the recipient of a Ph.D. fellowship from INRA and Région Bretagne. This research was supported by an Agence Nationale de la Recherche (ANR) grant under the GenoFerment 2E.11 PNRA Project.

Footnotes

Published ahead of print on 8 May 2009.

Supplemental material for this article may be found at http://aem.asm.org/.

REFERENCES

  • 1.Baron, F., M. F. Cochet, W. Ablain, N. Grosset, M. N. Madec, F. Gonnet, S. Jan, and M. Gautier. 2006. Rapid and cost-effective method for micro-organism enumeration based on miniaturisation of the conventional plate-counting technique. Lait 86:251-257. [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Ben Zakour, N., M. Gautier, R. Andonov, D. Lavenier, M. F. Cochet, P. Veber, A. Sorokin, and Y. Le Loir. 2004. GenoFrag: software to design primers optimized for whole genome scanning by long-range PCR amplification. Nucleic Acids Res. 32:17-24. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Bessman, M. J., D. N. Frick, and S. F. O'Handley. 1996. The MutT proteins or “Nudix” hydrolases, a family of versatile, widely distributed, “housecleaning” enzymes. J. Biol. Chem. 271:25059-25062. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Bolotin, A., P. Wincker, S. Mauger, O. Jaillon, K. Malarme, J. Weissenbach, S. D. Ehrlich, and A. Sorokin. 2001. The complete genome sequence of the lactic acid bacterium Lactococcus lactis ssp. lactis IL1403. Genome Res. 11:731-753. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Buist, G., J. Kok, K. J. Leenhouts, M. Dabrowska, G. Venema, and A. J. Haandrikman. 1995. Molecular cloning and nucleotide sequence of the gene encoding the major peptidoglycan hydrolase of Lactococcus lactis, a muramidase needed for cell separation. J. Bacteriol. 177:1554-1563. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Charlier, C., M. Cretenet, S. Even, and Y. Le Loir. 2009. Interactions between Staphylococcus aureus and lactic acid bacteria: an old story with new perspectives. Int. J. Food Microbiol. 131:30-39. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Christianson, D. W. 1997. Structural chemistry and biology of manganese metalloenzymes. Prog. Biophys. Mol. Biol. 67:217-252. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Condon, C., M. Grunberg-Manago, and H. Putzer. 1996. Aminoacyl-tRNA synthetase gene regulation in Bacillus subtilis. Biochimie 78:381-389. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Crowley, J. D., D. A. Traynor, and D. C. Weatherburn. 2000. Enzymes and proteins containing manganese: an overview. Met. Ions Biol. Syst. 37:209-278. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Dressaire, C., E. Redon, H. Milhem, P. Besse, P. Loubiere, and M. Cocaign-Bousquet. 2008. Growth rate regulated genes and their wide involvement in the Lactococcus lactis stress responses. BMC Genomics 9:343. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Drider, D., S. Bekal, and H. Prevost. 2004. Genetic organization and expression of citrate permease in lactic acid bacteria. Genet. Mol. Res. 3:273-281. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Escamilla-Hurtado, M. L., A. Tomasini-Campocosio, S. Valdes-Martinez, and J. Soriano-Santos. 1996. Diacetyl formation by lactic bacteria. Rev. Latinoam Microbiol. 38:129-137. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Even, S., N. D. Lindley, and M. Cocaign-Bousquet. 2003. Transcriptional, translational and metabolic regulation of glycolysis in Lactococcus lactis subsp. cremoris MG 1363 grown in continuous acidic cultures. Microbiology 149:1935-1944. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Even, S., C. Charlier, S. Nouaille, N. L. Ben Zakour, M. Cretenet, F. J. Cousin, M. Gautier, M. Cocaign-Bousquet, P. Loubière, and Y. Le Loir. 2009. Staphylococcus aureus virulence expression is impaired by Lactococcus lactis in mixed cultures. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 75:4459-4472. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Frees, D., A. Chastanet, S. Qazi, K. Sorensen, P. Hill, T. Msadek, and H. Ingmer. 2004. Clp ATPases are required for stress tolerance, intracellular replication and biofilm formation in Staphylococcus aureus. Mol. Microbiol. 54:1445-1462. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Frees, D., F. K. Vogensen, and H. Ingmer. 2003. Identification of proteins induced at low pH in Lactococcus lactis. Int. J. Food Microbiol. 87:293-300. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Fuchs, S., J. Pane-Farre, C. Kohler, M. Hecker, and S. Engelmann. 2007. Anaerobic gene expression in Staphylococcus aureus. J. Bacteriol. 189:4275-4289. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Giard, J. C., A. Rince, H. Capiaux, Y. Auffray, and A. Hartke. 2000. Inactivation of the stress- and starvation-inducible gls24 operon has a pleiotrophic effect on cell morphology, stress sensitivity, and gene expression in Enterococcus faecalis. J. Bacteriol. 182:4512-4520. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Giard, J. C., N. Verneuil, Y. Auffray, and A. Hartke. 2002. Characterization of genes homologous to the general stress-inducible gene gls24 in Enterococcus faecalis and Lactococcus lactis. FEMS Microbiol. Lett. 206:235-239. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Groot, M. N., E. Klaassens, W. M. de Vos, J. Delcour, P. Hols, and M. Kleerebezem. 2005. Genome-based in silico detection of putative manganese transport systems in Lactobacillus plantarum and their genetic analysis. Microbiology 151:1229-1238. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Huard, C., G. Miranda, Y. Redko, F. Wessner, S. J. Foster, and M. P. Chapot-Chartier. 2004. Analysis of the peptidoglycan hydrolase complement of Lactococcus lactis: identification of a third N-acetylglucosaminidase, AcmC. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 70:3493-3499. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Jensen, P. R., and K. Hammer. 1993. Minimal requirements for exponential growth of Lactococcus lactis. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 59:4363-4366. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Kilstrup, M., S. Jacobsen, K. Hammer, and F. K. Vogensen. 1997. Induction of heat shock proteins DnaK, GroEL, and GroES by salt stress in Lactococcus lactis. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 63:1826-1837. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Le Loir, Y., F. Baron, and M. Gautier. 2003. Staphylococcus aureus and food poisoning. Genet. Mol. Res. 2:63-76. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Liang, P. H., T. P. Ko, and A. H. Wang. 2002. Structure, mechanism and function of prenyltransferases. Eur. J. Biochem. 269:3339-3354. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Lowy, F. D. 1998. Staphylococcus aureus infections. N. Engl. J. Med. 339:520-532. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Maligoy, M., M. Mercade, M. Cocaign-Bousquet, and P. Loubiere. 2008. Transcriptome analysis of Lactococcus lactis in coculture with Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 74:485-494. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.McLennan, A. G. 2006. The Nudix hydrolase superfamily. Cell. Mol. Life Sci. 63:123-143. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Melchiorsen, C. R., K. V. Jokumsen, J. Villadsen, M. G. Johnsen, H. Israelsen, and J. Arnau. 2000. Synthesis and posttranslational regulation of pyruvate formate-lyase in Lactococcus lactis. J. Bacteriol. 182:4783-4788. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Meyrand, M., A. Boughammoura, P. Courtin, C. Mezange, A. Guillot, and M. P. Chapot-Chartier. 2007. Peptidoglycan N-acetylglucosamine deacetylation decreases autolysis in Lactococcus lactis. Microbiology 153:3275-3285. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Reference deleted.
  • 32.Pedersen, M. B., C. Garrigues, K. Tuphile, C. Brun, K. Vido, M. Bennedsen, H. Mollgaard, P. Gaudu, and A. Gruss. 2008. Impact of aeration and heme-activated respiration on Lactococcus lactis gene expression: identification of a heme-responsive operon. J. Bacteriol. 190:4903-4911. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Pestova, E. V., L. S. Havarstein, and D. A. Morrison. 1996. Regulation of competence for genetic transformation in Streptococcus pneumoniae by an auto-induced peptide pheromone and a two-component regulatory system. Mol. Microbiol. 21:853-862. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Pfaffl, M. W. 2001. A new mathematical model for relative quantification in real-time RT-PCR. Nucleic Acids Res. 29:e45. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Poquet, I., V. Saint, E. Seznec, N. Simoes, A. Bolotin, and A. Gruss. 2000. HtrA is the unique surface housekeeping protease in Lactococcus lactis and is required for natural protein processing. Mol. Microbiol. 35:1042-1051. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Que, Q., and J. D. Helmann. 2000. Manganese homeostasis in Bacillus subtilis is regulated by MntR, a bifunctional regulator related to the diphtheria toxin repressor family of proteins. Mol. Microbiol. 35:1454-1468. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Raynaud, S., R. Perrin, M. Cocaign-Bousquet, and P. Loubiere. 2005. Metabolic and transcriptomic adaptation of Lactococcus lactis subsp. lactis biovar diacetylactis in response to autoacidification and temperature downshift in skim milk. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 71:8016-8023. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38.Redko, Y., P. Courtin, C. Mezange, C. Huard, and M. P. Chapot-Chartier. 2007. Lactococcus lactis gene yjgB encodes a gamma-d-glutaminyl-l-lysyl-endopeptidase which hydrolyzes peptidoglycan. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 73:5825-5831. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39.Redon, E., P. Loubiere, and M. Cocaign-Bousquet. 2005. Transcriptome analysis of the progressive adaptation of Lactococcus lactis to carbon starvation. J. Bacteriol. 187:3589-3592. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 40.Rezaiki, L., G. Lamberet, A. Derre, A. Gruss, and P. Gaudu. 2008. Lactococcus lactis produces short-chain quinones that cross-feed Group B Streptococcus to activate respiration growth. Mol. Microbiol. 67:947-957. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 41.Scherl, A., P. Francois, M. Bento, J. M. Deshusses, Y. Charbonnier, V. Converset, A. Huyghe, N. Walter, C. Hoogland, R. D. Appel, J. C. Sanchez, C. G. Zimmermann-Ivol, G. L. Corthals, D. F. Hochstrasser, and J. Schrenzel. 2005. Correlation of proteomic and transcriptomic profiles of Staphylococcus aureus during the post-exponential phase of growth. J. Microbiol. Methods 60:247-257. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 42.Solomon, J. M., B. A. Lazazzera, and A. D. Grossman. 1996. Purification and characterization of an extracellular peptide factor that affects two different developmental pathways in Bacillus subtilis. Genes Dev. 10:2014-2024. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 43.Teng, F., E. C. Nannini, and B. E. Murray. 2005. Importance of gls24 in virulence and stress response of Enterococcus faecalis and use of the Gls24 protein as a possible immunotherapy target. J. Infect. Dis. 191:472-480. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 44.Terzaghi, B. E., and W. E. Sandine. 1975. Improved medium for lactic streptococci and their bacteriophages. Appl. Microbiol. 29:807-813. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 45.Zhu, Y., E. C. Weiss, M. Otto, P. D. Fey, M. S. Smeltzer, and G. A. Somerville. 2007. Staphylococcus aureus biofilm metabolism and the influence of arginine on polysaccharide intercellular adhesin synthesis, biofilm formation, and pathogenesis. Infect. Immun. 75:4219-4226. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 46.Zomer, A. L., G. Buist, R. Larsen, J. Kok, and O. P. Kuipers. 2007. Time-resolved determination of the CcpA regulon of Lactococcus lactis subsp. cremoris MG1363. J. Bacteriol. 189:1366-1381. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

[Supplemental material]

Articles from Applied and Environmental Microbiology are provided here courtesy of American Society for Microbiology (ASM)

RESOURCES