Skip to main content
Journal of Clinical Microbiology logoLink to Journal of Clinical Microbiology
. 1992 Dec;30(12):3217–3219. doi: 10.1128/jcm.30.12.3217-3219.1992

Evaluation of methods for differentiation of coagulase-positive staphylococci.

J R Roberson 1, L K Fox 1, D D Hancock 1, T E Besser 1
PMCID: PMC270634  PMID: 1452705

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to determine the minimum number of tests that could be used to differentiate between the coagulase-positive strains of staphylococcus: Staphylococcus aureus, Staphylococcus hyicus, and Staphylococcus intermedius. Eighty coagulase-positive strains of each of the three species were examined. The five tests conducted were growth on modified Baird-Parker agar, growth on P agar supplemented with acriflavin, production of acetoin, anaerobic fermentation of mannitol, and presence of beta-galactosidase. Positive test percentages for S. aureus were 100% for growth on modified Baird-Parker agar, 100% for growth on P agar supplemented with acriflavin, 94% for production of acetoin, 99% for anaerobic fermentation of mannitol, and 0% for presence of beta-galactosidase. Positive test percentages for S. intermedius were 0% for growth on modified Baird-Parker agar, 0% for growth on P agar supplemented with acriflavin, 1% for production of acetoin, 0% for anaerobic fermentation of mannitol, and 100% for presence of beta-galactosidase. S. hyicus isolates were negative in all five tests. Results from the 240 coagulase-positive staphylococcus strains tested would suggest correct identification of coagulase-positive staphylococci with P agar supplemented with acriflavin and the beta-galactosidase test. These two tests are simple to conduct and result in quick and easy differentiation of the three coagulase-positive staphylococcal species.

Full text

PDF
3218

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Devriese L. A. Baird-Parker medium supplemented with acriflavine, polymyxins and sulphonamide for the selective isolation of Staphylococcus aureus from heavily contaminated materials. J Appl Bacteriol. 1981 Apr;50(2):351–357. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2672.1981.tb00899.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Devriese L. A., Oeding P. Characteristics of Staphylococcus aureus strains isolated from different animal species. Res Vet Sci. 1976 Nov;21(3):284–291. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Jasper D. E., Infante F., Dellinger J. D. Relationships among the results of coagulase, staphylococcal toxin, and thermonuclease tests on staphylococci from cow milk. J Clin Microbiol. 1985 Apr;21(4):582–584. doi: 10.1128/jcm.21.4.582-584.1985. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Kloos W. E., Wolfshohl J. F. Identification of Staphylococcus species with the API STAPH-IDENT system. J Clin Microbiol. 1982 Sep;16(3):509–516. doi: 10.1128/jcm.16.3.509-516.1982. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Langlois B. E., Harmon R. J., Akers K. Identification of Staphylococcus species of bovine origin with the API Staph-Ident system. J Clin Microbiol. 1983 Nov;18(5):1212–1219. doi: 10.1128/jcm.18.5.1212-1219.1983. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Watts J. L., Pankey J. W., Nickerson S. C. Evaluation of the Staph-Ident and STAPHase systems for identification of staphylococci from bovine intramammary infections. J Clin Microbiol. 1984 Sep;20(3):448–452. doi: 10.1128/jcm.20.3.448-452.1984. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Journal of Clinical Microbiology are provided here courtesy of American Society for Microbiology (ASM)

RESOURCES