Skip to main content
PMC home page
Journal of Clinical Microbiology logoLink to Journal of Clinical Microbiology
. 1983 Jul;18(1):150–153. doi: 10.1128/jcm.18.1.150-153.1983

Rapid method for identification and susceptibility testing of Escherichia coli bacteriuria.

F E Dennstedt, C E Stager, J R Davis
PMCID: PMC270759  PMID: 6350344

Abstract

This report describes a rapid method for the identification and susceptibility testing of Escherichia coli bacteriuria by use of the Autobac urine screen (AUS), a 5-h indole test, and the AutoMicrobic system E. coli Susceptibility Card (AMS-ECSC). All specimens that were AUS negative at 3 and 5 h were reported as negative. All specimens that were AUS positive at 3 or 5 h were removed from the refrigerator and streaked to a MacConkey-blood agar biplate with a 0.001-ml calibrated loop and incubated at 35 degrees C. The standard method for identification and susceptibility testing consisted of inoculating isolated colonies into the AutoMicrobic system Enterobacteriaceae-Plus Biochemical Card and the AutoMicrobic system General Susceptibility Card. Of 915 specimens, 212 (23.2%) were AUS positive at 3 h, of which 112 (52.8%) were indole positive when tryptophan broth was tested at 5 h. The sensitivity and specificity of this screening method for E. coli bacteriuria were 78.8 and 72.2%, respectively. If contaminated cultures were excluded, specificity was 94.4%. When the indole test was positive, 10 microliters of growth from tryptophan broth was used as inoculum for the AMS-ECSC. AMS-ECSC results were final at 12 h. The sensitivity and specificity of the AMS-ECSC for identification of E. coli were 90.4 and 55.0%, respectively. If contaminated cultures were excluded, specificity was 100%. AMS-ECSC susceptibility results demonstrated an overall agreement of 94.3% with the standard method, with 0.5% very major, 3.4% major, and 1.8% minor discrepancies. The biplate was examined after overnight incubation, and when colonies compatible in morphology with E. coli were present in significant numbers, AMS-ECSC results were reported. When discrepancies were found between biplate and AMS-ECSC results, the biplate was processed in the conventional manner. A rapid method for identifying and performing susceptibility tests for approximately 70% of the specimens with E. coli bacteriuria is described.

Full text

PDF
151

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Blazevic D. J., Stemper J. E., Matsen J. M. Organisms encountered in urine cultures over a 10-year period. Appl Microbiol. 1972 Feb;23(2):421–422. doi: 10.1128/am.23.2.421-422.1972. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Davis J. R., Stager C. E., Wende R. D., Qadri S. M. Clinical laboratory evaluation of the automicrobic system Enterobacteriaceae biochemical card. J Clin Microbiol. 1981 Oct;14(4):370–375. doi: 10.1128/jcm.14.4.370-375.1981. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Hale D. C., Wright D. N., McKie J. E., Isenberg H. D., Jenkins R. D., Matsen J. M. Rapid screening for bacteriuria by light scatter photometry (Autobac): a collaborative study. J Clin Microbiol. 1981 Jan;13(1):147–150. doi: 10.1128/jcm.13.1.147-150.1981. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Hayward N. J., Jeavons T. H. Assessment of technique for rapid detection of Escherichia coli and Proteus species in urine by head-space gas-liquid chromatography. J Clin Microbiol. 1977 Sep;6(3):202–208. doi: 10.1128/jcm.6.3.202-208.1977. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Heinze P. A., Thrupp L. D., Anselmo C. R. A rapid (4--6-hour) urine-culture system for direct identification and direct antimicrobial susceptibility testing. Am J Clin Pathol. 1979 Feb;71(2):177–183. doi: 10.1093/ajcp/71.2.177. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. ISENBERG H. D., SUNDHEIM L. H. Indole reactions in bacteria. J Bacteriol. 1958 Jun;75(6):682–690. doi: 10.1128/jb.75.6.682-690.1958. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Isenberg H. D., Gavan T. L., Smith P. B., Sonnenwirth A., Taylor W., Martin W. J., Rhoden D., Balows A. Collaborative investigation of the AutoMicrobic System Enterobacteriaceae biochemical card. J Clin Microbiol. 1980 Jun;11(6):694–702. doi: 10.1128/jcm.11.6.694-702.1980. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Jenkins R. D., Hale D. C., Matsen J. M. Rapid semiautomated screening and processing of urine specimens. J Clin Microbiol. 1980 Mar;11(3):220–225. doi: 10.1128/jcm.11.3.220-225.1980. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Kelly M. T., Balfour L. C. Evaluation and optimization of urine screening by Autobac. J Clin Microbiol. 1981 Apr;13(4):677–680. doi: 10.1128/jcm.13.4.677-680.1981. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Kelly M. T., Latimer J. M., Balfour L. C. Comparison of three automated systems for antimicrobial susceptibility testing of gram-negative bacilli. J Clin Microbiol. 1982 May;15(5):902–905. doi: 10.1128/jcm.15.5.902-905.1982. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Murray P. R., Niles A. C. Detection of bacteriuria: manual screening test and early examination of agar plates. J Clin Microbiol. 1981 Jan;13(1):85–88. doi: 10.1128/jcm.13.1.85-88.1981. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Nachum R., Shanbrom E. Rapid detection of Gram-negative bacteriuria by Limulus amoebocyte lysate assay. J Clin Microbiol. 1981 Jan;13(1):158–162. doi: 10.1128/jcm.13.1.158-162.1981. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Ransohoff D. F., Feinstein A. R. Problems of spectrum and bias in evaluating the efficacy of diagnostic tests. N Engl J Med. 1978 Oct 26;299(17):926–930. doi: 10.1056/NEJM197810262991705. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Journal of Clinical Microbiology are provided here courtesy of American Society for Microbiology (ASM)

RESOURCES