Abstract
In a comparison of the radiometric BACTEC 460 (Johnston Laboratories) and the BCB broth slide system (Roche Diagnostics Division), the latter yielded a slightly greater number of clinically significant microorganisms, as well as contaminants, from aerobic blood cultures. These differences may reflect the larger volume of blood required for and the greater amount of manipulation associated with the BCB.
Full text
PDF
Selected References
These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.
- Bryan L. E. Comparison of a slide blood culture system with a supplemented peptone broth culture method. J Clin Microbiol. 1981 Oct;14(4):389–392. doi: 10.1128/jcm.14.4.389-392.1981. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Eng J. Effect of sodium polyanethol sulfonate in blood cultures. J Clin Microbiol. 1975 Feb;1(2):119–123. doi: 10.1128/jcm.1.2.119-123.1975. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Roberts F. J. A review of positive blood cultures: identification and source of microorganisms and patterns of sensitivity to antibiotics. Rev Infect Dis. 1980 May-Jun;2(3):329–339. doi: 10.1093/clinids/2.3.329. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Washington J. A., 2nd, Hall M. M., Warren E. Evaluation of blood culture media supplemented with sucrose or with cysteine. J Clin Microbiol. 1975 Jan;1(1):79–81. doi: 10.1128/jcm.1.1.79-81.1975. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]