Abstract
A comparative study was made of stained fecal smears and cultured fecal swabs for identification of the large spirochetes Treponema hyodysenteriae and Treponema innocens. Feces were obtained by swabbing rectums, colons, and stools of nonexposed swine and swine experimentally exposed to swine dysentery. In this study there was a significant (P less than 0.001) correlation between the observation of one or more large spirochetes on stained slides and obtaining either a strong or a weak beta-hemolytic reaction in culture. A significant (P less than 0.001) correlation was also found between the observation of one or more large spirochetes on stained smears or obtaining either a strong or a weak beta-hemolytic reaction in culture and the occurrence of either nonhemorrhagic or hemorrhagic diarrhea in the swine. In the diarrheic swine at the time of swabbing, 157 of 393 samples (40%) were negative for both the presence of large spirochetes on stained smears and the production of either a strong or a weak beta-hemolytic reaction; in nondiarrheic swine, 42 of 278 samples (15.1%) were positive in stained smears and 32 of 268 samples (11.9%) were positive by culturing. In swine infected with swine dysentery, 17 of 1,011 samples produced weak beta-hemolytic reactions, and in swine infected with nonpathogenic large spirochetes of T. innocens, three of 34 samples produced strong beta-hemolytic reactions. It was concluded from this study that neither staining rectal smears nor culturing rectal swabs is sufficient, either together or alone, for the diagnosis of swine dysentery; however, these laboratory methods could be highly supportive of a diagnosis of swine dysentery in swine with clinical signs and lesions of the disease.
Full text
PDF
Images in this article
Selected References
These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.
- Fisher L. F., Olander H. J. Shedding of Treponema hyodysenteriae, transmission of disease, and agglutinin response to pigs convalescent from swine dysentery. Am J Vet Res. 1981 Mar;42(3):450–455. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Harris D. L., Glock R. D., Christensen C. R., Kinyon J. M. Inoculation of pigs with Treponema hyodysenteriae (new species) and reproduction f the disease. Vet Med Small Anim Clin. 1972 Jan;67(1):61–64. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Hudson M. J., Alexander T. J., Lysons R. J. Diagnosis of swine dysentery: spirochaetes which may be confused with Treponema hyodysenteriae. Vet Rec. 1976 Dec 18;99(25-26):498–500. doi: 10.1136/vr.99.25-26.498. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Joens L. A., Songer J. G., Harris D. L., Kinyon J. M. Comparison of selective culture and serologic agglutination of Treponema hyodysenteriae for diagnosis of swine dysentery. Vet Rec. 1979 Nov 17;105(20):463–465. doi: 10.1136/vr.105.20.463. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Kinyon J. M., Harris D. L., Glock R. D. Enteropathogenicity of various isolates of Treponema hyodysenteriae. Infect Immun. 1977 Feb;15(2):638–646. doi: 10.1128/iai.15.2.638-646.1977. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Olson L. D., Rodabaugh D. E. Evaluation of cobalt arsanilate for prevention and treatment of swine dysentery. Am J Vet Res. 1973 Jul;34(7):903–907. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Olson L. D. Staining large spirochetes in fecal and colonic scrapings with Victoria blue 4-R: an aid in the diagnosis of swine dysentery. Vet Med Small Anim Clin. 1978 Jan;73(1):80–80. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Songer J. G., Kinyon J. M., Harris D. L. Selective medium for isolation of Treponema hyodysenteriae. J Clin Microbiol. 1976 Jul;4(1):57–60. doi: 10.1128/jcm.4.1.57-60.1976. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Taylor D. J., Alexander T. J. The production of dysentery in swine by feeding cultures containing a spirochaete. Br Vet J. 1971 Nov;127(11):58–61. doi: 10.1016/s0007-1935(17)37282-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]