Skip to main content
Journal of Clinical Microbiology logoLink to Journal of Clinical Microbiology
. 1982 Apr;15(4):582–588. doi: 10.1128/jcm.15.4.582-588.1982

Sensitivity, specificity, and reproducibility of the automicrobic system (with the Enterobacteriaceae-plus biochemical card) for identifying clinical isolates of Gram- negative bacilli.

A L Barry, T L Gavan, R E Badal, M J Telenson
PMCID: PMC272148  PMID: 7040457

Abstract

Two independent laboratories tested 1,743 clinical isolates by using the Enterobacteriaceae-plus Biochemical Card in the AutoMicrobic system (AMS) and identical standard reference methods. Included were 55 isolates representing 11 species that cannot be identified by the enterobacteriaceae-plus Biochemical Card computer program; 3 or these isolates were incorrectly identified as Pseudomonas cepacia. With the other 1,688 isolates, 5% of the AMS identifications were considered to be equivocal (probability value, less than 0.80), and the remaining test were 97% accurate (sensitive), Difficulty was observed in the ability of the AMS to identify some H2S-negative Citrobacter freundii species. An AMS response of P. cepacia was also considered nonspecific, because several other organisms were misidentified at P. cepacia. Reproducibility of the system was documented by testing 125 strains on 3-separate days; only 6 strains produced significantly variable results. The AMS (with the Enterobacteriaceae-plus Biochemical Card) was a very satisfactory, automated system for accurately identifying most gram-negative bacilli within 8 to 13 h.

Full text

PDF
585

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Barry A. L., Badal R. E. Identification of Enterobacteriaceae by the automicrobic system: Enterobacteriaceae biochemical cards versus Enterobacteriaceae-plus biochemical cards. J Clin Microbiol. 1982 Apr;15(4):575–581. doi: 10.1128/jcm.15.4.575-581.1982. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Burdash N. M., Teti G., West M. E., Bannister E. R., Manos J. P. Evaluation of an automated, computerized system (automicrobic system) for Enterobacteriaceae identification. J Clin Microbiol. 1981 Feb;13(2):331–334. doi: 10.1128/jcm.13.2.331-334.1981. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Freeman J. W., Rowland R. W., Overman S. B., Goodman N. L. Laboratory evaluation of the AutoMicrobic system for identification of Enterobacteriaceae. J Clin Microbiol. 1981 May;13(5):895–898. doi: 10.1128/jcm.13.5.895-898.1981. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Hasyn J. J., Cundy K. R., Dietz C. C., Wong W. Clinical laboratory evaluation of the Auto-Microbic system for rapid identification of Enterobacteriaceae. J Clin Microbiol. 1981 Mar;13(3):491–497. doi: 10.1128/jcm.13.3.491-497.1981. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Isenberg H. D., Gavan T. L., Smith P. B., Sonnenwirth A., Taylor W., Martin W. J., Rhoden D., Balows A. Collaborative investigation of the AutoMicrobic System Enterobacteriaceae biochemical card. J Clin Microbiol. 1980 Jun;11(6):694–702. doi: 10.1128/jcm.11.6.694-702.1980. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Journal of Clinical Microbiology are provided here courtesy of American Society for Microbiology (ASM)

RESOURCES