Abstract
Rapid slide agglutination (RSA), quantitative plate agglutination, slow tube agglutination (STA), and ring precipitation (RP) tests were performed on 200 isolates of Haemophilus pleuropneumoniae by using the type sera produced in rabbits against five known serotype strains and one strain 202. RSA and RP tests both yielded the same results as those by STA. None of the agglutination procedures could be used for serotyping isolates that autoagglutinated in saline. The RP test was successfully used for serotyping such strains. The specificity of the RSA and RP tests was confirmed by cross-absorption studies. All of the isolates except two had strong serotype-specific activities. The most common serotype isolated in Quebec was serotype 1, followed by serotypes 5 and 2. None of the isolates belonged to serotypes 3 and 4. Only two isolates were found to be untypable; they could possibly belong to serotype(s) not yet defined. The RSA and RP tests may be at least as reliable as the STA test, but easier to perform, less expensive, and much more rapid than any of the other methods reported. Of all the procedures studied by us, the RP test proved to be the method of choice for serotyping H. pleuropneumoniae; hence, it should replace the STA test for serotyping H. pleuropneumoniae.
Full text
PDF
Selected References
These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.
- Biberstein E. L., Gunnarsson A., Hurvell B. Cultural and biochemical criteria for the identification of haemophilus spp from swine. Am J Vet Res. 1977 Jan;38(1):7–11. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Davidson J. N., King J. M. An outbreak of haemophilus parahaemolyticus pneumonia in growing pigs. Cornell Vet. 1980 Oct;70(4):360–364. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Greenway J. A. Hemophilus pneumonia in B.C. swine. Can Vet J. 1981 Jan;22(1):20–21. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Gunnarsson A., Biberstein E. L., Hurvell B. Serologic studies on porcine strains of Haemophilus parahaemolyticus (pleuropneumoniae): agglutination reactions. Am J Vet Res. 1977 Aug;38(8):1111–1114. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Gunnarsson A., Hurvell B., Biberstein E. L. Serologic studies of porcine strains of Haemophilus parahaemolyticus (pleuropneumoniae): antigenic specificity and relationship between serotypes. Am J Vet Res. 1978 Aug;39(8):1286–1292. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Gunnarsson A. Serologic studies on porcine strains of Haemophilus parahaemolyticus (pleuropneumoniae): extraction of type-specific antigens. Am J Vet Res. 1979 Apr;40(4):469–472. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Little T. W. Haemophilus infection in pigs. Vet Rec. 1970 Oct 3;87(14):399–402. doi: 10.1136/vr.87.14.399. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Mylrea P. J., Fraser G., Macqueen P., Lambourne D. A. Pleuropneumonia in pigs caused by Haemophilus parahaemolyticus. Aust Vet J. 1974 Jun;50(6):255–259. doi: 10.1111/j.1751-0813.1974.tb05292.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Nicolet J. Sur l'hémophilose du pore. 3. Différenciation sérologique de Haemophilus parahaemolyticus. Zentralbl Bakteriol Orig. 1971;216(4):487–495. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Nielsen R., Mandrup M. Pleuropneumonia in swine caused by Haemophilus parahaemolyticus. A study of the epidemiology of the infection. Nord Vet Med. 1977 Nov;29(11):465–473. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Nielsen R. Serological and immunological studies of pleuropneumonia of swine caused by Haemophilus parahaemolyticus. Acta Vet Scand. 1974;15(1):80–89. doi: 10.1186/BF03547495. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Rosendal S., Lombin L., DeMoor J. Serotyping and detection of Haemophilus pleuropneumoniae by indirect fluorescent antibody technique. Can J Comp Med. 1981 Jul;45(3):271–274. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Schiefer B., Moffatt R. E., Greenfield J., Agar J. L., Majka J. A. Porcine Hemophilus parahemolyticus pneumonia in Saskatchewan. I. Natural occurrence and findings. Can J Comp Med. 1974 Apr;38(2):99–104. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]