Skip to main content
Journal of Clinical Microbiology logoLink to Journal of Clinical Microbiology
. 1982 Sep;16(3):525–530. doi: 10.1128/jcm.16.3.525-530.1982

Clinical laboratory comparison of a slide blood culture system with a conventional broth system.

M A Pfaller, T K Sibley, L M Westfall, J E Hoppe-Bauer, M A Keating, P R Murray
PMCID: PMC272402  PMID: 6752192

Abstract

The recovery of bacteria and fungi from blood cultures was compared in conventional tryptic soy broth (TSB) bottles and in TSB bottles with an agarcoated slide attachment. A total of 2,662 sets of blood cultures, including 413 that were positive (15.5%), were evaluated. Significantly more gram-positive and gram-negative bacteria were recovered in the slide culture bottles than in conventional bottles (299 versus 253 isolates). Growth of gram-positive organisms and fungi was detected in the slide culture bottles 24 to 48 h earlier than in the TSB bottles. In addition, 76% of the isolates in the slide culture system were detected on the agar slide. In comparison, only 40% of the isolates in the TSB bottles were detected initially by blind subculturing. The incidences of contamination were 2.7% (71 cultures) for the slide culture system and 1.5% (39 cultures) for the TSB bottles.

Full text

PDF
527

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Bryan L. E. Comparison of a slide blood culture system with a supplemented peptone broth culture method. J Clin Microbiol. 1981 Oct;14(4):389–392. doi: 10.1128/jcm.14.4.389-392.1981. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Caplan L. M., Merz W. G. Evaluation of two commercially prepared biphasic media for recovery of fungi from blood. J Clin Microbiol. 1978 Oct;8(4):469–470. doi: 10.1128/jcm.8.4.469-470.1978. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Hall M. M., Mueske C. A., Ilstrup D. M., Washington J. A., 2nd Evaluation of a biphasic medium for blood cultures. J Clin Microbiol. 1979 Nov;10(5):673–676. doi: 10.1128/jcm.10.5.673-676.1979. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Kiehn T. E., Capitolo C., Mayo J. B., Armstrong D. Comparative recovery of fungi from biphasic and conventional blood culture media. J Clin Microbiol. 1981 Dec;14(6):681–683. doi: 10.1128/jcm.14.6.681-683.1981. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Murray P. R., Sondag J. E. Evaluation of routine subcultures of macroscopically negative blood cultures for detection of anaerobes. J Clin Microbiol. 1978 Oct;8(4):427–430. doi: 10.1128/jcm.8.4.427-430.1978. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Paisley J. W., Rosenblatt J. E., Hall M., Washington J. A., 2nd Evaluation of a routine anaerobic subculture of blood cultures for detection of anaerobic bacteremia. J Clin Microbiol. 1978 Dec;8(6):764–766. doi: 10.1128/jcm.8.6.764-766.1978. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Roberts G. D., Washington J. A., 2nd Detection of fungi in blood cultures. J Clin Microbiol. 1975 Mar;1(3):309–310. doi: 10.1128/jcm.1.3.309-310.1975. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. SCOTT E. G. A practical blood culture procedure. Am J Clin Pathol. 1951 Mar;21(3):290–294. doi: 10.1093/ajcp/21.3_ts.290. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Steurenthaler W. Erfahrungen mit einem neuartigen Blutkultursystem (BCB-System "Roche") in der Kinderklinik. Med Welt. 1979 Feb 2;30(5):173–176. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Washington J. A., 2nd Blood cultures: principles and techniques. Mayo Clin Proc. 1975 Feb;50(2):91–98. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Journal of Clinical Microbiology are provided here courtesy of American Society for Microbiology (ASM)

RESOURCES