Skip to main content
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America logoLink to Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America
. 2009 Jul 28;106(32):13427–13432. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0904638106

Drosophila O-GlcNAc transferase (OGT) is encoded by the Polycomb group (PcG) gene, super sex combs (sxc)

Donald A R Sinclair a,1, Monika Syrzycka a, Matthew S Macauley b, Tara Rastgardani a, Ivana Komljenovic c, David J Vocadlo b, Hugh W Brock c, Barry M Honda a,1
PMCID: PMC2726349  PMID: 19666537

Abstract

O-linked N-acetylglucosamine transferase (OGT) reversibly modifies serine and threonine residues of many intracellular proteins with a single β-O-linked N-acetylglucosamine residue (O-GlcNAc), and has been implicated in insulin signaling, neurodegenerative disease, cellular stress response, and other important processes in mammals. OGT also glycosylates RNA polymerase II and various transcription factors, which suggests that it might be directly involved in transcriptional regulation. We report here that the Drosophila OGT is encoded by the Polycomb group (PcG) gene, super sex combs (sxc). Furthermore, major sites of O-GlcNAc modification on polytene chromosomes correspond to PcG protein binding sites. Our results thus suggest a direct role for O-linked glycosylation by OGT in PcG-mediated epigenetic gene silencing, which is important in developmental regulation, stem cell maintenance, genomic imprinting, and cancer. In addition, we observe rescue of sxc lethality by a human Ogt cDNA transgene; thus Drosophila may provide an ideal model to study important functional roles of OGT in mammals.

Keywords: epigenetic, gene silencing, O-glycosylation, glycosyl transferase


The enzyme OGT catalyzes the addition of a single O-GlcNAc residue to serine and threonine residues of a large number of proteins with diverse cellular functions (1). O-GlcNAc is a reversible posttranslational modification; another enzyme, O-GlcNAcase (OGA), can remove the sugar. In mice, the single Ogt gene is required for viability (2). Overexpression or knockdown of Ogt has implicated it and/or the O-GlcNAc posttranslational modification in a wide range of key signaling pathways and cellular processes, including roles in insulin signaling/diabetes (3), cell−cycle regulation (4), stress response (5), and immune cell regulation (6). Intriguingly, OGT also modifies unphosphorylated Pol II (Pol IIA) and a number of transcription factors (7); however, demonstrating a clear functional role for O-linked glycosylation by OGT in transcriptional regulation has proven elusive (1).

While working on a functional annotation of centric heterochromatin of Drosophila melanogaster, we noted that the Ogt gene was in a region of chromosome 2R that includes the Polycomb group (PcG) gene super sex combs (sxc) (8). Initially characterized in Drosophila as regulators of Hox gene expression along the anteroposterior axis in early development, PcG proteins form multiprotein complexes that epigenetically regulate an extensive list of target genes in animals and plants. PcG proteins play key roles in developmental regulation, stem cell maintenance, genomic imprinting, and cancer, although the mechanism of this epigenetic regulation is not yet completely clear (reviewed in refs. 912).

The sxc gene has not been well characterized, in large part because it is localized within centric heterochromatin, which has proven more difficult to map and sequence than euchromatin (13). As observed for mutations in other PcG genes, loss of sxc function results in derepression of Hox genes (8, 10), with resulting homeotic transformations, including the appearance of ectopic sex combs on mesothoracic (T2) and/or metathoracic (T3) legs. Unlike most other PcG genes however, sxc alleles are recessive and exhibit a late lethal phase i.e., sxc-null flies die as pharate adults, although early derepression of Hox genes is observed in embryos (8). Data from pole-cell transplantation experiments have confirmed that sxc is essential during embryogenesis and that this requirement is fulfilled by maternally derived sxc+ product (8). Finally, sxc mutations enhance the phenotypes of mutations in other PcG genes (14).

Here we report that the sxc gene encodes the Drosophila OGT protein: sxc mutant DNA shows corresponding lesions in the OGT gene, and expression of a Drosophila or even human ogt transgene rescues sxc mutant flies. We also observe extensive overlap between sites of O-GlcNAc protein modification and sites of PcG protein binding on polytene chromosomes and in chromatin immunoprecipitation (ChIP) experiments, further suggesting that OGT activity has an important role in PcG gene silencing. Our results thus point to an intriguing link between OGT activity and epigenetic gene regulation by PcG proteins, and suggest that Drosophila may provide a powerful model system to further study the roles of OGT in important cellular processes.

Results

Mapping of the sxc Locus to the Region Containing Ogt.

The sxc gene was originally mapped to a proximal segment of chromosome 2R heterochromatin; further genetic analysis (see supporting information (SI) Fig. S1, SI Text) suggested that sxc corresponded to 1 of the 7 genes located between Nipped-A and CG42345 (overlapping the dotted line in Fig. S1). Because sxc is involved in gene repression (8), we felt that the best candidates were CG2682 (d4), CG10392 (Ogt), and CG10417 (which encodes a protein phosphatase). We also favoured the idea that sxc might encode an enzyme, because this would be more consistent with the observation that sxc mutations act in a recessive manner: both gene copies must be inactivated to show a phenotype, whereas most PcG genes are dominant modifiers. Additionally, attempts to rescue sxc lethality using a UAS-cDNA transgene for d4 were unsuccessful, suggesting that sxc and d4 are not equivalent (D. Sinclair, unpublished results). Because sxc is fairly mutable (8), and because the Ogt gene product is larger than that of CG10417 (http://flybase.org/), and also given the potential link between OGT signaling and PcG function, we decided to focus first on the possibility that sxc corresponded to Ogt.

Mutations in the PcG Gene sxc Show Corresponding Lesions in the ogt Gene and OGT Protein.

In an attempt to link the Drosophila Ogt gene to sxc, we isolated genomic DNA from mutant sxc embryos, and used gene-specific primers to amplify and sequence across portions of the Ogt genomic locus (15). The results, summarized in Fig. 1, strongly suggest that sxc encodes the OGT protein. In sxc1/sxc1 and sxc5/sxc5 embryos, we identified nonsense mutations in Ogt that would result in expression of truncated enzyme with a resulting loss of function, while sxc4/sxc4 embryos showed a missense mutation of a highly conserved N residue to I, which is located close to the active site (16). In sxcNC130/sxcNC130 embryos we found a splice acceptor mutation (AG to AA) that should result in an aberrant transcript and production of truncated enzyme. sxc2637/sxc2637 embryos have a large transpac transposable element insertion within the first exon of Ogt, which would disrupt gene function (see SI). Another mutation, Df(2R)NC31, is a chromosomal deficiency (Df) that results in deletion of the entire Ogt coding region (data not shown).

Fig. 1.

Fig. 1.

Schematic map of the Drosophila Ogt gene and sxc mutations. The solid boxes represent exons with black (protein coding) and white (5′ and 3′ noncoding) regions. The angled lines below indicate the introns and their sizes. The nature and position of sxc mutations is indicated above the lines; X indicates a stop codon.

To demonstrate that the sxc mutations affected OGT protein, we examined third instar mutant larvae, in which maternally contributed protein or mRNA have dropped to low levels, to evaluate changes in OGT protein levels and enzyme activity. Western blot analysis shows a complete loss of OGT protein and OGT activity in sxc2637/sxc2637 mutant larvae (Fig. 2 A and B) and in other mutant combinations predicted to express no protein (Figs. S2 and S3). The missense allele sxc4 does show an immunoreactive protein of the expected size for OGT, yet enzyme activity is nearly completely absent (Figs. S2 and S3). While we were unable to find a DNA lesion in sxc3 mutants, we confirmed that it is an OGT null by Western blot and enzyme activity assays (Fig. S2 and S3). Because sxc mutations affect expression and/or activity of OGT protein in vivo, these data further suggest that sxc encodes OGT.

Fig. 2.

Fig. 2.

Measurements of OGT protein levels and enzyme activity. (A) Western blot analysis of homogenates of larvae containing 2 functional copies of the sxc gene (wild type, lane1), 1 copy (sxc2637/Balancer (Bal), lane 2), or no copies (sxc2637/sxc2637 homozygous, lane 3). (B) OGT enzymatic activity in extracts from wild-type, sxc2637/Bal, and sxc2637/sxc2637 larvae were assayed using recombinant p62 as the acceptor substrate. Activity is reported as a percentage of activity relative to that found for wild-type fly larvae extracts. (C) Western blot analysis of homogenates of wild-type flies (lane 1) versus those carrying a tubulin-GAL4 driven Ogt RNAi transgene (lane 2). (D) Western blot analysis of adult wild-type (lane 1) and sxc3/sxc2637 mutant flies rescued by a tubulin-GAL4 driven human Ogt transgene (lane 2). For Western blots, all extracts were probed for OGT (Upper) using rabbit anti-OGT Ab (H-300) and also for β-tubulin using a mouse anti-β-tublin mAb (E7) to ensure similar loading of samples (Lower).

sxc Mutations Are Rescued by ogt Transgenes.

If the sxc gene encodes OGT, then a Drosophila Ogt transgene should rescue flies carrying sxc mutations. Consistent with this view, a pUAST-Ogt transgene that is ubiquitously expressed under the regulation of a tubulin-GAL4 driver rescues sxc lethality (Table 1). We recovered 64 surviving sxc3/sxc2637 transheterozygotes carrying the Drosophila Ogt transgene, compared to zero expected and observed in the absence of the transgene (no rescue, Table 1). The rescue of sxc lethality by the Ogt transgene establishes that sxc and Ogt are the same locus.

Table 1.

Rescue with Drosophila Ogt cDNA transgene

Parental genotype F1 genotype
Total
CyRoi CyRoi TM3 sxc3/sxc2637
sxc3/CyRoi; tub-GAL4/TM3 Ser X sxc2637/CyO (mutant progeny lack transgene) 85 41 0 (no rescue) 126
sxc3/CyRoi; tub-GAL4/TM3 Ser X sxc2637/CyRoi; UAS-D. melanogaster Ogt cDNA/TM3 Sb (mutant progeny have transgene) 112 129 64 (rescue) 305

Ubiquitous expression of D. melanogaster Ogt cDNA rescues D. melanogaster sxc3/sxc2637 mutants. The surviving sxc3/sxc2637 transheterozygotes (64) are fertile and have ectopic wing vein material.

Parallel experiments show that knockdown of Ogt gene expression using RNAi constructs reduces OGT protein expression significantly (Fig. 2C). As expected, many of these Ogt RNAi lines enhance lethality in sxc heterozygotes (Fig. S4) and in some cases, dead male pharate adults, dissected from pupal cases, exhibited ectopic sex combs, a phenotype indistinguishable from that observed in sxc/sxc mutant flies (data not shown).

Human and fly OGT proteins show 77% identity and 86% similarity, based upon protein sequence alignment (data not shown). We wanted to determine whether this functional conservation was sufficient for a human Ogt cDNA transgene to rescue sxc lethality. The human Ogt transgene also rescues sxc mutants, with 82 rescued progeny compared to zero expected in the absence of the transgene (Table 2). The large number (82 versus zero) and similar proportion (roughly 20%) of rescued relative to total progeny, suggest that the human gene rescues sxc lethality as efficiently as its fly counterpart, and likely functions similarly in flies and humans. For both the Drosophila and human transgenes, rescued males and females were fertile and appeared normal, except that the majority had small amounts of ectopic wing vein material radiating away from the posterior cross vein (between L4 and L5). In Fig. 2D, Western blot analysis confirms corresponding expression of the slightly smaller human OGT protein in these transgenic flies. These data indicate that Ogt likely has analogous functional and regulatory roles in development in Drosophila and mammals, making Drosophila an attractive model for studying OGT function.

Table 2.

Rescue with human Ogt cDNA transgene

Parental genotype F1 genotype
Total
CyRoi CyRoi TM3 sxc3/sxc2637
sxc3/CyRoi; tub-GAL4/TM3 Ser X sxc2637/CyO (mutant progeny lack transgene) 85 41 0 (no rescue) 126
sxc3/CyRoi; tub-GAL4/TM3 Ser X sxc2637/CyRoi; UAS-Hs Ogt cDNA/UAS-Hs Ogt cDNA (mutant progeny have transgene) 191 128 82 (rescue) 401

Ubiquitous expression of human Ogt cDNA rescues D. melanogaster sxc3/sxc2637 mutants. The surviving sxc3/sxc2637 transheterozygotes (82) are fertile and have ectopic wing vein material.

Colocalization of O-GlcNAc Protein Modification and PcG Binding on Polytene Chromosomes.

To determine whether the addition of O-GlcNAc residues by OGT might act in concert with PcG protein binding to downstream target genes, we used an anti-O-GlcNAc antibody for in situ analysis of polytene chromosomes. This antibody was chosen because the available anti-OGT antibody used for Western blot analysis was not suitable for immunohistochemistry or chromatin immunoprecipitation (ChIP) analysis (data not shown). This anti-O-GlcNAc antibody binds to a limited number of sites on polytene chromosomes, and these sites show extensive overlap with major binding sites of the PcG protein Polyhomeotic (Ph). Fig. 3 shows O-GlcNAc binding sites on chromosome 3R at the bithorax (BX-C) and Antennapedia complexes, well-known PcG targets (912), and at other discrete sites. We obtained similar results for Polycomb (Pc) protein (data not shown). This result is consistent with recent genomewide analyses showing that PcG proteins, including Pc and Ph, bind at the same sites (17, 18), and suggests that 1 or more PcG proteins could be candidate substrates.

Fig. 3.

Fig. 3.

Overlapping binding sites for anti-O-GlcNAc and anti-Ph antibodies on chromosome 3R. Polytene chromosomes were reacted with antibodies to O-GlcNAc (Top) and Ph (Middle). These images were superimposed on chromosomes stained with DAPI, and on each other (Bottom). The locations of the Antennapedia complex (“a”) and bithorax (BX-C) complex (“b”), well-characterized PcG targets, are indicated in Bottom.

The resolution of in situ hybridization is not sufficient to show that OGT acts at the known sites of PcG protein binding, the PcG response elements (PREs). To show this more definitively, we used chromatin immunoprecipitation (ChIP) to assay the presence of O-GlcNAc at the bithoraxoid PRE of Ultrabithorax (Ubx), a well-defined component of BX-C which has been extensively characterized (19, 20). The O-GlcNAc binding pattern is strongest in the middle of the PRE, consistent with the previously reported positioning of PcG protein binding (19, 20) and with our own data for binding of Polyhomeotic (Fig. 4B). Moreover, binding of this anti-O-GlcNAc antibody was abolished in sxc3/Df(2R)NC31 mutants (Fig. 4C), which demonstrates that the specificity of the antibody is limited to O-GlcNAc-containing epitopes, indicative of OGT activity. We also observed that, while O-GlcNAc signal is absent, binding of Pc and Ph is unaffected in sxc/sxc mutants (Fig. S5), suggesting that recruitment of PcG complexes to polytene chromosomes does not depend significantly upon OGT activity. This result again indicates that the detected signal is OGT-dependent and specific to O-GlcNAc residues.

Fig. 4.

Fig. 4.

ChIP analysis of O-GlcNAc modifications at the BX-C locus. (A) A map of the bxd PRE and location of 8 primer pairs used to quantitate binding is shown. (B) Percentage of input binding for each primer pair in embryos is shown. Light gray, IgG control; dark gray, GlcNAc; black, Ph. Negative controls, rp49 (ribosomal protein 49), CG18622 (a gene just outside AbdB of the BX-C that doesn't bind PcG proteins). (C) O-GlcNAc binding is absent in polytene chromosomes of sxc/sxc mutants. Light gray, IgG; dark gray, GlcNAc WT; black, GlcNAc sxc−/− mutant.

Discussion

Our results clearly demonstrate that the PcG gene sxc encodes the Drosophila OGT enzyme. Mutations in sxc cause homeotic phenotypes (9) because of derepression of homeotic loci (21, 22) and enhance the phenotypes of some PcG mutations (14). Together with the existing genetic and molecular data, our polytene and ChIP binding data show that OGT acts directly at PcG targets in chromatin but does not have a direct role in recruiting PcG protein to chromatin: O-GlcNAc modification, but not Pc/Ph binding, is abolished at PcG target sites in sxc/sxc mutants. We therefore hypothesize that O-glycosylation by OGT has a primary role in gene silencing by PcG complexes.

The experiments with polytene chromosomes required very high titers of antibody, leading us to believe that this antibody recognizes predominantly major sites with relatively high levels of O-GlcNAc modification; again, the absence of signal in sxc/sxc mutants (Fig. S5 and S4C) confirms that this modification is OGT dependent. We also observe staining representing lower background levels of O-GlcNAc uniformly across the chromosomes (Fig. 3). The latter result is consistent with a previous report showing O-GlcNAc-modified chromatin proteins ubiquitously localized on polytene chromosomes (23).

PcG proteins regulate many targets, including genes encoding proteins that function throughout development (17, 18). Some of the pleiotropic phenotypes of Ogt mutants may thus be a consequence of improper silencing of PcG targets, although our data do not rule out other roles for OGT and O-GlcNAc modification in the many important cellular processes linked to OGT function. Homozygous sxc/sxc mutants survive over 5 days until late larval or pharate adult (but die in pupal cases) stages, presumably because maternally contributed sxc mRNA or protein, deposited in the fertilized egg, compensates for the loss of zygotic sxc function. This suggests that most cellular processes are relatively insensitive to gradual loss of OGT in development. Interestingly however, inappropriate derepression of Hox genes is detectable by 4.5 h postfertilization in sxc/sxc embryos, similar to that observed for other PcG mutations (22). Furthermore, we have observed almost complete embryonic lethality when ogt RNAi transgene expression is controlled by a Gal4 driver (69B), which drives expression in the embryonic epidermis (results not shown). Thus silencing of Hox genes is very sensitive to sxc mutations and to RNAi-induced reductions in ogt gene expression; these results suggest an early and essential role for O-GlcNAc modification of proteins in PcG silencing.

To convincingly address how OGT mediates PcG silencing will require extensive further study. The first challenge will be to obtain a complete inventory of chromatin-associated proteins modified with O-GlcNAc at PcG target sites, because these candidate substrates could provide the functional link between OGT activity and PcG silencing. One plausible candidate target is the PcG protein, Pleiohomeotic (Pho), a DNA-binding protein believed to play a key role in recruiting PcG complexes to specific PcG binding sites (reviewed in ref. 24). O-GlcNAc modification of YY1, the mammalian orthologue of Drosophila Pho, does not affect its affinity for DNA but does alter its interaction with protein partners (25). Pho shares almost complete amino acid sequence identity with its mammalian orthologue YY1, in key functional regions including the Zn finger and spacer domains (26). A number of transcription factors, and the C-terminal domain (CTD) region of the large subunit RNA polymerase II itself, are also modified by O-GlcNAc (1, 7), as is a protein associated with E(Pc), another PcG protein (27). Other potential substrates may yet be identified; for example, OGT associates with a number of other cellular proteins, including the mSin3A chromatin-modifying complex (28) and the cell proliferation factor HCF-1 (29).

Interestingly, it has recently been reported that OGT interacts with MLL-5 and subsequent O-GlcNAc modification is required for H3K4 methylation and response to retinoic acid (30). Moreover, Chalkley et al. (31) have recently characterized a number of O-GlcNAc-modified members of gene repressor complexes, including a protein related to Polyhomeotic (mammalian polyhomeotic-like protein 3). These results provide corroborative evidence that O-GlcNAc modifications may have key roles in gene regulation and identify more putative OGT substrates. A second major challenge will be to establish a direct, mechanistic link between O-GlcNAc modification of target substrate(s) and subsequent PcG silencing.

Finally, both mice (2) and flies require Ogt function for viability; our demonstration of rescue of sxc lethality by a human Ogt cDNA transgene implies that key roles for OGT first demonstrated in humans—signaling, stress response, and others—may also be relevant in flies. Drosophila may therefore provide a powerful model for further work on elucidating the role of Ogt in critically important cellular processes.

Materials and Methods

Drosophila Stocks and Culture Conditions.

Flies were grown at 25 °C on cornmeal-molasses-yeast medium supplemented with the mold inhibitors tegosept and propionic acid. Six different sxc alleles were used in the current study. The origins of the EMS-induced alleles, sxc1, sxc3, sxc4, and sxc5, are described in Ingham (8); sxc1 was induced on a second chromosome bearing the markers cn, bw, and sp and the other 3 alleles were induced on an isogenic second chromosome bearing the markers b, pr, cn, and bw. sxcNC130, an EMS-induced allele obtained from the Bloomington Stock Center, was generated more recently using a second chromosome bearing the markers cn and bw (32); its status as an sxc allele was confirmed by complementation (D. Sinclair, unpublished results). sxc2637, also obtained from the Bloomington Stock Center, was generated in an extensive P-element-based gene disruption study (33) and was originally designated l (2)02637. See SI for more on its genetic and molecular characterization. Finally, Df(2R)NC31, an EMS-induced mutation that was previously defined as a Nipped-A allele (32), was kindly provided by D. Dorsett. It was more recently determined to be a deletion for Nipped-A, sxc, and several other adjacent genes in proximal 2R (D. Sinclair, unpublished results).

Single Embryo PCR.

super sex combs (sxc) mutant alleles were balanced over CyO Kr-GAL4 UAS-GFP or CyO twi-GAL4 UAS-GFP chromosomes. Genomic DNA was isolated from individual embryos of each strain and PCR was used (15) to identify samples originating from homozygous embryos containing sxc defects. Primers were designed to amplify the GFP transgene (330-bp fragment) and an X-linked gene used to evaluate DNA integrity, Grp84 (215-bp fragment) as previously described (34). DNA specimens for which PCR amplification detected the presence of Grp84 and the absence of the GFP transgene were used in subsequent analysis. Using DNA from homozygous embryos, PCR was performed using gene-specific primers designed to anneal to regions flanking the exons of the ogt gene.

Sequence Analysis of Mutant O-Glycosyltransferase (Ogt) Genes.

DNA sequencing using ogt gene-specific primers (see Table S1 for details) was done by Macrogen Inc. Wild-type ogt sequence for exons 1 to 9, including all splice junctions, was downloaded from the FlyBase Web site (http://www.flybase.org). Sequences from sxc mutants were compared to wild-type sequence using the Basic Local Alignment and Search Tool (BLAST) algorithm for 2 sequences (http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/blast/bl2seq/wblast2.cgi). Default BLAST settings were used, with the exception of leaving low-complexity sequences unmasked. ORFs of sequences with changes were translated using ApE Plasmid Editor (ApE version 1.11 by M. Wayne Davis), and the subsequent protein sequences were aligned with wild-type D. melanogaster Ogt sequence using BLASTP to identify any changes at the amino acid level. Multiple protein sequence alignments were generated with BioEdit (BioEdit version 7.0.5 by Tom Hall).

Assays of OGT Protein Levels and Enzyme Activity.

Third instar (L3) larvae were prepared from transheterozygous lines, generated in genetic crosses that combine 2 different sxc alleles, or combining an sxc mutation over Df(2R)NC31, which also lacks sxc function. Generating sxc transheterozygotes was necessary because most sxc alleles (except sxc2637) carry second-site mutations; when present in 2 copies, these other mutations cause death at earlier stages of development. Forty milligrams of L3 larvae (approximately 40 larvae) were homogenized in 1 mL of lysis buffer (50 mM NaH2PO4, 150 mM NaCl, 0.1% SDS, 1% Nonidet P-40, 0.25% sodium deoxycholate, 1 μg/mL aprotinin, 1 μg/mL leupeptin, 1 μg/mL pepstatin, 1 mM sodium orthovanadate, 1 mM PMSF, 1 mM EDTA, and 1 mM NButGT, pH 7.4) using a tissue homogenizer (T-18 Ultra-Turrax). Insoluble cell debris was removed by centrifugation at 17,900 × g for 20 min and the resulting supernatant was used for Western blots.

OGT protein levels were determined via Western blotting: membrane was probed with either anti-OGT polyclonal IgG (H-300, Santa Cruz Biotechnology) at a dilution of 1:2,500 or a control anti-β-tubulin mAb IgG (Developmental Studies Hybridoma Bank) at a dilution of 1:2,000, followed by incubation with the appropriate HRP conjugated secondary antibody (Santa Cruz Biotechnology) and development with SuperSignal West Pico Chemiluminescence substrate (Pierce).

For OGT activity assays, larvae were homogenized as above, except that detergents were left out of the lysis buffer. These extracts were incubated with protein A/G-agarose beads (40 μL Calbiochem) with prebound anti-OGT antibody. After incubation and washes, OGT protein bound to the beads was assayed by adding 50 μL of recombinant p62 (1 μM) in 50 mM Tris, 150 mM NaCl, 0.5% Nonidet P-40, 12.5 mM MgCl2, 1 mM β-ME, and 700 nM [3H]-UDP-GlcNAc (0.1 μCi/μL) (Perkin–Elmer). Following incubation and washing in PBS, 50 μL of this combined supernatant was spotted onto a small piece (1.5 × 2.5 cm) of nitrocellulose membrane (Bio-Rad) in duplicate and allowed to dry. The membranes were then washed extensively with 5 large volumes of PBS. Levels of incorporated [3H]-UDP-GlcNAc were then determined by scintillation counting. All assays were done in triplicate and error bars represent the SD.

Transgene Constructs.

The pP{UAST-Dm Ogt} cDNA construct used for phenotypic rescue was generated as follows: an Ogt cDNA was prepared from isolated mRNA by RT-PCR. BglII and XbaI restriction sites were introduced via the indicated reverse-transcription PCR primers at the 5′ (GCGCAGATCTAAATCGTATTAACAGCTGAGTGG) and 3′ (GCCGTCTAGATTCTTATTATATATCGTATAAC) ends of the Ogt cDNA, respectively, to directionally clone the cDNA insert into the pUAST polylinker.

The pP{UAST-Hs Ogt} cDNA construct was generated by subcloning the human Ogt cDNA (obtained from the ATCC; cDNA clone MGC: 39117 IMAGE: 5017795, accession no. BC038180) into the NotI and EcoRI sites of the Drosophila germline transformation vector pUAST.

Stable Ogt RNAi lines were generated by PCR amplification and cloning of the region of the Drosophila Ogt cDNA encoding the 420th to 640th amino acid residues into the pSympUAST vector (35). Primers used were OGTRNAiEcoR1For: GGAAGCTATTAGAATTCAACCCACATTTGC and OGTRNAiBglIIRev: GCAGATCTCGACTGATTTTGTGTCGAAATGTTG.

Trangenic Drosophila were generated in a w1118 background by microinjection into fly embryos (BestGene, Inc.) using standard methods (36).

Rescue Crosses.

For testing phenotypic rescue with the D. melanogaster UAS-Ogt transgene, sxc2637/CyRoi; UAS Dmel Ogt cDNA/TM3 Sb males and sxc3/CyRoi; tub-GAL4/TM3 Ser females were generated using standard genetic methods. For testing rescue with the human UAS-Ogt cDNA transgene, sxc3/CyRoi; tub-GAL4/TM3 Ser males and sxc2637/CyRoi; UAS-HsOgt cDNA/UAS-HsOgt cDNA females were generated and crossed together. In both cases, progeny genotypes were identified via visible phenotypic markers and counted until the 18th day following cross set-up. There is some variability in proportions of genotypes recovered, which are likely attributable to effects of combining different balancer chromosomes with multiple rearrangements. The proportion of rescued to total progeny (64/305 versus 82/401) is similar for both constructs. All UAS and GAL4 constructs are located on the third chromosomes.

RNAi Crosses and Determination of Relative Viability.

sxc3/Cy, Roi; Tub GAL4/TM3, Ser females were crossed separately to 10 different Ogt RNAi second or third chromosome transgenic lines designated 1m–10m. In some cases, the RNAi transgenes were heterozygous with either CyO or TM3, Sb (the inserts were recessive lethal); in other cases, the RNAi transgenes were homozygous. The F1 offspring (n = 251–600) were examined for relative viability of the 2 diagnostic classes: (1) Ogt RNAi transgene; Tub GAL4; sxc3 (RNAi driven in an sxc3 mutant background) and (2) Ogt RNAi transgene; Tub GAL4; Balancer (RNAi driven in an sxc+ background). Relative viability for each cross was determined by the ratio: [Number of diagnostic class flies]/[Number of Ogt RNAi transgene; sxc3; Balancer flies]. In addition, for each cross, male pharate adults were examined visually for ectopic sex combs, the most obvious diagnostic of sxc homeosis.

Immunohistochemistry of Polytene Chromosomes.

A monoclonal antibody to O-GlcNAc (Abcam 2735) was used at a dilution of 1:10 to 1:50. Turner et al. (37) have shown that this antibody is specific for O-GlcNAc modification; similar experiments verify this specificity in the staining of polytene chromosomes (Fig. S6) and our results showing the absence of antibody binding in sxc/sxc mutants provide further corroboration. A rabbit antibody to the proximal isoform of Polyhomeotic described previously (38) was used at a dilution of 1:175, and an antibody to Pc (a generous gift of Renato Paro) was used at a dilution of 1:75. Polytene chromosomes were prepared and subjected to immunohistochemistry as previously described (39). DNA was stained with 4,6-diamidion-2-phenylindole (DAPI) at 0.01 mg/mL. Antibody binding was detected with goat anti-mouse labeled with Alexa Fluor 568 and goat anti-rabbit labeled with Alexa Fluor 488 (Molecular Probes) used at a dilution of 1:100. Black and white images were collected by a CCD camera mounted on a Zeiss Axiophot microscope. These images were pseudocolored and superimposed using Adobe Photoshop.

Chromatin Immunoprecipitation.

Chromatin immunoprecipitation was carried out as described (40) using lysates from 10- to 16-h embryos or from salivary glands. For each immunoprecipitation we used lysate containing 25 ng of DNA. The primary antibody was incubated with the lysate overnight at 4 °C and collected with agarose beads bound to protein A/G. After extensive washing, DNA in 10 mM Tris-HCl pH8.0, 1 mM EDTA was eluted from the beads using Chelex 100 resin followed by 10 min of heating at 95 °C. The amount of immunoprecipitated DNA was determined using Sybr Green and quantitative PCR. Data with the antibody of interest were compared to data using mixed Ig (IgG) used as a control for nonspecific binding and are expressed as percentage of input DNA. For each antibody, 3 independent immunoprecipitations were carried out, and for each immunoprecipitation we performed 2 technical replicates. See SI for more on primers used.

Supplementary Material

Supporting Information

Acknowledgments.

We thank Anshu Parajulee, Inho Kim, and Amanda Berscht for technical assistance, Maria Cristina Gambetta, Jurg Muller, and lab colleagues for discussions. This research was funded by grants to H.W.B. and B.M.H. from the Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council (NSERC) of Canada and to D.J.V. by the Canadian Institutes of Health Research. D.J.V. is a Canada Research Chair in Chemical Glycobiology and a scholar of the Michael Smith Foundation for Health Research (MSFHR). M.S. and M.S.M. were supported in part by NSERC PGSB graduate awards, and M.S.M. by a scholarship from MSFHR. T.R. was the recipient of an NSERC USRA award.

Footnotes

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

This article is a PNAS Direct Submission.

This article contains supporting information online at www.pnas.org/cgi/content/full/0904638106/DCSupplemental.

References

  • 1.Hart GW, Housley MP, Slawson C. Cycling of O-linked beta-N-acetylglucosamine on nucleocytoplasmic proteins. Nature. 2007;446:1017–1022. doi: 10.1038/nature05815. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Shafi R, et al. The O-GlcNAc transferase gene resides on the X chromosome and is essential for embryonic stem cell viability and mouse ontogeny. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2000;97:5735–5739. doi: 10.1073/pnas.100471497. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.McClain DA, et al. Altered glycan-dependent signaling induces insulin resistance and hyperleptinemia. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2002;99:10695–10699. doi: 10.1073/pnas.152346899. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Slawson C, et al. Perturbations in O-linked beta-N-acetylglucosamine protein modification cause severe defects in mitotic progression and cytokinesis. J Biol Chem. 2005;280:32944–32956. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M503396200. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Zachara NE, et al. Dynamic O-GlcNAc modification of nucleocytoplasmic proteins in response to stress. A survival response of mammalian cells. J Biol Chem. 2004;279:30133–30142. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M403773200. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Golks A, Guerini D. The O-linked N-acetylglucosamine modification in cellular signalling and the immune system. “Protein modifications: Beyond the usual suspects” review series. EMBO Rep. 2008;9:748–753. doi: 10.1038/embor.2008.129. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Jackson SP, Tjian R. O-glycosylation of eukaryotic transcription factors: Implications for mechanisms of transcriptional regulation. Cell. 1988;55:125–133. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(88)90015-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Ingham PW. A gene that regulates the bithorax complex differentially in larval and adult cells of Drosophila. Cell. 1984;37:815–823. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(84)90416-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Schuettengruber B, Chourrout D, Vervoort M, Leblanc B, Cavalli G. Genome regulation by polycomb and trithorax proteins. Cell. 2007;128:735–745. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2007.02.009. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Ringrose L, Paro R. Polycomb/Trithorax response elements and epigenetic memory of cell identity. Development. 2007;134:223–232. doi: 10.1242/dev.02723. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Pietersen AM, van Lohuizen M. Stem cell regulation by polycomb repressors: Postponing commitment. Curr Opin Cell Biol. 2008;20:201–207. doi: 10.1016/j.ceb.2008.01.004. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Schwartz YB, Pirrotta V. Polycomb complexes and epigenetic states. Curr Opin Cell Biol. 2008;20:266–273. doi: 10.1016/j.ceb.2008.03.002. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Hoskins RA, et al. Sequence finishing and mapping of Drosophila melanogaster heterochromatin. Science. 2007;316:1625–1628. doi: 10.1126/science.1139816. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Campbell RB, Sinclair DA, Couling M, Brock HW. Genetic interactions and dosage effects of Polycomb group genes of Drosophila. Mol Gen Genet. 1995;246:291–300. doi: 10.1007/BF00288601. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Hatton LS, O'Hare K. Technical Tips Online, T01816. 1995 http://www.bio.ic.ac.uk/research/ohare/t01816.htm.
  • 16.Martinez-Fleites C, et al. Structure of an O-GlcNAc transferase homolog provides insight into intracellular glycosylation. Nat Struct Mol Biol. 2008;15:764–765. doi: 10.1038/nsmb.1443. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Oktaba K, et al. Dynamic regulation by polycomb group protein complexes controls pattern formation and the cell cycle in Drosophila. Dev Cell. 2008;15:877–889. doi: 10.1016/j.devcel.2008.10.005. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Schuettengruber B, et al. Functional anatomy of polycomb and trithorax chromatin landscapes in Drosophila embryos. PLoS Biol. 2009;7:e13. doi: 10.1371/journal.pbio.1000013. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Papp B, Muller J. Histone trimethylation and the maintenance of transcriptional ON and OFF states by trxG and PcG proteins. Genes Dev. 2006;20:2041–2054. doi: 10.1101/gad.388706. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Petruk S, Smith ST, Sedkov Y, Mazo A. Association of trxG and PcG proteins with the bxd maintenance element depends on transcriptional activity. Development. 2008;135:2383–2390. doi: 10.1242/dev.023275. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.McKeon J, Brock HW. Interactions of the Polycomb group of genes with homeotic loci of Drosophila. Roux's Arch Dev Biol. 1991;199:387–396. doi: 10.1007/BF01705848. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Simon J, Chiang A, Bender W. Ten different Polycomb group genes are required for spatial control of the abdA and AbdB homeotic products. Development. 1992;114:493–505. doi: 10.1242/dev.114.2.493. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Kelly WG, Hart GW. Glycosylation of chromosomal proteins: localization of O-linked N-acetylglucosamine in Drosophila chromatin. Cell. 1989;57:243–251. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(89)90962-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Muller J, Kassis JA. Polycomb response elements and targeting of Polycomb group proteins in Drosophila. Curr Opin Gen Dev. 2006;16:476–484. doi: 10.1016/j.gde.2006.08.005. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Hiromura M, et al. YY1 is regulated by O-linked N-acetylglucosaminylation (O-glcNAcylation) J Biol Chem. 2003;278:14046–14052. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M300789200. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Brown JL, Mucci D, Whiteley M, Dirksen ML, Kassis JA. The Drosophila Polycomb group gene pleiohomeotic encodes a DNA binding protein with homology to the transcription factor YY1. Mol Cell. 1998;1:1057–1064. doi: 10.1016/s1097-2765(00)80106-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Tezel G, et al. Role for O-glycosylation of RFP in the interaction with enhancer of polycomb. Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 2002;290:409–414. doi: 10.1006/bbrc.2001.6161. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Yang X, Zhang F, Kudlow JE. Recruitment of O-GlcNAc transferase to promoters by corepressor mSin3A: Coupling protein O-GlcNAcylation to transcriptional repression. Cell. 2002;110:69–80. doi: 10.1016/s0092-8674(02)00810-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Wysocka J, et al. Human Sin3 deacetylase and trithorax-related Set1/Ash2 histone H3–K4 methyltransferase are tethered together selectively by the cell-proliferation factor HCF-1. Genes Dev. 2003;17:896–911. doi: 10.1101/gad.252103. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Fujiki R, et al. GlcNAcylation of a histone methyltransferase in retinoic-acid-induced granulopoiesis. Nature. 2009;459:455–459. doi: 10.1038/nature07954. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Chalkley RJ, et al. Identification of protein O-GlcNAcylation sites using electron transfer dissociation mass spectrometry on native peptides. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2009;106(22):8894–8899. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0900288106. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Myster SH, et al. Genetic and bioinformatic analysis of 41C and the 2R heterochromatin of Drosophila melanogaster: A window on the heterochromatin-euchromatin junction. Genetics. 2004;166:807–822. doi: 10.1534/genetics.166.2.807. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Spradling AC, et al. The Berkeley Drosophila Genome Project gene disruption project: Single P-element insertions mutating 25% of vital Drosophila genes. Genetics. 1999;153:135–177. doi: 10.1093/genetics/153.1.135. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Hallson G, et al. The Drosophila cohesin subunit Rad21 is a trithorax group (trxG) protein. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2008;105:12405–12410. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0801698105. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Giordano E, Rendina R, Peluso I, Furia M. RNAi triggered by symmetrically transcribed transgenes in Drosophila melanogaster. Genetics. 2002;160:637–648. doi: 10.1093/genetics/160.2.637. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Rubin GM, Spradling AC. Genetic transformation of Drosophila with transposable element vectors. Science. 1982;218:348–353. doi: 10.1126/science.6289436. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Turner JR, Tartakoff AM, Greenspan NS. Cytologic assessment of nuclear and cytoplasmic O-linked N-acetylglucosamine distribution by using antistreptococcal monoclonal antibodies. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 1990;87:5608–5612. doi: 10.1073/pnas.87.15.5608. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38.Hodgson JW, et al. The polyhomeotic locus of Drosophila melanogaster is transcriptionally and post-transcriptionally regulated during embryogenesis. Mech Dev. 1997;66:69–81. doi: 10.1016/s0925-4773(97)00091-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39.Franke A, et al. Polycomb and polyhomeotic are constituents of a multimeric protein complex in chromatin of Drosophila melanogaster. EMBO J. 1992;11:2941–2950. doi: 10.1002/j.1460-2075.1992.tb05364.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 40.Petruk S, et al. Transcription of bxd noncoding RNAs promoted by trithorax represses Ubx in cis by transcriptional interference. Cell. 2006;127:1209–1221. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2006.10.039. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

Supporting Information

Articles from Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America are provided here courtesy of National Academy of Sciences

RESOURCES