Abstract
Immediate culture or refrigeration of urine is recommended, but not always practical. Therefore, we evaluated the Becton-Dickinson Urine Culture Kit containing a boric acid-glycerol-sodium formate preservative in a study of 1,000 clinical urine specimens. Each specimen was cultured a total of four times by the surface streak technique with a 0.001-ml calibrated loop. After an initial reference culture (culture 1), a portion of urine was poured into a clean nonsterile paper cup, aspirated into a urine transport tube, and recultured immediately (culture 2). The original specimen cup was refrigerated for 18 to 24 h (culture 3), and the urine transport tube was held at room temperature for 18 to 24 h (culture 4) before repeat cultures. Eighty-eight of the initial reference cultures were positive (pure growth of greater than 10(5) bacteria per ml). Eighty-two (93.2%) of the 88 specimens positive on the reference culture were also positive after refrigeration or holding at room temperature in the transport tube for 24 h. There was one false-positive culture from refrigerated urine but none from the transport tube. Mixing of urine in a nonsterile container did not introduce detectable contamination. We conclude that the Becton-Dickinson Urine Culture Kit maintains a stable bacterial population in urine for up to 24 h as reliably as refrigeration. Urine for culture may be collected in a nonsterile container if it is immediately aspirated into the transport tube so that contaminants are not allowed to multiply.
Full text
PDFSelected References
These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.
- Amies C. R., Corpas A. A preservative for urine specimens in transit to the bacteriological laboratory. J Med Microbiol. 1971 Aug;4(3):362–365. doi: 10.1099/00222615-4-3-362. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- HOEPRICH P. D. Culture of the urine. J Lab Clin Med. 1960 Dec;56:899–907. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Hindman R., Tronic B., Bartlett R. Effect of delay on culture of urine. J Clin Microbiol. 1976 Jul;4(1):102–103. doi: 10.1128/jcm.4.1.102-103.1976. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Jefferson H., Dalton H. P., Escobar M. R., Allison M. J. Transportation delay and the microbiological quality of clinical specimens. Am J Clin Pathol. 1975 Nov;64(5):689–693. doi: 10.1093/ajcp/64.5.689. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- KASS E. H. Asymptomatic infections of the urinary tract. Trans Assoc Am Physicians. 1956;69:56–64. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- LaFave J. B., Engel J. J., French J. D., Richmond M. D., Rider R. E. Office screening for asymptomatic urinary tract infections. The evaluation of a practical, economic and reliable method screening the urines of asymptomatic girls in a busy pediatric office. Clin Pediatr (Phila) 1979 Jan;18(1):53, 57-9. doi: 10.1177/000992287901800108. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Porter I. A., Brodie J. Boric acid preservation of urine samples. Br Med J. 1969 May 10;2(5653):353–355. doi: 10.1136/bmj.2.5653.353. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- RYAN W. L., MILLS R. D. Bacterial multiplication in urine during refrigeration. Am J Med Technol. 1963 May-Jun;29:175–180. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Shrestha T. L. Effects of delayed culture on semiquantitative urinary bacteriology results. J Clin Pathol. 1975 May;28(5):392–393. doi: 10.1136/jcp.28.5.392. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Watson P. G., Duerden B. I. Laboratory assessment of physical and chemical methods of preserving urine specimens. J Clin Pathol. 1977 Jun;30(6):532–536. doi: 10.1136/jcp.30.6.532. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Wheldon D. B., Slack M. Multiplication of contaminant bacteria in urine and interpretation of delayed culture. J Clin Pathol. 1977 Jul;30(7):615–619. doi: 10.1136/jcp.30.7.615. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]