Skip to main content
PMC home page
The Behavior Analyst logoLink to The Behavior Analyst
. 2000 Fall;23(2):267–277. doi: 10.1007/BF03392015

Women in applied behavior analysis

Frances K McSweeney, Patricia Donahoe, Samantha Swindell
PMCID: PMC2731339  PMID: 22478351

Abstract

The status of women in applied behavior analysis was examined by comparing the participation of women in the Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis (JABA) to their participation in three similar journals. For all journals, the percentage of articles with at least one female author, the percentage of authors who are female, and the percentage of articles with a female first author increased from 1978 to 1997. Participation by women in JABA was equal to or greater than participation by women in the comparison journals. However, women appeared as authors on papers in special sections of Behavior Modification substantially more often when the editor was female than when the editor was male. In addition, female membership on the editorial boards of JABA, Behavior Modification, and Behaviour Research and Therapy failed to increase from 1978 to 1997. We conclude that a “glass ceiling” reduces the participation of women at the highest levels of applied behavior analysis and related fields.

Keywords: participation of women, gender equity, glass ceiling, applied behavior analysis

Full text

PDF
270

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Dreher G. F., Cox T. H., Jr Race, gender, and opportunity: a study of compensation attainment and the establishment of mentoring relationships. J Appl Psychol. 1996 Jun;81(3):297–308. doi: 10.1037/0021-9010.81.3.297. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Iwata B. A., Lent C. E. Participation by women in behavior analysis: Some recent data on authorship of manuscripts submitted to the journal of applied behavior analysis. Behav Anal. 1984 Spring;7(1):77–78. doi: 10.1007/BF03391891. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Laties V. G. Society for the Experimental Analysis of Behavior: The first thirty years (1957-1987). J Exp Anal Behav. 1987 Nov;48(3):495–512. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1987.48-495. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. McSweeney F. K., Swindell S. Women in the experimental analysis of behavior. Behav Anal. 1998 Fall;21(2):193–202. doi: 10.1007/BF03391963. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Myers D. L. Participation by women in behavior analysis. II: 1992. Behav Anal. 1993 Spring;16(1):75–86. doi: 10.1007/BF03392613. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Neef N. A. Response to Myers on participation of women in behavior analysis: Right problem, wrong source. Behav Anal. 1993 Fall;16(2):357–359. doi: 10.1007/BF03392645. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Pion G. M., Mednick M. T., Astin H. S., Hall C. C., Kenkel M. B., Keita G. P., Kohout J. L., Kelleher J. C. The shifting gender composition of psychology. Trends and implications for the discipline. Am Psychol. 1996 May;51(5):509–528. doi: 10.1037//0003-066x.51.5.509. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Poling A., Grossett D., Fulton B., Roy S., Beechler S., Wittkopp C. J. Participation by women in behavior analysis. Behav Anal. 1983 Fall;6(2):145–152. doi: 10.1007/BF03392393. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Wenneras C., Wold A. Nepotism and sexism in peer-review. Nature. 1997 May 22;387(6631):341–343. doi: 10.1038/387341a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from The Behavior Analyst are provided here courtesy of Association for Behavior Analysis International

RESOURCES