Skip to main content
The Behavior Analyst logoLink to The Behavior Analyst
. 2002 Spring;25(1):37–44. doi: 10.1007/BF03392043

Participation by women in developmental, social, cognitive, and general psychology: A context for interpreting trends in behavior analysis

Frances K McSweeney, Craig D Parks
PMCID: PMC2731587  PMID: 22478376

Abstract

We examined participation by women in journals devoted to social, developmental, cognitive, and general psychology. Authorship and first authorship by women increased from 1978 to 1997 for most journals. Participation by women on the editorial staff did not keep pace with their increased authorship for social and developmental psychology. Based on these trends, women's participation decreased with increases in the selectivity of the position for social and developmental psychology (a glass ceiling). The development of a glass ceiling suggests that the contributions of men and women are not always treated equally (gender inequity). Because a similar glass ceiling was reported for journals in behavior analysis (McSweeney, Donahoe, & Swindell, 2000; McSweeney & Swindell, 1998), the causes of this inequity appear to be relatively widespread. The failure to find a glass ceiling for general and cognitive psychology suggests that the inequity might be reduced by subtle pressure for diversity in editorial positions and by adopting actions that encourage women to pursue research positions.

Keywords: gender equity, developmental psychology, social psychology, cognitive psychology, general psychology

Full text

PDF
38

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. McSweeney F. K., Donahoe P., Swindell S. Women in applied behavior analysis. Behav Anal. 2000 Fall;23(2):267–277. doi: 10.1007/BF03392015. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. McSweeney F. K., Swindell S. The glass ceiling is not fragile: A response to Odum (2000). Behav Anal. 2001 Spring;24(1):87–93. doi: 10.1007/BF03392021. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. McSweeney F. K., Swindell S. Women in the experimental analysis of behavior. Behav Anal. 1998 Fall;21(2):193–202. doi: 10.1007/BF03391963. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Neef N. A. Response to Myers on participation of women in behavior analysis: Right problem, wrong source. Behav Anal. 1993 Fall;16(2):357–359. doi: 10.1007/BF03392645. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Odum A. L. Reflections on the glass ceiling: women in the experimental analysis of behavior. Behav Anal. 2000 Fall;23(2):279–283. doi: 10.1007/BF03392016. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from The Behavior Analyst are provided here courtesy of Association for Behavior Analysis International

RESOURCES