Skip to main content
The Behavior Analyst logoLink to The Behavior Analyst
. 1991 Fall;14(2):187–196. doi: 10.1007/BF03392569

What can behavior analysis learn from the aversives controversy?

J M Johnston
PMCID: PMC2733507  PMID: 22478098

Abstract

The paper argues that behavior analysis may have contributed to the aversives controversy in a number of ways. The role that the field has played and the lessons that may be learned are discussed in the areas of research, training, and politics.

Keywords: aversives controversy, aversive consequences, punishment, professional training, developmental disabilities, retardation

Full text

PDF
188

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Foxx R. M., Azrin N. H. The elimination of autistic self-stimulatory behavior by overcorrection. J Appl Behav Anal. 1973 Spring;6(1):1–14. doi: 10.1901/jaba.1973.6-1. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Johnston J. M. Punishment of human behavior. Am Psychol. 1972 Nov;27(11):1033–1054. doi: 10.1037/h0033887. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Johnston J. M., Shook G. L. Developing behavior analysis at the state level. Behav Anal. 1987 Fall;10(2):199–233. doi: 10.1007/BF03392431. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Lovaas O. I., Koegel R. L., Schreibman L. Stimulus overselectivity in autism: a review of research. Psychol Bull. 1979 Nov;86(6):1236–1254. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Morse L. A., Bruns B. J. Nurturing behavioral repertoires within a nonsupportive environment. Behav Anal. 1983 Spring;6(1):19–25. doi: 10.1007/BF03391870. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Schover L. R., Newsom C. D. Overselectivity, developmental level, and overtraining in autistic and normal children. J Abnorm Child Psychol. 1976;4(3):289–298. doi: 10.1007/BF00917765. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Schreibman L., Koegel R. L., Craig M. S. Reducing stimulus overselectivity in autistic children. J Abnorm Child Psychol. 1977 Dec;5(4):425–436. doi: 10.1007/BF00915090. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Schroeder S. R., Schroeder C. S. The role of the AAMR in the aversives controversy. Ment Retard. 1989 Jun;27(3):iii–v. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Sherman R. A. Aversives, fundamental rights and the courts. Behav Anal. 1991 Fall;14(2):197–206. doi: 10.1007/BF03392570. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from The Behavior Analyst are provided here courtesy of Association for Behavior Analysis International

RESOURCES