Skip to main content
Journal of Clinical Microbiology logoLink to Journal of Clinical Microbiology
. 1981 May;13(5):1000–1003. doi: 10.1128/jcm.13.5.1000-1003.1981

Gentamicin and amikacin disk susceptibility tests with Pseudomonas aeruginosa: definition of minimal inhibitory concentration correlates for susceptible and resistant categories.

A L Barry, C Thornsberry, R N Jones
PMCID: PMC273933  PMID: 6787072

Abstract

With currently recommended disk susceptibility tests, minimal inhibitory concentration correlates for amikacin were greater than 16 micrograms/ml for resistance and less than or equal to 12 micrograms/ml (not less than or equal to 8 micrograms/ml) for susceptibility. For gentamicin, they were greater than 8 micrograms/ml for resistance and less than or equal to 6 micrograms/ml (not less than or equal to 4 micrograms/ml) for susceptibility. Minor discrepancies between disk tests and minimal inhibitory concentration determinations will occur if only doubling dilutions of drug are used for measuring minimal inhibitory concentration values.

Full text

PDF
1003

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Barry A. L., Thornsberry C., Jones R. N., Gerlach E. H. Interpretive standards for disk susceptibility tests with Sch 21420 and amikacin. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 1980 Oct;18(4):616–621. doi: 10.1128/aac.18.4.616. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Minshew B. H., Pollock H. M., Schoenknecht F. D., Sherris J. C. Emergence in a burn center of populations of bacteria resistant to gentamicin, tobramycin, and amikacin: evidence for the need for changes in zone diameter interpretative standards. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 1977 Dec;12(6):688–696. doi: 10.1128/aac.12.6.688. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Moellering R. C., Jr, Wennersten C., Kunz L. J., Poitras J. W. Resistance to gentamicin, tobramycin and amikacin among clinical isolates of bacteria. Am J Med. 1977 Jun;62(6):873–881. doi: 10.1016/0002-9343(77)90655-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Pollock H. M., Minshew B. H., Kenny M. A., Schoenknecht F. D. Effect of different lots of Mueller-Hinton agar on the interpretation of the gentamicin susceptibility of Pseudomonas aeruginosa. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 1978 Sep;14(3):360–367. doi: 10.1128/aac.14.3.360. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Reller L. B., Schoenknecht F. D., Kenny M. A., Sherris J. C. Antibiotic susceptibility testing of Pseudomonas aeruginosa: selection of a control strain and criteria for magnesium and calcium content in media. J Infect Dis. 1974 Nov;130(5):454–463. doi: 10.1093/infdis/130.5.454. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Washington J. A., 2nd, Yu P. K., Gavan T. L., Schoenknecht F. D., Thornsberry C. Interpretation of the disk diffusion susceptibility test for amikacin: report of a collaborative study. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 1979 Mar;15(3):400–407. doi: 10.1128/aac.15.3.400. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Journal of Clinical Microbiology are provided here courtesy of American Society for Microbiology (ASM)

RESOURCES