Abstract
A comparison between sodium polyanetholsulfonate and sodium amylosulfate in unvented vacuum blood culture bottles containing tryptic soy broth was made with 5,800 sets of blood cultures. No statistically significant differences in isolation rates of bacteria were noted.
Full text
PDF
Selected References
These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.
- Blazevic D. J., Stemper J. E., Matsen J. M. Effect of aerobic and anaerobic atmospheres on isolation of organisms from blood cultures. J Clin Microbiol. 1975 Feb;1(2):154–156. doi: 10.1128/jcm.1.2.154-156.1975. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Crawford J. J., Sconyers J. R., Moriarty J. D., King R. C., West J. F. Bacteremia after tooth extractions studied with the aid of prereduced anaerobically sterilized culture media. Appl Microbiol. 1974 May;27(5):927–932. doi: 10.1128/am.27.5.927-932.1974. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Graves M. H., Morello J. A., Kocka F. E. Sodium polyanethol sulfonate sensitivity of anaerobic cocci. Appl Microbiol. 1974 Jun;27(6):1131–1133. doi: 10.1128/am.27.6.1131-1133.1974. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Harkness J. L., Hall M., Ilstrup D. M., Washington J. A., 2nd Effects of atmosphere of incubation and of routine subcultures on detection of bacteremia in vacuum blood culture bottles. J Clin Microbiol. 1975 Oct;2(4):296–299. doi: 10.1128/jcm.2.4.296-299.1975. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Kocka F. E., Arthur E. J., Searcy R. L. Comparative effects of two sulfated polyanions used in blood culture on anaerobic cocci. Am J Clin Pathol. 1974 Jan;61(1):25–27. doi: 10.1093/ajcp/61.1.25. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Kocka F. E., Magoc T., Searcy R. L. New anticoagulant for combating antibacterial activity of human blood. 1. Proc Soc Exp Biol Med. 1972 Sep;140(4):1231–1234. doi: 10.3181/00379727-140-36648. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Washington J. A., 2nd Blood cultures: principles and techniques. Mayo Clin Proc. 1975 Feb;50(2):91–98. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]