Abstract
A latex agglutination (LA) method for detection of pneumococcal antigens was evaluated and compared with counterimmunoelectrophoresis (CIE). LA was 2 to 10 times more sensitive than CIE for the detection of purified capsular polysaccharides in defined media, but only when a 1+ or 2+ agglutination reaction was interpreted as positive. LA was much less sensitive than CIE with clinical samples. In 50 cases of pneumococcal pneumonia, antigen was detected in the serum almost twice as often with CIE (40%) as with LA (22%). LA was positive in six cases of pneumonia where CIE was negative; however, in three of these cases, antigen was detected only in undiluted sera, which raised some question about the specificity of the result. With 18 samples of cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) from 11 patients with pneumococcal meningitis, the CIE test was positive more frequenlty (14 samples) than was LA (11 samples). Moreover, antigen was detected in CSF by LA in only one additional patient than was positive by CIE alone. There was one false-positive LA reaction among 45 samples of CSF from patients without pneumococcal infection. Although LA is a less complicated method than CIE, it is not a sensitive test for pneumococcal antigens and would be of little value as a routine diagnostic method.
Full text
PDF
Images in this article
Selected References
These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.
- BLOOMFIELD N., GORDON M. A., ELMENDORF D. F., Jr DETECTION OF CRYPTOCOCCUS NEOFORMANS ANTIGEN IN BODY FLUIDS BY LATEX PARTICLE AGGLUTINATION. Proc Soc Exp Biol Med. 1963 Oct;114:64–67. doi: 10.3181/00379727-114-28586. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Bartram C. E., Jr, Crowder J. G., Beeler B., White A. Diagnosis of bacterial diseases by detection of serum antigens by counterimmunoelectrophoresis, sensitivity, and specificity of detecting Pseudomonas and pneumococcal antigens. J Lab Clin Med. 1974 Apr;83(4):591–598. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Bennett J. E., Bailey J. W. Control for rheumatoid factor in the latex test for cryptococcosis. Am J Clin Pathol. 1971 Sep;56(3):360–365. doi: 10.1093/ajcp/56.3.360. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Bindschadler D. D., Bennett J. E. Serology of human cryptococcosis. Ann Intern Med. 1968 Jul;69(1):45–52. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-69-1-45. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Coonrod J. D., Rytel M. W. Detection of type-specific pneumococcal antigens by counterimmunoelectrophoresis. I. Methodology and immunologic properties of pneumococcal antigens. J Lab Clin Med. 1973 May;81(5):770–777. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Coonrod J. D., Rytel M. W. Detection of type-specific pneumococcal antigens by counterimmunoelectrophoresis. II. Etiologic diagnosis of pneumococcal pneumonia. J Lab Clin Med. 1973 May;81(5):778–786. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Coonrod J. D., Rytel M. W. Determination of aetiology of bacterial meningitis by counter-immunoelectrophoresis. Lancet. 1972 May 27;1(7761):1154–1157. doi: 10.1016/s0140-6736(72)91376-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Gordon M. A., Lapa E. W. Elimination of rheumatoid factor in the latex test for cryptococcosis. Am J Clin Pathol. 1974 Apr;61(4):488–494. doi: 10.1093/ajcp/61.4.488. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Kenny G. E., Wentworth B. B., Beasley R. P., Foy H. M. Correlation of circulating capsular polysaccharide with bacteremia in pneumococcal pneumonia. Infect Immun. 1972 Oct;6(4):431–437. doi: 10.1128/iai.6.4.431-437.1972. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Newman R. B., Stevens R. W., Gaafar H. A. Latex agglutination test for the diagnosis of Haemophilus influenzae meningitis. J Lab Clin Med. 1970 Jul;76(1):107–113. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Severin W. P. Latex agglutination in the diagnosis of meningococcal meningitis. J Clin Pathol. 1972 Dec;25(12):1079–1082. doi: 10.1136/jcp.25.12.1079. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Whittle H. C., Tugwell P., Egler L. J., Greenwood B. M. Rapid bacteriological diagnosis of pyogenic meningitis by latex agglutination. Lancet. 1974 Sep 14;2(7881):619–621. doi: 10.1016/s0140-6736(74)91943-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]