Abstract
Although the acquisition of selection-based verbal behavior can be ascribed to the acquisition of a conditional discrimination, such an account cannot explain any generalization of the behavior to novel verbal stimuli. The problem is that printed and spoken words and phrases do not vary on continuous dimensions that would support stimulus generalization. Both conceptual analysis and empirical evidence suggest that an alternate form of stimulus control, joint control, can more readily account for acquisition and generalization of these performances. The fact that joint control depends on topography-based behavior implies that generalized selection-based behavior is not an alternative to topography-based behavior but depends on its prior development.
Full text
PDF
Selected References
These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.
- Carter D. E., Eckerman D. A. Symbolic matching by pigeons: rate of learning complex discriminations predicted from simple discriminations. Science. 1975 Feb 21;187(4177):662–664. doi: 10.1126/science.1114318. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Lowenkron B. Coding responses and the generalization of matching to sample in children. J Exp Anal Behav. 1984 Jul;42(1):1–18. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1984.42-1. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Lowenkron B. Generalization of delayed identity matching in retarded children. J Exp Anal Behav. 1988 Sep;50(2):163–172. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1988.50-163. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Lowenkron B. Instructional control of generalized relational matching to sample in children. J Exp Anal Behav. 1989 Nov;52(3):293–309. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1989.52-293. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]