Abstract
Silica exposure results in an increased lifelong risk of developing mycobacterial pulmonary infections. To date, there are no animal models that replicate this finding to permit assessment of the mechanisms underlying susceptibility to mycobacterial infection. To test the hypothesis that prior silica exposure increases risk of mycobacterial infection, we intratracheally (I.T.) administered silica, a control dust (Al2O3) or saline into mechanically ventilated C57BL/6 mice. Later, the mice received Mycobacterium avium or Mycobacterium tuberculosis I.T. Mice were sacrificed at defined time points and mycobacteria in lung homogenates were quantified. M. avium or M. tuberculosis infection was markedly increased in silica-exposed mice compared with mice exposed to either Al2O3 or saline beginning 3 wk after silica exposure. Similarly, lung sections from silica-exposed mice had many more acid fast bacilli+ (AFB+) organisms than from control mice. Alveolar macrophages (AMs) from bronchoalveolar lavage of silica-exposed mice also revealed a higher number of mycobacteria compared with mice treated with Al2O3 or saline. In addition, passive transfer of AMs from silica-exposed mice to control mice increased M. tuberculosis susceptibility. These results indicate that silica exposure converts mycobacteria-resistant mice into mycobacteria-susceptible mice via a process that likely involves a new population of AMs that are more susceptible to mycobacterial infection.
Silicosis is a fibrotic lung disease caused by inhalation of crystalline silica particles (SiO2) (1) that continues to be a major public health problem worldwide. Exposure to silica can result in acute silicosis, accelerated silicosis, or chronic silicosis (2, 3). Silica exposure is also well recognized as a major risk factor for the development of mycobacterial infections including tuberculosis (4-6). About one-half of the mycobacterial infections diagnosed in silica-exposed individuals are caused by Mycobacterium tuberculosis with the remainder caused by Mycobacterium kansasii and Mycobacterium avium intracellulare (7-9). There is some evidence that the magnitude of silica exposure impacts susceptibility to mycobacterial infection with the incidence of tuberculosis developing in subjects with advanced silicosis being higher than those with minimal exposure to silica (4). However, even individuals with minimal silica exposure have an increased risk of developing tuberculosis (10). Although the epidemiologic link between silica exposure and mycobacterial infection is well established, the mechanisms by which silica predisposes individuals to an increased susceptibility to mycobacterial infection remain unknown. Advances in this understanding have been limited by the lack of an animal model by which to study this interrelationship.
The interaction of mycobacteria and alveolar macrophages (AMs)3 in the lung is a critical step in the control of the mycobacterial infections. AMs use lysozymal enzymes, reactive oxygen intermediates, and reactive nitrogen intermediates to rid the lung of mycobacterial infection (11-13). However, in situations where this initial response fails, viable bacilli can survive and replicate, leading to progressive pulmonary infection (14). A number of factors that decrease macrophage functions have also been identified to greatly increase the risk of developing tuberculosis and other mycobacterial infections. These include HIV infection, malnutrition, age, and alcohol (15-18).
Silica particles have direct effects on AMs (19) and, depending on the concentration, alter key metabolic functions and/or decrease antibacterial defenses (20), stimulate release of various inflammatory mediators (20, 21), and alter AM phagocytosis (22). Silica has also been shown to disrupt calcium homeostasis (23), increase oxygen radical production, and induce DNA damage in AMs (24, 25). At high concentrations in vitro, silica is directly toxic to AMs resulting in cell injury or death (21, 26). Previous evidence suggests that in addition to a membranolytic effect, silica may also induce apoptosis in AMs (20). Because silica administration impairs or kills macrophages (22), it has been suggested that silica damage to AMs results in impaired host defense against mycobacteria infection and accounts for the increased risk for mycobacterial disease in individuals exposed to silica (4-6, 27-30).
Animal models are an important tool for investigating pathogenesis of infection. However, there are currently no in vivo models of silica exposure that demonstrate increased risk of mycobacterial infections. The objective of the current study was to determine whether silica exposure leads to increased susceptibility to mycobacterial infection. We now provide evidence that mycobacterial infection is markedly increased in silica-exposed mice compared to control mice. In addition, the passive transfer of AMs harvested from silica-exposed mice after 4 wk to control mice increases M. tuberculosis susceptibility. These results demonstrate for the first time that silica exposure increases susceptibility to mycobacterial infection that is likely mediated by a new population of macrophages appearing weeks after the initial silica exposure.
Materials and Methods
Animals
C57BL/6 mice, 6–8 wk old, were purchased from The Jackson Laboratory and housed under pathogen-free conditions at the animal facility of the University of Cincinnati, College of Medicine. All animal procedures were approved by the University of Cincinnati Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee. The mice were housed in a barrier facility, maintained in sterile conditions in microisolator cages, and supplied with sterilized food and water. C57BL/6 mice were chosen for this study, because they are considered to be relatively resistant to infection with M. avium and M. tuberculosis (31, 32).
All experimental animals were maintained in microisolator cages until use. Animals were infected under BSL2 conditions with M. avium. Alternatively, they were transferred to the BSL3 animal facility at the University of Cincinnati and infected with M. tuberculosis in a class III biohazard safety cabinet.
Culture and isolation of mycobacteria
M. avium (strain 25291), obtained from American Type Culture Collection, was grown at 37°C in Middlebrook 7H9 broth (Difco) supplemented with 10% ADC enrichment (5% BSA fraction V, 2% dextrose, and 0.003% catalase) and 0.05% Tween 80 or on agar Middlebrook 7H11 medium (Difco) supplemented with OADC (0.05% oleic acid, 5% BSA fraction V, 2% dextrose, 0.004% beef catalase, and 0.85% NaCl2). On a regular basis, mycobacterial purity was verified by: 1) Kinyoun acid fast smears, 2) culture of organisms in 7H11 Middlebrook selective medium for 6–8 wk and examination for the appearance of characteristic colonies, and 3) Gram stain and subculturing on blood agar to exclude presence of contaminating fungi or other bacteria.
In addition to M. avium, we studied the virulent strain of M. tuberculosis (Erdman, ATCC 35801). GFP-expressing H37Rv was a gift from Dr. V. Deretic (University of New Mexico, Albuquerque, NM). M. tuberculosis organisms were cultivated on 7H11 agar plates and harvested in RPMI 1640 containing 10 mM HEPES to form predominantly single-cell suspensions. To minimize problems with clumping, suspensions were gently sonicated in a GenProbe bath sonicator. The accuracy of counts was confirmed with a serial dilution and determination of CFUs.
Isolation of murine AMs
The AMs were isolated as previously described by our laboratory (33). Briefly, mice were sacrificed and lavaged using HBSS without Ca2+ or Mg2+ plus 0.6 mM EDTA. Approximately 10 ml of bronchoalveolar lavage (BAL) fluid was obtained from each mouse. The BAL fluid was centrifuged (1500 × g, 5 min), the cells were resuspended in lysing solution containing 0.01 M KHCO3 with 0.15 M NH4Cl, centrifuged (1500 × g, 5 min) to remove RBC, and resuspended in 0.9% NaCl. Cell counts were determined using a hemocytometer. Cell differential was determined by examination of cytopreparation smears (Cytospin II; Shandon Southern Instruments) after staining with the Hema 3 staining system (Fisher Scientific). Viability of the AMs was >98% as determined by trypan blue exclusion.
Passive transfer of AMs into recipient mice
Mice were anesthetized with isoflurane, after which the trachea was exposed using blunt dissection. A small incision was made in between the tracheal rings and a 20-gauge angiocath was inserted into the trachea. The AMs isolated from saline- or silica-administered mice (5 × 105) in 50 μl of HBSS were administered into the lungs via the tracheal catheter. The AM suspension was followed by 200 μl of air to clear the angiocath and upper respiratory tract of the mice. After 10 min, the mice were administered M. tuberculosis intratracheally (I.T.). Mice were sacrificed after 30 days and M. tuberculosis in the lung homogenates was assessed by determination of CFU.
Silica exposure
Crystalline silica was obtained in the form of alpha quartz (MinUSil 5; US Silica). Previous and recent studies from our laboratory have shown that silica crystals are directly cytotoxic to rat AMs, and the degree of cytotoxicity is dependent on the size of the particles (0.5–5 μm), their concentration as well as the duration of exposure (34-36). This preparation was used for all in vivo experiments. Before use, the silica was heated to 250°C for 2 h to destroy endotoxin (35, 36). For in vivo exposure, 6- to 8-wk-old pathogen-free mice (20–25 g) from The Jackson Laboratory were anesthetized with isoflurane and I.T. inoculated with 0.05 ml of sterile saline or 0.05 ml of saline containing 5 mg of silica/mouse (250 mg/kg of the body weight) or 5 mg of Al2O3/mouse (Sigma-Aldrich) via a catheter (37, 38). Al2O3 (mean crystal size of 2.4 μm) was used as a nontoxic inorganic crystal control (negative control) (39).
Infection of mice with M. avium and M. tuberculosis
Mice were infected I.T. with M. avium (5 × 105–5 × 108) suspended in 50 μl of HBSS via the tracheal catheter. The mice were ventilated for 10 min and then allowed to recover. Thirty days later, the mice were sacrificed and M. avium were recovered from lung homogenates.
Similarly M. tuberculosis (2.5 × 101–1 × 106) suspended in 50 μl of HBSS was administered I.T. into the lungs of mice in the BSL3 facility of the University of Cincinnati. Thirty days after M. tuberculosis administration, mice were sacrificed and the burden of M. tuberculosis was determined from lung homogenates.
Determination of mycobacterial CFUs in the lung
To assess mycobacterial growth, the lungs were removed aseptically at specified time points. The lungs were cut into small pieces and homogenized. Viable mycobacteria in the lung homogenates were then assessed as CFUs by performing serial dilutions from the lung homogenate and plating onto 7H11 agar in 6-well plates in duplicates. The plates were placed in CO2-permeable sealed Ziploc bags (Minigrip lab guard; Seguin) and incubated at 37°C with 5% CO2 for 2–3 wk and colonies were counted. The plates were again incubated for an additional 2 wk to decrease the possibility of failure to detect slower growing M. tuberculosis strains. No difference in the number of colonies was observed in reincubated plates.
Histologic examination of mouse lungs
Mice were sacrificed and the lungs were surgically removed, fixed with 10% neutral-buffered formalin, and paraffin embedded. Lung sections (5 μm) were stained using either H&E or Ziehl-Neelsen staining. Histopathologic changes were examined using light microscopy.
Viability of AMs
The viability of AMs was determined by a viability/cytotoxic kit obtained from Molecular Probes (catalog no. L3224). This is a two-color fluorescence-based color assay, which simultaneously identifies live vs dead cells on the basis of membrane integrity. A volume of 50 μl of live/dead assay reagent was added to AMs (5 × 104) obtained from mice exposed to silica, Al2O3, or saline and incubated at 37°C for 30 min in the dark. Following incubation, the AMs were transferred onto a slide and viewed under fluorescent microscopy. The images were taken randomly from the slide. The percentage of live cells was calculated as the number of live cells divided by the number of total cells at each time point. The number of live cells over total number of cells gives the live:dead ratio.
Analysis of silica-induced apoptosis in vivo
Morphologic analysis of apoptotic AMs was performed using an annexin V-binding assay. The annexin V assay is based on translocation of phosphatidylserine from the inner (cytoplasmic) leaflet of the plasma membrane to the outer (cell surface) leaflet soon after the induction of apoptosis, and that the annexin V protein has a strong, specific affinity for phosphatidylserine. AMs were isolated from the BAL on days 3, 7, 14, 21, and 30 days after silica exposure. BAL cells (5 × 106) were stained with annexin V using an Annexin-V-FLUOS staining kit (Roche Diagnostics) according to the manufacturer’s instructions. The samples were divided into two. Apoptotic morphology was determined using a Spot cam fluorescence microscope (Zeiss) and photographed using a digital camera. The AMs from five to seven microscopic fields were counted per area. Approximately 200–300 cells per group were assessed in randomly selected fields to avoid experimental bias. The percentage of apoptotic cells was calculated by determining the number of cells with the stain in the total number of examined cells. The cells were also analyzed (10,000 cells/sample) on a FACScan (BD Biosciences) by using CellQuest flow cytometric analysis software.
Statistical analysis
All experiments were conducted in triplicate with a minimum of three experiments. The results are expressed as means ± SEM. The statistical difference between the control and experimental data was determined by Student’s t test or ANOVA with paired comparisons. A p < 0.05 was considered to be statistically significant (40).
Results
Effects of silica on AMs
To examine the effect of silica exposure on the airway cells, mice were exposed to silica, Al2O3, or saline and the cells were retrieved by BAL at different time points (3 days and 1, 2, 3, 4, and 8 wk). At 3 days after silica exposure, a marked increase in airway AM was observed that returned to baseline by ~3 wk (Fig. 1A). Cell viability of AMs was assessed by live/dead staining and also indicated an increase in nonviable cells in the airway at 3 days after silica exposure which decreased, but remained elevated for at least 8 wk (Fig. 1B). We also assessed to what extent silica induced apoptosis in the AM population. Fig. 1C shows the percentage of total BAL AMs that were apoptotic in mice exposed to silica for 3, 7, 14, 21, and 30 days of exposure. Relative to control mice, beginning at the earliest time point examined (3 days), silica exposure markedly increased the percentage of apoptotic AM, peaking at days 7–14 and then falling back toward the control levels over the subsequent weeks. This was further confirmed by FACS analysis (data not shown). These data indicate that silica administration results in a rapid increase in BAL cells, including AM. The number of AMs returns to control levels by 4 wk, but elevated levels of nonviable and apoptotic cells persisted beyond that time.
FIGURE 1.

Effect of silica on AM numbers. Silica or saline were instilled I.T. into recipient C57BL/6 mice. A, The AM number retrieved by BAL was demonstrated after 1, 2, 3, 4, and 8 wk by cell differentials and was normalized by live/dead staining. Data are expressed as viable AMs. These data indicate that silica increases in AM number for ~3 wk as indicated by the dashed line (- - -). Total BAL cells were also increased following silica administration as indicated by the solid line (—); non-AM cells were largely neutrophils that returned to normal levels by 3 wk (data not shown). B, Silica (solid line), Al2O3 (dashed line), and saline (dotted line) were instilled I.T. into recipient C57BL/6 mice and the viability of AMs was assessed at 1, 2, 3, 4, and 8 wk by live/dead staining. Data are expressed as dead cells of the percentage of total cells. These data indicate that silica results in immediate injury to the AMs but is significantly diminished by 4 wk (p < 0.001). C, AMs were isolated by BAL on 3, 7, 14, 21, and 30 days after silica exposure. AMs were incubated with annexin V and assessed morphologically by fluorescence microscopy. The percentage of apoptotic cells was calculated by determining the number of cells with annexin V relative to the total number of cells. The results are expressed as the mean of three experiments performed in triplicate from four mice at each time point. *, Significantly different from saline control at p < 0.05.
Silica exposure increases murine susceptibility to mycobacterial infection
We next investigated the kinetics of silica-induced susceptibility to mycobacterial infection in vivo by varying the time course of silica exposure and determining susceptibility to M. avium and M. tuberculosis infection. Silica or saline was administered I.T. to C57BL/6 mice. At 1, 2, 3, 4, 6, 8, 10, 12, 14, or 16 wk after silica exposure, subgroups of mice were infected I.T. with M. avium (106). Mice were sacrificed 30 days following mycobacterial administration, lungs were homogenized, and the number of M. avium was determined and expressed as CFUs. For each time point tested, silica-exposed/M. avium-infected mice were compared with mice receiving saline/M. avium. When infection with M. avium occurred within 1–2 wk after silica exposure, there was no significant difference in M. avium growth within the lungs relative to mice that had received saline instead of silica. However, beginning 3 wk after silica exposure, mice exposed to silica showed a significant increase in M. avium infection compared with the group that had received saline (p < 0.05 comparison of silica with saline exposure; Fig. 2A). Furthermore, the capacity of prior silica exposure to increase the M. avium CFUs within the lung remained evident for up to 16 wk after silica exposure, when the experiment was terminated. At all time points tested, M. avium growth remained stable in C57BL/6 mice administered with saline. These CFU data indicate that 4 wk following silica exposure is the critical time point for increased susceptibility of mice to M. avium infection. Consequently, this 4-wk time point was used for the subsequent M. avium experiments.
FIGURE 2.

Susceptibility to mycobacterial infection as a function of time after silica exposure. C57BL/6 mice were administered silica or saline I.T. and after 1, 2, 3, 4, 6, 8, 10, 12, 14, or 16 wk, groups of mice received M. avium (106) or M. tuberculosis (2.5 × 101). Mice were sacrificed 30 days after infection. The extent of M. avium infection (A) or M. tuberculosis (B) infection was determined by lung CFUs. In silica-treated mice, CFUs for M. tuberculosis were initially lower than control levels as indicated by the solid line (—), a time of maximal injury to AMs (Fig. 1A). However, after 3–4 wk, M. tuberculosis CFUs revealed a 10-fold increase in silica-treated mice above control levels as indicated by dashed line (- - -). The y-axis in each panel is the number (CFUs) × 103 of bacilli (M. avium and M. tuberculosis), one single time point (30 days) postinfection for each group. The x-axis in each panel is the time after silica exposure in which infection with the mycobacteria took place. This is not a growth curve of the bacteria. The results are expressed as the mean ± SEM of three experiments performed in triplicate from four mice at each time point and are representative of two independent experiments. (*, p < 0.05 saline vs silica (1–2 wk)).The CFU data indicate that 4 wk after silica exposure is the critical time point for increased susceptibility to mycobacterial infection.
To determine the effect of silica exposure on susceptibility to M. tuberculosis infection, mice received M. tuberculosis (Erdman, 2.5 × 101) 1, 2, 3, 4, 6, 8, 10, or 12 wk after silica exposure. Thirty days later, CFUs were determined. Interestingly, the levels of M. tuberculosis at 30 days were lower in the mice infected at weeks 1 and 2 after silica exposure compared with control mice (p < 0.05, both comparisons; Fig. 2B). This decreased susceptibility to infection occurred during the same 1–2 wk following silica exposure associated with maximal cytotoxicity (Fig. 1B) and apoptosis (Fig. 1C) of AMs. In mice infected with M. tuberculosis at 3wk after silica exposure, there was an increase in CFUs of M. tuberculosis at day 30 postinfection with a progressive increase in M. tuberculosis CFUs with initial infection from 4- to 16-wk post-silica exposure, similar to the results with M. avium (Fig. 2B). Consistent with previous results (41), M. tuberculosis infection of the control group (no silica) showed a reproducible organism burden of ~6.5 × 104 CFUs at day 30 postinfection, which reflects a marked increase over the initial inoculum. Thus, M. tuberculosis growth remained stable in control C57BL/6 mice with a 10-fold increase in CFU numbers occurring in silica-exposed mice. These data demonstrate that silica exposure has a differential effect on susceptibility to M. tuberculosis, with resistance to infection early following silica exposure and enhanced susceptibility beyond 3 wk of exposure.
Susceptibility to mycobacteria infection is specific to silica exposure
We next confirmed that the increase in susceptibility to mycobacterial infection was specific to silica exposure and not simply a property of particulate exposure to the lung. C57BL/6 mice were administered saline, particulate Al2O3, or silica I.T. Thirty days later, all mice received M. avium (106) or M. tuberculosis (2.5 × 101). After an additional 30 days (60 days from particulate or saline exposure), the mice were sacrificed and mycobacteria in lung homogenate were determined. Mice exposed to silica showed a significant increase in the amount of M. avium or M. tuberculosis in their lungs compared with mice given Al2O3 or saline (p < 0.01 comparison of silica with either Al2O3 dust or saline exposure; Fig. 3). There was no significant difference in M. avium/M. tuberculosis CFUs between mice that received saline or particulate Al2O3 (Fig. 3, A and B, respectively).
FIGURE 3.

Susceptibility to mycobacteria infection is specific to silica exposure. C57BL/6 mice were I.T. administered saline, Al2O3, or silica and, after 30 days, all mice received M. avium (106) or M. tuberculosis (2.5 × 101). After 30 days (60 days from silica exposure), mice were sacrificed and lung homogenate was processed to monitor the M. avium and M. tuberculosis growth, as determined by CFUs. Results shown are the mean ± SEM for four mice per experimental group. These results indicate that mice exposed to silica and challenged with M. avium or M. tuberculosis resulted in a marked increase in M. avium or M. tuberculosis growth compared with control mice (p < 0.01 comparison of silica with either control dust or saline exposure). There were no significant differences in M. avium or M. tuberculosis growth between the two control groups (saline or Al2O3).
Concentration-dependent mycobacterial infection in silica-exposed mice
Having established 30 days postsilica exposure as an optimal period for demonstrating increased susceptibility to mycobacterial infection, we sought to establish the threshold of mycobacterial exposure needed to establish infection. C57BL/6 mice were exposed to silica or saline. Thirty days later, they received increasing concentrations of M. tuberculosis (2.5 × 101 –1 × 106). Since M. tuberculosis is more virulent than M. avium, the mice were observed every day for mortality after M. tuberculosis administration. Mice remaining alive at the end of the fourth week were sacrificed, lungs were homogenized, and M. tuberculosis growth was determined by CFUs. Silica-exposed mice demonstrated a concentration dependency with increased M. tuberculosis CFUs compared with saline control mice (data not shown). Silica-exposed mice that received M. tuberculosis between 105 and 106 did not survive beyond 1 wk. The silica-exposed mice that received 103 or 104 M. tuberculosis survived between 3 and 4 wk. However, mice that received 2.5 × 101–5 × 103 survived beyond 4 wk (Fig. 4). After 16 wk, only one death occurred in mice receiving saline instead of silica regardless of the concentration of the M. tuberculosis inoculum. Thus, the M. tuberculosis (Erdman) strain is significantly more virulent in C57BL/6 mice treated with silica. The optimal concentration of M. tuberculosis for our animal model was found to be 2.5 × 101 in silica-exposed mice and this concentration was used for the rest of the M. tuberculosis experiments.
FIGURE 4.

Survival of silica-exposed mice and control mice infected with M. tuberculosis. To determine the survival rate of the mice administered silica and challenged with M. tuberculosis, C57BL/6 mice were administered saline or silica I.T. After 30 days, all of the mice received the Erdman strain of M. tuberculosis (2.5 × 101–1 × 107) and mortality was determined over an 8-wk period (n = 5 mice/group). No deaths occurred in saline-treated control mice from any M. tuberculosis inoculum. The results are expressed as the mean ± SEM of three experiments performed in triplicate from four mice at each time point and are representative of two independent experiments. These results suggest that the M. tuberculosis Erdman strain is significantly more virulent in C57BL/6 mice treated with silica.
Concentrations of M. avium at 103 resulted in low-level infection and concentrations of 108 resulted in high-level infection in silica-exposed mice. The concentration of 106 M. avium reproducibly established consistent growth during the 30 days of observation. The number of M. avium CFUs recovered from control C57BL/6 mice (no silica) increased only slightly with the increasing size of the M. avium inocula (103 CFU vs 108 CFU; data not shown).
Histopathology of silica and mycobacterial infection
To assess the histopathologic changes in the lung following silica exposure and M. tuberculosis infection, lung sections were stained by standard H&E and examined under light microscopy (Fig. 5). In response to silica exposure alone (i.e., before mycobacterial infection), lung tissue had evidence of monocytes, lymphocytes, and neutrophil infiltrations at day 30 (Fig. 5A). Further increases in inflammation were noted in the lungs of silica-exposed mice 30 days after they were infected with M. tuberculosis (Fig. 5B). There was moderate pathologic change in lung sections from saline-exposed mice after M. tuberculosis infection (Fig. 5C). Lung sections from saline-exposed control animals and uninfected mice did not exhibit any pathologic changes, regardless of whether or not they were subsequently infected with M. tuberculosis (Fig. 5D). Similar histopathologic changes were observed with M. avium (data not shown).
FIGURE 5.

Morphologic evidence of silica-induced lung injury and increased mycobacterial infection. Silica-exposed mice revealed marked inflammatory cell infiltration at day 30 in the absence of M. tuberculosis infection (A). The cells were mixtures of macrophages, lymphocytes, and monocytes (data not shown). Further increases in cellular infiltration were noted in the lungs of M. tuberculosis-infected mice exposed to silica by day 60 (B). Lung sections from saline-exposed control animals in the presence (C) or absence (D) of M. tuberculosis infection did not exhibit any pathologic changes.
Consistent with the CFU determinations, the lung sections from silica-exposed mice showed an increased number of M. avium+ bacilli as indicated with black arrows in Fig. 6A. In contrast, no acid fast bacilli (AFB) could be detected in either saline-treated mice (Fig. 6B) or in Al2O3-treated mouse lung sections (Fig. 6C).
FIGURE 6.
Increased M. avium in the lungs and AMs of silica-treated mice. Lung sections from silica-exposed mice reveal large numbers of AFB+ bacilli as indicated by arrows in A. In contrast, there was no evidence of AFB+ bacilli in the lungs of either Al2O3-treated mice (B) or saline-treated mice (C). Similarly, BAL cytopreparation smears from silica-exposed mice revealed large numbers of AFB+ bacilli as indicated by arrows in D (original magnification, ×100). In contrast, no AFB could be detected in AMs of either Al2O3-treated mice (E) or saline-treated mice (F). These data indicate that silica-exposed mice have a marked increase in M. avium number compared with the control mice.
To determine whether AMs from silica-exposed mice showed increase susceptibility to mycobacterial infection in vivo, C57BL/6 mice received silica, Al2O3, or saline. Thirty days after exposure, all mice were inoculated with M. avium (106; 60 days from silica exposure), mice were sacrificed, and AMs were isolated from the BAL. AMs from silica-exposed mice contained greater numbers of M. avium compared with mice exposed to Al2O3 or saline (Fig. 6, D—F).
To confirm that M. tuberculosis numbers were increased in silica-treated mice compared with control mice, C57BL/6 mice received I.T. silica or saline and after 30 days all of the mice received enhanced GFP (EGFP)-labeled H37Rv M. tuberculosis (2.5 × 101). Thirty days later, the mice were sacrificed. The confocal photomicrographs indicate that the number of EGFP-labeled M. tuberculosis in the lung sections of silica-exposed mice were significantly increased (Fig. 7A) compared with either saline-treated mice (Fig. 7B) or in Al2O3-treated mice lung sections (Fig. 7C). These data provide further evidence for the large number of EGFP-labeled M. tuberculosis present in AMs, suggesting that AMs are the reservoir for the mycobacterial bacilli in the lung following silica exposure.
FIGURE 7.
Increased M. tuberculosis in the lungs of silica-treated mice. Lung sections from mice exposed to silica and saline 4 wk before I.T. administration of EGFP M. tuberculosis were obtained after 4 wk of infection. The lung sections were observed under confocal microscopy for the presence of EGFP M. tuberculosis (original magnification, ×63). Lung sections from silica-exposed mice revealed large numbers of EGFP-labeled M. tuberculosis (A). In contrast, there were fewer numbers of EGFP bacilli present in the lungs of either Al2O3-treated mice (B) or saline-treated mice (C). These data indicate that silica-exposed mice have a marked increase in M. tuberculosis number compared with the control mice.
Passive transfer of AMs from silica-exposed mice to control mice increases M. tuberculosis susceptibility
To further assess the role of AMs in increasing susceptibility to mycobacterial infection following silica exposure, the lungs of C57BL/6 control mice were instilled with AMs harvested from silica-exposed mice or normal control mice at a concentration of 0.5 × 106/50 μl. Groups of mice exposed to silica 4 wk before also received AMs harvested from either control or silica-exposed mice. All sets of mice then received I.T. M. tuberculosis. Thirty days after transfer of AMs and initiation of M. tuberculosis infection, the mice were sacrificed. Their lungs were removed and the number M. tuberculosis in the lung homogenate was assessed by CFUs. Administration of AMs from silica-exposed mice to control mice significantly increased M. tuberculosis growth in the normal mice (Fig. 8). Transfer of normal AMs into silica-exposed mice diminished M. tuberculosis growth (Fig. 8). Transfer of silica-exposed AMs into silica-exposed C57BL/6 mice showed no effect on M. tuberculosis levels (Fig. 8). Likewise, airway delivery of normal C57BL/6 AMs into recipient C57BL/6 mice resulted in similar low M. tuberculosis levels compared with normal C57BL/6 mice (Fig. 8). These data suggest that passive transfer of AMs from silica-exposed mice confers in vivo susceptibility to mycobacterial infection to normal C57BL/6 mice.
FIGURE 8.

Passive transfer of AMs from silica-exposed mice to control mice increases M. tuberculosis susceptibility. Silica-exposed (4 wk post-exposure) or control C57BL/6 mice were administered I.T. AMs were harvested from silica-exposed mice or normal mice at a concentration of 0.5 × 106/50 μl. All mice then received M. tuberculosis I.T. Thirty days later, the mice were sacrificed, lungs were removed, and the growth of M. tuberculosis from the lung homogenate was assessed by CFUs (*, p < 0.05 saline mice alone vs silica AMs (**, p < 0.05, control mice with M. tuberculosis) (*, p < 0.05 silica mice alone vs control AMs (***, p < 0.05, silica mice with M. tuberculosis). The results are expressed as the mean ± SEM of three experiments performed in triplicate and are representative of two independent experiments. These data suggest that passive transfer of silica-exposed AMs from silica-exposed mice to normal mice enhances in vivo susceptibility of mycobacterial infection.
Discussion
Animal models remain an important tool in defining the pathogenesis of human infectious diseases. However, despite strong epidemiologic links between exposure to silica and susceptibility to mycobacterial infection in humans (4-6, 27-29), there have been no animal models described to our knowledge that confirm this association and can be used to elucidate the underlying mechanism(s) responsible. The current work is the first study showing that silica exposure markedly increases susceptibility to both M. avium and M. tuberculosis infection in mice. Furthermore, susceptibility to infection is associated with the appearance of repopulating AMs in the lungs following silica exposure.
The timing of the exposure to silica appears critical to the increased susceptibility to both M. avium and M. tuberculosis. No increase in mycobacterial susceptibility was seen during the initial 3 wk following silica exposure. In fact, in the first 2 wk following in vivo silica exposure, susceptibility to M. tuberculosis infection decreased relative to control mice. These results were surprising in view of prior in vitro studies reporting numerous deleterious effects on AM function following acute exposure to silica (19-25, 29), suggesting that silica-mediated AM injury might impair host defense and increase susceptibility to infection. However, the findings are consistent with previous AM depletion studies that demonstrate resistance to mycobacterial susceptibility (42).
The interaction of mycobacteria with AMs is complex. Ingestion of mycobacteria by AMs is a critical step in the control of mycobacterial infections. Following inhalation in an immune-competent host, mycobacteria are phagocytosed and killed by AMs. However, in situations where this initial response fails, viable bacilli use AMs as their primary site of replication, surviving and multiplying in a cellular environment protected from elimination by other components of the immune system (10, 14, 42-44).
Somewhat paradoxically, AMs also appear to be critical to the development of mycobacterial infection. Depleting AMs in mice with chlodronate (dichloromethylene diphosphonate) diminished the severity of pulmonary tuberculosis (42). This is not surprising since mycobacteria are intracellular pathogens that use macrophages as a “safe harbor” to grow and replicate (14). The presence of an adequate supply of healthy AMs may be critical for the establishment and maintenance of lung infection by M. avium and M. tuberculosis (42). Apoptosis of AMs has been suggested as a host defense mechanism against mycobacteria (45-49). In our studies M. avium or M. tuberculosis associated with AMs were dramatically increased in silica-exposed mice compared with mice exposed with control dust or saline, but an increased number of dead cells was also present. Silica-induced apoptosis increased in AMs over the first 2 wk and then declined. The percentage of apoptotic cells was returning to control levels at the time of increased susceptibility to M. tuberculosis infection (Fig. 2C). Perhaps the loss of healthy AMs early after silica exposure decreases susceptibility to M. tuberculosis (Fig. 2B) by decreasing the number of host cells capable of sustaining mycobacterial infection. AM recovery, presumably with repopulating viable AMs weeks later, may result in increased susceptibility (Fig. 2B).
AMs from silicotic mice appear to have a reduced ability to kill mycobacteria. Silica crystals in vitro adversely affect AMs as preincubating AMs with “sublethal” concentrations of quartz crystals results in a reduced ability to kill tubercle bacilli (22, 30). Our studies reveal that AMs from silica-exposed mice have more AFB+ organisms than AMs from mice exposed to Al2O3 or control mice with M. avium alone. These infected AMs are present at the same time as AMs are repopulating the lungs following silica injury. It is not clear whether there is a specific subpopulation within these repopulating AMs that are responsible for the increased bacilli survival and replication.
Silica also affects susceptibility to other infections that are delayed by several weeks following exposure as we demonstrated for mycobacteria in this study. For example, mice are not susceptible to Histoplasma capsulatum 3–7 days after exposure to silica (50). However, if the time between silica exposure of mice and inoculation with H. capsulatum is increased to 14 or 21 days, enhanced susceptibility to infection occurs (50). In another study, rats exposed to silica for short time periods were not susceptible to Listeria monocytogenes infection (51). In contrast, silica exposure for almost 2 years increased susceptibility to L. monocytogenes (51, 52). These studies support our findings and suggest that a delayed effect following silica exposure may play a critical role in increasing susceptibility to a variety of intracellular pulmonary pathogens.
A key finding from our study is that AMs harvested from silica-exposed mice at a time when the mice exhibit increased susceptibility to mycobacterial infection transferred that increased susceptibility to mycobacteria to otherwise resistant control mice. Passive transfer of AMs from unexposed mice into silica-exposed mice significantly reduced the number of M. tuberculosis organisms. These results clearly indicate that AMs can transfer susceptibility to M. tuberculosis, suggesting that AMs are pivotal for silica-induced susceptibility. The mechanisms underlying macrophage programming that might induce mycobacterial susceptibility or resistance have yet to be fully elucidated.
Our data support the concept that changes in the alveolar environment after silica exposure and specifically a new population of macrophages may be linked to the increase in mycobacterial susceptibility following silica exposure. Immunologic properties of macrophages vary following defined activation stimuli (53). For example, the classically activated macrophages (M1) induced by Th1 signals (IFN-γ, TNF-α, and LPS) protect against intracellular pathogens as a result of increased oxidative burst, NO release, cytotoxic activities, and the production of proinflammatory cytokines (54, 55). In contrast, M2 macrophages induced by Th2 cytokines (e.g., IL-4) are generally characterized by low production of proinflammatory cytokines within the lung (56, 57). Previous studies suggest that macrophages from individuals with chronic inflammation resemble alternatively activated macrophages (M2) (58, 59). Although the presence of M2 macrophages has been linked to fibrosis, the presence of these macrophages appeared to diminish tissue injury and fibrosis following I.T. instillation of silica (56). Further studies will be needed to define the cellular and molecular markers of the population of AMs that appear 3 wk after silica exposure and are responsible for the enhanced susceptibility to mycobacterial infection.
Both macrophage-activating and -inactivating cytokines are produced following exposure to mycobacteria (60). However, whether local production of cytokines that specially impair AM function during the progression of silicosis contributes to susceptibility to mycobacterial infection is not known. The Th1 response is essential in protecting against M. tuberculosis infection; however, a Th2 cytokine profile subsequently results in increased susceptibility to M. tuberculosis and other opportunistic infections (60-65).
Previous studies suggest that the progression of silicosis is associated with a Th1 to Th2 switch in cytokines secretion (62). Acute silica exposure is associated with the induction of Th1 cytokines such as IL-2, IFN-γ, IL-12, and IL-18 (62, 66-73). However, other reports also suggest increases in Th2-type cytokines such as IL-4, IL-5, IL-9, IL-10, and IL-13 in silicosis (74). Preliminary studies from our laboratory have not identified any dramatic difference in the cytokine profile in the BAL of silica exposed relative to control mice at the time that we see enhanced susceptibility to mycobacterial infection (4 wk; data not shown). Nevertheless, it remains possible that a decrease in key macrophage-activating cytokines or enhancement in the levels of inhibitory cytokines in a later stage of silicosis could lead to the enhanced susceptibility to M. avium or M. tuberculosis disease due to impairment in AM immune functions.
In summary, we have demonstrated that silica pre-exposure for 30 days or more converts mycobacterial-resistant C57BL/6 mice into mice that are highly susceptible to both M. avium and M. tuberculosis infection. AMs from silica-exposed mice revealed higher numbers of AFB+ M. avium compared with mice exposed to control dust or saline. Similarly, only lung sections from silica-exposed mice markedly increased M. avium and M. tuberculosis infection compared with control mice. In addition, passive transfer of silica-exposed AMs enhanced in vivo susceptibility of M. tuberculosis infection in normal C57BL/6 hosts. Direct or indirect effects of silica in the airway on AM populations appear to be critical in enhancing susceptibility to mycobacterial infection. The murine model that we describe herein offers an important new opportunity to uncover the link between human silicosis and mycobacterial infections of the lung.
Acknowledgments
We thank Julie Valente for contributing to the preparation of this manuscript, Neal Wolfe for providing assistance in the BSL3 facility, and Banu Rekha Kesavalu and Judy Cain for technical assistance.
Footnotes
This work was supported by National Institutes of Health Grant R01 HL076955 (to R.P. and B.E.B.) and Veterans Affairs Merit Review Award (to B.E.B.).
- AM
- alveolar macrophage
- BAL
- bronchoalveolar lavage
- I.T.
- intratracheal(ly)
- EGFP
- enhanced GFP
- AFB
- acid fast bacilli
Disclosures The authors have no financial conflict of interest.
References
- 1.Bowden D. Macrophage, dust and pulmonary diseases. Exp. Lung Res. 1987;12:89–107. doi: 10.3109/01902148709062834. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Mossman BT, Churg A. Mechanisms in the pathogenesis of asbestosis and silicosis. Am. J. Respir. Crit. Care Med. 1998;157:1666–1680. doi: 10.1164/ajrccm.157.5.9707141. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Craighead J, Kleinerman J, Abraham J, Gibbs A, Greene F, Harley R, Ruettner J, NV V, EB J. Diseases associated with exposure to silica and nonfibrous silicate minerals: Silicosis and Silicate Disease Committee. Arch. Pathol. Lab. Med. 1988;112:673–720. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Chang KC, Leung CC, Tam CM. Tuberculosis risk factors in a silicotic cohort in Hong Kong. Int. J Tuberc. Lung Dis. 2001;5:177–184. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Corbett EL, Churchyard GJ, Clayton T, Herselman P, Williams B, Hayes R, Mulder D, De Cock KM. Risk factors for pulmonary mycobacterial disease in South African gold miners: a case-control study. Am. J. Respir. Crit. Care Med. 1999;159:94–99. doi: 10.1164/ajrccm.159.1.9803048. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Hnizdo E, Murray J. Risk of pulmonary tuberculosis relative to silicosis and exposure to silica dust in South African gold miners. Occup. Environ. Med. 1998;55:496–502. doi: 10.1136/oem.55.7.496. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Cowie RL. The epidemiology of tuberculosis in gold miners with silicosis. Am. J Respir. Crit. Care Med. 1994;150:1460–1462. doi: 10.1164/ajrccm.150.5.7952577. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Corbett EL, Hay M, Churchyard GJ, Herselman P, Clayton T, Williams BG, Hayes R, Mulder D, De Cock KM. Mycobacterium kansasii and M. scrofulaceum isolates from HIV-negative South African gold miners: incidence, clinical significance and radiology. Int. J. Tuberc. Lung Dis. 1999;3:501–507. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Owens MW, Kinasewitz GT, Gonzalez E. Sandblaster’s lung with mycobacterial infection. Am. J Med. Sci. 1988;295:554–557. doi: 10.1097/00000441-198806000-00010. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Fenton MJ, Vermeulen MW. Immunopathology of tuberculosis: roles of macrophages and monocytes. Infect. Immun. 1996;64:683–690. doi: 10.1128/iai.64.3.683-690.1996. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Chan J, Xing Y, Magliozzo RS, Bloom BR. Killing of virulent Mycobacterium tuberculosis by reactive nitrogen intermediates produced by activated murine macrophages. J. Exp. Med. 1992;175:1111–1122. doi: 10.1084/jem.175.4.1111. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Akaki T, Tomioka H, Shimizu T, Dekio S, Sato K. Comparative roles of free fatty acids with reactive nitrogen intermediates and reactive oxygen intermediates in expression of the anti-microbial activity of macrophages against Mycobacterium tuberculosis. Clin. Exp. Immunol. 2000;121:302–310. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2249.2000.01298.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Kusner DJ, Barton JA. ATP stimulates human macrophages to kill intracellular virulent Mycobacterium tuberculosis via calcium-dependent phagosome-lysosome fusion. J. Immunol. 2001;167:3308–3315. doi: 10.4049/jimmunol.167.6.3308. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Flynn JL, Chan J. Immune evasion by Mycobacterium tuberculosis: living with the enemy. Curr. Opin. Immunol. 2003;15:450–455. doi: 10.1016/s0952-7915(03)00075-x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Barnes PF, Bloch AB, Davidson PT, Snider DE., Jr. Tuberculosis in patients with human immunodeficiency virus infection. N. Engl. J. Med. 1991;324:1644–1650. doi: 10.1056/NEJM199106063242307. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.van Lettow M, Fawzi WW, Semba RD. Triple trouble: the role of malnutrition in tuberculosis and human immunodeficiency virus co-infection. Nutr. Rev. 2003;61:81–90. doi: 10.1301/nr.2003.marr.81-90. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Johnson MP, Chaisson RE. Tuberculosis and HIV disease. AIDS Clin. Rev. 1991:109–126. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Churchyard GJ, Kleinschmidt I, Corbett EL, Murray J, Smith J, De Cock KM. Factors associated with an increased case-fatality rate in HIV-infected and non-infected South African gold miners with pulmonary tuberculosis. Int. J. Tuberc. Lung Dis. 2000;4:705–712. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Hamilton RF, Jr., Thakur SA, Holian A. Silica binding and toxicity in alveolar macrophages. Free Radical Biol. Med. 2008;44:1246–1258. doi: 10.1016/j.freeradbiomed.2007.12.027. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Shen HM, Zhang Z, Zhang QF, Ong CN. Reactive oxygen species and caspase activation mediate silica-induced apoptosis in alveolar macrophages. Am. J. Physiol. 2001;280:L10–L17. doi: 10.1152/ajplung.2001.280.1.L10. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Vallyathan V, Shi X. The role of oxygen free radicals in occupational and environmental lung diseases. Environ. Health Perspect. 1997;105(Suppl 1):165–177. doi: 10.1289/ehp.97105s1165. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Zimmerman B, Canono B, Campbell P. Silica decreases phagocytosis and bactericidal activity of both macrophages and neutrophils in vitro. Immunology. 1986;59:521–525. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Gleva GF, Goodglick LA, Kane AB. Altered calcium homeostasis in irreversibly injured P388D1 macrophages. Am. J. Pathol. 1990;137:43–57. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Shi X, Mao Y, Daniel LN, Saffiotti U, Dalal NS, Vallyathan V. Silica radical-induced DNA damage and lipid peroxidation. Environ. Health Perspect. 1994;102:149–154. doi: 10.1289/ehp.94102s10149. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Daniel LN, Mao Y, Wang TC, Markey CJ, Markey SP, Shi X, Saffiotti U. DNA strand breakage, thymine glycol production, and hydroxyl radical generation induced by different samples of crystalline silica in vitro. Environ. Res. 1995;71:60–73. doi: 10.1006/enrs.1995.1068. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Shi X, Castranova V, Halliwell B, Vallyathan V. Reactive oxygen species and silica-induced carcinogenesis. J. Toxicol. Environ. Health B Crit. Rev. 1998;1:181–197. doi: 10.1080/10937409809524551. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Chen GX, Burnett CA, Cameron LL, Alterman T, Lalich NR, Tanaka S, Althouse RB. Tuberculosis mortality and silica exposure: a case-control study based on a national mortality database for the years 1983–1992. Int. J. Occup. Environ. Health. 1997;3:163–170. doi: 10.1179/oeh.1997.3.3.163. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Snider DE., Jr. The relationship between tuberculosis and silicosis. Am. Rev. Respir. Dis. 1978;118:455–460. doi: 10.1164/arrd.1978.118.3.455. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Balmes J. Silica exposure and tuberculosis: an old problem with some new twists. J. Occup. Med. 1990;32:114–115. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30.Allison AC, Hart PD. Potentiation by silica of the growth of Mycobacterium tuberculosis in macrophage cultures. Br. J. Exp. Pathol. 1968;49:465–476. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31.Ohtsuka Y, Munakata M, Ukita H, Takahashi T, Satoh A, Homma Y, Kawakami Y. Increased susceptibility to silicosis and TNF-α production in C57BL/6J mice. Am. J. Respir. Crit. Care Med. 1995;152:2144–2149. doi: 10.1164/ajrccm.152.6.8520788. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32.Roque S, Nobrega C, Appelberg R, Correia-Neves M. IL-10 underlies distinct susceptibility of BALB/c and C57BL/6 mice to Mycobacterium avium infection and influences efficacy of antibiotic therapy. J. Immunol. 2007;178:8028–8035. doi: 10.4049/jimmunol.178.12.8028. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33.Pasula R, Downing JF, Wright JR, Kachel DL, Davis TE, Jr., Martin WJ., II Surfactant protein A (SP-A) mediates attachment of Mycobacterium tuberculosis to murine alveolar macrophages. American J. Respir. Cell Mol. Biol. 1997;17:209–217. doi: 10.1165/ajrcmb.17.2.2469. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34.Allison AC, Harrington JS, Birbeck M. An examination of the cytotoxic effects of silica on macrophages. J. Exp. Med. 1966;124:141–154. doi: 10.1084/jem.124.2.141. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35.Wisniowski P, Spech R, Wu M, Doyle N, Pasula R, Martin W., II Vitronectin protects alveolar macrophages from silica toxicity. Am. J. Respir. Crit. Care Med. 2000;162:733–739. doi: 10.1164/ajrccm.162.2.9808015. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36.Spech RW, Wisniowski P, Kachel DL, Wright JR, Martin WJ., II Surfactant protein A prevents silica-mediated toxicity to rat alveolar macrophages. Am. J. Physiol. 2000;278:L713–L718. doi: 10.1152/ajplung.2000.278.4.L713. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 37.Wu M, Hussain S, He Y-H, Pasula R, Smith AP, Martin WJ., II Genetically engineered macrophages expressing IFN-γ restore alveolar immune function in scid mice. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA. 2001;98:14589–14594. doi: 10.1073/pnas.251451498. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 38.Pasula R, Weaver T, Martinez MA, Martin WJ., II Morphologic detection and functional assessment of reconstituted normal alveolar macrophages in the lungs of SCID mice. J. Immunol. 2002;169:4504–4510. doi: 10.4049/jimmunol.169.8.4504. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 39.Warshawsky D, Reilman R, Cheu J, Radike M, Rice C. Influence of particle dose on the cytotoxicity of hamster and rat pulmonary alveolar macrophage in vitro. J. Toxicol. Environ. Health. 1994;42:407–421. doi: 10.1080/15287399409531891. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 40.Kuebler RR, Smith H. Statistics. Wiley; New York: 1976. [Google Scholar]
- 41.Botha T, Ryffel B. Reactivation of latent tuberculosis by an inhibitor of inducible nitric oxide synthase in an aerosol murine model. Immunology. 2002;107:350–357. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2567.2002.01511.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 42.Leemans JC, Juffermans JP, Florquin S, Rooijen NV, Vervoordeldonk MJ, Verbon A, van Deventer SJH, van der Poll T. Depletion of alveolar macrophages exerts protective effects in pulmonary tuberculosis in mice. J. Immunol. 2001;166:4604–4611. doi: 10.4049/jimmunol.166.7.4604. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 43.Pieters J. Entry and survival of pathogenic mycobacteria in macrophages. Microbes Infect. 2001;3:249–255. doi: 10.1016/s1286-4579(01)01376-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 44.Malik ZA, Denning GM, Kusner DJ. Inhibition of Ca2+ signaling by Mycobacterium tuberculosis is associated with reduced phagosomelysosome fusion and increased survival within human macrophages. J. Exp. Med. 2000;191:287–302. doi: 10.1084/jem.191.2.287. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 45.Keane J, Balcewicz-Sablinska MK, Remold HG, Chupp G, Meek B, Fenton M, Kornfeld H. Infection by Mycobacterium tuberculosis promotes human alveolar macrophage apoptosis. Infect. Immun. 1997;65:298–304. doi: 10.1128/iai.65.1.298-304.1997. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 46.Balcewicz-Sablinska MK, Keane J, Kornfeld H, Remold H. Pathogenic Mycobacterium tuberculosis evades apoptosis of host macrophages by release of TNF-R2, resulting in inactivation of TNF-α. J. Immunol. 1998;161:2636–2641. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 47.Keane J, Remold HG, Kornfeld H. Virulent Mycobacterium tuberculosis strains evade apoptosis of infected alveolar macrophages. J. Immunol. 2000;164:2016–2020. doi: 10.4049/jimmunol.164.4.2016. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 48.Fayyazi A, Eichmeyer B, Soruri A, Schweyer S, Herms J, Schwarz P, Radzun HJ. Apoptosis of macrophages and T cells in tuberculosis associated caseous necrosis. J. Pathol. 2000;191:417–425. doi: 10.1002/1096-9896(2000)9999:9999<::AID-PATH664>3.0.CO;2-R. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 49.Watson VE, Hill LL, Owen-Schaub LB, Davis DW, McConkey DJ, Jagannath C, Hunter RL, Jr., Actor JK. Apoptosis in mycobacterium tuberculosis infection in mice exhibiting varied immunopathology. J. Pathol. 2000;190:211–220. doi: 10.1002/(SICI)1096-9896(200002)190:2<211::AID-PATH530>3.0.CO;2-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 50.Von Behren LA, Chaudhary S, Khardori N, Rabinovich S, Shu MD, Tewari RP. Effect of silica on the susceptibility of mice to experimental histoplasmosis. J. Reticuloendothel. Soc. 1983;34:99–111. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 51.Weissman D, Antonini JM, Abrons H, Zhuang Z, Stanley C, Schafer R, Hubbs A. Impaired clearance of pulmonary Listeria monocytogenes infection in experimental silicosis. FASEB J. 1999;13:A641. [Google Scholar]
- 52.Antonini JM, Roberts JR, Yang HM, Barger MW, Ramsey D, Castranova V, Ma JY. Effect of silica inhalation on the pulmonary clearance of a bacterial pathogen in Fischer 344 rats. Lung. 2000;178:341–350. doi: 10.1007/s004080000038. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 53.MacMicking J, Xie QW, Nathan C. Nitric oxide and macrophage function. Annu. Rev. Immunol. 1997;15:323–350. doi: 10.1146/annurev.immunol.15.1.323. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 54.Okamoto T, Kohil G, Finkelstein EI, Bove P, Akaike T, van der Vliet A. Multiple contributing roles for NOS2 in LPS-induced acute airway inflammation in mice. Am. J. Physiol. 2004;286:L198–L1209. doi: 10.1152/ajplung.00136.2003. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 55.Speyer CL, Neff TA, Warner RL, Guo RF, Sarma JV, Riedemann NC, Murphy ME, Murphy HS, Ward PA. Regulatory effects of iNOS on acute lung inflammatory responses in mice. Am. J. Pathol. 2003;163:2319–2328. doi: 10.1016/S0002-9440(10)63588-2. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 56.Misson P, van den Brule S, Barbarin V, Lison D, Huaux F. Markers of macrophage differentiation in experimental silicosis. J. Leukocyte Biol. 2004;76:926–932. doi: 10.1189/jlb.0104019. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 57.Mora AL, Torres-González E, Rojas, Corredor M, Ritzenthaler C, Xu J, Roman J, Brigham J, Stecenko A. Activation of alveolar macrophages via the alternative pathway in herpesvirus-induced lung fibrosis. Am. J. Resp. Cell Mol. Biol. 2006;35:466–471. doi: 10.1165/rcmb.2006-0121OC. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 58.Corsini E, Giani A, Lucchi L, Peano S, Viviani B, Galli CL, Marinovich M. Resistance to acute silicosis in senescent rats: role of alveolar macrophages. Chem. Res. Toxicol. 2003;16:1520–1527. doi: 10.1021/tx034139+. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 59.Orfila C, Lipert JC, Gossart S, Frisach MF, Cambon C, Pipy B. Immunocytochemical characterization of lung macrophage surface phenotypes and expression of cytokines in acute experimental silicosis in mice. Histochem. J. 1998;30:857–867. doi: 10.1023/a:1003485312164. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 60.van Crevel R, Ottenhoff TH, van der Meer JW. Innate immunity to Mycobacterium tuberculosis. Clin. Microbiol. Rev. 2002;15:294–309. doi: 10.1128/CMR.15.2.294-309.2002. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 61.Jouanguy E, Doffinger R, Dupuis S, Pallier A, Altare F, Casanova JL. IL-12 and IFN-γ in host defense against mycobacteria and Salmonella in mice and men. Curr. Opin. Immunol. 1999;11:346–351. doi: 10.1016/s0952-7915(99)80055-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 62.Garn H, Friedetzky A, Kirchner A, Jager R, Gemsa D. Experimental silicosis: a shift to a preferential IFN-γ-based Th1 response in thoracic lymph nodes. Am. J. Physiol. 2000;278:L1221–L1230. doi: 10.1152/ajplung.2000.278.6.L1221. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 63.Frucht DM, Sandberg DI, Brown MR, Gerstberger SM, Holland SM. IL-12-independent costimulation pathways for interferon-γ production in familial disseminated Mycobacterium avium complex infection. Clin. Immunol. 1999;91:234–241. doi: 10.1006/clim.1999.4688. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 64.de Jong R, Altare F, Haagen IA, Elferink DG, Boer T, van Breda Vriesman PJ, Kabel PJ, Draaisma JM, van Dissel JT, Kroon FP, et al. Severe mycobacterial and Salmonella infections in interleukin-12 receptor-deficient patients. Science. 1998;280:1435–1438. doi: 10.1126/science.280.5368.1435. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 65.Lichtenauer-Kaligis EG, de Boer T, Verreck FA, van Voorden S, Hoeve MA, van de Vosse E, Ersoy F, Tezcan I, van Dissel JT, Sanal O, Ottenhoff TH. Severe Mycobacterium bovis BCG infections in a large series of novel IL-12 receptor β1 deficient patients and evidence for the existence of partial IL-12 receptor β1 deficiency. Eur. J. Immunol. 2003;33:59–69. doi: 10.1002/immu.200390008. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 66.Davis GS, Hemenway DR, Evans JN, Lapenas DJ, Brody AR. Alveolar macrophage stimulation and population changes in silica-exposed rats. Chest. 1981;80:8S–10S. doi: 10.1378/chest.80.1_supplement.8s. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 67.Davis GS, Pfeiffer LM, Hemenway DR. Interferon-γ production by specific lung lymphocyte phenotypes in silicosis in mice. Am. J. Cell Mol. Biol. 2000;22:491–501. doi: 10.1165/ajrcmb.22.4.3599. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 68.Brown JM, Pfau JC, Holian A. Immunoglobulin and lymphocyte responses following silica exposure in New Zealand mixed mice. Inhal. Toxicol. 2004;16:133–139. doi: 10.1080/08958370490270936. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 69.Davis GS, Pfeiffer LM, Hemenway DR. Expansion of interferon-γ-producing lung lymphocytes in mouse silicosis. Am. J. Respir. Cell Mol. Biol. 1999;20:813–824. doi: 10.1165/ajrcmb.20.4.3407. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 70.Garn H, Friedetzky A, Davis GS, Hemenway DR, Gemsa D. T-lymphocyte activation in the enlarged thoracic lymph nodes of rats with silicosis. Am. J. Cell Mol. Biol. 1997;16:309–316. doi: 10.1165/ajrcmb.16.3.9070616. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 71.Garn H, Friedetzky A, Kirchner A, Jäger R, Gemsa D. Experimental silicosis: a shift to a preferential IFN-γ-based Th1 response in thoracic lymph nodes. Am. J. Physiol. 2000;278:L1221–L1230. doi: 10.1152/ajplung.2000.278.6.L1221. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 72.van Zijverden M, van der Pijl A, Bol M, van Pinxteren FA, de Haar C, Penninks AH, van Loveren H, Pieters R. Diesel exhaust, carbon black, and silica particles display distinct Th1/Th2 modulating activity. Toxicol. Appl. Pharmacol. 2000;168:131–139. doi: 10.1006/taap.2000.9013. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 73.Arras M, Huaux F, Vink A, Delos M, Coutelier MJP, Many MC, Barbarin V, Renauld JC, Lison D. Interleukin-9 reduces lung fibrosis and type 2 immune polarization induced by silica particles in a murine model. Am. J Cell Mol. Biol. 2001;24:368–375. doi: 10.1165/ajrcmb.24.4.4249. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 74.Misson P, van dan Brûle S, Barbarin V, Lison D, Huaux F. Markers of macrophage differentiation in experimental silicosis. J. Leukocyte Biol. 2004;76:926–932. doi: 10.1189/jlb.0104019. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]


