Skip to main content
Journal of Clinical Microbiology logoLink to Journal of Clinical Microbiology
. 1978 May;7(5):454–458. doi: 10.1128/jcm.7.5.454-458.1978

Evaluation of the card test for diagnosis of human brucellosis.

A O Russell, C M Patton, A F Kaufmann
PMCID: PMC275016  PMID: 659575

Abstract

The relative efficacy of the card test in the diagnosis of human brucellosis was evaluated by comparison with four other tests: the standard tube agglutination test, centrifugation agglutination test, 2-mercaptoethanol degradation technique, and 2-mercaptoethanol centrifugation agglutination test. A total of 1,701 serum specimens from persons with various degrees of potential exposure to brucella organisms or cross-reactive antigens were used in this study. In comparison with standard tube agglutination results, the card test had a sensitivity of 95.3% and a specificity of 84.1%. The card-test antigen was nonreactive with serum specimens from tularemia patients and cholera vaccinees. Our data indicated that this test measures both immunoglobulin G and immunoglobulin M agglutinins. The value of the card test in the presumptive serological diagnosis of clinical brucellosis in humans appears to be low; however, the card test may be of value in serological surveys to delineate high-risk populations.

Full text

PDF
458

Images in this article

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Benenson A. S., Saad A., Mosley W. H. Serological studies in cholera. 2. The vibriocidal antibody response of cholera patients determined by a microtechnique. Bull World Health Organ. 1968;38(2):277–285. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Buchanan T. M., Hendricks S. L., Patton C. M., Feldman R. A. Brucellosis in the United States, 1960-1972; An abattoir-associated disease. Part III. Epidemiology and evidence for acquired immunity. Medicine (Baltimore) 1974 Nov;53(6):427–439. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Buchanan T. M., Sulzer C. R., Frix M. K., Feldman R. A. Brucellosis in the United States, 1960-1972. An abattoir-associated disease. Part II. Diagnostic aspects. Medicine (Baltimore) 1974 Nov;53(6):415–425. doi: 10.1097/00005792-197411000-00002. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Corbel M. J. Identification of the immunoglobulin class active in the Rose Bengal plate test for bovine brucellosis. J Hyg (Lond) 1972 Dec;70(4):779–795. doi: 10.1017/s0022172400022622. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. LAMBERT G., AMERAULT T. E. An evaluation of acidified plate test antigens for detecting bovine brucellosis. Am J Vet Res. 1962 Sep;23:1031–1034. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Nicoletti P., Fadai-Ghotbi M. M. A comparison of the tube agglutination and card tests for the diagnosis of Brucella melitensis infection in humans. Can J Public Health. 1971 Sep-Oct;62(5):442–445. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. O'Reilly D. J., Cunningham B. An assessment of the brucellosis card test. Vet Rec. 1971 Jun 5;88(23):590–594. doi: 10.1136/vr.88.23.590. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Prior M. G., Niilo L., Reeker W. H. Use of the brucellosis card test for screening cattle in Saskatchewan. Can J Comp Med. 1975 Apr;39(2):107–109. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. REDDIN J. L., ANDERSON R. K., JENNESS R., SPINK W. W. SIGNIFICANCE OF 7S AND MACROGLOBULIN BRUCELLA AGGLUTININS IN HUMAN BRUCELLOSIS. N Engl J Med. 1965 Jun 17;272:1263–1268. doi: 10.1056/NEJM196506172722403. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. ROSE J. E., ROEPKE M. H. An acidified antigen for detection of nonspecific reactions in the plate-agglutination test for bovine brucellosis. Am J Vet Res. 1957 Jul;18(68):550–555. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Journal of Clinical Microbiology are provided here courtesy of American Society for Microbiology (ASM)

RESOURCES