Skip to main content
PMC home page
Journal of Bacteriology logoLink to Journal of Bacteriology
. 1966 Sep;92(3):601–608. doi: 10.1128/jb.92.3.601-608.1966

Glucose Effect and the Galactose Enzymes of Escherichia coli: Correlation Between Glucose Inhibition of Induction and Inducer Transport

Sankar Adhya 1, Harrison Echols 1
PMCID: PMC276297  PMID: 5332079

Abstract

Adhya, Sankar (University of Wisconsin, Madison), and Harrison Echols. Glucose effect and the galactose enzymes of Escherichia coli: correlation between glucose inhibition of induction and inducer transport. J. Bacteriol. 92:601–608. 1966.—The inhibitory effect of glucose on the induction of the enzymes required for galactose utilization (“glucose effect”) was studied in Escherichia coli. Experiments on the uptake into the cell of labeled inducers (d-galactose-C14 and d-fucose-H3) pointed to inhibition at the level of inducer transport as the possible primary mechanism of the glucose effect in the case of the gal enzymes. This interpretation was supported by the finding that a mutant constitutive for the lac enzymes was resistant to glucose inhibition of galactose induction of the gal enzymes; the mutant had acquired a glucose-resistant alternative transport mechanism for galactose via the constitutively synthesized galactoside permease. Further support for the transport inhibition model was provided by the finding that glucose did not substantially inhibit induction of the gal enzymes when glucose and galactose were produced intracellularly by β-galactosidase hydrolysis of lactose, even if excess glucose was added. The inducer uptake experiments also showed that d-galactose and d-fucose probably enter the cell via different transport systems, although uptake of both compounds was inhibited by glucose.

Full text

PDF
603

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. BUTTIN G., COHEN G. N., MONOD J., RICKENBERG H. V. La galactoside-perméase d'Escherichia coli. Ann Inst Pasteur (Paris) 1956 Dec;91(6):829–857. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. ECHOLS H., REZNICHEK J., ADHYA S. COMPLEMENTATION, RECOMBINATION, AND SUPPRESSION IN GALACTOSE NEGATIVE MUTANTS OF E. COLI. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1963 Aug;50:286–293. doi: 10.1073/pnas.50.2.286. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. EGAN J. B., MORSE M. L. CARBOHYDRATE TRANSPORT IN STAPHYLOCOCCUS AUREUS I. GENETIC AND BIOCHEMICAL ANALYSIS OF A PLEIOTROPIC TRANSPORT MUTANT. Biochim Biophys Acta. 1965 Feb 15;97:310–319. doi: 10.1016/0304-4165(65)90096-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Echols H. PROPERTIES OF F' STRAINS OF ESCHERICHIA COLI SUPERINFECTED WITH F-LACTOSE AND F-GALATOSE EPISOMES. J Bacteriol. 1963 Feb;85(2):262–268. doi: 10.1128/jb.85.2.262-268.1963. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. HORECKER B. L., THOMAS J., MONOD J. Galactose transport in Escherichia coli. I. General properties as studied in a galactokinaseless mutant. J Biol Chem. 1960 Jun;235:1580–1585. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. ISHIBASHI M., SUGINO Y., HIROTA Y. CHROMOSOMAL LOCATION OF THYMINE AND ARGININE GENES IN ESCHERICHIA COLI AND AN F' INCORPORATING THEM. J Bacteriol. 1964 Mar;87:554–561. doi: 10.1128/jb.87.3.554-561.1964. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. JACOB F., MONOD J. Genetic regulatory mechanisms in the synthesis of proteins. J Mol Biol. 1961 Jun;3:318–356. doi: 10.1016/s0022-2836(61)80072-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. KEPES A. [Kinetic studies on galactoside permease of Escherichia coli]. Biochim Biophys Acta. 1960 May 6;40:70–84. doi: 10.1016/0006-3002(60)91316-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. KESSLER D. P., RICKENBERG H. V. The competitive inhibition of alpha-methylglucoside uptake in Escherichia coli. Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 1963 Mar 25;10:482–487. doi: 10.1016/0006-291x(63)90383-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Kalckar H. M., Kurahashi K., Jordan E. HEREDITARY DEFECTS IN GALACTOSE METABOLISM IN ESCHERICHIA COLI MUTANTS, I. DETERMINATION OF ENZYME ACTIVITIES. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1959 Dec;45(12):1776–1786. doi: 10.1073/pnas.45.12.1776. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. LOWRY O. H., ROSEBROUGH N. J., FARR A. L., RANDALL R. J. Protein measurement with the Folin phenol reagent. J Biol Chem. 1951 Nov;193(1):265–275. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. MAGASANIK B. Catabolite repression. Cold Spring Harb Symp Quant Biol. 1961;26:249–256. doi: 10.1101/sqb.1961.026.01.031. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. ROGERS D., YU S. H. Substrate specificity of a glucose permease of Escherichia coli. J Bacteriol. 1962 Nov;84:877–881. doi: 10.1128/jb.84.5.877-881.1962. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. SHERMAN J. R., ADLER J. Galactokinse from Escherichia coli. J Biol Chem. 1963 Mar;238:873–878. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Journal of Bacteriology are provided here courtesy of American Society for Microbiology (ASM)

RESOURCES