Skip to main content
Journal of Bacteriology logoLink to Journal of Bacteriology
. 1965 Apr;89(4):1097–1100. doi: 10.1128/jb.89.4.1097-1100.1965

Location and Regeneration of Enterovirus Receptors of HeLa Cells1

Ihor Zajac a, Richard L Crowell a,2
PMCID: PMC277602  PMID: 14279119

Abstract

Zajac, Ihor (Hahnemann Medical College, Philadelphia, Pa.), and Richard L. Crowell. Location and regeneration of enterovirus receptors of HeLa cells. J. Bacteriol. 89:1097–1100. 1965.—Treatment of live HeLa cells with chymotrypsin or trypsin completely inactivated the viral receptors for coxsackievirus B3 and poliovirus T1, respectively. Enzyme-treated cells regained their enterovirus receptor activity after incubation in culture medium. The existence of intracellular receptors for virus could not be demonstrated when live HeLa cells were treated with enzyme prior to disruption and fractionation. These results suggested that receptors for enteroviruses are limited to the cell surface.

Full text

PDF
1099

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. BALUDA M. A. Loss of viral receptors in homologous interference by ultraviolet-irradiated Newcastle disease virus. Virology. 1959 Mar;7(3):315–327. doi: 10.1016/0042-6822(59)90201-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. CROWELL R. L., SYVERTON J. T. The mammalian cell-virus relationship. VI. Sustained infection of HeLa cells by Coxsackie B3 virus and effect on superinfection. J Exp Med. 1961 Feb 1;113:419–435. doi: 10.1084/jem.113.2.419. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. DULBECCO R., VOGT M. Plaque formation and isolation of pure lines with poliomyelitis viruses. J Exp Med. 1954 Feb;99(2):167–182. doi: 10.1084/jem.99.2.167. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. HOLLAND J. J., McLAREN L. C. The location and nature of enterovirus receptors in susceptible cells. J Exp Med. 1961 Aug 1;114:161–171. doi: 10.1084/jem.114.2.161. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. KODZA H., JUNGEBLUT C. W. Effect of receptor-destroying enzyme on the growth of EMC virus in tissue culture. J Immunol. 1958 Jul;81(1):76–81. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. MARCUS P. I. Symposium on the biology of cells modified by viruses or antigens. IV. Single-cell techniques in tracing virus-host interactions. Bacteriol Rev. 1959 Dec;23(4):232–249. doi: 10.1128/br.23.4.232-249.1959. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. ROTHSCHILD J. The isolation of microsomal membranes. Biochem Soc Symp. 1963;22:4–31. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. SCHOELLMANN G., SHAW E. Direct evidence for the presence of histidine in the active center of chymotrypsin. Biochemistry. 1963 Mar-Apr;2:252–255. doi: 10.1021/bi00902a008. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. THORNE H. V. ELECTROPHORETIC STUDY OF THE INTERACTION OF RADIOACTIVE POLIOVIRUS WITH COMPONENTS OF CULTURED CELLS. J Bacteriol. 1963 Jun;85:1247–1255. doi: 10.1128/jb.85.6.1247-1255.1963. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. ZAJAC I., CROWELL R. L. EFFECT OF ENZYMES ON THE INTERACTION OF ENTEROVIRUSES WITH LIVING HELA CELLS. J Bacteriol. 1965 Mar;89:574–582. doi: 10.1128/jb.89.3.574-582.1965. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Journal of Bacteriology are provided here courtesy of American Society for Microbiology (ASM)

RESOURCES