Skip to main content
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America logoLink to Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America
. 1988 Mar;85(5):1327–1329. doi: 10.1073/pnas.85.5.1327

Role of algal eukaryotes in subtidal columnar stromatolite formation

Stanley M Awramik *, Robert Riding
PMCID: PMC279763  PMID: 16593910

Abstract

Columnar stromatolites were abundant and widespread in the Proterozoic but are exceedingly rare in modern seas. Consequently, the stromatolites at Hamelin Pool in Shark Bay, Western Australia, have been widely interpreted as unique modern analogs of ancient stromatolites constructed by complex communities of cyanobacteria. However, the Shark Bay columnar stromatolites contain sediment that is unusually coarse for stromatolites both ancient and modern, and the subtidal columnar stromatolites have a significant component of algal eukaryotes dominated by motile diatoms with mucilaginous tubes. This suggests that Shark Bay columnar stromatolites are not strict analogs for most ancient cyanobacterial stromatolites, least of all for those from subtidal environments. We argue that algal eukaryotes may play a substantial role in the formation and maintenance of subtidal columnar stromatolites at Shark Bay and are capable of trapping coarse sediment. In contrast, cyanobacteria have difficulty in trapping coarse sediment and produce essentially fine-grained stromatolites. We propose that there are two major types or end members of Recent marine stromatolites: (i) eualgal-cyanobacterial stromatolites that are generally coarse-grained, and (ii) cyanobacterial stromatolites that are generally fine-grained.

Keywords: cyanobacteria, Proterozoic, Shark Bay

Full text

PDF
1327

Images in this article

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Awramik S. M. Precambrian columnar stromatolite diversity: reflection of metazoan appearance. Science. 1971 Nov 19;174(4011):825–827. doi: 10.1126/science.174.4011.825. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Awramik S. M., Vanyo J. P. Heliotropism in modern stromatolites. Science. 1986 Mar 14;231(4743):1279–1281. doi: 10.1126/science.231.4743.1279. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Dravis J. J. Hardened subtidal stromatolites, bahamas. Science. 1983 Jan 28;219(4583):385–386. doi: 10.1126/science.219.4583.385. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Garrett P. Phanerozoic stromatolites: noncompetitive ecologic restriction by grazing and burrowing animals. Science. 1970 Jul 10;169(3941):171–173. doi: 10.1126/science.169.3941.171. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America are provided here courtesy of National Academy of Sciences

RESOURCES