Abstract
The v-Crk protein was originally isolated as the oncogene fusion product of the CT10 chicken retrovirus. Cellular homologues of v-Crk include Crk, which encodes two alternatively spliced proteins (CrkI and CrkII), and CrkL. Though CrkI/II proteins are elevated in several types of cancer, including breast, the question of whether these Crk adaptor proteins can promote breast cancer has not been addressed. We created a transgenic mouse model that allows the expression of CrkII through the hormonally responsive mouse mammary tumor virus promoter. During puberty, transgenic mice were found to have delayed ductal outgrowth, characterized by increased collagen surrounding the terminal end buds. In post-pubertal mice, precocious ductal branching was observed and associated with increased proliferation. Focal mammary tumors appeared in a subset of animals, with a latency of approximately 15 months. Mouse mammary tumor virus/CrkII tumors showed high levels of Crk protein as well as various cytokeratin markers characteristic of their respective tumor pathologies. This study demonstrates that the precise expression of CrkII is critical for integrating signals for ductal outgrowth and branching morphogenesis during mammary gland development. Furthermore, this study provides evidence for a potential role of CrkII in integrating signals for breast cancer progression in vivo, which has important implications for elevated CrkII observed in human cancer.
Crk was originally isolated as the oncogene fusion product of the CT10 chicken retrovirus (v-Crk) in chicken fibrosarcomas.1 Cellular homologues of v-Crk include c-Crk, which encodes two proteins (c-CrkI and c-CrkII) through alternative splicing, and the related protein c-CrkL. Crk proteins consist of Src homology 2 (SH2) and Src homology 3 (SH3) domains.2 CrkI contains one SH2 domain and one SH3 domain, whereas CrkII also contains a linker region (containing a Y221 negative regulatory site) and a second SH3 domain at the C-terminus.2 CrkL is similar to CrkII with one SH2 domain and 2 SH3 domains, and shares 60% homology with CrkII.3 CrkI, CrkII, and CrkL are all expressed in several tissue types, though CrkI is generally expressed at lower levels than CrkII, and CrkL is highest in hematopoietic tissues.3,4
Crk adaptor proteins have no enzymatic activity but rather play an important role during cellular signaling by mediating the formation of protein−protein complexes.2 In response to extracellular stimuli, Crk has been implicated in cellular processes including cell migration, invasion, adhesion, proliferation, apoptosis, or phagocytosis, depending on the signal transduction pathway activated and the effector proteins involved.2 For instance, in response to hepatocyte growth factor, Crk proteins are required for dispersal of organized epithelial colonies, the formation of lamellipodia, and the breakdown of adherens junctions, all of which are events critical for tumor cell dispersal, invasion and, hence, cancer progression.5 Overexpression of Crk promotes an invasive phenotype regardless of upstream signaling, identifying Crk as a key modulator of upstream signals for cell invasion.6 Moreover, Crk proteins are elevated in multiple types of human cancer, including lung carcinoma, glioblastoma, and breast cancer.7–10
All three Crk proteins (CrkI, CrkII, CrkL) have been shown to be involved in transformation in vitro, albeit to varying degrees. CrkI, which most closely resembles v-Crk, has demonstrated the highest transforming potential. Fibroblast cells expressing CrkI proliferate in soft agar and form tumors in nude mice.11 Although CrkII was thought to have no transforming activity,11 a more recent study has shown that overexpression of CrkII in NIH3T3 fibroblasts and various mouse embryo fibroblasts can induce growth in soft agar, suggesting that CrkII can play a role in anchorage-independent growth, one component of cell transformation.12 Overexpression of CrkL also leads to anchorage-independent growth in fibroblasts.13 Significantly, a mouse model overexpressing CrkL through its endogenous promoter at a high copy number was associated with an increased incidence of leukemogenesis in Bcr-Abl transgenic animals.13,14 Although evidence supports that all three Crk proteins are capable of transforming cells in culture, few studies have addressed their role in vivo and no studies have specifically examined Crk in epithelial derived cancers.
Most in vitro studies on CrkII have focused on fibroblasts, however, CrkII is well-expressed in the epithelium of many tissues.4 Furthermore, although CrkI/II has been shown to be overexpressed in breast cancer, no information is known about whether CrkI/II adaptor proteins can contribute to the formation of the disease. Thus, to examine the importance of CrkII in both tumor progression and mammary gland development, we derived transgenic mice expressing CrkII in the mammary epithelium, under the transcriptional control of the mouse mammary tumor virus promoter (MMTV).
Materials and Methods
Plasmid Construction and Generation of Transgenic Mice
For transgenic mice, pSport6-CrkII (Open Biosystems, NM_016823) was cloned into pDONR201 using the Gateway Vector Conversion System (Invitrogen, Burlington, Canada) then subsequently cloned into p206 vector containing attR cloning sites, the MMTV promoter, and the SV40 polyadenylation sequence. To generate transgenic mice, a purified 6.3 Kb MMTV-CrkII fragment was microinjected into pronuclei of FVB and the generation of chimeric mice was performed at the McGill Transgenic Facility, McGill University. Mice were housed in the Royal Victoria Hospital (Montreal, Canada) transgenic mouse facility and all experiments were performed in accordance with McGill University Animal Ethics Committee guidelines.
Genotyping of Transgenic Mice
Transgenic mice were identified by PCR using DNA extracted from tail tips. PCR reactions were performed using two SV40 specific primers: forward 5′-GGAACCTTACTTCTGTGGTGT-3′ and reverse 5′-GCATCCCACCACTGCTCCCATTC-3′ which gave rise to a product of 350 bp. To examine expression levels of the transgene, total RNA was extracted, isolated, and purified from mammary glands using Trizol reagent (Invitrogen) according to the manufacturer's protocol. Reverse transcription (RT) reactions were performed using oligodT for priming (Invitrogen) and SuperscriptII reverse transcriptase (Invitrogen). Real-time PCR was performed using the Rotor Gene Real-time thermocycler (Corbett Research, Sydney, Australia). The housekeeping gene ALAS1 was used as a control (5′-CCACTGGAAGAGCTGTGTGA-3′ and 3′-TGGCAATGTATCCTCCAACA-5′). The values for each sample obtained from a standard curve were used to determine the expression levels of the transgene by dividing the SV40 value over the housekeeping gene.
Wholemount Analysis of Mammary Glands
Right inguinal mammary glands (#4) were processed according to previously published methods.15 Wholemount images were captured using AxioVision software (Carl Zeiss, Toronto, Canada) and a Zeiss microscope (Carl Zeiss).
Quantification of Ductal Development from Wholemounts
To quantitate ductal outgrowth, images of wholemounts from mice at 10 weeks of age were captured using a microscope and AxioVision software (Carl Zeiss) at a magnification of ×0.6. Using Scion Image-NIH equivalent software for Microsoft Windows (Scion Company, Frederick, MD), the distance from the lymph node to the terminal end bud and the lymph node to the edge of the fat pad was calculated. This calculates the percentage of mammary fat pad by comparing the distance traveled by the leading end buds to the total length of the fat pad.
Increased stroma (eg, fibroblasts, immune cells, extracellular matrix) surrounding terminal end buds was imaged on wholemounts at ×20 and was observed as a “halo” that surrounded the epithelial ducts and end buds. The percentage of terminal end buds with enhanced stroma (or halo-like structures) was quantified and represented as a percentage relative to the total number of terminal end buds present within the mammary glands.
To quantitate the average diameter of end buds, three measurements were taken from the widest portion of each terminal end bud and the average diameter was calculated for the MMTV/CrkII and the FVB mice using Image J software (National Institute of Health, MD), which were then expressed as a percentage. For mice at 10 weeks of age, six control mice and six MMTV/CrkII mice were examined.
Quantification of Ki-67 staining on paraffin-embedded sections derived from 20-week-old MMTV/CrkII and FVB mice was performed using Image Scope software (Quorum Technologies, Guelph, Canada). Quantification was performed using a nuclear algorithm that distinguished between hematoxylin-stained (blue) cells and Ki-67−positive (brown) cells. Using annotation tools, the lymph node was excluded from analysis. Mammary glands from five MMTV/CrkII mice and four FVB control mice were used for analysis.
Histology
Left inguinal mammary glands (#4) were fixed in 10% neutral buffered formalin (Surgipath, Richmond, IL) overnight, transferred to 70% ethanol, and paraffin-embedded. Sections were stained with H&E, or Masson's Trichrome staining. All images were captured using the Aperio Slide Scanner and Image Scope software (Quorum Technologies).
Immunohistochemistry
All paraffin sections (4 μm) were deparaffinized and rehydrated in a series of incubations in xylene and ethanols, and washed in 1× PBS. All antibodies were diluted in PBS containing 2% bovine serum albumen. Antigen retrieval was performed using 10 mmol/L sodium citrate pH 6.0. Sections were then washed in water followed by PBS. Endogenous peroxidases were removed by washing in 3% hydrogen peroxide (Fisher Scientific, Canada). Sections blocked in 2% bovine serum albumen were then incubated with primary antibody overnight at room temperature, then with secondary antibody for 30 minutes at room temperature. Sections were washed and, if biotinylated, subjected to an ABC reagent for 30 minutes (Vector, Burlingame, CA). After washing, sections underwent a diaminobenzidine substrate reaction (DAKO Cytomation, Glostrup, Denmark), were counterstained with hematoxylin and mounted using Acytrol. Primary antibodies included: Ki-67 (1:1500), Crk (1:200), cytokeratin (CK)8 (1:1200), CK6 (1:800), CK14 (1:1000), smooth muscle actin (SMA; 1:500), proliferating cell nuclear antigen (1:1500), vimentin (1:1500), netrin-4 (1:100), and laminin (1:100). Staining for proliferating cell nuclear antigen was performed using the Mouse on Mouse staining kit (Chemicon, Temecula, CA). The secondary antibody for Crk and SMA was anti-mouse horseradish peroxidase (1:500), whereas Ki-67, laminin, CK14, and CK6 used the anti-rabbit Vectastain biotinylated antibody (Vector). CK8 staining required the biotinylated anti-guinea pig whereas vimentin and netrin-4 required the biotinylated anti-goat secondary antibody (Vector). The F4/80 staining required the biotinylated anti-rat secondary antibody (Vector). The proliferating cell nuclear antigen antibody was purchased from DAKO Cytomation, CK8/18 from Fitzgerald Industries International (Concord, MA), and CK14 and CK6 were from Covance (Berkley, CA). The rabbit polyclonal antibody recognizing Ki-67 was purchased from Abcam (Cambridge, MA). Monoclonal antibodies for Crk and vimentin were purchased from BD Transduction Laboratories (Lexington, KY), SMA and laminin from Sigma Aldrich (Oakville, Canada), Ki-67, F4/80, and netrin-4 from Cedarlane Laboratories (Hornby, Canada). For terminal deoxynucleotidyl transferase dUTP nick-end labeling, the TUNEL Apoptag Plus Peroxidase In Situ Detection system was used according to the manufacturer protocol (Chemicon). All images were captured using the Aperio Slide Scanner and Image Scope software. Immunofluorescence of mammary wholemounts was performed according to standard procedures.16
Protein Analysis and Antibodies
Mouse mammary glands were lysed and whole cell lysates were resolved by SDS-polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis in 12% gels as previously described.8 The connective tissue growth factor (CTGF) antibody was generously provided by Dr. Peter Siegel's laboratory. Densitometry was performed using Image J Software.
Analysis of Tumor Formation
Mammary glands with visible tumor formation were resected. Tumor pieces were snap frozen in liquid nitrogen or fixed in 10% neutral buffered formalin.
Microarray Analysis
T47D and T47D-CrkII cells were cultured as previously described and either harvested for protein or RNA.5 RNA was isolated using Trizol and then quantified and amplified according to previous methods.17 The RNA was subsequently labeled with Cy5 and hybridized against Cy3 labeled Universal Human Reference RNA (Stratagene) on 1x44K Human Oligo microarray chips purchased from Agilent Technologies (Palo Alto, CA). Microarrays were washed and scanned using Agilent's dual-laser microarray scanner (Model G2505B) according to the manufacturer's instructions. Cy3/Cy5 signals were quantified using Agilent Feature Extraction software (Palo Alto, CA). Microarray normalization was performed as previously described.18 Differential expression was evaluated using Linear Models for Microarray Data (LIMMA) and Benjamin-Hochberg and a multiple testing correction was applied. A hypergeometric test was used to identify Gene Ontology (GO) and Kyoto Encyclopedia of Genes and Genomes (KEGG) categories overrepresented in the set of differentially expressed genes.
RT-PCR
RNA used for the microarrays (before amplification) was reverse-transcribed, according to the manufacturer's direction (Roche, Canada). RT-PCR analysis was performed using the Qiagen SYBR Green kit and a Roche lightcycler (Roche, Canada). A standard curve was created by combining equal amounts of each sample and performing serial dilutions. Primers were: Calponin1, 5′-CCAGCCCCTGTAGAACTCAA-3′ Calponin1, 3′-ACAGCTGGAATAGCGTTGCT-5′; Netrin 4, 5′CAGCAGCACTGCCACTACAT-3′ Netrin 4, 3′-CATCATGGCTGTCATCTTGG-5′; CTGF, 5′-GGAAAAGATTCCCACCCAAT-3′, CTGF, 3′-TGCTCCTAAAGCCACACCTT-5′; progesterone receptor, 5′-ACATGGTAGCTGTGGGAAGG-3′, progesterone receptor, 3′-GCTAAGCCAGCAAGAAATGG-5′; and collagen12alpha1, 5′-CAGGTTCCGGCTAACACATT-3′, collagen12alpha1, 3′-GTCTCCACCCTCCTTTGTGA-5′.
Statistical Analysis
Results were expressed as the mean ± SE. Statistical analysis of data were performed using a Student's t-test.
Results
Overexpression of CrkII in the Mammary Epithelium Leads to Defects in Ductal Outgrowth
To determine the effects of overexpression of CrkII on mammary gland physiology and tumorigenesis, MMTV/CrkII transgenic mice were generated (Figure 1A). Five positive founder lines were further characterized for transgene expression. Mammary glands from both nulliparous and lactating female mice were examined for expression levels of the transgene by quantitative RT-PCR and Western blot analysis (Figure 1, B and C). The MMTV promoter induces high expression during pregnancy and lactation, although transgene expression is detected in the nulliparous mammary gland during puberty.19 Expression of the CrkII transgene using primers specific for the transgene SV40 polyA signal indicated that the transgene was expressed in each founder line in both nulliparous and lactating mice (Figure 1B). Moreover, as expected, CrkII protein was higher in lactating transgenic mice than their wild-type counterparts (Figure 1C). Immunohistochemistry on sections from paraffin-embedded mammary epithelium revealed intense but heterogeneous Crk expression in both the nucleus and the cytoplasm of luminal epithelium in transgenic mice when compared with control FVB mice (Figure 1D). MMTV/CrkII lines (6396 and 6398) with the highest levels of mRNA expression specific for the transgene (Figure 1B) were used for further study.
To determine whether overexpression of CrkII in the mammary epithelium could perturb normal mammary gland development, wholemounts of nulliparous mammary glands were examined during puberty. At this particular stage of development, terminal end buds form, which are large, bulbous structures of active proliferation and differentiation.20 Dichotomous branching of the terminal end buds, along with secondary side branching results in the expansion of the ductal tree, until the mammary fat pad is filled. At the end of puberty, when the ductal tree has expanded to reach the edges of the fat pad, the terminal end bud structures then regress.20 Mammary glands from nulliparous mice at various stages of puberty (5 to 12 weeks) displayed delayed ductal outgrowth compared with their wild-type FVB littermates (Figure 2A). The suppression of ductal outgrowth was most significant between 7 to 10 weeks of age. Thus, the inhibitory effect of CrkII on mammary ductal outgrowth was quantified by determining the percentage of fatty stroma filled by the ducts and end buds (Figure 2B). This was calculated by comparing the distance traveled by the leading end buds to the total length of the mammary fat pad. Inhibition of ductal outgrowth was most pronounced at 10 weeks of age, with an inhibition of 31% (Figure 2B). However, in MMTV/CrkII mice at 12 weeks of age, terminal end buds were still persistent and disorganized, and had not yet reached the edges of the fat pad, whereas in their wild-type littermates, these buds were regressed and the fat pads were filled with branching ducts (Figure 2A). In addition, the average number of terminal end buds in a gland were increased in the MMTV/CrkII mice (16, n = 6) relative to control mice (9, n = 6) at 10 weeks of age and the average diameter of these structures was 18% larger (Figure 2C).
As previously mentioned, cellular proliferation and differentiation are active processes within terminal end buds.21 Proliferative epithelial cells drive the expansion of the mammary tree, and cap cells and body cells differentiate into basal myoepithelial cells, and luminal cells respectively.20,21 Active apoptosis also occurs within the terminal end buds to create the lumen of the ducts.20 However, suppression of ductal outgrowth did not coincide with significant changes in cell proliferation, apoptosis, or differentiation (through staining of Ki-67, terminal deoxynucleotidyl transferase dUTP nick-end labeling, CK8, and CK14 respectively) between control and MMTV/CrkII mice at 10 weeks of age (Figure 2D). Indeed, quantification of Ki-67 positive cells did not reveal a significant increase in the percentage of proliferating cells within the MMTV/CrkII transgenic mice (49.6%) relative to the wild-type mice (39.2%) (See Supplemental Figure S1 at http://ajp.amjpathol.org). Additional staining on FVB and MMTV/CrkII wholemounts at 5 weeks of age were analyzed for Ki-67 (proliferation), CK8 (luminal epithelial marker), and SMA (myoepithelial and fibroblast marker) through immunofluorescence, and no obvious differences were seen (See Supplemental Figure S1 at http://ajp.amjpathol.org).
In addition to growth regulation and cellular differentiation, ductal outgrowth depends on the integrity of the end bud structure since perturbations that alter cellular adhesion or cell−cell contact can inhibit ductal extension.21 CrkII has been shown to play a role in cellular adhesion and cell−cell contact, however, by indirect immunofluorescence, no alterations were visualized in E-cadherin and ZO-1 localization, which are markers of adherens and tight junctions, respectively (See Supplemental Figure S2 at http://ajp.amjpathol.org). Therefore, multiple lines of transgenic mice with elevated levels of CrkII in the mammary epithelium display a delay in mammary development during puberty by suppressing the outgrowth of epithelial ducts without any obvious effects on proliferation, apoptosis, cell−cell contact, adhesion, or cell differentiation.
CrkII Transgene Leads to Enhanced Mammary Gland Branching Characterized by Increased Proliferation
Ductal outgrowth within the MMTV/CrkII transgenic mice is complete by 14 weeks of age. Once fully developed, there is a discrete Crk-dependent phenotype in the mammary glands of post-pubertal mice, evidenced by increased ductal branching and enhanced proliferation (Figure 3A). This is accompanied by elevated Crk staining in the branching epithelium (Figure 3A). Quantification of Ki-67−positive cells revealed an increase in the percentage of proliferating cells within the MMTV/CrkII transgenic mice (11.8%) relative to the wild-type mice (3.3%) (Figure 3B). To determine whether the observed mammary epithelial abnormalities reflect the activation of known targets of Crk, we assessed Crk binding proteins and Crk associated pathways by Western blot analysis using whole cell lysates derived from mammary glands of 20-week-old mice. Several phosphorylated proteins were elevated in lysates derived from MMTV/CrkII transgenic mammary glands relative to FVB control littermates, which correlates with previous studies that observed enhanced tyrosine phosphorylation in whole cell lysates derived from v-crk transformed cells (See Supplemental Figure S3 at http://ajp.amjpathol.org). When the phosphorylation status of a known Crk binding partner, p130Cas, which is elevated in v-crk transformed cells, was examined, we observed variable phosphorylation levels in lysates from mammary glands demonstrating that known Crk binding partners are not significantly altered. Similarly, no significant changes in the activation of Akt and JNK kinases was observed in any of the seven MMTV/CrkII mice examined (data not shown), demonstrating that CrkII overexpression in vivo does not reflect pathways activated in v-crk transformed fibroblasts grown in serum. However, a consistent elevation was observed in phospho-Erk1 and Erk2 when compared with matched controls (See Supplemental Figure S3 at http://ajp.amjpathol.org). Our data implies that CrkII contributes to the enhanced branching morphogenesis observed in 20-week-old transgenic animals. Consistent with this, overexpression of the CrkII adaptor protein can contribute to branching morphogenesis in vitro.6
CrkII Transgene Leads to the Formation of Atypical Mammary Architecture in Adult Nulliparous Mice
In aging nulliparous transgenic mice at approximately 1 year of age, enhanced branching persists, with several small buds branching off the main ductal tree. Furthermore, several MMTV/CrkII mice displayed atypical ductal structures, such as spiculated ends and lobuloalveoli, although they cannot be classified as hyperplastic (Figure 3C). Other stages of mammary gland development were also examined (See Supplemental Figure S4 at http://ajp.amjpathol.org). Transgenic mice examined at days 10 and 18 of pregnancy showed no alterations compared with control animals when assessed by wholemount analysis and histology. Furthermore, no significant changes in lactation or involution were observed in the MMTV/CrkII transgenic mice relative to control mice (See Supplemental Figure S4 at http://ajp.amjpathol.org). Hence, CrkII overexpression in the mammary epithelium disrupts early development, promotes enhanced branching and other atypical branching structures, but does not lead to obvious changes during pregnancy, lactation, and involution.
Elevated Levels of CrkII Predispose the Mammary Epithelium to Tumorigenesis
To determine whether overexpression of CrkII could lead to the development of mammary tumors, two cohorts of mice (nulliparous and multiparous) were established for the 6396 and 6398 transgenic lines. In the two lines studied, lobular hyperplasia was evident in the MMTV/CrkII multiparous transgenic mice relative to the wild-type mice (data not shown). Tumor development was monitored in both nulliparous and multiparous females. This revealed a combined tumor incidence of 17.6% (6/34) and a tumor latency of approximately 445 days (∼14.8 months). By contrast, the tumor incidence in female FVB control mice was 4.0% (1/25) with a similar latency of 461 days (∼15.3 months). The tumors from the MMTV/CrkII mice were of a diverse phenotype, including fibroadenoma-like lesions, glandular carcinoma, secretory glandular carcinoma, and squamous adenocarcinoma (Table 1, Figure 4). No metastatic lesions were found in any animals. The induction of mammary tumors in the MMTV/CrkII mice was accompanied by an increase in the overall levels of Crk protein (Figure 4, Figure 5).
Table 1.
Tumor pathology | Latency (days) | Status |
---|---|---|
Adenosquamous carcinoma | 327 | Multiparous |
Fibroadenoma-like lesion | 466 | Nulliparous |
Glandular carcinoma | 507 | Multiparous |
Secretory glandular carcinoma | 452 | Multiparous |
Radial scar | 449 | Nulliparous |
Unknown | 471 | Nulliparous |
Mice from two MMTV/CrkII transgenic lines were divided into two groups—nulliparous or multiparous—and monitored for tumor development. MMTV/CrkII mice show a combined rate of tumor incidence of 17.6% (6/34), whereas age-matched FVB developed tumors with an incidence of 4% (1/25).
CrkII lesions were further characterized for markers characteristic of these tumor pathologies. Fibroadenoma-like lesions consisted of several lineages of differentiated epithelial cells (as noted by staining for CK8, CK14, and SMA) interspersed within mesenchymal cell populations (vimentin, SMA) (Figure 5A). The squamous adenocarcinoma, characterized by a high mitotic index and the presence of cytokeratin pearls, stained positive for CK14 and SMA (myoepithelial markers), as well as CK6 (a putative progenitor cell marker) and CK8 (luminal epithelial marker), suggesting that this tumor was of a mixed cellular lineage (Figure 5B). Quantitative RT-PCR specific for the transgene confirmed that the tumor was indeed positive for the CrkII transgene (data not shown). Thus, overexpression of CrkII can lead to tumor development, albeit at a low incidence and with a long latency. The tumors that formed in MMTV/CrkII mice were of diverse phenotypes and expressed different cellular markers that are characteristic of these tumor pathologies. No differences were noted in the average life expectancy of the MMTV/CrkII transgenic mice versus the control FVB mice.
Overexpression of CrkII Leads to Alterations in Gene Expression that Impact Mammary Tumorigenesis
To understand how overexpression of CrkII may impact tumorigenesis, we performed microarray analysis comparing the breast cancer cell line T47D with T47D cells overexpressing CrkII (Figure 6A). We chose this cell line as it is a well-differentiated breast cancer cell line and we have previously characterized these cells in vitro.5 In that study, we observed that overexpression of CrkII promotes cellular dispersal, with the T47D-CrkII cells acquiring a more mesenchymal phenotype, characterized by the loss of adherens junctions and reorganization of the actin cytoskeleton.5 The top 36 of 1850 differentially expressed genes between T47D and T47D-CrkII cells were identified and visualized as a heat map (Figure 6B). Examination of overrepresented Kyoto Encyclopedia of Genes and Genomes (KEGG) and Gene Ontology (GO) categories in the set of differentially expressed genes revealed that a number of biological processes important for tumor biology were significantly altered in T47D-CrkII cells, including cellular adhesion, migration, cytoskeletal organization, regulation of Rho GTPases, proliferation, and regulation of the cell cycle (See Supplemental Figures S5 and S6, along with Supplemental Tables 1–3 at http://ajp.amjpathol.org). These results imply that deregulation of CrkII could give rise to changes in gene expression required, but not sufficient, for tumorigenesis. Interestingly, of the many genes altered in the CrkII overexpressing cells, several also have functions implicated in mammary gland development, including Netrin 4, Calponin 1, CTGF, and the progesterone receptor. Each of these genes were validated through quantitative real-time PCR (Figure 6C).
CTGF and Netrin-4 Are Elevated in the Mammary Glands of MMTV/CrkII Transgenic Mice
To examine whether any of the gene targets from the T47D-CrkII cells could correlate with the observed mammary epithelial biology observed in the MMTV/CrkII transgenic mice, we performed Western blot analysis to assess the protein levels of two differentially expressed gene targets (CTGF and netrin-4). CTGF is involved in regulating lactogenic differentiation of mouse mammary epithelial cells and is highly expressed during pregnancy and lactation,22 whereas netrin-4 has no known role in the mammary gland, although it has been shown to mediate branching morphogenesis of lungs and salivary glands.23,24 Whole cell lysates derived from mammary glands, revealed that both CTGF and netrin-4 were elevated in lysates derived from MMTV/CrkII transgenic mammary glands relative to FVB control littermates, thus, correlating with the gene profiling data (Figure 7A). Densitometry of Western blots revealed a significant elevation in the expression of both CTGF and netrin-4 in MMTV/CrkII transgenic mice relative to the wild-type littermates (Figure 7B). It is interesting that immunohistochemistry of netrin-4 revealed strong staining surrounding the terminal end bud structures in the MMTV/CrkII transgenic mice, which correlated with the expression of laminin, an extracellular matrix component that has been shown to associate with netrin-4 (Figure 7C). As the co-localization of netrin-4 and laminin has been associated with impaired branching morphogenesis of the salivary gland,23 these data imply that netrin-4 may play a role in delayed ductal outgrowth in the MMTV/CrkII mice.
Elevated Levels of Collagen Isoforms in CrkII Transgenic Mammary Epithelium Are Associated with Delayed Ductal Outgrowth
To further investigate how overexpression of CrkII may alter mammary gland development, we examined the subset of differentially expressed genes associated with the extracellular matrix (Figure 8A). Interestingly, this revealed that several collagen isoforms were elevated when CrkII was overexpressed in T47D cells, one of which, collagen type12 alpha1, was validated by RT-PCR (Figure 8, A and B). The elevation of collagen isoforms in T47D-CrkII cells correlates with histological sections of MMTV/CrkII mammary glands, which revealed disorganized and thickened collagenous stroma surrounding the terminal end buds when compared with normal FVB littermates (Figure 8C). This phenotype was characterized by increased collagen surrounding the terminal end buds, as determined by Trichrome staining, and indicates a mechanism through which CrkII overexpression may result in delayed development of the mammary gland during puberty (Figure 8C). Crk protein was observed in the terminal end buds surrounded by collagen, but was relatively absent in all FVB littermates tested (n = 5) (Figure 8C).
Interestingly, when mammary wholemounts were imaged and quantified for stromal content (ie, fibroblasts, extracellular matrix, immune cells), only 20% of terminal end buds examined in FVB mice had stroma encompassing the leading edge of the terminal end bud, as observed as a “halo-like” structure surrounding the terminal end buds (see Supplemental Figure S7 at http://ajp.amjpathol.org) and Materials and Methods. In contrast, 62% of the MMTV/CrkII terminal end buds were encased in these “halo-like” structures, suggesting enhanced stromal content (Figure 8D). These observations correlate with the histological images of enhanced collagen surrounding MMTV/CrkII terminal end buds, although other stromal cellular components may be present. For instance, in mammary gland development, macrophages are required for proper ductal elongation, as well as remodeling of the extracellular matrix.25 Since macrophages can influence both fibroblast proliferation and collagen deposition,25 F4/80 staining was performed to assess for any potential differences in macrophage recruitment to the terminal end buds of MMTV/CrkII and wild-type mice. No significant difference in the number of F4/80 positive macrophages was observed between MMTV/CrkII mammary glands and wild-type mice (Figure 8, E and F). Thus, the CrkII associated collagen deposition surrounding the terminal end buds correlates with delayed ductal outgrowth within MMTV/CrkII transgenic mice.
Discussion
This study provides direct evidence that elevated levels of CrkII in the mammary epithelium of transgenic mice interferes with normal mammary gland development and induces mammary epithelial tumors, albeit with low incidence. The CrkII transgene exhibited expression that is characteristic of the MMTV promoter, with higher levels of expression in the lactating gland as compared with the nulliparous state.19 Immunohistochemistry revealed mosaic staining for the transgene throughout the mammary luminal epithelium and within ducts. This most likely reflects the nature of the MMTV promoter, as several other MMTV mouse models also show heterogeneous staining.19,26 CrkII was localized in both the nucleus and cytoplasm of the mammary epithelial cells. Although most studies have focused on the role of Crk proteins as adaptor proteins in the cytoplasm, others have identified CrkII in the nucleus. For instance, Miller and colleagues7 found CrkII in the nucleus and cytoplasm in lung adenocarcinomas. Several CrkII SH3N binding partners, such as DOCK180 and Abl were also found to be associated with CrkII in the nucleus.27 Although that study identified CrkII as a mediator of apoptosis when targeted to the nucleus, CrkII may play additional nuclear roles. Terminal deoxynucleotidyl transferase dUTP nick-end labeling staining in the nulliparous mammary glands did not reveal significant apoptosis, thus, the role of CrkII in the nucleus could depend on context, tissue and other proteins. Furthermore, CrkL plays an active role in the nucleus, functioning to regulate transcription within many different cell types, however, few studies have examined the role of CrkII in this context.28–31
Mammary gland development initiates during embryogenesis; however, the majority of mammary gland development occurs during the onset of puberty. Beginning at 3 weeks of age, terminal end buds form and begin the process of ductal elongation until they have reached the edge of the fat pad, whereupon they regress.20 MMTV/CrkII mice exhibited a developmental abnormality such that ductal outgrowth was delayed at 5 weeks of age and was not complete at 12 weeks of age, when the mammary fat pad is normally filled with epithelial ducts (Figure 2). Although higher MMTV/CrkII expression in virgin animals was not evident through Western blot analysis (which contains not only epithelia but also stroma and adipocytes), immunohistochemistry on paraffin embedded sections showed positive Crk staining in the terminal end bud epithelia of the virgin mammary glands of the MMTV/CrkII animals, but not in those of the FVB control mice.
This suggests that the overexpression of CrkII within the terminal end bud structures is responsible for the delay in ductal outgrowth. Indeed, other studies have demonstrated that the MMTV promoter is active in the terminal end buds.19 This retarded phenotype is similar to other mouse models, such as MMTV/heregulin, MMTV/EphB4, MMTV/Cripto, and mice overexpressing either Krct or p190-B Rho GTPase.26,32–35 For MMTV/CrkII mice, delayed outgrowth is associated with increased collagen surrounding the terminal end buds, with no significant changes in cellular proliferation, apoptosis, cell−cell contact, differentiation, or macrophage recruitment despite the increased diameter of the terminal end buds themselves (Supplemental Figure S1 and S2 at http://ajp.amjpathol.org).
Gene expression profiling revealed that overexpression of CrkII results in enhanced expression of netrin-4, a secreted protein that is structurally related to laminin β chains and is expressed in various tissues, including the kidney, ovary, lung, and heart.23,24 Although netrin-4 has not previously been observed in mammary tissues, netrin-1 and several netrin receptors have been identified in mammary epithelium.36,37 Netrin-4 is secreted by epithelial cells and is often deposited into the basement membrane.23 Several studies have identified netrin-4 as being an antagonist during branching morphogenesis of the lung and kidney, and that its inhibitory effects were associated with laminin co-localization.23,24 Whether netrin-4 alters laminin signaling to epithelial cells or whether integration of netrin-4 into the laminin network enhances its presentation to a putative receptor has yet to be determined.23 Our study has revealed positive netrin-4 staining surrounding the terminal end buds of MMTV/CrkII transgenic mice, which correlates with strong laminin staining. These data support the hypothesis that enhanced production of netrin-4 contributes to delayed ductal outgrowth in the MMTV/CrkII transgenic mice.
Additional analysis of gene expression changes associated with T47D-CrkII cells implies that overexpression of CrkII results in enhanced production of several collagen isoforms, which may alter the finely tuned stromal−epithelial interaction. Interactions between the stroma and epithelium occurs during ductal outgrowth, when the invading epithelium must communicate with the stroma to co-ordinate the invasion of the terminal end buds; however, the mechanism by which this cross talk regulates branching morphogenesis in vivo is not well understood. Alterations to the adjacent stromal microenvironment, such as enhanced collagen observed in MMTV/CrkII transgenic mice, could have profound effects on mammary outgrowth. Weaver and colleagues demonstrated that matrix rigidity plays a critical role in epithelial morphogenesis by altering cell−cell/cell−matrix adhesion as well as cell polarity.38 This can have profound effects on cellular proliferation and can compromise cellular architecture. We did not observe significant alterations in cellular proliferation or apoptosis within the terminal end bud structures of MMTV/CrkII transgenic mice. However, the 10% increase in Ki-67−positive cells in the MMTV/CrkII terminal end buds, coupled with their enlarged diameter, as compared with wild-type mice, suggests that there may be a subtle alteration in proliferation that was missed at the time points examined. In conclusion, CrkII is a critical regulator of mammary gland outgrowth, as even subtle changes in the levels of Crk expression can upset normal development.
Although overexpression of CrkII results in the delayed outgrowth of the mammary epithelia, the ductal tree eventually filled the fat pad at later time points (ie, 14 weeks). In post-pubertal mice, MMTV/CrkII transgenic glands displayed enhanced side branching, which is associated with increased proliferation (Figure 3). We confirmed that altered branching patterns in MMTV/CrkII mice were not due to changes in the estrous cycle (data not shown). Consistent with this, mice overexpressing p130Cas, a major binding partner of Crk, also display a similar phenotype.39 Furthermore, other adaptor proteins such as Shc and Grb2 show a comparable phenotype when driven by the MMTV promoter, suggesting that these adaptor proteins may potentiate the action of specific growth factors during normal mammary gland development.40 Interestingly, CrkII is downstream from several growth factors that have been shown to be required for branching morphogenesis, either in vitro or in vivo, such as epidermal growth factor, hepatocyte growth factor, and insulin-like growth factor.41–44 Although we were unable to observe significantly elevated phosphorylation levels of p130Cas, a major Crk binding partner, we observed a consistent elevation of phospho-Erk1/2 levels in MMTV/CrkII mice at 20 weeks of age, when compared with wild-type mice. Interestingly, in MMTV/p130Cas transgenic mice, enhanced branching is associated with increased MAPK signaling.39
Lobular hyperplasia was significant in the MMTV/CrkII multiparous transgenic mice relative to the wild-type mice (data not shown), although aging FVB mice can develop hyperplasia due to pituitary abnormalities.45,46 Overexpression of CrkII may aid in the progression of these naturally occurring lesions. In support of this, CrkI/II are significantly overexpressed in poorly differentiated lung tumors, suggesting a potential role for Crk proteins in the progression from early to advanced states of disease.7
Although tumor incidence was low in MMTV/CrkII transgenic mice, tumor development was found in both nulliparous and multiparous females, with a combined tumor incidence of 17.6% and a tumor latency of 445 days (Table 1). The long latency and low incidence suggests that other genetic events are required for tumor onset. These results are important since overexpression of other adaptor and scaffold proteins, p130Cas, Grb2, and Gab2 were unable to induce tumor formation.39,40,47 Consistent with the CrkII data, mice overexpressing Shc also have a low tumor incidence of 7%.40 The low tumor incidence of CrkII transgenic mice may be associated with its linker region, containing the Y221 negative regulatory site and its SH3 domain at the C-terminus.48 Phosphorylation of Y221 by binding partners such as Abl results in the auto-inhibitory structure of CrkII, thus preventing binding by any SH3 binding partners.49,50
Interestingly, the lesions found in MMTV/CrkII nulliparous mice were benign, as compared with tumors found in MMTV/CrkII multiparous animals, suggesting that elevated transgene expression may play a role in malignancy (Table 1). Within the tumors identified in the multiparous cohorts, one CrkII tumor was identified as a squamous adenocarcinoma, with a high mitotic index and the presence of cytokeratin pearls. Quantitative RT-PCR specific for the transgene confirmed that this tumor is indeed positive for the Crk transgene. The pathology of the CrkII tumor is similar to MMTV models in which the Wnt pathway is active.51 These features are reminiscent of those seen in human basal breast cancers, which are correlated with poor prognosis.52 Basal-like tumors are a distinct subset of breast cancer that expresses genes characteristic of basal epithelial cells, including progenitor cells (CK6), and myoepithelial cells (CK14).53 Indeed, staining in the CrkII adenosquamous carcinoma was positive for CK14 (myoepithelial marker), CK8 (epithelial marker), as well as CK6 (a putative progenitor marker), suggesting that this tumor may be of mixed cellular lineage (Figure 5). Consistent with the MMTV-Wnt mice, there were two predominant cellular components—luminal (CK8+) and myoepithelial (CK14+),51 suggesting that transformation occurs from a bipotential cell.
Genes differentially expressed were evaluated with Kyoto Encyclopedia of Genes and Genomes (KEGG) and Gene Ontology (GO) pathway analysis programs, in which genes have been categorized based on their molecular function and biological processes. A recent microarray-based study by Kouros-Mehr and Werb54 identified genes and pathways thought to be involved in regulating branching morphogenesis of the mammary gland, and interestingly, we found several of these biological processes significantly altered in the T47D-CrkII expression profile, such as cell cycle, actin cytoskeleton reorganization, and cellular adhesion. In addition, several genes involved in the regulation of Rho GTPases were detected in the CrkII overexpressing cells (See Supplemental Figures S5 and S6 at http://ajp.amjpathol.org).54 This microarray data correlates with the phenotypes observed in MMTV/CrkII mice, as recent studies have identified Rho GTPases as critical regulators of mammary epithelial branching morphogenesis.32,55
In conclusion, we demonstrate that overexpression of CrkII is associated with altered mammary gland development and accelerated tumor development. Based on the results obtained from the MMTV/CrkII transgenic mice and the microarray profile obtained from the T47D-CrkII cells, overexpression of CrkII alters mammary gland development in a multifactorial manner. Although the low incidence of tumors in our transgenic mouse model highlights the fact that CrkII is not a strong oncogene, the ability of CrkII to induce a branching phenotype during a normally quiescent state suggests that it plays an active role in proliferation and epithelial remodeling. This precocious development, combined with the fact that CrkII is downstream of several signaling proteins involved in breast cancer development, highlights the potential consequence of increased Crk proteins in the human disease.
Acknowledgements
We thank Anie Monast for her technical assistance with the mouse colonies. In addition, we thank Hong Zhao, Naila Chughtai, and Sean Cory for their assistance with the microarray hybridization and analysis. We thank members of the Park and Cardiff laboratories for helpful comments and support. We thank Robert Annan for critically reviewing the manuscript.
Footnotes
Supported by a grant to M.P. from the Terry Fox Foundation New Frontiers Program Project. K.E.F. is a recipient of US Army Department of Defense scholarship. M.P. is the Diane and Sal Guerrara Chair in Cancer Genetics at McGill University.
Supplemental material for this article can be found on http://ajp.amjpathol.org.
The current address for S.R. is Department of Anatomy and Cell Biology, McGill University, Montreal Neurological Institute, Montreal QC, H3A 2B4, Canada.
Web Extra Material
Molecular Function GO categories over-represented in the set of differentially expressed genes between T47D and T47D-CrkII cells.
Biological Processes GO categories over-represented in the set of differentially expressed genes between T47D and T47D-CrkII cells.
References
- 1.Mayer BJ, Hamaguchi M, Hanafusa H. A novel viral oncogene with structural similarity to phospholipase C. Nature. 1988;332:272–275. doi: 10.1038/332272a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Feller SM. Crk family adaptors-signalling complex formation and biological roles. Oncogene. 2001;20:6348–6371. doi: 10.1038/sj.onc.1204779. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.ten Hoeve J, Morris C, Heisterkamp N, Groffen J. Isolation and chromosomal localization of CRKL, a human crk-like gene. Oncogene. 1993;8:2469–2474. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Reichman CT, Mayer BJ, Keshav S, Hanafusa H. The product of the cellular crk gene consists primarily of SH2 and SH3 regions. Cell Growth Differ. 1992;3:451–460. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Lamorte L, Royal I, Naujokas M, Park M. Crk adapter proteins promote an epithelial-mesenchymal-like transition and are required for HGF-mediated cell spreading and breakdown of epithelial adherens junctions. Mol Biol Cell. 2002;13:1449–1461. doi: 10.1091/mbc.01-10-0477. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Lamorte L, Rodrigues S, Naujokas M, Park M. Crk synergizes with epidermal growth factor for epithelial invasion and morphogenesis and is required for the met morphogenic program. J Biol Chem. 2002;277:37904–37911. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M201743200. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Miller CT, Chen G, Gharib TG, Wang H, Thomas DG, Misek DE, Giordano TJ, Yee J, Orringer MB, Hanash SM, Beer DG. Increased C-CRK proto-oncogene expression is associated with an aggressive phenotype in lung adenocarcinomas. Oncogene. 2003;22:7950–7957. doi: 10.1038/sj.onc.1206529. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Rodrigues SP, Fathers KE, Chan G, Zuo D, Halwani F, Meterissian S, Park M. CrkI and CrkII function as key signaling integrators for migration and invasion of cancer cells. Mol Cancer Res. 2005;3:183–194. doi: 10.1158/1541-7786.MCR-04-0211. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Nishihara H, Tanaka S, Tsuda M, Oikawa S, Maeda M, Shimizu M, Shinomiya H, Tanigami A, Sawa H, Nagashima K. Molecular and immunohistochemical analysis of signaling adaptor protein Crk in human cancers. Cancer Lett. 2002;180:55–61. doi: 10.1016/s0304-3835(01)00763-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Takino T, Nakada M, Miyamori H, Yamashita J, Yamada KM, Sato H. CrkI adapter protein modulates cell migration and invasion in glioblastoma. Cancer Res. 2003;63:2335–2337. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Matsuda M, Tanaka S, Nagata S, Kojima A, Kurata T, Shibuya M. Two species of human CRK cDNA encode proteins with distinct biological activities. Mol Cell Biol. 1992;12:3482–3489. doi: 10.1128/mcb.12.8.3482. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Iwahara T, Akagi T, Shishido T, Hanafusa H. CrkII induces serum response factor activation and cellular transformation through its function in Rho activation. Oncogene. 2003;22:5946–5957. doi: 10.1038/sj.onc.1206633. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Senechal K, Halpern J, Sawyers CL. The CRKL adaptor protein transforms fibroblasts and functions in transformation by the BCR-ABL oncogene. J Biol Chem. 1996;271:23255–23261. doi: 10.1074/jbc.271.38.23255. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Hemmeryckx B, van Wijk A, Reichert A, Kaartinen V, de Jong R, Pattengale PK, Gonzalez-Gomez I, Groffen J, Heisterkamp N. Crkl enhances leukemogenesis in BCR/ABL P190 transgenic mice. Cancer Res. 2001;61:1398–1405. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.White DE, Kurpios NA, Zuo D, Hassell JA, Blaess S, Mueller U, Muller WJ. Targeted disruption of beta1-integrin in a transgenic mouse model of human breast cancer reveals an essential role in mammary tumor induction. Cancer Cell. 2004;6:159–170. doi: 10.1016/j.ccr.2004.06.025. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Lahlou H, Sanguin-Gendreau V, Zuo D, Cardiff RD, McLean GW, Frame MC, Muller WJ. Mammary epithelial-specific disruption of the focal adhesion kinase blocks mammary tumor progression. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2007;104:20302–20307. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0710091104. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Finak G, Bertos N, Pepin F, Sadekova S, Souleimanova M, Zhao H, Chen H, Omeroglu G, Meterissian S, Omeroglu A, Hallett M, Park M. Stromal gene expression predicts clinical outcome in breast cancer. Nat Med. 2008;14:518–527. doi: 10.1038/nm1764. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Finak G, Sadekova S, Pepin F, Hallett M, Meterissian S, Halwani F, Khetani K, Souleimanova M, Zabolotny B, Omeroglu A, Park M. Gene expression signatures of morphologically normal breast tissue identify basal-like tumors. Breast Cancer Res. 2006;8:R58. doi: 10.1186/bcr1608. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Wagner KU, McAllister K, Ward T, Davis B, Wiseman R, Hennighausen L. Spatial and temporal expression of the Cre gene under the control of the MMTV-LTR in different lines of transgenic mice. Transgenic Res. 2001;10:545–553. doi: 10.1023/a:1013063514007. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Richert MM, Schwertfeger KL, Ryder JW, Anderson SM. An atlas of mouse mammary gland development. J Mammary Gland Biol Neoplasia. 2000;5:227–241. doi: 10.1023/a:1026499523505. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Hinck L, Silberstein GB. Key stages in mammary gland development: the mammary end bud as a motile organ. Breast Cancer Res. 2005;7:245–251. doi: 10.1186/bcr1331. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Wang W, Morrison B, Galbaugh T, Jose CC, Kenney N, Cutler ML. Glucocorticoid induced expression of connective tissue growth factor contributes to lactogenic differentiation of mouse mammary epithelial cells. J Cell Physiol. 2008;214:38–46. doi: 10.1002/jcp.21159. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Schneiders FI, Maertens B, Bose K, Li Y, Brunken WJ, Paulsson M, Smyth N, Koch M. Binding of netrin-4 to laminin short arms regulates basement membrane assembly. J Biol Chem. 2007;282:23750–23758. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M703137200. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Liu Y, Stein E, Oliver T, Li Y, Brunken WJ, Koch M, Tessier-Lavigne M, Hogan BL. Novel role for Netrins in regulating epithelial behavior during lung branching morphogenesis. Curr Biol. 2004;14:897–905. doi: 10.1016/j.cub.2004.05.020. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Schwertfeger KL, Rosen JM, Cohen DA. Mammary gland macrophages: pleiotropic functions in mammary development. J Mammary Gland Biol Neoplasia. 2006;11:229–238. doi: 10.1007/s10911-006-9028-y. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Nikolova Z, Djonov V, Zuercher G, Andres AC, Ziemiecki A. Cell-type specific and estrogen dependent expression of the receptor tyrosine kinase EphB4 and its ligand ephrin-B2 during mammary gland morphogenesis. J Cell Sci. 1998;111(Pt 18):2741–2751. doi: 10.1242/jcs.111.18.2741. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Kar B, Reichman CT, Singh S, O'Connor JP, Birge RB. Proapoptotic function of the nuclear Crk II adaptor protein. Biochemistry. 2007;46:10828–10840. doi: 10.1021/bi700537e. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Fish EN, Uddin S, Korkmaz M, Majchrzak B, Druker BJ, Platanias LC. Activation of a CrkL-stat5 signaling complex by type I interferons. J Biol Chem. 1999;274:571–573. doi: 10.1074/jbc.274.2.571. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Nautiyal J, Kumar PG, Laloraya M. 17Beta-estradiol induces nuclear translocation of CrkL at the window of embryo implantation. Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 2004;318:103–112. doi: 10.1016/j.bbrc.2004.04.005. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30.Ozaki K, Oda A, Wakao H, Rhodes J, Druker BJ, Ishida A, Wakui M, Okamoto S, Morita K, Handa M, Komatsu N, Ohashi H, Miyajima A, Ikeda Y. Thrombopoietin induces association of Crkl with STAT5 but not STAT3 in human platelets. Blood. 1998;92:4652–4662. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31.Rhodes J, York RD, Tara D, Tajinda K, Druker BJ. CrkL functions as a nuclear adaptor and transcriptional activator in Bcr-Abl-expressing cells. Exp Hematol. 2000;28:305–310. doi: 10.1016/s0301-472x(99)00148-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32.Vargo-Gogola T, Heckman BM, Gunther EJ, Chodosh LA, Rosen JM. P190-B Rho GTPase-activating protein overexpression disrupts ductal morphogenesis and induces hyperplastic lesions in the developing mammary gland. Mol Endocrinol. 2006;20:1391–1405. doi: 10.1210/me.2005-0426. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33.Wechselberger C, Strizzi L, Kenney N, Hirota M, Sun Y, Ebert A, Orozco O, Bianco C, Khan NI, Wallace-Jones B, Normanno N, Adkins H, Sanicola M, Salomon DS. Human Cripto-1 overexpression in the mouse mammary gland results in the development of hyperplasia and adenocarcinoma. Oncogene. 2005;24:4094–4105. doi: 10.1038/sj.onc.1208417. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34.Stairs DB, Notarfrancesco KL, Chodosh LA. The serine/threonine kinase. Krct, affects endbud morphogenesis during murine mammary gland development. Transgenic Res. 2005;14:919–940. doi: 10.1007/s11248-005-1806-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35.Weinstein EJ, Leder P. The extracellular region of heregulin is sufficient to promote mammary gland proliferation and tumorigenesis but not apoptosis. Cancer Res. 2000;60:3856–3861. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36.Srinivasan K, Strickland P, Valdes A, Shin GC, Hinck L. Netrin-1/neogenin interaction stabilizes multipotent progenitor cap cells during mammary gland morphogenesis. Dev Cell. 2003;4:371–382. doi: 10.1016/s1534-5807(03)00054-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 37.Strizzi L, Mancino M, Bianco C, Raafat A, Gonzales M, Booth BW, Watanabe K, Nagaoka T, Mack DL, Howard B, Callahan R, Smith GH, Salomon DS. Netrin-1 can affect morphogenesis and differentiation of the mouse mammary gland. J Cell Physiol. 2008;216:824–834. doi: 10.1002/jcp.21462. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 38.Paszek MJ, Zahir N, Johnson KR, Lakins JN, Rozenberg GI, Gefen A, Reinhart-King CA, Margulies SS, Dembo M, Boettiger D, Hammer DA, Weaver VM. Tensional homeostasis and the malignant phenotype. Cancer Cell. 2005;8:241–254. doi: 10.1016/j.ccr.2005.08.010. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 39.Cabodi S, Tinnirello A, Di Stefano P, Bisaro B, Ambrosino E, Castellano I, Sapino A, Arisio R, Cavallo F, Forni G, Glukhova M, Silengo L, Altruda F, Turco E, Tarone G, Defilippi P. p130Cas as a new regulator of mammary epithelial cell proliferation, survival, and HER2-neu oncogene-dependent breast tumorigenesis. Cancer Res. 2006;66:4672–4680. doi: 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-05-2909. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 40.Rauh MJ, Blackmore V, Andrechek ER, Tortorice CG, Daly R, Lai VK, Pawson T, Cardiff RD, Siegel PM, Muller WJ. Accelerated mammary tumor development in mutant polyomavirus middle T transgenic mice expressing elevated levels of either the Shc or Grb2 adapter protein. Mol Cell Biol. 1999;19:8169–8179. doi: 10.1128/mcb.19.12.8169. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 41.Niemann C, Brinkmann V, Spitzer E, Hartmann G, Sachs M, Naundorf H, Birchmeier W. Reconstitution of mammary gland development in vitro: requirement of c-met and c-erbB2 signaling for branching and alveolar morphogenesis. J Cell Biol. 1998;143:533–545. doi: 10.1083/jcb.143.2.533. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 42.Pepper MS, Soriano JV, Menoud PA, Sappino AP, Orci L, Montesano R. Modulation of hepatocyte growth factor and c-met in the rat mammary gland during pregnancy, lactation, and involution. Exp Cell Res. 1995;219:204–210. doi: 10.1006/excr.1995.1220. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 43.Xie W, Paterson AJ, Chin E, Nabell LM, Kudlow JE. Targeted expression of a dominant negative epidermal growth factor receptor in the mammary gland of transgenic mice inhibits pubertal mammary duct development. Mol Endocrinol. 1997;11:1766–1781. doi: 10.1210/mend.11.12.0019. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 44.Ruan W, Kleinberg DL. Insulin-like growth factor I is essential for terminal end bud formation and ductal morphogenesis during mammary development. Endocrinology. 1999;140:5075–5081. doi: 10.1210/endo.140.11.7095. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 45.Wakefield LM, Thordarson G, Nieto AI, Shyamala G, Galvez JJ, Anver MR, Cardiff RD. Spontaneous pituitary abnormalities and mammary hyperplasia in FVB/NCr mice: implications for mouse modeling. Comp Med. 2003;53:424–432. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 46.Nieto AI, Shyamala G, Galvez JJ, Thordarson G, Wakefield LM, Cardiff RD. Persistent mammary hyperplasia in FVB/N mice. Comp Med. 2003;53:433–438. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 47.Bentires-Alj M, Gil SG, Chan R, Wang ZC, Wang Y, Imanaka N, Harris LN, Richardson A, Neel BG, Gu H. A role for the scaffolding adapter GAB2 in breast cancer. Nat Med. 2006;12:114–121. doi: 10.1038/nm1341. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 48.Abassi YA, Vuori K. Tyrosine 221 in Crk regulates adhesion-dependent membrane localization of Crk and Rac and activation of Rac signaling. EMBO J. 2002;21:4571–4582. doi: 10.1093/emboj/cdf446. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 49.Klemke RL, Leng J, Molander R, Brooks PC, Vuori K, Cheresh DA. CAS/Crk coupling serves as a “molecular switch” for induction of cell migration. J Cell Biol. 1998;140:961–972. doi: 10.1083/jcb.140.4.961. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 50.Kobashigawa Y, Sakai M, Naito M, Yokochi M, Kumeta H, Makino Y, Ogura K, Tanaka S, Inagaki F. Structural basis for the transforming activity of human cancer-related signaling adaptor protein CRK. Nat Struct Mol Biol. 2007;14:503–510. doi: 10.1038/nsmb1241. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 51.Li Y, Welm B, Podsypanina K, Huang S, Chamorro M, Zhang X, Rowlands T, Egeblad M, Cowin P, Werb Z, Tan LK, Rosen JM, Varmus HE. Evidence that transgenes encoding components of the Wnt signaling pathway preferentially induce mammary cancers from progenitor cells. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2003;100:15853–15858. doi: 10.1073/pnas.2136825100. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 52.Sorlie T, Perou CM, Tibshirani R, Aas T, Geisler S, Johnsen H, Hastie T, Eisen MB, van de Rijn M, Jeffrey SS, Thorsen T, Quist H, Matese JC, Brown PO, Botstein D, Eystein Lonning P, Borresen-Dale AL. Gene expression patterns of breast carcinomas distinguish tumor subclasses with clinical implications. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2001;98:10869–10874. doi: 10.1073/pnas.191367098. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 53.Fadare O, Tavassoli FA. Clinical and pathologic aspects of basal-like breast cancers. Nat Clin Pract Oncol. 2008;5:149–159. doi: 10.1038/ncponc1038. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 54.Kouros-Mehr H, Werb Z. Candidate regulators of mammary branching morphogenesis identified by genome-wide transcript analysis. Dev Dyn. 2006;235:3404–3412. doi: 10.1002/dvdy.20978. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 55.Ewald AJ, Brenot A, Duong M, Chan BS, Werb Z. Collective epithelial migration and cell rearrangements drive mammary branching morphogenesis. Dev Cell. 2008;14:570–581. doi: 10.1016/j.devcel.2008.03.003. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.
Supplementary Materials
Molecular Function GO categories over-represented in the set of differentially expressed genes between T47D and T47D-CrkII cells.
Biological Processes GO categories over-represented in the set of differentially expressed genes between T47D and T47D-CrkII cells.