Skip to main content
PMC home page
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America logoLink to Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America
. 1988 Apr;85(8):2696–2700. doi: 10.1073/pnas.85.8.2696

Mitotic sectored colonies: evidence of heteroduplex DNA formation during direct repeat recombination.

H Ronne 1, R Rothstein 1
PMCID: PMC280065  PMID: 3282237

Abstract

In yeast meiosis, ascosporal colonies are sometimes sectored for a marker--i.e., half the colony has one allele and half has the other. This is interpreted as replicative resolution of heteroduplex DNA (hDNA) formed as a recombination intermediate. We have looked for similar evidence of hDNA formation during mitotic recombination between two repeated sequences on the same chromosome. The two repeats, an ochre suppressor and a wild-type tRNA gene, are separated by plasmid DNA and the URA3 marker. Recombination between the repeats excises the URA3 gene and one copy of the repeat, leaving either the wild-type tRNA or the suppressor on the chromosome. A red/white color assay is used to distinguish between the two. We find that some colonies that have lost the URA3 gene are sectored for the suppressor. This suggests that hDNA is formed across the anticodon during the recombination event and then resolved by replication. The disruption of either of two genes involved in recombination and repair, RAD1 and RAD52, does not significantly alter the frequency of sectored colony formation during plasmid excision.

Full text

PDF
2696

Images in this article

2698Image
on p.2698

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Bishop D. K., Kolodner R. D. Repair of heteroduplex plasmid DNA after transformation into Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Mol Cell Biol. 1986 Oct;6(10):3401–3409. doi: 10.1128/mcb.6.10.3401. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Bishop D. K., Williamson M. S., Fogel S., Kolodner R. D. The role of heteroduplex correction in gene conversion in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Nature. 1987 Jul 23;328(6128):362–364. doi: 10.1038/328362a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Boeke J. D., LaCroute F., Fink G. R. A positive selection for mutants lacking orotidine-5'-phosphate decarboxylase activity in yeast: 5-fluoro-orotic acid resistance. Mol Gen Genet. 1984;197(2):345–346. doi: 10.1007/BF00330984. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Borts R. H., Haber J. E. Meiotic recombination in yeast: alteration by multiple heterozygosities. Science. 1987 Sep 18;237(4821):1459–1465. doi: 10.1126/science.2820060. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Esposito M. S. Evidence that spontaneous mitotic recombination occurs at the two-strand stage. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1978 Sep;75(9):4436–4440. doi: 10.1073/pnas.75.9.4436. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Esposito M. S. Postmeiotic segregation in Saccharomyces. Mol Gen Genet. 1971;111(3):297–299. doi: 10.1007/BF00433113. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. FOGEL S., HURST D. D. Coincidence relations between gene conversion and mitotic recombination in Saccharomyces. Genetics. 1963 Mar;48:321–328. doi: 10.1093/genetics/48.3.321. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Fabre F. Induced intragenic recombination in yeast can occur during the G1 mitotic phase. Nature. 1978 Apr 27;272(5656):795–798. doi: 10.1038/272795a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Fabre F., Roman H. Genetic evidence for inducibility of recombination competence in yeast. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1977 Apr;74(4):1667–1671. doi: 10.1073/pnas.74.4.1667. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Fogel S., Mortimer R., Lusnak K., Tavares F. Meiotic gene conversion: a signal of the basic recombination event in yeast. Cold Spring Harb Symp Quant Biol. 1979;43(Pt 2):1325–1341. doi: 10.1101/sqb.1979.043.01.152. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Golin J. E., Esposito M. S. Evidence for joint genic control of spontaneous mutation and genetic recombination during mitosis in Saccharomyces. Mol Gen Genet. 1977 Jan 18;150(2):127–135. doi: 10.1007/BF00695392. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Golin J. E., Falco S. C., Margolskee J. P. Coincident gene conversion events in yeast that involve a large insertion. Genetics. 1986 Dec;114(4):1081–1094. doi: 10.1093/genetics/114.4.1081. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Hartwell L. H., Smith D. Altered fidelity of mitotic chromosome transmission in cell cycle mutants of S. cerevisiae. Genetics. 1985 Jul;110(3):381–395. doi: 10.1093/genetics/110.3.381. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Hastings P. J. Measurement of restoration and conversion: its meaning for the mismatch repair hypothesis of conversion. Cold Spring Harb Symp Quant Biol. 1984;49:49–53. doi: 10.1101/sqb.1984.049.01.008. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Jackson J. A., Fink G. R. Gene conversion between duplicated genetic elements in yeast. Nature. 1981 Jul 23;292(5821):306–311. doi: 10.1038/292306a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Kurjan J., Hall B. D., Gillam S., Smith M. Mutations at the yeast SUP4 tRNATyr locus: DNA sequence changes in mutants lacking suppressor activity. Cell. 1980 Jul;20(3):701–709. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(80)90316-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Malone R. E., Esposito R. E. The RAD52 gene is required for homothallic interconversion of mating types and spontaneous mitotic recombination in yeast. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1980 Jan;77(1):503–507. doi: 10.1073/pnas.77.1.503. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Meselson M. S., Radding C. M. A general model for genetic recombination. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1975 Jan;72(1):358–361. doi: 10.1073/pnas.72.1.358. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Muster-Nassal C., Kolodner R. Mismatch correction catalyzed by cell-free extracts of Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1986 Oct;83(20):7618–7622. doi: 10.1073/pnas.83.20.7618. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. Orr-Weaver T. L., Szostak J. W., Rothstein R. J. Yeast transformation: a model system for the study of recombination. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1981 Oct;78(10):6354–6358. doi: 10.1073/pnas.78.10.6354. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. Prakash S., Prakash L., Burke W., Montelone B. A. Effects of the RAD52 Gene on Recombination in SACCHAROMYCES CEREVISIAE. Genetics. 1980 Jan;94(1):31–50. doi: 10.1093/genetics/94.1.31. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  22. Roman H., Fabre F. Gene conversion and associated reciprocal recombination are separable events in vegetative cells of Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1983 Nov;80(22):6912–6916. doi: 10.1073/pnas.80.22.6912. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  23. Rothstein R. J. A genetic fine structure analysis of the suppressor 3 locus in Saccharomyces. Genetics. 1977 Jan;85(1):55–64. doi: 10.1093/genetics/85.1.55. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  24. Rothstein R. J. One-step gene disruption in yeast. Methods Enzymol. 1983;101:202–211. doi: 10.1016/0076-6879(83)01015-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  25. Rothstein R. Deletions of a tyrosine tRNA gene in S. cerevisiae. Cell. 1979 May;17(1):185–190. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(79)90306-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  26. Rothstein R. Double-strand-break repair, gene conversion, and postdivision segregation. Cold Spring Harb Symp Quant Biol. 1984;49:629–637. doi: 10.1101/sqb.1984.049.01.071. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  27. Rothstein R., Helms C., Rosenberg N. Concerted deletions and inversions are caused by mitotic recombination between delta sequences in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Mol Cell Biol. 1987 Mar;7(3):1198–1207. doi: 10.1128/mcb.7.3.1198. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  28. Shortle D., Haber J. E., Botstein D. Lethal disruption of the yeast actin gene by integrative DNA transformation. Science. 1982 Jul 23;217(4557):371–373. doi: 10.1126/science.7046050. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  29. Struhl K., Stinchcomb D. T., Scherer S., Davis R. W. High-frequency transformation of yeast: autonomous replication of hybrid DNA molecules. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1979 Mar;76(3):1035–1039. doi: 10.1073/pnas.76.3.1035. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  30. Szostak J. W., Orr-Weaver T. L., Rothstein R. J., Stahl F. W. The double-strand-break repair model for recombination. Cell. 1983 May;33(1):25–35. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(83)90331-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  31. Wildenberg J. The relation of mitotic recombination to DNA replication in yeast pedigrees. Genetics. 1970 Oct;66(2):291–304. doi: 10.1093/genetics/66.2.291. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  32. Yang E., Friedberg E. C. Molecular cloning and nucleotide sequence analysis of the Saccharomyces cerevisiae RAD1 gene. Mol Cell Biol. 1984 Oct;4(10):2161–2169. doi: 10.1128/mcb.4.10.2161. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America are provided here courtesy of National Academy of Sciences

RESOURCES