Skip to main content
NIHPA Author Manuscripts logoLink to NIHPA Author Manuscripts
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2010 Jan 7.
Published in final edited form as: Leuk Lymphoma. 2008 Aug;49(8):1427–1430. doi: 10.1080/10428190802220527

Intrathecal liposomal cytarabine: More friend than foe?

DEEPA BHOJWANI 1, CHING-HON PUI 1
PMCID: PMC2803076  NIHMSID: NIHMS162789  PMID: 18766957

Intrathecal chemotherapy is an integral component of treatment for acute leukemia and non-Hodgkin lymphoma, and together with intensive systemic chemotherapy, has largely replaced cranial irradiation as central-nervous-system (CNS)-directed therapy, even in patients with high-risk disease.1 However, the optimal intrathecal treatment has yet to be established. Because cytotoxic concentrations of conventional intrathecal chemotherapy are maintained in the cerebrospinal fluid for only a short time and frequently repeated lumbar punctures may pose technical difficulties in some patients, a sustained-release formulation of cytarabine was developed.

By encapsulating in spherical multivesicular, biodegradable lipid-based particles known as DepoFoam, lioposomal cytarabine is released gradually after administration, thereby prolonging exposure to the drug in cerebrospinal fluid. This liposomal formulation has a half-life of 100 to 263 hours after intrathecal or intraventricular administration at doses of 12.5 mg to 75 mg, as compared to only 3.4 hours after intrathecal administration of 30 mg of free cytarabine.2-4 Thus, while one dose of conventional cytarabine results in cytotoxic concentrations (≥0.1 μg/mL) in the cerebrospinal fluid for <24 hours, one dose of liposomal cytarabine maintains concentrations for 8 days or more in children and for more than 14 days in most adults.2,4 Based on its significantly improved response rate as compared to standard formulation of cytarabine in a randomized trial,5 liposomal cytarabine was approved by the Food and Drug Administration for the treatment of patients with lymphomatous meningitis.

In Phase I/II studies in adults and children, liposomal cytarabine was very effective.2,4-6 Chemical arachnoiditis, characterized by headache, back pain, fever, nausea, and vomiting, was common but could be prevented by concomitant administration of systemic dexamethasone.2,4-6 The recommended dose of liposomal cytarabine is 50 mg for adults and 35 mg for children, administered with systemic dexamethasone for 5 days, every 2 weeks during induction and consolidation therapy, and every 4 weeks during continuation therapy.2,4-6

In the early studies when liposomal cytarabine was given as a single agent or together with conventional doses of systemic chemotherapy, neurotoxicity other than arachnoiditis was uncommon. In a study at M.D. Anderson for adults with newly diagnosed acute lymphoblastic leukemia, patients were treated with their hyper-CVAD regimen which includes high-dose methotrexate and high-dose cytarabine, modified by substituting liposomal cytarabine for conventional intrathecal therapy for CNS prophylaxis.7 To minimize the potential overlapping toxicity of intrathecal and systemic cytarabine, the investigators separated liposomal cytarabine treatments by at least 12 days, and did not begin intrathecal treatment until at least 7 days after the last dose of systemic cytarabine. Despite this precaution and the concomitant use of dexamethasone orally or intravenously for 5 days, a high rate (16%) of significant neurotoxicity that include encephalopathy, cauda equina syndrome, seizure and pseudotumor cerebri, was observed among 31 patients treated, prompting the termination of the study. The investigators suggested that intrathecal liposomal cytarabine given concomitantly with systemic chemotherapy that crosses the blood-brain barrier can result in significant neurotoxicity.

In a subsequent study using modified hyper-CVAD regimen in which liposomal cytarabine treatments were given further apart (every 3 weeks), 2 of 14 adults with leukemia or lymphoma still developed significant neurologic events (severe headache and somnolence plus hyponatremia, respectively).8 The findings of these two studies led to the suggestion that liposomal cytarabine should not be given prior to or during treatment with high-dose chemotherapy that penetrates the blood-brain barrier.9

In this issue of Leukemia & Lymphoma, Parasole et al 10 reported the efficacy and safety of intrathecal liposomal cytarabine in 6 heavily pretreated children with acute lymphoblastic leukemia (4 T-cell and 2 B-cell precursor) and CNS relapse, representing the first relapse in 2 patients, second relapse in 3, and third relapse in 1. The patient with third relapse had been previously treated with cranial irradiation and total body irradiation for transplantation. All patients including one with Down syndrome tolerated liposomal cytarabine relatively well with sustained clearance of blasts in cerebrospinal fluid. Only one child developed grade 2 headache, and none experienced significant neurotoxicity. Importantly, 5 of the 6 patients received concurrent systemic high-dose cytarabine (2 gm/m2/dose). There are several plausible explanations for the apparently contrasting experience between adult and childhood cases. First, children may tolerate the liposomal cytarabine better than adults. However, in a prior study of 5 children with neoplastic meningitis,11 one heavily pretreated patient developed transient encephalopathy 4 days after receiving high-dose methotrexate and a single dose of liposomal cytarabine. Secondly, Parasole et al 10judiciously used age-adjusted doses of liposomal cytarabine as is standard with other intrathecal agents in pediatrics. Thirdly and perhaps of interest, they instilled intrathecal methylprednisolone concurrently with liposomal cytarabine in two of their patients. In this regard, intrathecal prednisone may be more effective than systemic dexamethasone in preventing local inflammatory effects of liposomal cytarabine. However, many more patients need to be treated to confirm the potential protective effect of intrathecal prednisone. Having no neurotoxicities in six patients does not establish improved safety with this approach, because statistically the true rate of events can still be as high as 39%. Nonetheless, if the finding of Parasole and colleagues is confirmed by additional studies, it most certainly will generate greater enthusiasm to use this effective treatment.

The potential neurotoxicity of liposomal cytarabine has been a major concern of leukemia therapists in using this treatment modality despite its great effectiveness. Preventive measures may reduce, but are not likely to totally eliminate the risk of neurotoxicity. Liposomal cytarabine is beneficial, especially in refractory patients and its use in a broader clinical practice requires careful assessment of both risks and benefits. We have summarized published studies in Table 1. Several large phase II adult studies are ongoing in the United States and Europe to further test the safety and efficacy of intrathecal liposomal cytarabine alone and in combination with chemotherapeutic drugs as well as monoclonal antibodies. As more data becomes available, we will learn optimal use of this highly effective drug.

Table 1.

Summary of neurotoxic events in studies using intrathecal liposomal cytarabine#

Study No. of
patients
(age)
Type of study Indication Dose and
frequency of
liposomal
cytarabine
Total
no. of
doses
Route of
administr
ation
Measures taken to
prevent
neurotoxicity
Concurrent
cranial RT or
high dose
chemotherapy
Neurotoxicity
(≥ Grade III)
Proportion of
patients with≥
grade III
neurotoxicity
(95% CI)
Cytologic
response (No.
of patients)
Kim et al
^ (1993)4
12
(6–73 yrs)
Phase I Neoplastic
meningitis
(4 hematologic
malignancies, 8
solid tumors)
12.5–125 mg;
Q 2–3 weeks
47 IVT: 11
LP: 1
Both: 3
NR Cranial
irradiation: 2
Encephalopathy: 3
Headache: 2
5 of 47 cycles
10.6% (1.8%
to 19.5%)
7 of 9
evaluable
patients
Chamberl
ain et al
(1995)3
9
(23–67 yrs)
Phase 1 Neoplastic
meningitis
(4 NHL, 1 AML,
3 solid tumors)
75 mg;
Q 2 weeks
18 LP Dexamethasone
PO in 15 cycles
NR None 0 of 9
0%
(0% to 28%)
6 of 8
evaluable
patients
Glantz et
al^
(1999)5
14
(35–86 yrs)
Randomized
phase II
Lymphomatous
meningitis
50 mg;
Q 2 weeks X 2
months, Q 4
weeks X 8
months
74 IVT: 13
LP: 1
Dexamethasone
PO/IV
None Headache: 4
Meningismus: 2
Confusion: 2
Somnolence: 2
10 of 74
cycles
13.5% (5.7%
to 21.3%)
10 of 14
Glantz et
al (1999)6
31
(19–74 yrs)
Randomized
phase II
Neoplastic
meningitis (solid
tumors)
50 mg;
Q 2 weeks X 2
months, Q 4
weeks X 8
months
102 IVT: 29
LP: 2
Dexamethasone
PO/IV
Cranial or
spinal
irradiation: 4
Headache: 4
Altered mental status: 5
Seizures: 1
Sensory/Motor: 1
Drug related meningitis: 3
CNS infection: 3
17 of 31
54.8% (37.3%
to 72.3%)
8 of 31
Jaeckle
et al^
(2001)12
53
(28–74 yrs)
4 studies
(1 randomized,
included 11
patients from
Glantz et al6,
3 non
randomized)
Neoplastic
meningitis
(breast cancer)
50 mg;
Q 2 weeks X 2
months, Q 4
weeks X 2
months
177 IVT: 42
LP: 8
Both: 3
Dexamethasone
PO/IV
Cranial
irradiation: 13
Headache: 2
Arachnoiditis: 4
6 of 177
cycles
3.4%
(0.7% to 6%)
12 of 43
evaluable
patients
Bomgaar
s et al
(2004)2
18
(4–19 yrs)
Phase I Neoplastic
meningitis
(9 ALL, 1 AML, 8
brain tumors)
25–50 mg;
Q 2 weeks X 1
month,
Q 4 weeks X 2
months, Q 8
weeks X 12
months
78 IVT: 3
LP: 12
Both: 3
Dexamethasone
PO/IV
None Headache: 3 3 of 18
16.6%
(0% to 33.9%)
8 of 14
evaluable
patients
Sancho
et al
(2006)13
6
(5–50 yrs)
Retrospective
series
CNS
involvement in
leukemia
50 mg;
Q 2 weeks
(25 mg in 5 yr
old)
29 LP Dexamethsaone
PO/IV
NR None 0 of 6
0%
(0% to 39%)
2 of 3
evaluable
patients
Jabbour
et al
(2007)7
31
(>18 yrs)
Phase II Newly diagnosed
adult ALL
50 mg Day 2 and
15 of
HyperCVAD
cycle,
Day 10 of MA
cycle
NR LP Dexamethsone
PO/IV
Liposomal
cytarabine >7 days
after HD cytarabine
High dose
methotrexate
and
cytarabine: 31
Papilledema and
blindness: 1
Increased intracranial
pressure: 2
Cauda eqina syndrome: 2
5 of 31
16.1% (3.2%
to 29.1%)
Prophylactic
use
1 combined
marrow and
CNS relapse
Benesch
et al
(2007)11
5
(5–18 yrs)
Retrospective
series
Neoplastic
meningitis
(4 leukemia, 1
medulloblastoma
15–50 mg;
Q 2–4 weeks
(Single dose in 1
patient)
33 LP Dexamethasone
PO/IV
High dose
methotrexate
(8 gm/m2): 1
TBI: 1
Encephalopathy: 1
Seizures* : 1
2 of 5
40%
(0% to 82.9%)
3 of 5
Sancho
et al
(2007)14
10
(18–57 yrs)
Retrospective
series
AML
CNS
involvement:6
CNS relapse: 4
50 mg;
Q 2 or 4 weeks
(35 mg in 18 yr
old)
39 LP Dexamethasone
PO/IV
High dose
cytarabine: 6
Headache*: 3 3 of 10
30%
(1.6% to
58.4%)
9 of 9
evaluable
patients
McClune
et al
(2007)8
14
(23–72 yrs)
Retrospective
series
Newly diagnosed
ALL and
aggressive
lymphomas
50 mg
(25 mg if
intraventricular);
Q 3 weeks
40 IVT: 2
LP: 12
Dexamethasone
PO/IV
Liposomal
cytarabine Q3
weeks
High dose
methotrexate
and
cytarabine: 14
Hyponatremia and
somnolence*: 1
Headache*: 1
2 of 14
14.3%
(0% to 32.6%)
Prophylactic
use
No CNS
relapses
Parasole
et al
(2008)10
6
(2–26 yrs)
Retrospective
series
ALL with CNS
relapse
Q 2 weeks
(Q 1 week X 4 in
1 patient)
33 LP Dexamethasone
PO/IV
Methylprednisone
IT (2 patients)
Age adjusted dose
High dose
cytarabine
(2 gm/m2): 5
None 0/6
0%
(0% to 39%)
6 of 6
#

Includes studies ≥ 5 patients, published in English

*

Grade of toxicity not reported

^

Neurotoxic events reported per cycle of intrathecal liposomal cytarabine (not per patient)

IVT: Intraventricular

LP: Lumbar puncture

NR: Not reported

ALL: acute lymphoblastic leukemia

AML: Acute myeloid leukemia

CNS: Central nervous system

RT: Radiation therapy

Acknowledgments

Supported in part by grant CA21765 from the National Cancer Institute and by the American Lebanese Syrian Associated Charities (ALSAC)

References

  • 1.Pui CH, Howard SC. Current management and challenges of malignant disease in the CNS in paediatric leukaemia. Lancet Oncol. 2008;9(3):257–68. doi: 10.1016/S1470-2045(08)70070-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Bomgaars L, Geyer JR, Franklin J, Dahl G, Park J, Winick NJ, et al. Phase I trial of intrathecal liposomal cytarabine in children with neoplastic meningitis. J Clin Oncol. 2004;22(19):3916–21. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2004.01.046. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Chamberlain MC, Kormanik P, Howell SB, Kim S. Pharmacokinetics of intralumbar DTC-101 for the treatment of leptomeningeal metastases. Arch Neurol. 1995;52(9):912–7. doi: 10.1001/archneur.1995.00540330094020. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Kim S, Chatelut E, Kim JC, Howell SB, Cates C, Kormanik PA, et al. Extended CSF cytarabine exposure following intrathecal administration of DTC 101. J Clin Oncol. 1993;11(11):2186–93. doi: 10.1200/JCO.1993.11.11.2186. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Glantz MJ, LaFollette S, Jaeckle KA, Shapiro W, Swinnen L, Rozental JR, et al. Randomized trial of a slow-release versus a standard formulation of cytarabine for the intrathecal treatment of lymphomatous meningitis. J Clin Oncol. 1999;17(10):3110–6. doi: 10.1200/JCO.1999.17.10.3110. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Glantz MJ, Jaeckle KA, Chamberlain MC, Phuphanich S, Recht L, Swinnen LJ, et al. A randomized controlled trial comparing intrathecal sustained-release cytarabine (DepoCyt) to intrathecal methotrexate in patients with neoplastic meningitis from solid tumors. Clin Cancer Res. 1999;5(11):3394–402. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Jabbour E, O’Brien S, Kantarjian H, Garcia-Manero G, Ferrajoli A, Ravandi F, et al. Neurologic complications associated with intrathecal liposomal cytarabine given prophylactically in combination with high-dose methotrexate and cytarabine to patients with acute lymphocytic leukemia. Blood. 2007;109(8):3214–8. doi: 10.1182/blood-2006-08-043646. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.McClune B, Buadi FK, Aslam N, Przepiorka D. Intrathecal liposomal cytarabine for prevention of meningeal disease in patients with acute lymphocytic leukemia and high-grade lymphoma. Leuk Lymphoma. 2007;48(9):1849–51. doi: 10.1080/10428190701573232. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Pui CH. Toward optimal use of intrathecal liposomal cytarabine. Leuk Lymphoma. 2007;48(9):1672–3. doi: 10.1080/10428190701573687. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Parasole R, Menna G, Marra N, Petruzziello F, Locatelli F, Mangione A, et al. Efficacy and safety of intrathecal liposomal cytarabine for the treatment of meningeal relapse in acute lymphoblastic leukemia: experience of two pediatric institutions. Leukemia Lymphoma. 2008 doi: 10.1080/10428190802216749. in press. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Benesch M, Sovinz P, Krammer B, Lackner H, Mann G, Schwinger W, et al. Feasibility and toxicity of intrathecal liposomal cytarabine in 5 children and young adults with refractory neoplastic meningitis. J Pediatr Hematol Oncol. 2007;29(4):222–6. doi: 10.1097/MPH.0b013e318041f112. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Jaeckle KA, Phuphanich S, Bent MJ, Aiken R, Batchelor T, Campbell T, et al. Intrathecal treatment of neoplastic meningitis due to breast cancer with a slow-release formulation of cytarabine. Br J Cancer. 2001;84(2):157–63. doi: 10.1054/bjoc.2000.1574. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Sancho JM, Ribera JM, Romero MJ, Martin-Reina V, Giraldo P, Ruiz E. Compassionate use of intrathecal depot liposomal cytarabine as treatment of central nervous system involvement in acute leukemia: report of 6 cases. Haematologica. 2006;91(3):ECR02. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Sancho JM, Deben G, Parker A, Pinana JL, Bolam S, Sanchez-Garcia E, et al. Results of compassionate therapy with intrathecal depot liposomal cytarabine in acute myeloid leukemia meningeosis. Int J Hematol. 2007;86(1):33–6. doi: 10.1532/IJH97.E0704. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

RESOURCES