Skip to main content
NIHPA Author Manuscripts logoLink to NIHPA Author Manuscripts
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2011 Mar 5.
Published in final edited form as: Am J Med Genet B Neuropsychiatr Genet. 2010 Mar 5;153B(2):418–427. doi: 10.1002/ajmg.b.30995

GABRR1 and GABRR2, encoding the GABA-A receptor subunits ρ1 and ρ2, are associated with alcohol dependence

Xiaoling Xuei 1,*, Leah Flury-Wetherill 2, Danielle Dick 3, Alison Goate 4, Jay Tischfield 5, John Nurnberger Jr 6, Marc Schuckit 7, John Kramer 8, Sam Kuperman 9, Victor Hesselbrock 10, Bernice Porjesz 11, Tatiana Foroud 2, Howard J Edenberg 1,2
PMCID: PMC2829340  NIHMSID: NIHMS172899  PMID: 19536785

Abstract

The genes encoding several GABA-A receptor subunits, including GABRA2, have been associated with alcoholism, suggesting that variations in GABA signaling contribute to risk. Therefore, as part of a comprehensive evaluation of the GABA receptor genes, we evaluated the potential association of GABRR1 and GABRR2, which encode the ρ1 and ρ2 subunits of the pentameric GABA-A/GABA-C receptors. GABRR1 and GABRR2 lie in a head to tail orientation spanning 137 kb on chromosome 6q14-16. We genotyped 73 SNPs, covering both genes and extending 31 kb upstream of GABRR2 and 95 kb downstream of GABRR1, in a sample of 1923 European Americans from 219 multiplex alcohol dependent families. Family-based association analyses demonstrated that SNPs in both GABRR1 and GABRR2 were significantly associated with alcohol dependence. Among the associated SNPs was rs282129, a coding SNP (Met430Thr) in GABRR2. Secondary analysis using a median split for age of onset suggests that the association is strongest when the analysis is focused upon those with earlier onset of alcohol dependence. Haplotypes in each gene were significantly overtransmitted to family members who did not meet criteria for alcohol dependence (p<0.04), and a haplotype in GABRR2 was significantly overtransmitted to family members who met a broader definition of alcoholism (p=0.002) as well as DSM-IV dependence (p=0.04).

Keywords: alcoholism, GABA-A receptor, rho subunit, genetics, single nucleotide polymorphism

Introduction

Alcoholism is a complex genetic disorder, affected by multiple genes, environmental and social influence, and interactions between genes and environmental factors (Bierut et al., 1999; Cloninger et al., 1981; Heath et al., 1997; Kendler et al., 1994). To identify genes contributing to the risk for alcoholism, the Collaborative Study on the Genetics of Alcoholism (COGA) has utilized both linkage and association approaches, using carefully ascertained and rigorously evaluated individuals in families with multiple alcoholics (Begleiter et al., 1995; Edenberg, 2002; Foroud et al., 2000). With this approach, COGA has provided evidence that a number of specific genes are associated with the risk for alcoholism, including GABRA2, CHRM2, hTAS2R16, GABRG3, OPRK1, PDYN, ADH4, NFKB1, TACR3, NPY2R and ACN9 (Dick et al., 2004; Dick et al., 2008; Edenberg et al., 2004; Edenberg et al., 2006; Edenberg et al., 2008; Foroud et al., 2008; Hinrichs et al., 2006; Wang et al., 2004; Wetherill et al., 2008; Xuei et al., 2006).

GABA-A receptors are ligand-gated anion channels formed by pentameric complexes including α, β, γ, δ, ε, π, and ρ subunits, and mediate fast synaptic inhibition in response to GABA (Cutting et al., 1991; Enoch, 2008). GABA binds to an extracellular ligand-binding domain, while 4 trans-membrane domains form the ion channel for chloride transportation into cells. The effects of drugs and alcohol on GABA neurotransmission have been extensively studied, as has their role in alcohol dependence (Barnard et al., 1998; Koob, 2006; Lobo and Harris, 2008; Vengeliene et al., 2008). The GABA-ρ1 receptor subunit was originally cloned based upon homology to the GABA-A receptor subunits, and when expressed encodes a GABA-responsive chloride channel that binds mucimol (Cutting et al., 1991). The closely-related ρ2 subunit was cloned by homology to ρ1 (Cutting et al., 1992). Sequence similarity makes them part of the GABA-A family of receptors, and they form ligand-gated chloride channels, but insensitivity of the homopentamers to baclofen and bicuculline as well as benzodiazepines lead them to also be classified as GABA-C receptors (Bormann, 2000; Kusama et al., 1993; Shimada et al., 1992; Zhang et al., 2001). GABA-C receptors have a higher sensitivity to GABA and do not desensitize (Enz, 2001). In the superior colliculus they appear to be involved in long-term potentiation (Enz, 2001; Schmidt et al., 2001).

Several GABA receptor genes are associated with alcoholism. The association of GABRA2 with alcoholism (Edenberg et al., 2004) has been replicated in case-control studies of Germans (Fehr et al., 2006; Soyka et al., 2008), Russians (Lappalainen et al., 2005), European-Americans (Covault et al., 2004), Plain Indians (Enoch et al., 2006), and a general Australian population (Lind et al., 2008). The association was with SNPs in a region of linkage disequilibrium (LD) extending from intron 3 past the 3′ end of the GABRA2 gene (Edenberg et al., 2004; Covault et al., 2004) and may extend to the 5′ end of the adjacent GABRG1 gene, which is in LD with SNPs in GABRA2 (Covault et al. 2008). In the COGA sample, the association with GABRA2 was greatest among those alcohol dependent individuals with comorbid dependence on illicit drugs (Agrawal et al., 2006); this subgroup is characterized by greater severity of alcohol problems (Dick et al., 2007). SNPs in GABRG3 on chromosome 15 (Dick et al., 2004) and GABRA1 on chromosome 5 (Dick et al., 2006) have also been associated with alcoholism. The evidence for associations of several GABA receptors with alcoholism, along with the known effects of alcohol on GABA neurotransmission, raises the question of whether variations in additional GABA-A receptors, including ρ receptors, might also affect risk for alcoholism.

There is evidence for linkage of the power in the gamma band (29-45 Hz) of the resting electroencephalograph (EEG) over the frontal and central scalp with markers on chromosome 6q14-16 (Xuei et al., 2008). GABRR1 and GABRR2, encoding the GABA receptor subunits ρ1 and ρ2, lie together in a 137 kb region that falls within this linkage peak. Although the ρ1 and ρ2 subunits were originally found in the bipolar neurons in the retina (Cutting et al., 1991; Polenzani et al., 1991), they are widely expressed in the brain (including cortex, thalamus, pituitary gland, cerebellum, and hippocampus) and in the spinal cord (Cutting et al., 1991; Alakuijala et al., 2005a; Alakuijala et al., 2005b; Harvey et al., 2006; Lopez-Chavez et al., 2005; Milligan et al., 2004; Zheng et al., 2003). Homomeric ρ1 receptors are inhibited by ethanol at a low concentration (400 nM) of GABA (Mihic and Harris, 1996). Two amino acids in the GABA-A receptor transmembrane domains 2 (Ser270) and 3 (Ala291) are critical for allosteric modulation of the receptors by alcohols and volatile anesthetics (Mihic et al., 1997). Heteromeric complexes of ρ and α1 subunits were found in mouse cerebellar Purkinje cells, where ρ subunits contribute to functional ionotropic receptors mediating a component of phasic inhibitory GABAergic transmission (Harvey et al., 2006).

Therefore, we examined whether GABRR1 and GABRR2 might be associated with alcoholism. We genotyped 73 SNPs, covering GABRR1, GABRR2, and their flanking regions, in a sample of European Americans from families in which at least three first-degree relatives were alcohol dependent. We report here evidence that SNPs in both GABRR1 and GABRR2 were significantly associated with alcohol dependence.

Materials and Methods

Subjects

Subjects were collected at six centers in the United States: Indiana University, State University of New York Health Science Center, University of Connecticut, University of Iowa, University of California/San Diego, and Washington University, St. Louis. The institutional review boards of all participating institutions approved the study. Probands were identified through alcohol treatment programs. After providing informed consent, probands and their relatives were administered a validated poly-diagnostic instrument, the Semi-Structured Assessment for the Genetics of Alcoholism (SSAGA) interview (Bucholz et al., 1994; Hesselbrock et al., 1999). For ascertainment, alcoholism was defined as meeting criteria for both DSM-IIIR alcohol dependence (American Psychiatric Association 1987) and Feighner definite alcoholism (Feighner et al., 1972) (this combination is called COGA criteria). Details of the ascertainment and assessment have previously been published (Begleiter et al., 1995; Foroud et al., 2000; Reich et al., 1998) and are available in detail at zork.wustl.edu/niaaa/coga_instruments/resources.html. Families in which at least 3 first-degree relatives were alcohol dependent participated in the genetic part of the COGA study, as described in more detail by Foroud et al. (Foroud et al., 2000). A sample of 1923 European American individuals from 219 alcoholic families was used in this study.

SNP genotyping

Because HapMap data indicated that flanking genes were in LD with the GABRR1-GABRR2 gene cluster, we extended the genotyping into the flanking regions. Seventy three SNPs in a 262 kb region, including GABRR1 and GABRR2, UBE2J1 (ubiquitin-conjugating enzyme E2, J1) upstream of GABRR2, and PM20D2 (peptidase M20 domain containing 2), SRrp35 (serine-arginine repressor protein) and PNRC1 (proline-rich nuclear receptor coactivator 1) downstream of GABRR1 (Figure 1), were selected from public databases (dbSNP and HapMap). Preference was given to SNPs having minor allele frequencies greater than 5%. Four synonymous SNPs in the coding regions of GABRR1 and GABRR2 (rs34218666, rs35608866, rs34617047, and rs35301635) were genotyped despite their reported low minor allele frequencies; they proved monomorphic in our sample and are not included in the tables or analyses. SNP positions were obtained from NCBI reference human genome, build 36.3.

Figure 1.

Figure 1

Most assays were designed for the Sequenom MassArray system (Sequenom, San Diego, CA) using MassArray Assay Design Software. The assays were done using the hME or iPLEX assay format (Sequenom, San Diego, CA); in both cases, alleles were discriminated by mass spectrometry. Assays were tested on two groups of 40 unrelated individuals from the Coriell European-American and African-American samples. SNPs that were not in Hardy-Weinberg equilibrium in both populations were not genotyped in the sample. Some SNPs were genotyped using the Illumina technology on a BeadLab station with GoldenGate chemistry, as described previously (Dick et al., 2008).

All SNPs were tested for Mendelian inheritance using the program PEDCHECK (O’Connell and Weeks, 1998). Marker allele frequencies and heterozygosities were computed using the program USERM13 (Boehnke, 1991). Markers were tested for Hardy-Weinberg equilibrium in independent individuals from the study sample using Haploview (Barrett et al., 2005) and were omitted from analysis if they deviated significantly (p < 0.001) from Hardy-Weinberg equilibrium.

Statistical analyses

Linkage disequilibrium among genotyped SNPs was evaluated using HAPLOVIEW (Barrett et al., 2005). Coverage of the gene was additionally examined using Tagger (de Bakker et al., 2005) to determine the correlation between genotyped SNPs and all known SNPs in the HapMap I dataset.

Family based association analyses were performed using the Pedigree Disequilibrium test (PDT) (Martin et al., 2001) as implemented in the program UNPHASED (version 2.404) (Dudbridge, 2003). The PDT uses data from all available trios in a family, as well as discordant sibships. The PDTsum statistic, which gives greater weight to families with a larger number of informative trios and discordant sibships, was utilized as the primary statistic. Haplotypes from phase-certain individuals were used to further explore significant associations across the GABRR1-GABRR2 gene cluster. Association analysis using the haplotypes was performed using UNPHASED and the PDTsum statistic.

For our primary phenotype, we employed the DSM-IV criteria for alcohol dependence (American Psychiatric Association 1994), which could be derived from the SSAGA data; we used the broader COGA definition as a secondary phenotype. The vast majority of individuals who met DSM-IV criteria also met COGA criteria; 35 individuals who were positive for DSM-IV but negative for COGA criteria and 22 individuals who were positive for COGA criteria but negative for DSM-IV were coded as unknown and omitted from analysis (Table 1).

Table 1. Phenotypic distribution of 1,923 genotyped individuals.

Phenotypes # Affected (%) # Unaffected (%) Unknown1 (%)
DSM-IV 718 (37.3%) 1025 (53.3%) 180 (9.4%)
COGA 862 (44.8%) 881 (45.8%) 180 (9.4%)
EARLY2 399 (20.7%) 1025 (53.3%) 499 (26.0%)
1

There are 123 individuals without a completed SSAGA diagnostic interview, and 57 individuals recoded as unknown due to contradicting alcohol dependence classification.

2

Subjects coded as early met the DSM-IV criteria for alcohol dependence at age 21 or younger.

We performed secondary analyses exploring the hypothesis that genetic effects are stronger in those alcohol dependent individuals with an earlier age of onset. Association analysis was performed defining as affected only those individuals meeting DSM-IV criteria for alcohol dependence by age 21 (n = 399; Table 1). As in the above analyses of alcohol dependence, 1,025 family members were classified as unaffected. Others, including individuals meeting DSM-IV alcohol dependence criteria at age 22 or older, were considered unknown.

Results

GABRR1 and GABRR2 are in a head-to-tail orientation spanning 137 kb on chromosome 6q (Figure 1). Based on the LD pattern, we analyzed 69 SNPs in the region extending 31 kb upstream of GABRR2 to the adjacent gene UBE2J1, and 95 kb downstream of GABRR1; this 263 kb region included three additional genes, PM20D2, SRrp35 and PNRC1 (Figure 1). The mean minor allele frequency (MAF) was 0.29, with a standard deviation ± 0.11 and a range from 0.06 to 0.50 (Table 2). The LD pattern in our sample is similar to that in the HapMap CEU (CEPH European) database.

Table 2. Association analyses of GABRR1 and GABRR2 and their flanking regions.

Gene SNP
number
SNP_ID Chromosome
position1
SNP location2 MAF3 Minor
nucleotide4
DSM-
IV5
Early
onset5
COGA5
PNRC1 1 rs1130809 89,850,613 exon 2, Thr321 0.18 C 0.70 0.18* 0.77
2 rs11961455 89,852,007 downstream 0.42 C 0.66 0.23* 0.39

SRrp35 3 rs6938490 89,862,949 3′UTR 0.29 A 0.90 0.47 0.33
4 rs423516 89,884,774 promoter 0.29 T 0.57 0.15 0.72

PM20D2 5 rs4707518 89,907,725 upstream 0.29 C 0.69 0.22 0.98
6 rs1929635 89,923,709 intron 4 0.28 G 0.49 0.13 0.73

GABRR1 7 rs1331100 89,935,180 downstream 0.29 G 0.72 0.18 0.81
8 rs416115 89,941,956 downstream 0.30 C 0.17 0.014* 0.08*
9 rs3734201 89,945,162 3′UTR 0.42 C 0.58 0.04 0.55
10 rs1796743 89,945,463 exon 10, Ala389 0.35 T 0.40 0.12* 0.27
11 rs407221 89,947,094 intron 8 0.27 C 0.21 0.23 0.37
12 rs368873 89,949,881 intron 7 0.29 G 0.43 0.03* 0.14*
13 rs407206 89,951,687 intron 7 0.32 A 0.13 0.12 0.15
14 rs423463 89,955,427 intron 6 0.19 A 0.68 0.41* 0.97
15 rs453503 89,957,318 intron 5 0.19 T 0.64 0.38* 0.66
16 rs452667 89,960,039 intron 5 0.19 T 0.62 1.00 0.45
17 rs439912 89,963,734 intron 5 0.45 C 0.13 0.56 0.32
18 rs422751 89,964,592 exon 5, Asp140 0.16 G 0.97 0.86 0.8
19 rs11967322 89,966,483 intron 3 0.43 T 0.19 0.45 0.58
20 rs7741132 89,969,614 intron 2 0.33 A 0.14 0.06 0.13
21 rs7758893 89,973,360 intron 1 0.19 C 0.79 0.51* 0.76
22 rs881293 89,974,522 intron 1 0.32 C 0.63 0.29* 0.71
23 rs1029057 89,979,273 intron 1 0.28 T 1.00 0.87 0.44
24 rs6902106 89,982,459 intron 1 0.28 C 0.34 0.14* 0.09*
25 rs17504587 89,982,921 intron 1 0.19 T 0.04 0.03 0.01
26 rs1186902 89,983,681 exon 1, Arg21His 0.28 C 0.81 0.97 0.36
27 rs12200969 89,983,685 exon 1, Val20Met 0.34 C 0.20 0.09* 0.11*
28 rs1186903 89,984,290 promoter 0.35 A 0.11* 0.048* 0.10*
29 rs914479 89,986,927 upstream 0.35 C 0.08* 0.028* 0.04*
30 rs914478 89,987,638 upstream 0.34 C 0.12* 0.06* 0.07*
31 rs9342188 90,002,245 intergenic 0.09 C 0.83 0.27* 0.59
32 rs1321355 90,007,632 intergenic 0.27 G 0.10* 0.10* 0.08*
33 rs282135 90,008,949 intergenic 0.28 G 0.74 0.93 0.24
34 rs6914006 90,014,480 intergenic 0.44 A 0.46 0.47 0.73

GABRR2 35 rs3734198 90,021,011 downstream 0.43 G 0.62 0.84 0.92
36 rs282129 90,024,217 exon 9, Met430Thr 0.28 A 0.03* 0.08* 0.02*
37 rs13211104 90,027,125 intron 8 0.30 A 0.03* 0.07* 0.03*
38 rs9451191 90,029,831 intron 8 0.26 A 0.021 0.002 0.17
39 rs723041 90,030,782 intron 8 0.13 T 0.79 0.86 0.83
40 rs9294426 90,031,297 intron 7 0.29 A 0.55 0.38 1.00
41 rs12206367 90,031,345 intron 7 0.12 A 0.43 0.38 0.84
42 rs2273507 90,031,964 intron 7 0.20 G 0.70 0.55 0.52
43 rs2273508 90,034,567 intron 4 0.11 T 0.97 0.63 0.46
44 rs282121 90,036,802 intron 3 0.41 T 0.025 0.02 0.05
45 rs282117 90,038,132 exon 3, Val83 0.42 T 0.07 0.017 0.12
46 rs282115 90,038,431 intron 2 0.07 A 0.78 0.20* 0.96
47 rs9451194 90,042,098 intron 2 0.45 A 0.91 0.53 0.65
48 rs9362632 90,051,417 intron 2 0.29 G 0.87 0.88 0.36
49 rs3798256 90,053,124 intron 2 0.45 G 0.22 0.06 0.36
50 rs964626 90,056,015 intron 2 0.21 C 0.13* 0.16* 0.13*
51 rs9451196 90,057,273 intron 2 0.12 T 0.07* 0.21* 0.30*
52 rs6454750 90,057,490 intron 2 0.45 T 1.00 0.65 0.80
53 rs2148174 90,062,644 intron 2 0.33 T 0.41 0.78 0.85
54 rs7742664 90,065,463 intron 2 0.22 T 0.20* 0.03* 0.25*
55 rs2325202 90,068,229 intron 1 0.36 G 0.22 0.04* 0.16
56 rs1570028 90,069,154 intron 1 0.49 A 0.34 0.07* 0.08
57 rs6942204 90,072,687 intron 1 0.27 C 0.04 0.005 0.016
58 rs6454752 90,075,080 intron 1 0.23 T 0.43 0.21* 0.07*
59 rs9294432 90,076,686 intron 1 0.47 T 0.51 0.14* 0.04*
60 rs10944441 90,078,260 intron 1 0.18 A 0.08* 0.012* 0.005*
61 rs7764923 90,079,640 intron 1 0.24 T 0.08* 0.02* 0.007*
62 rs2236204 90,081,831 promoter 0.19 T 0.09* 0.015* 0.006*
63 rs9362636 90,083,516 promoter 0.06 G 0.86 0.88 0.91
64 rs2064831 90,089,661 upstream 0.18 C 0.09* 0.01* 0.009*

UBE2J1 65 rs13215418 90,093,230 downstream 0.17 T 0.56 0.93 0.73
66 rs10502 90,096,389 exon 8, Val229Leu 0.40 C 0.34 0.11* 0.07*
67 rs12189673 90,103,123 intron 5 0.30 C 0.62 0.25 0.05
68 rs7760851 90,109,323 intron 2 0.50 G 0.40 0.48 0.009
69 rs7743444 90,112,800 intron 1 0.24 T 0.88 0.97 0.52
1

Chromosome positions are based on NCBI Human Genome Assembly v36.3.

2

PNRC1 and PM20D2 are transcribed in forward direction; SRrp35, GABRR1, GABRR2 and UBE2J1 are transcribed in the opposite direction.

3

Minor Allele Frequency in this sample of European Americans.

4

Nucleotides are shown on the human genome strand.

5

P-value of UNPHASED PDTsum statistic for association between the SNP and alcohol dependence. P ≤ 0.05 is in bold.

*

Minor allele is preferentially transmitted to affected individuals.

SNP coverage was further assessed using Tagger (de Bakker et al., 2005); 61 of the SNPs were included in the HapMap database and could, therefore, be analyzed. In the CEU population, these 61 SNPs gave a mean r2 of 0.79 with a total of 250 HapMap SNPs in the region; 65% of the SNPs in the region were captured at r2 ≥ 0.8 and 84% at r2 ≥ 0.5. The 8 additional SNPs we genotyped that were not included in the HapMap database would further increase the coverage of this region. Thus, the SNPs we genotyped provide very good coverage of the variation in the GABRR1-GABRR2 gene cluster and adjacent genes.

Six SNPs were significantly associated with alcohol dependence defined by DSM-IV criteria (p < 0.05) (Table 2, Figure 2); five of these were located in GABRR2 from intron 1 to exon 9 and 1 was in intron 1 of GABRR1. Interestingly, rs282129 (p = 0.03) is a nonsynonymous coding SNP that leads to either a methionine or a threonine at amino acid 430 of GABRR2; the allele overtransmitted to the affected individuals encodes methionine. Eight additional SNPs (including 4 in the promoter to intron 1 region of GABRR2 and 1 upstream of GABRR1) demonstrated suggestive association (0.05 < p ≤ 0.10).

Figure 2.

Figure 2

We have previously found that the associations of GABRA2, CHRM2, and NFKB1 with alcoholism were strongest in the half of the sample that included the most severely affected individuals, whose onset of alcohol dependence was at age 21 or younger (Agrawal et al., 2006; Dick et al., 2007; Edenberg et al., 2008). Therefore, we performed additional analysis using a median split for age of onset of alcohol dependence, defining affected individuals as those who met DSM-IV criteria for alcohol dependence at age 21 or earlier (n = 399). Despite the reduction in power due to the substantially lower number of affected individuals, greater evidence for association was observed, with 16 significantly associated SNPs (p ≤ 0.05) in the GABRR1 and GABRR2 gene cluster, including a synonymous SNP (Val83; rs282117) in GABRR2, and another 8 suggestive (0.05 < p ≤ 0.10; Table 2, Figure 2).

Secondary analyses using the broader COGA criteria for alcohol dependence provided evidence for association; a total of 13 SNPs, including 8 concentrated in the region from intron 1 of GABRR2 upstream to a part of UBE2J1 that was in LD with the 5′ region of GABRR2, and 2 in the region from just upstream to intron 1 of GABRR1 (Table 2, Figure 2).

The pattern of LD was examined in each of the regions having SNPs associated with at least one of the three phenotypes (DSM-IV alcohol dependence, early onset DSM-IV alcohol dependence, and COGA alcohol dependence). While there was extensive LD as defined by D’ (Figure 1), differences in allele frequencies mean that the correlation of the SNPs (r2) was much more restricted (Figure 3), such that different groups of SNPs were correlated with each other but much less with other groups. Considering the LD pattern, it appears that there are at least 6 independent regions of association. Several groups of SNPs in LD with each other show similar patterns of association. At the 3′ end of GABRR1, SNPs 8, 10 and 12 are in high LD with each other (Figure 3, inset) and two provide evidence of association with early onset, while the third, less correlated SNP, approaches significance; SNP 9, in that cluster, is also significant. At the 5′ end of GABRR1, 3 SNPs (25, 28, 29) are significantly associated with early onset (and several others are nearly significant), with some evidence for association with the COGA definition of dependence (Table 2, Figure 3). Three SNPs (36-38) at the 3′ end of GABRR2 (which is just upstream of the 5′ end of GABRR1, Figure 3) show evidence for association with all 3 phenotypes, particularly DSM-IV dependence. Two of these, including the cSNP at position 430, are in LD with the group of SNPs at the 5′ end of GABRR1 (28-32; Figure 3, inset). Thus these two groups of SNPs may represent a single finding. SNP 38 is not in LD with other SNPs, and is most significant for the early onset phenotype.

Figure 3.

Figure 3

One SNP from each of these latter two groups was selected (rs914479 and rs282129; r2 = 0.42) and used in haplotype analysis to test whether a high risk haplotype could be identified within the region spanned by SNPs 27-37. The global test of significance was significant for all three alcohol dependence phenotypes: DSM-IV (p = 0.016), COGA (p = 0.014), and early onset (p = 0.030) (Table 3a). For all three phenotypes, a common haplotype having a frequency of 61% (T-G) was associated with the absence of alcohol dependence (p < 0.008 for DSM-IV; p < 0.007 for COGA; p = 0.019 for early onset. The complementary haplotype C-A, consisting of the minor alleles of both SNPs, was associated with COGA alcohol dependence (p = 0.02) and showed a trend toward significant association with DSM-IV (p = 0.11); the low frequency of this haplotype gives it lower power.

Table 3.

a. Haplotype analysis of 5′ region of GABRR1 and 3′ region of GABRR2.
rs914479
nucleotide1
rs282129
nucleotide1
DSM-IV3 Early onset3 COGA3
T G 0.008 0.019 0.007
T A2 0.08 0.07 0.43
C2 G 0.33 0.12 0.34
C2 A2 0.11 0.35 0.023

Global test 0.016 0.03 0.014
b. Haplotype analysis of GABRR2.
rs282121
nucleotide1
rs1094441
nucleotide1
DSM-IV3 Early
onset3
COGA3
T2 A2 0.84 0.30 0.24
T2 G 0.035 0.014 0.012
C A2 0.044 0.17 0.002
C G 0.37 0.25 0.67

Global test 0.07 0.05 0.005
1

Nucleotides are shown on the human genome strand.

2

Minor allele.

3

P-value of UNPHASED PDTsum statistic for association between the haplotype and alcohol dependence. P ≤ 0.05 is in bold.

There are two other clusters of SNPs in GABRR2 (SNPs 44-49 and 54-64) with high LD within each group (r2 > 0.54 and r2 > 0.64 respectively) but little LD between the two groups. There is consistency in the phenotypes associated with the significant SNPs and with the pattern of LD. One SNP from each group was selected for haplotype analysis (rs282121 and rs10944441; r2 = 0.06). The global test of association was significant for the broader COGA phenotype (p = 0.005) and for early onset (p = 0.05) alcohol dependence, and marginally significant for DSM-IV alcohol dependence (p = 0.07) (Table 3b). Haplotype T-G (frequency 38%), consisting of the minor allele of rs282121 and the major allele of rs10944441, was overtransmitted to individuals not meeting any of the three alcohol dependence criteria and its complement, C-A (frequency 12%), was overtransmitted to the individuals meeting COGA (p = 0.002) and DSM-IV (p = 0.044) criteria for alcohol dependence, but not related to early onset.

Discussion

This is the first study reporting evidence of association between GABRR1 and GABRR2 and alcohol dependence. Our primary analysis, using DSM-IV criteria as the phenotype, gave evidence of association primarily in GABRR2 (5 significant and 6 suggestive SNPs; Figure 1, Table 2). Among the associated SNPs, rs282129 is a non-synonymous coding SNP in exon 9 of GABRR2; the major allele (C) encodes Thr430 in transmembrane domain 4, which forms part of the ion channel, and the minor allele (T) encodes Met430. Met is overtransmitted to alcoholic individuals, suggesting that the protein with Met430 might differ in function in a way that might contribute to the development of alcohol dependence. However, this cSNP is in a larger region of LD extending to the upstream region of GABRR1, thus it could be that other regulatory variations in the region are responsible for the association..

Because early onset of alcoholism often reflects greater severity, including a higher risk for antisocial personality disorder and conduct disorder (Dick et al., 2007), and some of our earlier findings were stronger with this sub-phenotype (Agrawal et al., 2006; Dick et al., 2007; Edenberg et al., 2008), we examined whether the findings were primarily due to the cases with early onset. This was, in fact, found: eighteen SNPs spread across the 2-gene cluster, including a synonymous coding SNP (rs282117; Val83) in GABRR2, were significantly associated with early onset alcohol dependence. The increase in evidence for association despite the reduction by nearly half in the number of individuals deemed affected in this analysis suggests that the association with alcohol dependence is particularly strong in individuals who developed alcoholism at age 21 or younger.

Secondary analysis using a broader definition of alcoholism that includes additional individuals (COGA definition; Table 1) shows more SNPs significantly associated, particularly in the 5′ portion of GABRR2. The associated SNPs within each portion of GABRR1 and GABRR2 are in LD with each other (Figure 3). Both regions of association cover the 5′ promoter to the intron 1 region of each gene, suggesting that they may affect the regulation of these genes. Several SNPs in the two associated regions (SNPs 25-27 and 36, and SNPs 60-62) are located in highly conserved regions, suggesting potential functional roles in gene expression. The two intronic SNPs in UBE2J1 (SNPs 67 and 68) are in LD with the upstream region of GABRR2 (Figure 3, and may also affect expression of GABRR2.

The pattern of LD across these genes suggests that there are at least 6 different regions of association (Figure 3), and that there may be several different susceptibility haplotypes in this region. Between the 5′ region of GABRR1 and the 3′ end of GABRR2, we detected a haplotype (rs914479[T] - rs282129[G]) that appears to confer protection against all three phenotypes of alcohol dependence (Table 3). This region includes the coding SNP rs282129. A haplotype within the coding and proximal 5′ portion of GABRR2 (rs282121[T] - rs1094441[G]) also appears to confer protection from alcohol dependence (Table 3). We detected strong evidence of association of the complementary haplotype rs282121[C] - rs1094441[A] to COGA criteria for alcohol dependence (p = 0.002), less evidence of association with the narrower DSM-IV criteria (p = 0.044) but no evidence of association with the early onset subset of our sample; this pattern suggests that the C-A haplotype confers risk for alcoholism but not particularly for the more severe manifestations.

We analyzed one primary phenotype, DSM-IV alcohol dependence, and have performed secondary analyses using two phenotypes that included as affected only those meeting criteria for early onset DSM-IV alcohol dependence or those meeting the broader phenotype of alcohol dependence by COGA criteria. These alcohol dependence phenotypes are largely nested; they are not independent phenotypes, and some of the same SNPs affect risk for more than one of them. There is consistency in the patterns of association among the SNPs in LD with each other.

In summary, we have found evidence for association between GABRR1 and GABRR2 and alcohol dependence in a family-based study, with most of the evidence coming from individuals with early onset of the disorder. This report further supports the role of GABA receptor systems in the involvement of neurotransmission in response to alcohol. It may also provide future directions for functional studies of GABA ρ receptors.

Acknowledgments

The Collaborative Study on the Genetics of Alcoholism (COGA), Co-Principal Investigators B. Porjesz, V. Hesselbrock, H. Edenberg, L. Bierut, includes nine different centers where data collection, analysis, and storage take place. The nine sites and Principal Investigators and Co-Investigators are: University of Connecticut (V. Hesselbrock); Indiana University (H.J. Edenberg, J. Nurnberger Jr., T. Foroud); University of Iowa (S. Kuperman); SUNY Downstate (B. Porjesz); Washington University in St. Louis (L. Bierut, A. Goate, J. Rice); University of California at San Diego (M. Schuckit); Howard University (R. Taylor); Rutgers University (J. Tischfield); Southwest Foundation (L. Almasy). Q. Max Guo is the NIAAA Staff Collaborator. This national collaborative study is supported by the NIH Grant U10AA008401 from the National Institute on Alcohol Abuse and Alcoholism (NIAAA) and the National Institute on Drug Abuse (NIDA).

In memory of Henri Begleiter and Theodore Reich, Principal and Co-Principal Investigators of COGA since its inception; we are indebted to their leadership in the establishment and nurturing of COGA, and acknowledge with great admiration their seminal scientific contributions to the field.

SNP genotyping was carried out using the facilities of the Center for Medical Genomics at Indiana University School of Medicine, which is supported in part by the Indiana Genomics Initiative of Indiana University (INGEN®); INGEN is supported in part by The Lilly Endowment, Inc. We thank Gayathri Rajan, Rachel Schultz for expert technical assistance.

Reference

  1. Agrawal A, Edenberg HJ, Foroud T, Bierut LJ, Dunne G, Hinrichs AL, Nurnberger JI, Crowe R, Kuperman S, Schuckit MA, Begleiter H, Porjesz B, Dick DM. Association of GABRA2 with drug dependence in the collaborative study of the genetics of alcoholism sample. Behav Genet. 2006;36(5):640–50. doi: 10.1007/s10519-006-9069-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Alakuijala A, Palgi M, Wegelius K, Schmidt M, Enz R, Paulin L, Saarma M, Pasternack M. GABA receptor rho subunit expression in the developing rat brain. Brain Res Dev Brain Res. 2005a;154(1):15–23. doi: 10.1016/j.devbrainres.2004.09.010. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Alakuijala A, TalviOja K, Pasternack A, Pasternack M. Functional characterization of rat rho2 subunits expressed in HEK 293 cells. Eur J Neurosci. 2005b;21(3):692–700. doi: 10.1111/j.1460-9568.2005.03880.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. American Psychiatric Association . Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders. 3rd revised ed. American Psychiatric Association Press; Washington, DC: 1987. [Google Scholar]
  5. American Psychiatric Association . Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders. 4th revised ed. American Psychiatric Association Press; Washington, DC: 1994. [Google Scholar]
  6. Barnard EA, Skolnick P, Olsen RW, Mohler H, Sieghart W, Biggio G, Braestrup C, Bateson AN, Langer SZ. International Union of Pharmacology. XV. Subtypes of gamma-aminobutyric acidA receptors: classification on the basis of subunit structure and receptor function. Pharmacol Rev. 1998;50(2):291–313. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Barrett JC, Fry B, Maller J, Daly MJ. Haploview: analysis and visualization of LD and haplotype maps. Bioinformatics. 2005;21(2):263–5. doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/bth457. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Begleiter H, Reich T, Hesselbrock V, Porjesz B, Li T-K, Schuckit MA, Edenberg HJ, Rice AP. The Collaborative Study on the Genetics of Alcoholism. Alc.Health.Res.World. 1995;19:228–236. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Bierut LJ, Heath AC, Bucholz KK, Dinwiddie SH, Madden PA, Statham DJ, Dunne MP, Martin NG. Major depressive disorder in a community-based twin sample: are there different genetic and environmental contributions for men and women? Arch Gen Psychiatry. 1999;56(6):557–63. doi: 10.1001/archpsyc.56.6.557. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Boehnke M. Allele frequency estimation from data on relatives. Am J Hum Genet. 1991;48(1):22–5. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Bucholz KK, Cadoret R, Cloninger CR, Dinwiddie SH, Hesselbrock VM, Nurnberger JI, Jr., Reich T, Schmidt I, Schuckit MA. A new, semi-structured psychiatric interview for use in genetic linkage studies: a report on the reliability of the SSAGA. J Stud Alcohol. 1994;55(2):149–58. doi: 10.15288/jsa.1994.55.149. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Cloninger CR, Bohman M, Sigvardsson S. Inheritance of alcohol abuse. Cross-fostering analysis of adopted men. Arch Gen Psychiatry. 1981;38(8):861–8. doi: 10.1001/archpsyc.1981.01780330019001. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Covault J, Gelernter J, Hesselbrock V, Nellissery M, Kranzler HR. Allelic and haplotypic association of GABRA2 with alcohol dependence. Am J Med Genet B Neuropsychiatr Genet. 2004;129B(1):104–9. doi: 10.1002/ajmg.b.30091. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Covault J, Gelernter J, Jensen K, Anton R, Kranzler HR. Markers in the 5′-region of GABRG1 associate to alcohol dependence and are in linkage disequilibrium with markers in the adjacent GABRA2 gene. Neuropsychopharmacology. 2008;33(4):837–48. doi: 10.1038/sj.npp.1301456. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Cutting GR, Lu L, O’Hara BF, Kasch LM, Montrose-Rafizadeh C, Donovan DM, Shimada S, Antonarakis SE, Guggino WB, Uhl GR, Kazazian HH., Jr Cloning of the γ-aminobutyric acid (GABA) ρ1 cDNA: A GABA receptor subunit highly expressed in the retina. Proc Natl Acad Sci. 1991;88:2673–2677. doi: 10.1073/pnas.88.7.2673. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Cutting GR, Curristin S, Zoghbi H, O’Hara BF, Seldin MF, Uhl GR. Identification of a putative γ-aminobutyric acid (GABA) receptor subunit ρ2 cDNA and colonization of the genes encoding ρ2 (GABRR2) and ρ1 (GABRR1) to human chromosome 6q14-q21 and mouse chromosome 4. Genomics. 1992;12:801–806. doi: 10.1016/0888-7543(92)90312-g. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. de Bakker PI, Yelensky R, Pe’er I, Gabriel SB, Daly MJ, Altshuler D. Efficiency and power in genetic association studies. Nat Genet. 2005;37(11):1217–23. doi: 10.1038/ng1669. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Dick DM, Agrawal A, Wang JC, Hinrichs A, Bertelsen S, Bucholz KK, Schuckit M, Kramer J, Nurnberger J, Jr., Tischfield J, Edenberg HJ, Goate A, Bierut LJ. Alcohol dependence with comorbid drug dependence: genetic and phenotypic associations suggest a more severe form of the disorder with stronger genetic contribution to risk. Addiction. 2007;102(7):1131–9. doi: 10.1111/j.1360-0443.2007.01871.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Dick DM, Aliev F, Wang JC, Saccone S, Hinrichs A, Bertelsen S, Budde J, Saccone N, Foroud T, Nurnberger J, Jr., Xuei X, Conneally PM, Schuckit M, Almasy L, Crowe R, Kuperman S, Kramer J, Tischfield JA, Hesselbrock V, Edenberg HJ, Porjesz B, Rice JP, Bierut L, Goate A. A Systematic single nucleotide polymorphism screen to fine-map alcohol dependence genes on chromosome 7 identifies association with a novel susceptibility gene ACN9. Biol Psychiatry. 2008;63(11):1047–53. doi: 10.1016/j.biopsych.2007.11.005. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. Dick DM, Edenberg HJ, Xuei X, Goate A, Kuperman S, Schuckit M, Crowe R, Smith TL, Porjesz B, Begleiter H, Foroud T. Association of GABRG3 with alcohol dependence. Alcohol Clin Exp Res. 2004;28(1):4–9. doi: 10.1097/01.ALC.0000108645.54345.98. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. Dick DM, Plunkett J, Wetherill LF, Xuei X, Goate A, Hesselbrock V, Schuckit M, Crowe R, Edenberg HJ, Foroud T. Association between GABRA1 and drinking behaviors in the collaborative study on the genetics of alcoholism sample. Alcohol Clin Exp Res. 2006;30(7):1101–10. doi: 10.1111/j.1530-0277.2006.00136.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  22. Dudbridge F. Pedigree disequilibrium tests for multilocus haplotypes. Genet Epidemiol. 2003;25(2):115–21. doi: 10.1002/gepi.10252. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  23. Edenberg HJ. The Collaborative Study on the Genetics of Alcoholism: an update. Alcohol Res Health. 2002;26:214–218. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  24. Edenberg HJ, Dick DM, Xuei X, Tian H, Almasy L, Bauer LO, Crowe RR, Goate A, Hesselbrock V, Jones K, Kwon J, Li TK, Nurnberger JI, Jr., O’Connor SJ, Reich T, Rice J, Schuckit MA, Porjesz B, Foroud T, Begleiter H. Variations in GABRA2, encoding the alpha 2 subunit of the GABA(A) receptor, are associated with alcohol dependence and with brain oscillations. Am J Hum Genet. 2004;74(4):705–14. doi: 10.1086/383283. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  25. Edenberg HJ, Xuei X, Chen HJ, Tian H, Wetherill LF, Dick DM, Almasy L, Bierut L, Bucholz KK, Goate A, Hesselbrock V, Kuperman S, Nurnberger J, Porjesz B, Rice J, Schuckit M, Tischfield J, Begleiter H, Foroud T. Association of alcohol dehydrogenase genes with alcohol dependence: a comprehensive analysis. Hum Mol Genet. 2006;15(9):1539–49. doi: 10.1093/hmg/ddl073. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  26. Edenberg HJ, Xuei X, Wetherill LF, Bierut L, Bucholz K, Dick DM, Hesselbrock V, Kuperman S, Porjesz B, Schuckit MA, Tischfield JA, Almasy LA, Nurnberger JI, Jr., Foroud T. Association of NFKB1, which encodes a subunit of the transcription factor NF-kappaB, with alcohol dependence. Hum Mol Genet. 2008;17(7):963–70. doi: 10.1093/hmg/ddm368. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  27. Enoch MA, Schwartz L, Albaugh B, Virkkunen M, Goldman D. Dimensional anxiety mediates linkage of GABRA2 haplotypes with alcoholism. Am J Med Genet B Neuropsychiatr Genet. 2006;141B(6):599–607. doi: 10.1002/ajmg.b.30336. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  28. Enoch MA. The role of GABA(A) receptors in the development of alcoholism. Pharmacol Biochem Behav. 2008;90(1):95–104. doi: 10.1016/j.pbb.2008.03.007. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  29. Enz R. GABAC receptors: A molecular view. Biol Chem. 2001;382:1111–1122. doi: 10.1515/BC.2001.141. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  30. Fehr C, Sander T, Tadic A, Lenzen KP, Anghelescu I, Klawe C, Dahmen N, Schmidt LG, Szegedi A. Confirmation of association of the GABRA2 gene with alcohol dependence by subtype-specific analysis. Psychiatr Genet. 2006;16(1):9–17. doi: 10.1097/01.ypg.0000185027.89816.d9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  31. Feighner JP, Robins E, Guze SB, Woodruff RA, Jr., Winokur G, Munoz R. Diagnostic criteria for use in psychiatric research. Arch Gen Psychiatry. 1972;26(1):57–63. doi: 10.1001/archpsyc.1972.01750190059011. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  32. Foroud T, Edenberg HJ, Goate A, Rice J, Flury L, Koller DL, Bierut LJ, Conneally PM, Nurnberger JI, Bucholz KK, Li TK, Hesselbrock V, Crowe R, Schuckit M, Porjesz B, Begleiter H, Reich T. Alcoholism susceptibility loci: confirmation studies in a replicate sample and further mapping. Alcohol Clin Exp Res. 2000;24(7):933–45. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  33. Foroud T, Wetherill LF, Kramer J, Tischfield JA, Nurnberger JI, Jr., Schuckit MA, Xuei X, Edenberg HJ. The tachykinin receptor 3 is associated with alcohol and cocaine dependence. Alcohol Clin Exp Res. 2008;32(6):1023–30. doi: 10.1111/j.1530-0277.2008.00663.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  34. Harvey VL, Duguid IC, Krasel C, Stephens GJ. Evidence that GABA rho subunits contribute to functional ionotropic GABA receptors in mouse cerebellar Purkinje cells. J Physiol. 2006;577(Pt 1):127–39. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.2006.112482. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  35. Heath AC, Bucholz KK, Madden PA, Dinwiddie SH, Slutske WS, Bierut LJ, Statham DJ, Dunne MP, Whitfield JB, Martin NG. Genetic and environmental contributions to alcohol dependence risk in a national twin sample: consistency of findings in women and men. Psychol Med. 1997;27(6):1381–96. doi: 10.1017/s0033291797005643. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  36. Hesselbrock M, Easton C, Bucholz KK, Schuckit M, Hesselbrock V. A validity study of the SSAGA--a comparison with the SCAN. Addiction. 1999;94(9):1361–70. doi: 10.1046/j.1360-0443.1999.94913618.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  37. Hinrichs AL, Wang JC, Bufe B, Kwon JM, Budde J, Allen R, Bertelsen S, Evans W, Dick D, Rice J, Foroud T, Nurnberger J, Tischfield JA, Kuperman S, Crowe R, Hesselbrock V, Schuckit M, Almasy L, Porjesz B, Edenberg HJ, Begleiter H, Meyerhof W, Bierut LJ, Goate AM. Functional variant in a bitter-taste receptor (hTAS2R16) influences risk of alcohol dependence. Am J Hum Genet. 2006;78(1):103–11. doi: 10.1086/499253. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  38. Kendler KS, Neale MC, Heath AC, Kessler RC, Eaves LJ. A twin-family study of alcoholism in women. Am J Psychiatry. 1994;151(5):707–15. doi: 10.1176/ajp.151.5.707. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  39. Koob GF. A role for GABA in alcohol dependence. Adv Pharmacol. 2006;54:205–29. doi: 10.1016/s1054-3589(06)54009-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  40. Kusama T, Spivak CE, Whiting P, Dawson VL, Schaeffer JC, Uhl GR. Phramacology of GABA ρ1 and GABA α/β receptors expressed in Xenopus oocytes and COS cells. Br J Pharmacol. 1993;109:200–206. doi: 10.1111/j.1476-5381.1993.tb13554.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  41. Lappalainen J, Krupitsky E, Remizov M, Pchelina S, Taraskina A, Zvartau E, Somberg LK, Covault J, Kranzler HR, Krystal JH, Gelernter J. Association between alcoholism and gamma-amino butyric acid alpha2 receptor subtype in a Russian population. Alcohol Clin Exp Res. 2005;29(4):493–8. doi: 10.1097/01.alc.0000158938.97464.90. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  42. Lind PA, Macgregor S, Agrawal A, Montgomery GW, Heath AC, Martin NG, Whitfield JB. The role of GABRA2 in alcohol dependence, smoking, and illicit drug use in an Australian population sample. Alcohol Clin Exp Res. 2008;32(10):1721–31. doi: 10.1111/j.1530-0277.2008.00768.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  43. Lobo IA, Harris RA. GABA(A) receptors and alcohol. Pharmacol Biochem Behav. 2008;90(1):90–4. doi: 10.1016/j.pbb.2008.03.006. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  44. Lopez-Chavez A, Miledi R, Martinez-Torres A. Cloning and functional expression of the bovine GABA(C) rho2 subunit. Molecular evidence of a widespread distribution in the CNS. Neurosci Res. 2005;53(4):421–7. doi: 10.1016/j.neures.2005.08.014. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  45. Martin ER, Bass MP, Kaplan NL. Correcting for a potential bias in the pedigree disequilibrium test. Am J Hum Genet. 2001;68(4):1065–7. doi: 10.1086/319525. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  46. Mihic SJ, Harris RA. Inhibition of rho1 receptor GABAergic currents by alcohols and volatile anesthetics. J Pharmacol Exp Ther. 1996;277(1):411–6. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  47. Mihic SJ, Ye Q, Wick MJ, Koltchine VV, Krasowski MD, Finn SE, Mascia MP, Valenzuela CF, Hanson KK, Greenblatt EP, Harris RA, Harrison NL. Sites of alcohol and volatile anaesthetic action on GABA(A) and glycine receptors. Nature. 1997;389(6649):385–9. doi: 10.1038/38738. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  48. Milligan CJ, Buckley NJ, Garret M, Deuchars J, Deuchars SA. Evidence for inhibition mediated by coassembly of GABAA and GABAC receptor subunits in native central neurons. J Neurosci. 2004;24(33):7241–50. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.1979-04.2004. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  49. O’Connell JR, Weeks DE. PedCheck: a program for identification of genotype incompatibilities in linkage analysis. Am J Hum Genet. 1998;63(1):259–66. doi: 10.1086/301904. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  50. Polenzani L, Woodward RM, Miledi R. Expression of mammalian gamma-aminobutyric acid receptors with distinct pharmacology in Xenopus oocytes. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1991;88(10):4318–22. doi: 10.1073/pnas.88.10.4318. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  51. Reich T, Edenberg HJ, Goate A, Williams JT, Rice JP, Van Eerdewegh P, Foroud T, Hesselbrock V, Schuckit MA, Bucholz K, Porjesz B, Li TK, Conneally PM, Nurnberger JI, Jr., Tischfield JA, Crowe RR, Cloninger CR, Wu W, Shears S, Carr K, Crose C, Willig C, Begleiter H. Genome-wide search for genes affecting the risk for alcohol dependence. Am J Med Genet. 1998;81(3):207–15. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  52. Schmidt M, Boller M, Özen G, Hall WC. Disinhibition in rat superior colliculus mediated by GABAC receptors. J Neurosci. 2001;21(2):691–699. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.21-02-00691.2001. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  53. Shimada S, Cutting G, Uhl GR. γ-Aminobutyric acid A or C receptor? γ-Aminobutyric acid ρ1 receptor RNA induces Bicuculline-, Barbiturate-, and Benzodiazepine-insensitive γ-aminobutyric acid responses in Xenopus oocytes. Mol Pharmacol. 1992;41:683–687. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  54. Soyka M, Preuss UW, Hesselbrock V, Zill P, Koller G, Bondy B. GABA-A2 receptor subunit gene (GABRA2) polymorphisms and risk for alcohol dependence. J Psychiatr Res. 2008;42(3):184–91. doi: 10.1016/j.jpsychires.2006.11.006. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  55. Vengeliene V, Bilbao A, Molander A, Spanagel R. Neuropharmacology of alcohol addiction. Br J Pharmacol. 2008;154(2):299–315. doi: 10.1038/bjp.2008.30. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  56. Wang JC, Hinrichs AL, Stock H, Budde J, Allen R, Bertelsen S, Kwon JM, Wu W, Dick DM, Rice J, Jones K, Nurnberger JI, Jr., Tischfield J, Porjesz B, Edenberg HJ, Hesselbrock V, Crowe R, Schuckit M, Begleiter H, Reich T, Goate AM, Bierut LJ. Evidence of common and specific genetic effects: association of the muscarinic acetylcholine receptor M2 (CHRM2) gene with alcohol dependence and major depressive syndrome. Hum Mol Genet. 2004;13(17):1903–11. doi: 10.1093/hmg/ddh194. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  57. Wetherill L, Schuckit MA, Hesselbrock V, Xuei X, Liang T, Dick DM, Kramer J, Nurnberger JI, Jr, Tischfield JA, Porjesz B, Edenberg HJ, Foroud T. Neuropeptide Y Receptor Genes Are Associated With Alcohol Dependence, Alcohol Withdrawal Phenotypes, and Cocaine Dependence. Alcohol Clin Exp Res. 2008 doi: 10.1111/j.1530-0277.2008.00790.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  58. Xuei X, Dick D, Flury-Wetherill L, Tian HJ, Agrawal A, Bierut L, Goate A, Bucholz K, Schuckit M, Nurnberger J, Jr, Tischfield J, Kuperman S, Porjesz B, Begleiter H, Foroud T, Edenberg HJ. Association of the [kappa]-opioid system with alcohol dependence. Mol Psychiatry. 2006;11(11):1016–1024. doi: 10.1038/sj.mp.4001882. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  59. Xuei X, Flury-Wetherill L, Foroud T, Rangaswamy M, Dick D, Tischfield J, Porjesz B, Edenberg H. GABRR1 and GABRR2, encoding the GABA-A receptor subunits ρ1 and ρ2, are associated with alcohol dependence. Alcohol Clin Exp Res Suppl. 2008;32(6):143A. [Google Scholar]
  60. Zhang D, Pan ZH, Awobuluyi M, Lipton SA. Structure and function of GABA(C) receptors: a comparison of native versus recombinant receptors. Trends Pharmacol Sci. 2001;22(3):121–32. doi: 10.1016/s0165-6147(00)01625-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  61. Zheng W, Xie W, Zhang J, Strong JA, Wang L, Yu L, Xu M, Lu L. Function of gamma-aminobutyric acid receptor/channel rho 1 subunits in spinal cord. J Biol Chem. 2003;278(48):48321–9. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M307930200. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

RESOURCES