Skip to main content
The BMJ logoLink to The BMJ
. 1999 Dec 18;319(7225):1605–1608. doi: 10.1136/bmj.319.7225.1605

Alliteration in medicine: a puzzling profusion of p's

Gregory F Hayden 1
PMCID: PMC28305  PMID: 10600957

Abstract

Problem

Puzzling, progressive profusion of alliterative “p's” in published papers.

Purpose

To depict this particular “p” predominance with pinpoint precision.

Plan

Periodic, painstaking perusal of periodicals by a professor of paediatrics.

Proposal

The “p” plethora is positively perplexing and potentially perturbing.

Alliteration is a literary device consisting of repetition of the same starting sound in several words in a sentence.1 Consider, for example, Shakespeare's playful parody of alliteration in Peter Quince's prologue in A Midsummer Night's Dream:

“Whereat with blade, with bloody blameful blade,

He bravely broach'd his boiling bloody breast.”

Alliteration has appeared frequently in the medical literature—for example: “Respiratory syncytial virus—from chimps with colds to conundrums and cures;”2 “The choreas: of faints, fevers, and families;”3 “Coronary artery stents—gauging, gorging, and gouging;”4 “Moschcowitz, multimers, and metalloprotease;”5 “Alagille syndrome: a nutritional niche for Notch;”6 “Theodor Billroth: success with sutures and strings.”7

Perusing the medical literature with alliteration in mind, I have become perplexed by a peculiar propensity for the letter “p” to be placed in prominent positions. Consider for a moment the alliterative content of the BMJ, a prestigious periodical also published in Pakistani, Polish, and Portuguese. Perhaps the prime example is a piece entitled “A potpourri of parasites in poetry and proverb,”8 but the journal has presented articles addressing such topics as paracetamol poisoning,9 practitioners' pressure to prescribe,10 physicians' partnerships with patients,11 partnerships for prevention in public playgrounds,12 and pregnancy outcomes which have been persistently poor.13 Other topics have included patients' priorities,14 the political process of puzzling out private versus public priorities,15 and the ponderous problem of whether the priorities in apportioning resources should be primarily pragmatic or principally principled.16

In pursuing this plethora of “p” further, it becomes apparent that this predominance extends past paper titles to many other aspects of medicine. The purpose of this paper is to point this puzzling phenomenon of “p” profusion to the attention of practising physicians.

Methods

I used no scientific search strategy but collected examples piecemeal over several years. I am a primary care paediatrician with a small private practice, so I have a natural penchant for perusing paediatric papers. Please pardon this paediatric predominance. Pathologists, pulmonologists, and other practitioners are invited to provide examples from their particular fields. I would prefer you to participate by post.

graphic file with name hayg1720.f1.jpg

DOLLY THOMPSETT

For the purposes of this paper, alliteration is defined as occurring when the same sound starts several words of a sequence. Internal alliteration is a “soundalike,” whereby the same sound starts syllables within a word (for example, polyposis or parapertussis). Visual alliteration is a “lookalike,” whereby successive words or syllables start with the same letter but with different sounds (for example, popliteal pterygium or pneumonic plague). This is only literally alliterative, but a pleasing abbreviation may be used, such as referring to a physician parent as a “PP.”17 Non-visual alliteration occurs when successive words or syllables start with the same sound but with a different letter (for example, nosocomial pneumonia or pseudocyesis). In compiling the list of two-p sequences, I excluded: single words with internal alliteration; two-word sequences with visual alliteration; and “impure” sequences in which two “p's” were preceded, followed, or interrupted by another letter (such as PPD, the purified protein derivative used for tuberculin skin testing).

The calculation of P values was considered using a non-parametric procedure. The proportions of pages occupied by “p” words in a general18 and medical19 dictionary are 0.07 and 0.11, so the approximate likelihood of any particular word starting with the letter “p” (the probability of a primary p, expressed as Ppp) is approximately 0.09. The precise probability of nsuccessive words starting with the letter “p” can be expressed as Pppn.

Two-p sequences

Most examples of two-p sequences are straightforward (box), but a few explanatory comments are in order.

Two-p sequences (in alphabetical order)

Palmar pustules (as in neonatal candidiasis20) Pink puffer
Palpable purpura (Henoch-Schönlein purpura) Pleuritic pain
Paradoxical pulse Poison pen (see text)
Parakeratosa pustulosa (may include psoriatic pitting21) Polymorphous perverse
Paralytic (or postinoculation) poliomyelitis Pool palms28 (see text)
Parapsoriatic plaques Poor prognosis
Passion purpura (“hickey”) Popsicle panniculitis29
Paediatric Puzzler (see text) The portable paediatrician30 (see text)
Paediatricians' perceptions22 Postsurgical pemphigus31
Paediatrician presence23 Postural proteinuria
Pediculosis pubis Practice parameter
Penile purpura (as manifestation of lichen sclerosus et atrophicus24) Precocious puberty
Perianal pruritus (see text) Prolapse paranoia (mitral valve32)
Periodic paralysis Prone position
Periodic polyserositis (familial Mediterranean fever) Prophylactic penicillin
Periumbilical purpura (as in disseminated strongyloidiasis25) Prurigo of pregnancy33
Pes planus Puffer poison (tetrodotoxin from puffer fish)
Piezogenic papules2627 Purulent pericarditis
Pyrantel (or pyrvinium) pamoate (see text)

Firstly, “pool palms” refer to palms with red linear plaques resulting from contact with rough swimming pool surfaces.28 Secondly, the presentation and proper treatment of enterobiasis are highlighted. In a paediatric patient with perianal pruritus, the prudent paediatrician should pursue the possibility of pinworms as the primary problem. If the presence of pinworms seems probable, a prescription for pyrantel pamoate or piperazine is appropriate. (Parenthetically, in years past, pyrvinium pamoate, previously patented as Povan, was another popular option.) Finally, the “paediatric puzzler” and the “poison pen” are popular features in the monthly journal Contemporary Pediatrics. One “puzzler” was entitled “A tale of two pees—pink and purple urine,”34 whereas the “pen” portrays the unhappy plight of paediatric patients who experience perverse physiological phenomena after partaking of pokeweed, pot, painkillers, and other potent pharmacological agents. Parenthetically, this popular periodical recently presented one article about a Pennsylvania paediatrician who perked up his practice with a parenting programme35; a second article about an antismoking programme which proved practical for practice36; and a third about how to put the principles of pregnancy prevention programmes into practice.37 The journal's editor, Julia McMillan, penned The Portable Paediatrician,30 and also an editorial entitled “Pediatrician Presence.”23 The journal's creator, Frank Oski, edited the textbook Principles and Practice of Pediatrics,38 propelling us to the next level of alliteration.

Three-p sequences

Several three-p sequences have been sighted. The Pasadena Prevention Project, for example, has examined ethnic variations in blood pressures among adolescents.39 A papilloma of the bladder may cause haematuria that is profuse, periodic, and painless.40

An article on the familial aggregation of Behçet's disease studied the parents of paediatric probands.41 An editorial about death rates from coronary disease was subtitled “Progress and a Puzzling Paradox,”42 and an article about diagnosing pulmonary embolism was subtitled “Pitfalls, Progress, Promises.”43 A historical essay about William Stokes was subtitled “ Stoking the fires of prevention and pathophysiological patterns,”44 and a paper about substance abuse in paediatric patients was subtitled: “Prediction, Protection and Prevention.”45 An article exploring the causes of paediatric behaviour problems was entitled “Promoting Parental Presence,”46 and the periodical Pediatrics has recently proposed a process for post-publication peer review (P3R).47 Two recent articles pertained to substance P and the part it plays in pain pathogenesis. The first paper presented a procedure for the partial purification of this potent peptide,48 whereas the second publication challenged whether the central questions in pain perception are peripheral.49

Many other three-p sequences derive from dermatological conditions. Superficial staphylococcal infections in atopic children, for example, can produce pinpoint, pruritic pustules. Recent reports have described patients with perianal pseudoverrucous papules 50,51; persistent papular plaques52; pruritic purple plaques53; painless, pruritic papules54; persistent, painful plantar masses55; progressive, pigmentary purpura56; pruritic papular porokeratosis57; and pedal erosions which were painful, plaque-like and pitted.58 A final skin finding is a benign lesion of the penile corona known as pearly penile papules or pink pearly papules.59 These lesions have occasionally been referred to as pink, pearly, penile papules, bringing us to the next level of alliteration. Parenthetically, since some parents refer to their son's penis as his “private parts” or “pee-pee,” a further variation might qualify at an even higher level.

Four-p sequences

Many sequences have attained the four-p level. An editorial described “Preventive Pediatrics: the Promise and the Peril,”60 and an article provided psychological perspectives on paediatric pain.61 Several examples derive from the dermatological literature, including: painful, piezogenic, pedal papules62; puzzling palmar and plantar papules63; porokeratosis punctata palmaris and plantaris64; and the “impure” sequence of pruritic, urticarial, papules and plaques of pregnancy (PUPPP).65 Managers of physician practice plans now apply the four p's of marketing to the medical market place: product, price, placement, and promotion.66 Finally, the internal alliteration in “A Potpourri of Parasites in Poetry and Proverb” is particularly powerful,8 pushing us to the next level.

Five-p sequences

The five-p level of alliteration includes numerous mnemonics. The “five p's,” for example, are helpful in remembering the characteristic skin lesions of lichen planus: planar, polygonal, pruritic, purple, and papular. A second five-p mnemonic describes the lesions of lichen aureus: pigmented, purpuric papules in peripheral patches. Parenthetically, these lesions are most prevalent on the periphery and carry a poor prognosis for rapid resolution. A third five-p mnemonic describes an infant with cretinism: pot belly, pallor, puffy face, protruding umbilicus, and poked out tongue.40 A fourth five-p mnemonic describes clinical features of the hands and feet of a child with acrodynia from chronic mercury poisoning: pink, puffy, painful, perspiring, and peeling. Finally, the numerous causes of paralytic ileus include five p's: postoperative, peritonitis, potassium low, pelvic and spinal fractures (plaster of Paris jacket), and parturition.40

Non-mnemonic sequences have also been noticed. The following parties are interested in measuring health outcomes: patients, providers, payers, politicians, and the public.67 A paediatric continuing education meeting was advertised as “A Potpourri of Practical Pediatrics Plus Politics,”68 and a presentation at another meeting was advertised as “Presenter Promises a Potpourri of Pearls for the Practitioner.”69 Patients with congenital disorders affecting multiple organ systems suffer from “p*** poor protoplasm poorly put together.” Once again, the internal alliteration of “potpourri” and “protoplasm” packs particular alliterative punch and propels us to still higher levels.

Six-p sequences

Peter Piper may have picked a peck of pickled peppers, but few medical sequences have attained the six-p level of alliteration. A dermatological article, however, described pruritic, pigmented papules posing permanent problems.70 The vulgar advice offered by a high school wrestling coach also applies to medical students taking standardised examinations: “Prior preparation prevents p*** poor performance.” Causes of vitamin B 12 deficiency include six p's: pernicious anaemia; partial (or total) gastrectomy; pockets in bowel (diverticula or stagnant loops); parasites (Diphyllobothrium latum); pancreatitis; and paucity in diet (vegan).40 The symptoms of arterial occlusion include six p's: pallor, paraesthesia, pulselessness, paralysis, prostration, and pain. Some versions of this mnemonic also include poikilothermia, bringing us to the next level.

Longer p sequences

The work of authors who have attained the highest levels of “p” alliteration deserves particular praise. In one dermatologic case report, perniotic skin lesions due to chronic cold exposure are described in a seven-p sequence as “purple patches, papules or plaques present on the proximal phalanges.”71 The complications of a Meckel's diverticulum can be remembered as the “seven p's”: peptic ulceration of adjacent mucosa with melaena; perforation and general peritonitis; pain which is colicky with intussusception; pink, raspberry tumour at umbilicus; patent vitellointestinal duct; persisting band with strangulations or cysts along the track; and persistent umbilical discharge.40

graphic file with name hayg1720.f2.jpg

DOLLY THOMPSETT

Features of primary aldosteronism include the “eight p's”: periodic attacks of muscle weakness; paraesthesia; polyuria; polydipsia; potassium loss; pressure of blood rises; plasma sodium rises; and pyelonephritis likely to occur.40

In a recent article about screening for developmental delays, the authors reach the nine-p stage and urge “primary prevention through a parent professional partnership ... a proactive, primary prevention process.”72 Features of the nephrotic syndrome include the “nine p's”: proteinuria; plasma protein falls; plasma volume drops; pitting oedema with a pale, puffy face; pleural effusion; pericardial effusion; pressure of blood rises; prognosis variable; and paucity of gamma globulin lowers patient's resistance.40

One 10-p sequence is a mnemonic for the manifestations of Henoch-Schönlein (or anaphylactoid) purpura: palpable purpura; periarticular pain; periodic periumbilical pangs; proteinuria; and a positive prognosis.

Features of patients with enteric fever include “11 p's”: positive blood culture early in the course; pulse slow; phlebitis; periostitis; pneumonia; parotitis; Peyer's patches ulcerated; pyonephrosis; premature delivery; perforation of bowel and blood vessels; and positive Widal reaction.40

One 12-p mnemonic includes causes of dyspnoea of rapid onset starting with “p”: pneumonia, pneumothorax, pulmonary spasm (asthma), peanut (foreign body), pulmonary embolus, pericardial tamponade, pump (left heart) failure, peak seekers (high altitudes), psychogenic, poisons, pancreas (diabetes), and pre- and postrenal uraemia.40 This mnemonic can arguably be improved by limiting visual alliteration; pneumonia can be reclassified as pulmonary perihilar patchiness and pneumothorax as pleural pneumatic pressure. Finally, a typical patient with a perforated peptic ulcer has been described using 12 “p's” as a puking patient, perspiring with punishingly severe pain, with pulse rising, pressure falling, peristalsis losing, pain descending with pressure, guarding all over the abdomen, lying perfectly still with peritonitis.40

Conclusion

Some of my professional colleagues have perfected laboratory techniques that can be applied to a broad range of diverse topics, producing a prodigious proliferation of publishable papers. These colleagues have asked if I now plan 25 similar articles honouring the other letters of the alphabet. Positively not. My “p” collection has provided a pleasant pastime, but I encourage others to complete the series.

One can only ponder what the authors' possible purposes may have been for repeating “p” in particular passages. In some instances, the prose is ponderous, and the “p” predominance is clearly contrived. Referring to hypertension as “pressure of blood rises,” for example, was presumably done for the specific purpose of completing a long list of “p's.” In other instances, however, the passages' style and polish provide pure poetic pleasure, and it seems plausible to propose that the authors were potentially unaware of their “p” proclivity and the powerful and poignant “p” presence in their papers.

Some proponents of the “publish or perish” paradigm have proposed that my primary purpose in preparing this paper for publication was a promotion. This is pure poppycock. Such a premise is perfectly preposterous. As a professor with permanence (tenure), I have reached the pinnacle of my profession. My purpose has been to pay proper and profound homage to my predecessors with a peculiar p-preoccupation. P's on earth to men of good will.

Acknowledgments

I thank Susan Hayden and Drs Margaret Mohrmann, Andy Wise, Walter Tunnessen, and Frank Saulsbury for their comments and suggestions.

References

  • 1.Harris WH, Levey JS, editors. New Columbia encyclopedia. 4th ed. New York: Columbia University Press; 1975. p. 71. [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Hall CB, McBride JT. Respiratory syncytial virus—from chimps with colds to conundrums and cures. N Engl J Med. 1991;325:57–58. doi: 10.1056/NEJM199107043250110. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Schoenberg DG, Schoenberg BS. The choreas: of faints, fevers and families. South Med J. 1977;70:1465–1466. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Topol EJ. Coronary artery stents—gauging, gorging and gouging. N Engl J Med. 1998;339:1702–1704. doi: 10.1056/NEJM199812033392311. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Moake JL. Moschcowitz, multimers and metalloprotease. N Engl J Med. 1998;339:1629–1631. doi: 10.1056/NEJM199811263392210. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Sokol RJ. Alagille syndrome: a nutritional niche for Notch. J Pediatr. 1999;134:136–138. doi: 10.1016/s0022-3476(99)70403-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Schoenberg DG, Schoenberg BS. Theodor Billroth: success with sutures and strings. South Med J. 1979;72:1590–1591. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Burns DA. A potpourri of parasites in poetry and proverb. BMJ. 1991;303:1611–1614. doi: 10.1136/bmj.303.6817.1611. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Routledge P, Vale JA, Bateman DN, Johnson GD, Jones A, Judd A, et al. Paracetamol poisoning. BMJ. 1998;317:1609–1610. doi: 10.1136/bmj.317.7173.1609. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Greenhalgh G, Gill P. Pressure to prescribe. BMJ. 1997;315:1482–1483. doi: 10.1136/bmj.315.7121.1482. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Richards T. Partnerships with patients. BMJ. 1998;316:85–86. doi: 10.1136/bmj.316.7125.85. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Sibert JR, Mott A, Rolfe K, James R, Evans R, Kemp A, et al. Preventing injuries in public playgrounds through partnership between health services and local authority. BMJ. 1999;318:1595. doi: 10.1136/bmj.318.7198.1595. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Simmons D. Persistently poor pregnancy outcomes. BMJ. 1997;315:263–264. doi: 10.1136/bmj.315.7103.263. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Richards T. Patients' priorities. BMJ. 1999;318:277. doi: 10.1136/bmj.318.7179.277. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Klein R. Puzzling out priorities. BMJ. 1998;317:959–960. doi: 10.1136/bmj.317.7164.959. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Klein R. Priorities and rationing: pragmatism or principles? BMJ. 1995;311:761–762. doi: 10.1136/bmj.311.7008.761. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Dusdieker LB, Murph JR, Murph WE, Dungy CI. Physicians treating their own children. AJDC. 1993;147:146–149. doi: 10.1001/archpedi.1993.02160260036018. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.The Merriam-Webster dictionary. Springfield, MA: Merriam Webster; 1994. [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Stedman's medical dictionary. 25th ed. Philadelphia, PA: Williams and Wilkins; 1990. [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Resnick SD, Greenberg RA. Auto-inoculated palmar pustules in neonatal candidiasis. Pediatr Dermatol. 1989;6:206–209. doi: 10.1111/j.1525-1470.1989.tb00819.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Tosti A, Peluso AM, Zucchelli V. Clinical features and long-term follow-up of 20 cases of parakeratosis pustulosa. Pediatr Dermatol. 1998;15:259–263. doi: 10.1046/j.1525-1470.1998.1998015259.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Gray D, Golden M, Ingersoll G, Hibbard R, Langefeld C. Pediatricians' perceptions of multidisciplinary diabetes care. McLean, Virginia: Ambulatory Pediatric Association abstract; 1990. [Google Scholar]
  • 23.McMillan JA. Pediatrician presence. Contemp Pediatr. 1999;16:9. [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Barton PG, Ford MJ, Beers BB. Penile purpura as a manifestation of lichen sclerosus et atrophicus. Pediatr Dermatol. 1993;10:129–131. doi: 10.1111/j.1525-1470.1993.tb00037.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Kalb RE, Grossman ME. Periumbilical purpura in disseminated strongyloidiasis. JAMA. 1986;256:1170–1171. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Van Straaten EA, Van Langen IM, Oorthuys JWE, Oosting J. Piezogenic papules of the feet in healthy children and their possible relation with connective tissue disorders. Pediatr Dermatol. 1991;8:277–279. doi: 10.1111/j.1525-1470.1991.tb00932.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Laing VB, Fleischer AB., Jr Piezogenic wrist papules. J Am Acad Dermatol. 1991;24:415–417. doi: 10.1016/0190-9622(91)70062-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Blauvelt A, Duarte AM, Schachner LA. Pool palms. J Am Acad Dermatol. 1992;27:111. doi: 10.1016/s0190-9622(08)80819-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Craig JE, Scholz TA, Vanderhooft SL, Etheridge SP. Fat necrosis after ice application for supraventricular tachycardia termination. J Pediatr. 1998;133:727. doi: 10.1016/s0022-3476(98)70140-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Markel H, Oski J, Oski F, McMillan J. The portable pediatrician. St Louis, MO: Mosby Year Book; 1992. [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Mehregan DR, Roenigk RK, Gibson LE. Postsurgical pemphigus. Arch Dermatol. 1992;128:414–415. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Kessler KM. Prolapse paranoia. J Am Coll Cardiol. 1988;11:48–49. doi: 10.1016/0735-1097(88)90165-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Nurse DS. Prurigo of pregnancy. Aust J Dermatol. 1968;9:258–267. doi: 10.1111/j.1440-0960.1968.tb01616.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Olk DG, Glenn RE, Tunnessen WW., Jr Pediatric puzzler: A tale of two pees: pink and purple urine. Contemp Pediatr. 1992;9:63–68. [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Werner JH, Jr, Mindell JA. Perking up your practice: parenting classes that work. Contemp Pediatr. 1994;11:57. [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Epps RP, Manley MW. A quick practical antismoking program for your practice. Contemp Pediatr. 1994;11:24. [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Kirby D. Reducing adolescent pregnancy: approaches that work. Contemp Pediatr. 1999;16:83–94. [Google Scholar]
  • 38.Oski FA, DeAngelis CD, Feigin RD, McMillan JA, Warshaw JB, editors. Principles and practice of pediatrics. 2nd ed. Philadelphia: Lippincott; 1994. [Google Scholar]
  • 39.Hohn AR, Dwyer KM, Dwyer JH. Blood pressure in youth from four ethnic groups: the Pasadena Prevention Project. J Pediatr. 1994;125:368–373. doi: 10.1016/s0022-3476(05)83278-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 40.Shipman JJ. Chicago: Year Book Medical Publishers; 1984. Mnemonics and tactics in surgery and medicine. 2nd ed. [Google Scholar]
  • 41.Kone-Paut I, Geisler I, Wechsler B, Ozen S, Ozdogan H, Rozenbaum M, et al. Familial aggregation in Behçet's disease: high frequency in siblings and parents of pediatric probands. J Pediatr. 1999;135:89–93. doi: 10.1016/s0022-3476(99)70333-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 42.Levy D, Thom TJ. Death rates from coronary disease: progress and a puzzling paradox. N Engl J Med. 1998;339:915–917. doi: 10.1056/NEJM199809243391309. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 43.Moser KM. Diagnosing pulmonary embolism: pitfalls, progress, promises. J Respir Dis. 1992;13:1037–1049. [Google Scholar]
  • 44.Schoenberg DG, Schoenberg BS. William Stokes: stoking the fires of prevention and pathophysiologic patterns. South Med J. 1978;71:956–957. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 45.Belcher HME, Shinitzky HE. Substance abuse in children: prediction, protection and prevention. Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med. 1998;152:952–960. doi: 10.1001/archpedi.152.10.952. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 46.Green M. Promoting parental “presence.”. Contemp Pediatr. 1999;16:118–138. [Google Scholar]
  • 47.Anderson KR, Lucey JF. A new capability: postpublication peer review for Pediatrics. Pediatrics. 1999;104:106. doi: 10.1542/peds.104.1.106. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 48.Fehder WP, Ho WZ, Campbell DE, Tourtelotte WN, Michaels L, Cutilli JR, et al. Development and evaluation of a chromatographic procedure for the partial purification of substance P with quantitation by an enzyme immunoassay. Clin Diagnostic Lab Immunol. 1998;5:303–307. doi: 10.1128/cdli.5.3.303-307.1998. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 49.Pasternak GW. The central questions in pain perception may be peripheral. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 1998;95:10354–10355. doi: 10.1073/pnas.95.18.10354. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 50.Tamaki T. Diaper dermatitis and perianal pseudoverrucous papules. Arch Dermatol. 1992;128:1277–1280. doi: 10.1001/archderm.1992.01680190137022. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 51.Cano LR, Briones VGP, Jove RP, Rodellas AC. Perianal pseudoverrucous papules and nodules after surgery for Hirschprung's disease. J Pediatr. 1994;125:914–916. doi: 10.1016/s0022-3476(05)82008-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 52.Fahrner LJ, Solomon AR. Persistent papular plaques on the face. Pediatr Dermatol. 1989;6:254–255. doi: 10.1111/j.1525-1470.1989.tb00826.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 53.Yalisove BL, Berzin M, Williams CM. Multiple pruritic purple plaques. Arch Dermatol. 1991;127:721. doi: 10.1001/archderm.127.5.721b. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 54.Dixon TC, Meselson M, Guillemin J, Hanna PC. Anthrax. New Engl J Med. 1999;341:815–826. doi: 10.1056/NEJM199909093411107. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 55.Anders KH, Lesher JL. Persistent painful plantar masses. Arch Dermatol. 1992;128:105. doi: 10.1001/archderm.128.1.106. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 56.Abeck D, Gross GE, Kuwert C, Steinkraus V, Mensing H, Ring J. Acetaminophen-induced progressive, pigmentary purpura (Schamberg's disease) J Am Acad Dermatol. 1992;27:123–124. doi: 10.1016/s0190-9622(08)80826-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 57.Kanzaki T, Miwa N, Kobayashi T, Ogawa S. Eruptive pruritic papular porokeratosis. J Dermatol. 1992;19:109–112. doi: 10.1111/j.1346-8138.1992.tb03190.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 58.Shah AS, Kamino H, Prose NS. Painful, plaque-like pitted keratolysis occurring in childhood. Pediatr Dermatol. 1992;9:251–254. doi: 10.1111/j.1525-1470.1992.tb00341.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 59.Neinstein L, Goldenring J. Pink pearly papules: an epidemiologic study. J Pediatr. 1984;105:594–595. doi: 10.1016/s0022-3476(84)80427-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 60.Eisenberg L. Preventive pediatrics; the promise and the peril. Pediatrics. 1987;80:415–422. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 61.McGrath PJ, McAlpine L. Psychologic perspectives on pediatric pain. J Pediatr. 1993;122:S2–S8. doi: 10.1016/s0022-3476(11)80002-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 62.Kahana M, Levy A, Ronnen M, Cohen M, Schewach-Millet M. Painful piezogenic pedal papules on a child with Ehlers-Danlos syndrome. Pediatr Dermatol. 1985;3:45–47. doi: 10.1111/j.1525-1470.1985.tb00485.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 63.Solis J, Sau P, James WD. Puzzling palmar and plantar papules. Arch Dermatol. 1991;127:1219–1224. doi: 10.1001/archderm.127.8.1220. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 64.Lestringant GG, Berge T. Porokeratosis punctata palmaris and plantaris: A new entity? Arch Dermatol. 1989;125:816–819. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 65.Weiss R, Hull P. Pruritic, urticarial, papules and plaques of pregnancy. J Am Acad Dermatol. 1992;26:715–717. doi: 10.1016/0190-9622(92)70098-z. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 66.Maibach E. Geneva: World Health Organisation; 1998. Communication strategies for expanding and sustaining immunization. Children's Vaccine Initiative Consultative Group Meeting; Geneva, Switzerland, November 1998. [Google Scholar]
  • 67.Detsky AS, Redelmeier DA. Measuring health outcomes: putting gains into perspective. N Engl J Med. 1998;339:402–403. doi: 10.1056/NEJM199808063390611. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 68.Virginia Chapter of the American Academy of Pediatrics. A potpourri of practical pediatrics plus politics. Virginia Pediatrics [the Chapter newsletter], Summer 1994.
  • 69.American Academy of Pediatrics. Presenter promises potpourri of pearls for the practitioner. Elk Grove Village, Illinois: AAP Highlight; April 1994. p. 1. [Google Scholar]
  • 70.Gebauer KA, Navaratnam TE, Holgate C. Pruritic, pigmented papules posing permanent problems. Arch Dermatol. 1992;128:105. doi: 10.1001/archderm.128.1.107. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 71.White KP, Rothe MJ, Milanese A, Grant-Kels JM. Perniosis in association with anorexia nervosa. Pediatr Dermatol. 1994;11:1–5. doi: 10.1111/j.1525-1470.1994.tb00063.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 72.Frankenburg WK. Preventing developmental delays: is developmental screening sufficient? Pediatrics. 1994;93:586–593. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from BMJ : British Medical Journal are provided here courtesy of BMJ Publishing Group

RESOURCES