Skip to main content
The BMJ logoLink to The BMJ
. 1998 Aug 22;317(7157):513–514. doi: 10.1136/bmj.317.7157.513

Blood pressure and ageing: longitudinal cohort study

John M Starr a, Susan Inch a, Susan Cross a, William J MacLennan a, Ian J Deary b
PMCID: PMC28645  PMID: 9712598

Arterial blood pressure rises throughout most of life in industrialised societies.1 In old age, however, blood pressure—especially diastolic—falls.1 This may be because people who are included in epidemiological studies have diseases or take drugs that affect blood pressure. As greater disease free life expectancy is predicted, the prevalence of hypertension in the elderly may rise if a continued blood pressure increase occurs in those who remain healthy. The few studies examining this provide no consensus.2,3 We investigated whether blood pressure changes in old age relate to health.

Subjects, methods, and results

We visited 602 (237 men, 365 women) untreated, healthy subjects (mean age 75.7 years, range 70-88 years) at home.4 Educational attainment was recorded and occupation classed as standard occupational classification groups 1-4 (white collar occupations) and groups 5-9 (blue collar occupations).5 Blood pressure was measured after the subjects had rested for 25-30 minutes. (A longer version of the methods appears on our web site.)

At follow up (median period 4.20 years, range 3.23-5.23 years), 69 subjects (11.5%) had died and 105 (17.4%) were unavailable.4 Health status (documented and self reported) was recorded for the remaining 426 subjects (70.8%) and blood pressure remeasured at home. Measurements were of questionable reliability in 41 subjects (9.6%) for reasons such as interruptions. Of the remaining 385 subjects (90.4%), men had significantly lower systolic (P=0.01) and diastolic (P=0.017) pressures than women. Occupation significantly influenced diastolic (P=0.009), but not systolic (P=0.68), pressure. Education correlated neither with systolic (P=0.44) nor diastolic (P=0.44) pressure. Age correlated negatively with diastolic (r=−0.124, P=0.01), but not with systolic (r=−0.039, P=0.2), pressure.

At follow up, 195 subjects (50.6%; 69 men, 126 women) remained healthy and untreated. Correlations between baseline and follow up for systolic and diastolic pressure were 0.49 and 0.24 respectively. When baseline blood pressure was controlled for, neither age nor education significantly affected blood pressure at follow up. When systolic and diastolic pressures were combined in a multivariate repeated measures analysis of variance, sex had no significant effect (P=0.43), but a significant effect was shown for occupation (P=0.021). A consistent pattern of rises in blood pressure occurred across occupational groups (table) except in groups 8 and 9. When subjects were stratified by occupation—white collar (n=119) and blue collar (n=66)—a significant rise in blood pressure occurred in white collar (P<0.001), but not blue collar (P=0.08), workers.

Incident disease (excluding 29 subjects with hypertension only) was reported or recorded in 163 subjects (42.3%; 76 men, 87 women). These subjects were older (P=0.005) than those who remained healthy and more commonly men (P=0.021), but there were no significant differences in education (P=0.40) or occupation (P=0.067). Mean blood pressure remained almost unchanged (table). No significant effects were detected for sex (P=0.46) or occupation (P=0.37) over time. Compared with healthy subjects there was a significant change in systolic pressure (P=0.003) and diastolic pressure (P=0.016) over time, corrected for age.

Comment

In the elderly, changes in blood pressure relate to health. In those who remained healthy blood pressure continued to rise by 1.5 mm Hg per year but fell in those who developed disease (representing probable heterogeneous effects of different medical conditions). In the healthy group no rise was seen in retired blue collar workers. Possibly, retired manual workers have more unrecognised disease, consistent with a persistent effect of socioeconomic factors on health status in old age. For healthy individuals the most important predictor of blood pressure at follow up was baseline blood pressure, accounting for 24% of the variance of systolic, but only 6% of the variance of diastolic, pressure. In general, disease affected systolic more than diastolic pressure. Hence the poorer correlation between baseline and follow up diastolic pressure compared with systolic pressure is not easily explained by possible undetected disease in the healthy group and deserves further investigation.

Table.

Systolic and diastolic arterial blood pressure by standard occupational group at baseline and four years’ follow up of healthy, untreated elderly people (mean age at baseline 74.4 years, mean education 11.2 years) compared with those with incident disease (mean age at baseline 75.8 years, mean education 10.9 years) or hypertension only (mean age at baseline 75.6 years, mean education 10.6 years). Values are mean (SD) unless stated otherwise

Group No of patients Baseline blood pressure (mm Hg)
Follow up blood pressure (mm Hg)
Systolic Diastolic Systolic Diastolic
Unclassified   8 171 (21) 92 (4)  164 (19) 92 (10)
1  34 155 (19) 83 (10) 162 (21) 89 (10)
2  31 152 (26) 82 (11) 157 (24) 83 (9) 
3  14 139 (13) 82 (9)  150 (17) 86 (11)
4  40 148 (20) 84 (10) 160 (22) 87 (8) 
5  15 157 (12) 85 (6)  163 (17) 88 (10)
6   8 156 (14) 83 (7)  159 (12) 91 (6) 
7  26 159 (24) 82 (8)  164 (20) 86 (11)
8   6 138 (23) 83 (11) 137 (10) 80 (4) 
9  11 157 (24) 88 (11) 156 (18) 88 (11)
Healthy 195 153 (22) 84 (9)  159 (20) 87 (10)
Diseased 163 160 (23) 85 (10) 159 (22) 86 (11)
Hypertension only  29 181 (18) 96 (12) 169 (18) 90 (10)

Table.

Distribution of 134 cases and 134 controls according to selected characteristics and by matched sets

Factor No of cases No of controls Matched sets* Odds ratio (95% CI)
Univariate Multivariate Multivariate§
Helicobacter pylori:
 Positive 27  18  225
 Negative 107  116 1691 1.6 (0.8 to 2.9) 0.8 (0.3 to 2.2) 1.3 (0.5 to 3.3)
Father’s height (cm):
 <165 54   7  351
 ⩾165 80 127  476 12.7 (4.6 to 35.3) 8.7 (2.8 to 27.6)
Mother’s height (cm):
 <155 69  13  762
 ⩾155 65 121  659 10.3 (4.5 to 23.9) 8.0 (3.0 to 20.9)
Mean parental height (cm):
 <160 62   5  260
 ⩾160 72 129  369 20.0 (6.3 to 63.8) 28.6 (7.3 to 112)
Parents’ education (years):
 <12 28  11  523
 ⩾12 106  123 6100 3.8 (1.6 to 9.4) 2.1 (0.9 to 6.4)
Birth weight (g):
 <2850 38  17  731
 ⩾2850 96 117 1086 3.1 (1.5 to 6.3) 9.6 (2.4 to 37.9)
Crowding index (subjects/room):
 ⩾1 17   7  215
 <1 117  127 5112 3.0 (1.1 to 8.2) 6.9 (1.0 to 48.7)
Pets (No of types):
 >1 24   7  123
 0-1 110  127 6104 3.8 (1.6 to 9.4) 1.9 (0.6 to 5.9)
*

Distribution of matched sets according to combination of exposure status (positive or negative) for each case and control.  

McNemar’s test based on matched sets.  

Conditional logistic regression model including terms for H pylori, father’s height, mother’s height, parental education, and presence of pets.  

§

Conditional logistic regression model including terms for H pylori, mean parental height, birth weight, and crowding index. 

Acknowledgments

We thank the patients and general practitioners.

Footnotes

Funding: This study was supported by a grant from the chief scientist’s office, Scotland.

Conflict of interest: None.

References

  • 1.Starr JM, Bulpitt CJ. Hypertension. In: Ebrahim S, editor. Epidemiology of old age. London: BMJ publications; 1996. [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Landahl S, Bengtsson C, Sigurdsson JA, Svanborg A, Svardsudd K. Age-related changes in blood pressure. Hypertension. 1986;8:1044–1049. doi: 10.1161/01.hyp.8.11.1044. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Bush TL, Linkens R, Maggi S, Hale WE. Blood pressure changes with ageing: evidence for a cohort effect. Ageing. 1989;1:39–45. doi: 10.1007/BF03323874. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Starr JM, Deary IJ, Inch S, Cross S, MacLennan WJ. Age-associated cognitive decline in healthy old people. Age Ageing. 1997;26:295–300. doi: 10.1093/ageing/26.4.295. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Office of Population Censuses and Surveys. Standard occupational classification. London: HMSO; 1991. [Google Scholar]

Articles from BMJ : British Medical Journal are provided here courtesy of BMJ Publishing Group

RESOURCES