Skip to main content
PMC home page
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America logoLink to Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America
. 1989 May;86(9):3316–3320. doi: 10.1073/pnas.86.9.3316

Two genetically identical antigen-presenting cell clones display heterogeneity in antigen processing.

M T Michalek 1, B Benacerraf 1, K L Rock 1
PMCID: PMC287122  PMID: 2470101

Abstract

Evidence from various antigen systems suggests that antigen processing can be one factor that determines the repertoire of immunogenic peptides. Thus, processing events may account for some of the disparity between the available and expressed helper T-cell repertoires. In this report, we demonstrate that the immunodominant T-cell determinant in ovalbumin [p323-339; ovalbumin-(323-339) heptadecapeptide] is processed differently by two genetically identical antigen-presenting cell lines, M12 and A20. The ovalbumin-specific T-cell-T-cell hybridomas, DO-11.10 and 3DO-54.8, were used to detect processed antigen. These T-T hybridomas have different fine specificities for the p323-339 determinant. A20 cells presented native ovalbumin well to both T-T hybridomas, whereas M12 cells presented native ovalbumin well to 3DO-54.8 but very inefficiently to DO-11.10. M12 and A20 cells effectively stimulated both T-T hybridomas with the same concentrations of the immunogenic synthetic peptide p323-339. Therefore, M12 cells and DO-11.10 can interact with each other, and both T-T hybridomas have similar sensitivities for the same immunogenic peptide. We conclude that genetically identical antigen-presenting cells can display heterogeneity in the fine processing of an immunodominant T-cell determinant, and synthetic model peptides that represent the minimal stimulatory sequence of a T-cell determinant are not necessarily identical to the structure of in vivo processed antigen. Heterogeneity in antigen processing by individual antigen-presenting cells would serve to increase the repertoire of immunogenic peptides that are presented to T cells.

Full text

PDF
3319

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Allen P. M., Matsueda G. R., Evans R. J., Dunbar J. B., Jr, Marshall G. R., Unanue E. R. Identification of the T-cell and Ia contact residues of a T-cell antigenic epitope. 1987 Jun 25-Jul 1Nature. 327(6124):713–715. doi: 10.1038/327713a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Babbitt B. P., Allen P. M., Matsueda G., Haber E., Unanue E. R. Binding of immunogenic peptides to Ia histocompatibility molecules. 1985 Sep 26-Oct 2Nature. 317(6035):359–361. doi: 10.1038/317359a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Berkower I., Buckenmeyer G. K., Berzofsky J. A. Molecular mapping of a histocompatibility-restricted immunodominant T cell epitope with synthetic and natural peptides: implications for T cell antigenic structure. J Immunol. 1986 Apr 1;136(7):2498–2503. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Brett S. J., Cease K. B., Berzofsky J. A. Influences of antigen processing on the expression of the T cell repertoire. Evidence for MHC-specific hindering structures on the products of processing. J Exp Med. 1988 Jul 1;168(1):357–373. doi: 10.1084/jem.168.1.357. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Buchmüller Y., Corradin G. Lymphocyte specificity to protein antigens. V. Conformational dependence of activation of cytochrome c-specific T cells. Eur J Immunol. 1982 May;12(5):412–416. doi: 10.1002/eji.1830120510. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Buus S., Colon S., Smith C., Freed J. H., Miles C., Grey H. M. Interaction between a "processed" ovalbumin peptide and Ia molecules. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1986 Jun;83(11):3968–3971. doi: 10.1073/pnas.83.11.3968. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Buus S., Sette A., Grey H. M. The interaction between protein-derived immunogenic peptides and Ia. Immunol Rev. 1987 Aug;98:115–141. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-065x.1987.tb00522.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Chesnut R. W., Colon S. M., Grey H. M. Requirements for the processing of antigens by antigen-presenting B cells. I. Functional comparison of B cell tumors and macrophages. J Immunol. 1982 Dec;129(6):2382–2388. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Falo L. D., Jr, Benacerraf B., Rock K. L. Phospholipase treatment of accessory cells that have been exposed to antigen selectively inhibits antigen-specific Ia-restricted, but not allospecific, stimulation of T lymphocytes. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1986 Sep;83(18):6994–6997. doi: 10.1073/pnas.83.18.6994. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Falo L. D., Jr, Benacerraf B., Rothstein L., Rock K. L. Cerulenin is a potent inhibitor of antigen processing by antigen-presenting cells. J Immunol. 1987 Dec 15;139(12):3918–3923. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Falo L. D., Jr, Haber S. I., Herrmann S., Benacerraf B., Rock K. L. Characterization of antigen association with accessory cells: specific removal of processed antigens from the cell surface by phospholipases. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1987 Jan;84(2):522–526. doi: 10.1073/pnas.84.2.522. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Fox B. S., Carbone F. R., Germain R. N., Paterson Y., Schwartz R. H. Processing of a minimal antigenic peptide alters its interaction with MHC molecules. Nature. 1988 Feb 11;331(6156):538–540. doi: 10.1038/331538a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Gammon G., Shastri N., Cogswell J., Wilbur S., Sadegh-Nasseri S., Krzych U., Miller A., Sercarz E. The choice of T-cell epitopes utilized on a protein antigen depends on multiple factors distant from, as well as at the determinant site. Immunol Rev. 1987 Aug;98:53–73. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-065x.1987.tb00519.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Hamano T., Kim K. J., Leiserson W. M., Asofsky R. Establishment of B cell hybridomas with B cell surface antigens. J Immunol. 1982 Oct;129(4):1403–1406. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Katz M. E., Maizels R. M., Wicker L., Miller A., Sercarz E. E. Immunological focusing by th mouse major histocompatibility complex: mouse strains confronted with distantly related lysozymes confine their attention to very few epitopes. Eur J Immunol. 1982 Jul;12(7):535–540. doi: 10.1002/eji.1830120702. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Kim K. J., Kanellopoulos-Langevin C., Merwin R. M., Sachs D. H., Asofsky R. Establishment and characterization of BALB/c lymphoma lines with B cell properties. J Immunol. 1979 Feb;122(2):549–554. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Kovac Z., Schwartz R. H. The molecular basis of the requirement for antigen processing of pigeon cytochrome c prior to T cell activation. J Immunol. 1985 May;134(5):3233–3240. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Malissen B., Price M. P., Goverman J. M., McMillan M., White J., Kappler J., Marrack P., Pierres A., Pierres M., Hood L. Gene transfer of H-2 class II genes: antigen presentation by mouse fibroblast and hamster B-cell lines. Cell. 1984 Feb;36(2):319–327. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(84)90225-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Norcross M. A., Bentley D. M., Margulies D. H., Germain R. N. Membrane Ia expression and antigen-presenting accessory cell function of L cells transfected with class II major histocompatibility complex genes. J Exp Med. 1984 Nov 1;160(5):1316–1337. doi: 10.1084/jem.160.5.1316. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. Puri J., Factorovich Y. Selective inhibition of antigen presentation to cloned T cells by protease inhibitors. J Immunol. 1988 Nov 15;141(10):3313–3317. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. Rock K. L., Benacerraf B. Inhibition of antigen-specific T lymphocyte activation by structurally related Ir gene-controlled polymers. Evidence of specific competition for accessory cell antigen presentation. J Exp Med. 1983 May 1;157(5):1618–1634. doi: 10.1084/jem.157.5.1618. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  22. Rock K. L. The role of Ia molecules in the activation of T lymphocytes. I. The activation of an IL 1-dependent IL 2-producing T cell hybridoma by Con A requires an interaction, which is not H-2-restricted, with an Ia-bearing accessory cell. J Immunol. 1982 Oct;129(4):1360–1366. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  23. Schwartz R. H., Fox B. S., Fraga E., Chen C., Singh B. The T lymphocyte response to cytochrome c. V. Determination of the minimal peptide size required for stimulation of T cell clones and assessment of the contribution of each residue beyond this size to antigenic potency. J Immunol. 1985 Oct;135(4):2598–2608. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  24. Schwartz R. H. T-lymphocyte recognition of antigen in association with gene products of the major histocompatibility complex. Annu Rev Immunol. 1985;3:237–261. doi: 10.1146/annurev.iy.03.040185.001321. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  25. Sette A., Buus S., Colon S., Smith J. A., Miles C., Grey H. M. Structural characteristics of an antigen required for its interaction with Ia and recognition by T cells. 1987 Jul 30-Aug 5Nature. 328(6129):395–399. doi: 10.1038/328395a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  26. Shastri N., Gammon G., Horvath S., Miller A., Sercarz E. E. The choice between two distinct T cell determinants within a 23-amino acid region of lysozyme depends on their structural context. J Immunol. 1986 Aug 1;137(3):911–915. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  27. Shastri N., Malissen B., Hood L. Ia-transfected L-cell fibroblasts present a lysozyme peptide but not the native protein to lysozyme-specific T cells. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1985 Sep;82(17):5885–5889. doi: 10.1073/pnas.82.17.5885. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  28. Shastri N., Miller A., Sercarz E. E. Amino acid residues distinct from the determinant region can profoundly affect activation of T cell clones by related antigens. J Immunol. 1986 Jan;136(2):371–376. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  29. Shastri N., Miller A., Sercarz E. E. The expressed T cell repertoire is hierarchical: the precise focus of lysozyme-specific T cell clones is dependent upon the structure of the immunogen. J Mol Cell Immunol. 1984;1(6):369–379. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  30. Shimonkevitz R., Colon S., Kappler J. W., Marrack P., Grey H. M. Antigen recognition by H-2-restricted T cells. II. A tryptic ovalbumin peptide that substitutes for processed antigen. J Immunol. 1984 Oct;133(4):2067–2074. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  31. Shimonkevitz R., Kappler J., Marrack P., Grey H. Antigen recognition by H-2-restricted T cells. I. Cell-free antigen processing. J Exp Med. 1983 Aug 1;158(2):303–316. doi: 10.1084/jem.158.2.303. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  32. Streicher H. Z., Berkower I. J., Busch M., Gurd F. R., Berzofsky J. A. Antigen conformation determines processing requirements for T-cell activation. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1984 Nov;81(21):6831–6835. doi: 10.1073/pnas.81.21.6831. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  33. Swierkosz J. E., Rock K., Marrack P., Kappler J. W. The role of H-2 linked genes in helper T-cell function. II. Isolation on antigen-pulsed macrophages of two separate populations of F1 helper T cells each specific for antigen and one set of parental H-2 products. J Exp Med. 1978 Feb 1;147(2):554–570. doi: 10.1084/jem.147.2.554. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  34. Thomas D. W., Schauster J. L., Hoffman M. D., Wilner G. D. Nonrandom catabolism of proteins in the formation of antigenic peptide fragments. J Immunol. 1985 Aug;135(2):1259–1263. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  35. Unanue E. R. Antigen-presenting function of the macrophage. Annu Rev Immunol. 1984;2:395–428. doi: 10.1146/annurev.iy.02.040184.002143. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  36. Walker E., Warner N. L., Chesnut R., Kappler J., Marrack P. Antigen-specific. I region-restricted interactions in vitro between tumor cell lines and T cell hybridomas. J Immunol. 1982 May;128(5):2164–2169. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  37. Werdelin O. Chemically related antigens compete for presentation by accessory cells to T cells. J Immunol. 1982 Nov;129(5):1883–1891. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  38. Ziegler H. K., Unanue E. R. Decrease in macrophage antigen catabolism caused by ammonia and chloroquine is associated with inhibition of antigen presentation to T cells. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1982 Jan;79(1):175–178. doi: 10.1073/pnas.79.1.175. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  39. Ziegler K., Unanue E. R. Identification of a macrophage antigen-processing event required for I-region-restricted antigen presentation to T lymphocytes. J Immunol. 1981 Nov;127(5):1869–1875. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America are provided here courtesy of National Academy of Sciences

RESOURCES