Skip to main content
NIHPA Author Manuscripts logoLink to NIHPA Author Manuscripts
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2010 May 18.
Published in final edited form as: J Am Soc Mass Spectrom. 2007 Sep 14;18(12):2090–2093. doi: 10.1016/j.jasms.2007.09.004

First Signal on the Cryogenic Fourier-Transform Ion Cyclotron Resonance Mass Spectrometer

Cheng Lin a,b,, Raman Mathur a,c,, Kostantin Aizikov a,c, Peter B O'Connor a,b,c
PMCID: PMC2872035  NIHMSID: NIHMS35396  PMID: 17931882

Abstract

The construction and achievement of the first signal on a cryogenic Fourier-transform ion cyclotron resonance mass spectrometer (FT-ICR-MS) are reported here, demonstrating proof-of-concept of this new instrument design. Building the FTICR cell into the cold bore of a superconducting magnet provided advantages over conventional warm bore design. At 4.2 K, the vacuum system cryopumps itself, thus removing the requirement for a large bore to achieve the desired pumping speed for maintaining base pressure. Furthermore, because the bore diameter has been reduced, the amount of magnet wire needed to achieve high field and homogeneity was also reduced, greatly decreasing the cost/Tesla of the magnet. The current instrument implements an actively shielded 14-Tesla magnet of vertical design with an external matrix assisted laser desorption/ionization (MALDI) source. The first signal was obtained by detecting the laser desorbed/ionized (LDI) C60+• ions, with the magnet at 7 Tesla, unshimmed, and the preamplifier mounted outside of the vacuum chamber at room temperature. A subsequent experiment done with the magnet at 14 Tesla and properly shimmed produced a C60 spectrum showing ∼350,000 resolving power at m/z ∼720. Increased magnetic field strength improves many FTMS performance parameters simultaneously, particularly mass resolving power and accuracy.

Introduction

Recent advances in Fourier-transform ion cyclotron resonance mass spectrometry (FT-ICR-MS, or FTMS) [1] have made it possible to routinely generate mass spectra with sub ppm mass accuracy [2-5] and ultra-high resolving power (with RP > 8,000,000 reported at 8.6 kDa) [6]. Mass accuracy and resolving power are critical and determining performance parameters for top-down [7] and bottom-up [8, 9] proteomics experiments, as well as petroleomics [10]. Many performance parameters of FTMS, particularly mass resolving power and accuracy, increase linearly with the magnetic field strength [11]. Currently, the highest field used in commercially available FTMS instruments is 15 T. While NMR magnets with up to 21 T magnetic field are commercially available, they are rarely used in FTMS instruments, because the narrow bore diameter limits the pumping speed and the base pressure obtainable. Increasing the bore diameter, however, increases the cost of the magnet (roughly quadratically) and greatly increases the difficulty of constructing a stable high homogeneity magnet. As a result, modern FTMS instruments have to make a compromise on bore diameter to ensure enough pumping speed to maintain the desirable base pressure, which limits the high field magnets currently accessible. In 2002, a new design, called the Cryogenic FTMS, was proposed in which the FTMS would be constructed inside the 4.2 K cold bore of a superconducting magnet [12]. At 4.2 K, instead of outgassing, the surfaces of the vacuum system become cryopumping, making it possible to achieve sufficient pumping speed (>105 L/s [13]) and low base pressure (<1×10-16 mbar [14]) with a narrow bore magnet. Moreover, the insulation between the cold bore that houses the magnet and the warm bore within which the FTMS is constructed can be removed in the cryogenic FTMS design, further increasing the available bore diameter. Finally, in addition to the gain in magnetic field strength, pumping speed, and base pressure, the cryogenic FTMS offers a third advantage in that the Johnson noise in the preamplifier's input resistor can be reduced by a factor of 8.4 by cooling the preamplifier to 4.2 K.

There are considerable, but manageable, challenges associated with the construction and operation of such a cryogenic FTMS that must be overcome. Particularly, the helium boiloff will greatly increase due to the increased heat transfer into the Dewar with the immersion of a metal chamber into the cryogenic magnet bore. This paper presents the construction of a cryogenic FTMS following closely the design proposed in the previous paper to solve these difficulties, and shows the first signal achieved on this instrument.

Experimental

Magnet Design

The cut-away view of the complete cryogenic FTMS with its salient components is shown in Figure 1. It incorporates an actively shielded 15 Tesla superconducting magnet (Cryomagnetics, Oak Ridge, TN) with a vertical, cryogenic temperature bore, and homogeneity of ∼12 ppm over a 5 cm by 5 cm cylindrical region. The system is designed to have zero loss in liquid helium under normal operation, with the equipped Sumitomo RDK415 cryo-refrigerator (Sumitomo Heavy Industries, Tokyo, Japan) providing a cooling power of ∼80 W at 77 K and ∼1.5 W at 4.2 K to compensate the heat transfer into the magnet Dewar. The Dewar can hold up to ∼100 Liters of liquid helium, which facilitates initial cool down, and provides a reservoir of cryogen to prevent magnet quenching in case of power outage and/or unaccounted heat loads. Two radiation shielded UHV chambers separate the outer surrounding environment from the magnet chamber, which is also radiation shielded from the 4 K inner chamber housing the FTMS, allowing for short duration temperature shocks. There is a 3.4 cm conflat port at the bottom of the Dewar for optical access offering capability of carrying out infrared multiphoton dissociation (IRMPD) experiments.

Figure 1.

Figure 1

Cut-away view of the complete cryogenic FTMS.

FTMS

The FTMS consists of an external matrix assisted laser desorption/ionization (MALDI) source [15], multipole ion guides, and an open cylindrical ICR cell [16]. The high pressure MALDI source is similar to the one described previously [17], where analytes are desorbed and ionized from the target plate mounted on an XY-stage (Fraunhofer USA, Brookline, MA) by focused 355 nm light from a Nd:YAG laser (Continuum, Santa Clara, CA). The ion transfer optics include an accumulation hexapole with front and back trapping plates that can trap ions externally, and a transmission hexapole, both driven by custom RF oscillators [18] but separated by a thin gate valve to maximize ion transmission [19]. The ICR cell has an outer diameter (o.d.) of 7 cm, with 5 cm long central excite/detect electrodes, a 10 cm long inner trapping ring on each side to extend the trapping volume, and two outer trapping plates. A 120 hour bakeout resulted in a vacuum at the cube of ∼1.5×10-9 mbar. This cube is ∼130 cm from the ICR cell, where the base pressure is expected to be lower because of cryopumping [14]; this assumption must be tested with further experiments.

Data Acquisition

A PXI-based data system (National Instruments, Austin, TX) developed at FOM-AMOLF [20] was used to control the pulse sequence, generate the excite waveform, and acquire the spectrum. The excite waveform was produced using an arbitrary waveform generator, followed by amplification and balancing through an iron-core transformer before transmission to the excite plates. The current setup uses an op-amp based standard instrumentation amplifier at room temperature outside of the vacuum system to amplify the induced ICR signal, so the hypothesized noise reduction is not expected with these initial results. The digitized transients were zero-filled once and fast Fourier transformed without apodization to produce the magnitude mode mass spectra shown.

Results and Discussion

First Signal at 7 Tesla

C60 was chosen as the analyte for tuning the cryogenic FTMS instrument. To reduce the tuning space dimension, the LDI mass spectrum of C60 was first obtained and optimized on a room temperature 7 T MALDI-FTMS instrument [21]. The data system, excite and detect amplifiers used in that experiment were then transported to the cryogenic FTMS, with its magnet also charged half-way to 7 T to allow direct usage of the previously optimized pulse sequence. With parameters such as ion time-of-flight, voltage settings on ion lenses, hexapole RF amplitudes and frequencies, and the excite amplitude and duration set near optimal values, acquiring the C60 spectrum in the cryo-FTMS was expected to require minimal tuning.

C60 molecules were first desorbed from a stainless steel plate and ionized by a single laser shot of around 80 μJ (focused to ∼100 μm diameter spot) at 355 nm, then transferred to the ICR cell through two hexapoles, both operated at 900 kHz and ∼25 Vpp amplitude. Gated trapping was used to trap the ions in the ICR cell, with the lower inner trapping ring held at 10 V, and the upper one briefly dropped to -1 V to allow the passage of ions into the cell before returning to 10 V, 1.27 msec after the laser fired, corresponding to a 1.27 msec ion flight time. After a short delay of ∼200 msec, the trapped ions were subjected to a broad band chirp excitation (m/z 500-1000 Da, 107-214 kHz at 7T) for 20 msec at 70% attenuation (∼20 Vpp), and the image current was detected at 4 MHz sampling rate and with 1 M point (14-bit) buffer size, corresponding to a 0.26 second transient. Figure 2 shows the optimized single scan mass spectrum of C60+ at 7 T, with the inset showing the time domain signal, which clearly displays the beat pattern of the closely spaced isotopic peaks. The mass resolving power, M/ΔMFWHM, is around 18,000, close to the theoretical Fourier-transform limit (f*t/2 [22]) of 19,344.

Figure 2.

Figure 2

First signal on cryogenic FTMS at 7 Tesla.

14 Tesla Spectrum

While the current magnet is designed for 15 T, shimming values are only available at 14 T. Thus, after optimizing the C60+ signal at 7 T, the magnet was brought up to 14 T, and shimmed for optimal overall homogeneity. Figure 3 shows a single scan spectrum of C60+ at 14 T with broad band excitation and an 8.4 second transient. The mass resolving power is ∼350,000, falling far short of the theoretical limit of ∼1,250,000. Such deviation likely results from dephasing of the ion clouds, particularly because the high trapping potentials employed increases trapping field inhomogeneities and the magnetron expansion rate.

Figure 3.

Figure 3

High resolution mass spectra of C60 at 14 Tesla.

Helium Boiloff

Building the FTMS directly into the cold magnet bore will inevitably increase the heat load on the magnet Dewar, resulting in a faster helium boiloff rate. While the use of a cryo-refrigerator does partially compensate for the heat transfer into the magnet Dewar, it is also important to minimize heat transfer to minimize boiloff. Since the magnet chamber and the FTMS are both inside UHV enclosures, convective heat transfer is negligible. Radiative heat transfer is minimized by installing radiation baffles along the ion optical axis, and putting many layers of super-insulation materials on the surfaces of the radiation shields. Conductive heat transfer can be readily estimated by the heat transfer equation [23]:

QConductive=k(T)ATx (1)

Where k(T) is the heat transfer coefficient, A is the cross-sectional area, and ∂T/∂x is the temperature gradient. It is clear that choosing material with minimal heat transfer coefficient and minimizing the cross-sectional area are essential to reduce the conductive heat load. Stainless steel was chosen to construct the bore tube, because in addition to having low thermal conductivity, it is also structurally strong, which allows the use of thin wall tube without the risk of imploding. The ion transfer hexapoles were made out of titanium tubes instead of rods, to reduce the cross-sectional area. Finally, all electrical connections down into the 4.2 K region were made with thin phosphor bronze magnet wires, which have very low heat conductance and reasonable electrical conductance.

The current system has a helium boiloff rate of around 5 Liters a day, corresponding to a ∼0.15 W uncompensated heat load. While manageable, it is highly desirable if the heat load can be further reduced by 0.15 W to attain a zero-loss system. This can be achieved by modifying the stainless steel ion guide tube, with its o.d. reduced to ∼2.5 cm (from 7.6 cm), just wide enough to house the ion guide, and its wall thickness reduced to 0.5 mm (from 0.9 mm), thick enough to resist crumpling even to 30 psig. This should provide a ∼6-fold reduction in heat conduction (from 0.23 W to 0.04 W), more than enough to eliminate the residue heat load.

Further improvements will involve installation of the low-temperature preamplifier [24] inside the vacuum, near the ICR cell, and chilled to 4.2 K. The present preamplifier is connected to the detect plates via approximately 2 meter long phosphor bronze wire and a ∼30 cm coaxial cable, adding an extra capacitance of ∼50 pF at the input of the amplifier, severely attenuating the ICR signal. Moreover, the instrumentation amplifier currently used is robust, but not optimal in terms of signal/noise. It has been shown that the custom-built silicon JFET-based room temperature preamplifier yields >25-fold lower noise than the commercial in-vacuum preamp, which is also 10-fold better than this simple instrumentation amp [25]. The GaAs MESFET-based cryogenic preamplifier has been tested and functions well at 4.2 K, with similar performance enhancement. Keeping the preamplifier inside the vacuum, shielded by the metal walls, will also significantly reduce RF interference.

Finally, the present system cryopumps using a simple aluminum container filled with activated charcoal placed just below the ICR cell. A higher surface area cryo-array is currently being designed, which should provide better pumping speed and base pressure once installed.

Conclusions

A cryogenic FTMS instrument has been constructed with a 15 T magnet, which offers several advantages over the conventional warm bore design, including the field strength, base pressure and preamplifier noise. The helium boiloff rate is currently at a manageable 5 L/day, with modifications under way to reduce the heat transfer further to make it a zero-loss system. First signal has been achieved on this instrument by detecting the LDI C60+ ions at 7 T, and later at 14 T. While not fully optimized, this signal shows the proof of concept for cryo-FTMS. Replacing the commercial room temperature instrumentation amplifier with the low-temperature preamplifier in proximity to the ICR cell is expected to improve the signal/noise significantly.

Acknowledgments

The authors gratefully acknowledge the financial support from the National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute (Grant NIH/NHLBI NO1HV28178), the National Center for Research Resources (Grant NIH/NCRR P41RR10888), and MDS Sciex. We thank Dr. Steve Beu, Dr. Gerald Gabrielse, Dr. Ron M. A. Heeren, Dr. Chris Hendrickson, Dr. Ronald Knepper, and Dr. Lutz Schweikhard for valuable comments, Adam Berryhill and Mike Coffey for the magnet design and operation, and Boston University Scientific Instruments Facility for building critical components for the instrument.

Footnotes

Publisher's Disclaimer: This is a PDF file of an unedited manuscript that has been accepted for publication. As a service to our customers we are providing this early version of the manuscript. The manuscript will undergo copyediting, typesetting, and review of the resulting proof before it is published in its final citable form. Please note that during the production process errors may be discovered which could affect the content, and all legal disclaimers that apply to the journal pertain.

References

  • 1.Comisarow MB, Marshall AG. Fourier Transform Ion Cyclotron Resonance Spectroscopy. Chemical Physics Letters. 1974;25:282–283. [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Easterling ML, Mize TH, Amster IJ. Routine Part-per-Million Mass Accuracy for High-Mass Ions: Space-Charge Effects in MALDI FT-ICR. Analytical Chemistry. 1999;71:624–632. doi: 10.1021/ac980690d. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Muddiman DC, Oberg AL. Statistical Evaluation of Internal and External Mass Calibration Laws Utilized in Fourier Transform Ion Cyclotron Resonance Mass Spectrometry. Analytical Chemistry. 2005;77:2406–2414. doi: 10.1021/ac048258l. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Zhang LK, Rempel D, Pramanik BN, Gross ML. Accurate Mass Measurements by Fourier Transform Mass Spectrometry. Mass Spectrometry Reviews. 2005;24:286–309. [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Kim S, Rodgers RP, Marshall AG. Truly “Exact” Mass: Elemental Composition can be Determined Uniquely from Molecular Mass Measurement at Similar to 0.1 mDa Accuracy for Molecules up to Similar to 500 Da. International Journal of Mass Spectrometry. 2006;251:260–265. [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Shi SDH, Hendrickson CL, Marshall AG. Counting Individual Sulfur Atoms in a Protein By Ultrahigh-Resolution Fourier Transform Ion Cyclotron Resonance Mass Spectrometry - Experimental Resolution of Isotopic Fine Structure in Proteins. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America. 1998;95:11532–11537. doi: 10.1073/pnas.95.20.11532. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Kelleher NL, Lin HY, Valaskovic GA, Aaserud DJ, Fridriksson EK, McLafferty FW. Top down versus Bottom up Protein Characterization by Tandem High-Resolution Mass Spectrometry. Journal of the American Chemical Society. 1999;121:806–812. [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Bogdanov B, Smith RD. Proteomics by FTICR Mass Spectrometry: Top down and Bottom up. Mass Spectrometry Reviews. 2005;24:168–200. doi: 10.1002/mas.20015. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Frank AM, Savitski MM, Nielsen ML, Zubarev RA, Pevzner PA. De novo Peptide Sequencing and Identification with Precision Mass Spectrometry. Journal of Proteome Research. 2007;6:114–123. doi: 10.1021/pr060271u. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Marshall AG, Rodgers RP. Petroleomics: The Next Grand Challenge for Chemical Analysis. Accounts of Chemical Research. 2004;37:53–59. doi: 10.1021/ar020177t. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Marshall AG, Hendrickson CL, Jackson GS. Fourier Transform Ion Cyclotron Resonance Mass Spectrometry - A Primer. Mass Spectrometry Reviews. 1998;17:1–35. doi: 10.1002/(SICI)1098-2787(1998)17:1<1::AID-MAS1>3.0.CO;2-K. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.O'Connor PB. Considerations for Design of a Fourier Transform Mass Spectrometer in the 4.2 K Cold Bore of a Superconducting Magnet. Rapid Communications in Mass Spectrometry. 2002;16:1160–1167. doi: 10.1002/rcm.685. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Winger BE, Hofstadler SA, Bruce JE, Udseth HR, Smith RD. High-Resolution Accurate Mass Measurements of Biomolecules Using a New Electrospray-Ionization Ion-Cyclotron Resonance Mass-Spectrometer. Journal of the American Society for Mass Spectrometry. 1993;4:566–577. doi: 10.1016/1044-0305(93)85018-S. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Gabrielse G, Fei X, Orozco LA, Tjoelker RL, Haas J, Kalinowsky H, Trainor TA, Kells W. Thousandfold Improvement in the Measured Antiproton Mass. Physical Review Letters. 1990;65:1317–1320. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.65.1317. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Hillenkamp F, Karas M, Beavis RC, Chait BT. Matrix-Assisted Laser Desorption Ionization Mass-Spectrometry of Biopolymers. Analytical Chemistry. 1991;63:A1193–A1202. doi: 10.1021/ac00024a002. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Beu SC, Laude DA. Elimination of Axial Ejection During Excitation with a Capacitively Coupled Open Trapped-Ion Cell for Fourier-Transform Ion-Cyclotron Resonance Mass-Spectrometry. Analytical Chemistry. 1992;64:177–180. [Google Scholar]
  • 17.O'Connor PB, Budnik BA, Ivleva VB, Kaur P, Moyer SC, Pittman JL, Costello CE. A High Pressure Matrix-Assisted Laser Desorption Ion Source for Fourier Transform Mass Spectrometry Designed to Accommodate Large Targets with Diverse Surfaces. Journal of the American Society for Mass Spectrometry. 2004;15:128–132. doi: 10.1016/j.jasms.2003.10.005. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.O'Connor PB, Costello CE, Earle WE. A High Voltage RF Oscillator for Driving Multipole Ion Guides. Journal of the American Society for Mass Spectrometry. 2002;13:1370–1375. doi: 10.1016/S1044-0305(02)00700-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Pittman JL, O'Connor PB. A Minimum Thickness Gate Valve with Integrated Ion Optics for Mass Spectrometry. Journal of the American Society for Mass Spectrometry. 2005;16:441–445. doi: 10.1016/j.jasms.2004.12.010. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Mize TH, Taban I, Duursma M, Seynen M, Konijnenburg M, Vijftigschild A, Doornik CV, Rooij GV, Heeren RMA. A Modular Data and Control System to Improve Sensitivity, Selectivity, Speed of Analysis, Ease of Use, and Transient Duration in an External Source FTICR-MS. International Journal of Mass Spectrometry. 2004;235:243–253. [Google Scholar]
  • 21.O'Connor PB, Costello CE. A high pressure matrix-assisted laser desorption/ionization Fourier transform mass spectrometry ion source for thermal stabilization of labile biomolecules. Rapid Communications in Mass Spectrometry. 2001;15:1862–1868. doi: 10.1002/rcm.447. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Comisarow MB. Ion Cyclotron Resonance Spectrometry II. Springer-Verlag; New York: 1982. [Google Scholar]
  • 23.White GK, Meeson PJ. Experimental Techniques in Low-Temperature Physics. Oxford University Press; Oxford: 2002. [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Mathur R, O'Connor PB, Knepper RW. Electronics for the Cryogenic Fourier Transform Mass Spectrometer. Proceedings of the 54th ASMS Conference on Mass Spectrometry and Allied Topics; Seattle, WA. May/June; 2006. DVD-ROM. [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Mathur R, Knepper RW, O'Connor PB. A Low-Noise, Wideband Preamplifier for a Fourier-Transform Ion Cyclotron Resonance Mass Spectrometer. doi: 10.1016/j.jasms.2007.09.013. submitted. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

RESOURCES