Skip to main content
Mediators of Inflammation logoLink to Mediators of Inflammation
. 2010 Jun 30;2010:784343. doi: 10.1155/2010/784343

Leptin Administration Downregulates the Increased Expression Levels of Genes Related to Oxidative Stress and Inflammation in the Skeletal Muscle of ob/ob Mice

Neira Sáinz 1, 2,2, Amaia Rodríguez 1, 2,2, Victoria Catalán 1, 2,2, Sara Becerril 1, 2,2, Beatriz Ramírez 1, 2,2, Javier Gómez-Ambrosi 1, 2,2, Gema Frühbeck 1, 2, 3,2,3,*
PMCID: PMC2910527  PMID: 20671928

Abstract

Obese leptin-deficient ob/ob mice exhibit a low-grade chronic inflammation together with a low muscle mass. Our aim was to analyze the changes in muscle expression levels of genes related to oxidative stress and inflammatory responses in leptin deficiency and to identify the effect of in vivo leptin administration. Ob/ob mice were divided in three groups as follows: control ob/ob, leptin-treated ob/ob (1 mg/kg/d) and leptin pair-fed ob/ob mice. Gastrocnemius weight was lower in control ob/ob than in wild type mice (P < .01) exhibiting an increase after leptin treatment compared to control and pair-fed (P < .01) ob/ob animals. Thiobarbituric acid reactive substances, markers of oxidative stress, were higher in serum (P < .01) and gastrocnemius (P = .05) of control ob/ob than in wild type mice and were significantly decreased (P < .01) by leptin treatment. Leptin deficiency altered the expression of 1,546 genes, while leptin treatment modified the regulation of 1,127 genes with 86 of them being involved in oxidative stress, immune defense and inflammatory response. Leptin administration decreased the high expression of Crybb1, Hspb3, Hspb7, Mt4, Cat, Rbm9, Serpinc1 and Serpinb1a observed in control ob/ob mice, indicating that it improves inflammation and muscle loss.

1. Introduction

Obesity is associated with a low-grade proinflammatory state resulting in an increase of circulating cytokines and inflammatory markers [1]. Inflammatory cytokines have been involved in the impairment of insulin signaling, thus providing molecular links between inflammation and insulin resistance [2]. Inflammation reportedly produces metabolic alterations in skeletal muscle with both inflammatory response and insulin resistance being associated with loss of muscle mass by decreased protein synthesis and increased proteolysis [35]. Recently, our group has shown that leptin reverses muscle loss of ob/ob mice by inhibiting the activity of the transcriptional factor forkhead box class O3a (FoxO3a) [6].

Leptin is an adipocyte-derived peptidic hormone [7] that inhibits food intake and increases thermogenesis by acting through its hypothalamic receptors [8, 9]. Leptin-deficient ob/ob mice are obese, hyperphagic, exhibit type 2 diabetes, decreased body temperature and hypogonadotropic hypogonadism [10]. Leptin is a member of the long-chain helical cytokine family and its receptors, which belong to the class I cytokine receptors, are present in bone marrow and spleen as well as on peripheral monocytes and lymphocytes [1]. Leptin increases in response to acute infection and sepsis and it has been reported to exert a profound influence on the function and proliferation of T lymphocytes and natural killer cells [11], on the phagocytosis of macrophages/monocytes [12], and to have a direct effect on the secretion of anti- and proinflammatory cytokines [13]. In this regard, impaired cellular and humoral immunity have been shown in leptin-deficient ob/ob mice as well as in leptin receptor-deficient db/db mice [14, 15]. These studies reflect the molecular nature of leptin as a cytokine and are consistent with leptin signaling playing a pivotal role in the pathogenesis of obesity-associated inflammation and muscle loss.

In the present paper, gastrocnemius muscle samples from wild type and ob/ob mice were analyzed for mRNA presence of over 41,000 transcripts by microarray analysis to identify genes involved in inflammation and oxidative stress that are affected by leptin deficiency and leptin administration in ob/ob mice. It was shown that leptin increases the gastrocnemius weight and reduces the high expression levels of genes related to the obesity-associated low-grade inflammation in skeletal muscle of ob/ob mice.

2. Material and Methods

2.1. Animals and Treatments

Ten-week-old male genetically obese ob/ob mice (C57BL/6J) (n = 15) and their lean control littermates wild type (n = 5) supplied by Harlan (Barcelona, Spain) were housed in a room with controlled temperature (22 ± 2°C) and a 12:12 light-dark cycle (lights on at 08:00 am). Body weight of ob/ob mice was measured before randomization into control, leptin-treated (1 mg/kg/d) and pair-fed groups (n = 5 per group). The control and pair-fed groups received vehicle (PBS), while leptin-treated mice were intraperitoneally administered with leptin (Bachem, Bubendorf, Switzerland) twice daily at 08:00 am and 08:00 pm for 28 days. Control and leptin-treated groups were provided with water and food ad libitum with a standard rodent chow (2014S Teklad, Harlan), while daily food intake of the pair-fed group was matched to the amount consumed by the leptin-treated group the day before in order to discriminate the inhibitory effect of leptin on appetite. Animals were sacrificed on the 28th day of treatment by CO2 inhalation 20 hours after the last PBS or leptin administration (in order to avoid picking up effects reflecting an acute response) and after 8 hours of fasting. Serum samples and gastrocnemius muscles were obtained and stored at −80°C. All experimental procedures conformed to the European Guidelines for the Care and Use of Laboratory Animals (directive 86/609) and were approved by the Ethical Committee for Animal Experimentation of the University of Navarra (080/05).

2.2. Blood Analysis

Serum glucose was analyzed using a sensitive-automatic glucose sensor (Ascensia Elite, Bayer, Barcelona, Spain). Free fatty acid (FFA) concentrations were measured by a colorimetric determination using the NEFA C kit (WAKO Chemicals, Neuss, Germany). Serum glycerol concentrations were evaluated by enzymatic methods as previously described [6]. Serum triglycerides (TG) concentrations were spectrophotometrically determined using a commercial kit (Infinity, Thermo Electron, Melbourne, Australia). Insulin and leptin were determined using specific mouse ELISA kits (Crystal Chem Inc., Chicago, IL, USA). Intra- and interassay coefficients of variation for measurements of insulin and leptin were 3.5% and 6.3%, respectively, for the former, and 2.8% and 5.8%, for the latter. Adiponectin concentrations were also assessed using a mouse ELISA kit (BioVendor Laboratory Medicine, Inc., Modrice, Czech Republic). Intra- and interassay coefficients of variation for adiponectin were 2.6% and 5.3%, respectively. Insulin resistance was calculated using the homeostasis model assessment score (HOMA; fasting insulin (μU/mL) × fasting glucose (mmol/L)/22.5) [16]. An indirect measure of insulin sensitivity was calculated by using the quantitative insulin sensitivity check index (QUICKI; 1/[log(fasting insulin mU/mL) + log(fasting glucose mg/dL)] [17].

Lipid peroxidation was analyzed by the measurement of thiobarbituric acid reactive substances (TBARS) in serum and gastrocnemius as previously described by Conti et al. [18] with some modifications. Since the best-known specific TBARS is malondialdehyde (MDA), we used serum MDA levels, a secondary product of lipid peroxidation, as an indicator of lipid peroxidation and oxidative stress. Gastrocnemius samples (20–30 mg) were homogenized in 20 volumes of phosphate buffer pH 7.4. Serum, muscle homogenates (5 μL) or standard (MDA) were mixed with 120 μL of diethyl thiobarbituric acid (DETBA) 10 mM and vortexed for 5 seconds. The reaction mixture was then incubated at 95°C for 60 minutes. After cooling to room temperature DETBA-MDA adducts were extracted in 360 μL n-butanol vortexing for 1 minute and centrifuged at 1,600 g for 10 minutes at room temperature. Then, the chromophore of the DETBA-MDA adduct was quantified in 200 μL of the upper butanol phase by fluorescence emission at 535 nm with an excitation at 590 nm. MDA equivalents (TBARS) were quantified using a calibration curve prepared using MDA standard working solutions and expressed as serum MDA μM and gastrocnemius MDA μM/mg protein. Protein concentrations were determined using a Bradford protein assay kit (BioRad, Hercules, CA, USA).

2.3. Microarray Experiments and Analysis

Total RNA was extracted from 20–30 mg of gastrocnemius muscle samples by homogenization with an ULTRA-TURRAX T 25 basic (IKA Werke GmbH, Staufen, Germany) using TRIzol reagent (Invitrogen, Barcelona, Spain). RNA was purified using the RNeasy Mini kit (Qiagen, Barcelona, Spain) and treated with DNase I (RNase-free DNase Set, Qiagen) in order to remove any trace of genomic DNA.

Gene expression analyses were conducted using the Agilent Whole Mouse Genome array (G4121B, Agilent Technologies, Santa Clara, CA, USA) containing ~41, 000 mouse genes and transcripts. Fluorescence-labeled cDNA probes were prepared from 1 μg of total RNA from each sample (5 animals per group) to be subsequently amino-allyl labeled and amplified using the Amino Allyl MessageAmp II aRNA Amplification Kit (Ambion, Austin, TX, USA). Aliquots (1.2 μg) of amplified aRNA were fluorescently labeled using Cy3/Cy5 (Amersham Biosciences, Buckinghamshire, UK) and then appropriately combined and hybridized to Agilent microarrays. Hybridizations were performed following a reference design, where control samples were pools of RNA from all individual samples. Two hybridizations with fluor reversal (Dye-swap) were performed for each sample. After washing, microarray slides were scanned using a Gene Pix 4100A scanner (Axon Instruments, Union City, CA, USA) and image quantization was performed using the software GenePiX Pro 6.0. Gene expression data for all replicate experiments were analyzed using the GeneSpring GX software version 7.3.1 (Agilent Technologies). Clustering was accomplished with the Gene and Condition Tree algorithms. In addition, Gene Ontology database (http://babelomics.bioinfo.cipf.es) and the KEGG website (http://www.genome.ad.jp/kegg/pathway) were used in conjunction with GeneSpring (http://www.agilent.com/ chem/genespring ) to identify pathways and functional groups of genes. All microarray data reported are described in accordance with MIAME guidelines (http://www.mged.org/Workgroups/MIAME/miame.html). More information regarding the microarray experiments can be found at the EMBL-European Bioinformatics Institute (http://www.ebi.ac.uk/aerep/login. ArrayExpress accession number: E-MEXP-1831). To validate the microarray data, a number of representative differentially expressed genes were selected to be individually studied by Real-Time PCR (7300 Real Time PCR System, Applied Biosystems, Foster City, CA, USA) (n = 5 per group) as previously described [19]. Primers and probes were designed using the software Primer Express 2.0 (Applied Biosystems) and purchased from Genosys (Sigma, Madrid, Spain) (Table 1).

Table 1.

Sequences of the primers and Taqman probes used in the Real-Time PCR.

Gene Gene Symbol GenBank
accesión number
Oligonucleotide sequence (5′-3′)
Peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor-γ coactivator-1α Pgc1a NM_008904 Forward: GTCTGAAAGGGCCAAACAGAGA
Reverse: TCAATTCTGTCCGCGTTGTG
Probe: FAM-AGCAGAAAGCAATTGAAGAGCGCCGT-TAMRA
Forkhead box O1 Foxo1 NM_019739 Forward: GCGGGCTGGAAGAATTCAAT
Reverse: TCCTTCATTCTGCACTCGAATAAAC T
Probe: FAM-CGCCACAATCTGTCCCTTCACA-TAMRA
Muscle atrophy F box MAFbx NM_026346 Forward: CCATCCTGGATTCCAGAAGATTC
Reverse: TCAGGGATGTGAGCTGTGACTTT
Probe: FAM-CTACGTAGTAAGGCTGTTGGAGCTGAT-TAMRA
Muscle RING finger 1 MuRF1 NM_001039048 Forward: CGCCATGAAGTGATCATGGA
Reverse: TCCTTGGAAGATGCTTTGCA
Probe: FAM-TGTACGGCCTGCAGAGGAACCTGAAA-TAMRA

2.4. Statistical Analysis

Data are expressed as mean ± standard error of the mean (SEM). Differences between groups were assessed by Kruskal-Wallis followed by Mann Whitney's U test. As previously outlined, Gene Ontology groupings were used to identify pathways significantly affected by leptin deficiency as opposed to its administration. Furthermore, statistical comparisons for microarray data to identify differentially expressed genes across different groups were performed using one-way ANOVA and Student's t-tests as appropriate. Spearman's correlations were used to evaluate the relations among different variables. All statistical analyses were performed by using the SPSS statistical program version 15.0 for Windows (SPSS, Chicago, IL, USA) and statistical significance was defined as P < .05.

3. Results

3.1. Leptin Treatment Improves the Metabolic Profile of ob/ob Mice

The morphological and biochemical characteristics of wild type and ob/ob mice are reported in Table 2. As expected, leptin treatment corrected the obese and diabetic phenotype of ob/ob mice. Body weight was significantly higher (P < .01) in the control ob/ob group as compared to wild type mice. Leptin-treated mice exhibited a decreased body weight (P < .01) as compared to control and pair-fed ob/ob animals. Importantly, leptin treatment normalized body weight of ob/ob mice as compared to wild type (P = .690). In addition, the gastrocnemius of control ob/ob mice exhibited a lower (P < .01) muscle weight than that of wild type mice and it was increased (P < .01) by leptin administration in comparison with that of control and pair-fed ob/ob rodents. As depicted in Table 2, higher fasting glucose (P < .05) and insulin (P < .01) concentrations were observed in the control ob/ob mice compared to wild types. Although no differences in glucose concentrations were observed in pair-fed as compared to leptin-treated ob/ob mice, higher serum insulin concentrations (P < .05) were detected in the pair-fed animals than in the leptin-treated ob/ob group. Furthermore, leptin administration normalized both the glucose and insulin levels in ob/ob mice compared to wild types. These data suggest that leptin increases the insulin sensitivity in peripheral tissues, as evidenced by the lower HOMA and higher QUICKI indices (P < .01) in the leptin-treated in comparison with the control ob/ob animals. Serum glycerol was markedly increased (P < .05) in the control ob/ob mice, while FFA and TG levels remained unchanged as compared to wild type mice. Interestingly, leptin not only decreased circulating concentrations of FFA (P < .05) and glycerol (P < .01) levels as compared to control ob/ob mice, but also FFA (P < .01), glycerol (P < .01) and TG (P < .05) concentrations as compared to pair-fed mice. Leptin administration to ob/ob mice reduced serum glycerol concentrations (P = .032) and tended to decrease FFA (P = .095) as compared to wild types. Furthermore, leptin treatment increased the low concentrations of adiponectin of ob/ob mice, but the differences fell out of statistical significance (P = .095).

Table 2.

Total body and skeletal muscle weights and biochemical characteristics of wild type and ob/ob mice.

wild type control ob/ob pair-fed ob/ob leptin-treated ob/ob
Body weight (g) 25.6 ± 0.3 47.8 ± 4.9b 35.7 ± 0.7 24.7 ± 1.2d,f
Gastrocnemius (mg) 142.9 ± 3.4 90.7 ± 10.0b 68.5 ± 1.6 104.9 ± 2.6b,f
Gastrocnemius (mg/g) 5.59 ± 0.12 1.91 ± 0.11b 1.92 ± 0.07 4.28 ± 0.15b,d,f
Glucose (mg/dL) 149 ± 42 430 ± 59a 160 ± 24d 178 ± 29d
FFA (mmol/L) 1.62 ± 0.49 1.61 ± 0.30 1.65 ± 0.12 0.78 ± 0.13c,f
Glycerol (mmol/L) 42.8 ± 6.7 81.6 ± 19.6a 39.6 ± 4.9c 12.3 ± 4.7a,d,f
TG (mg/dL) 122 ± 18 169 ± 32 151 ± 10 86 ± 17e
Insulin (ng/mL) 0.42 ± 0.09 8.60 ± 1.51b 2.40 ± 0.68c 0.47 ± 0.09d,e
Adiponectin (μg/mL) 30.2 ± 3.0 28.3 ± 5.4 39.1 ± 1.8 40.2 ± 3.0
Leptin (ng/mL) 1.36 ± 0.42 UD UD 3.48 ± 1.02
HOMA 4.3 ± 1.8 202.4 ± 33.8b 25.8 ± 10.4d 5.12 ± 1.1d
QUICKI 0.333 ± 0.023 0.205 ± 0.003b 0.263 ± 0.015d 0.311 ± 0.016d

Data are mean ± SEM (n = 5 per group). Differences between groups were analyzed by Kruskal-Wallis followed by Mann Whitney's U test. a P < .05 and b P < .01versus wild type. c P < .05 and d P < .01 versus ob/ob. e P < .05 and f P < .01 versus pair-fed ob/ob. FFA: free fatty acids. TG: triglycerides. UD: undetectable. HOMA: homeostasis model assessment. QUICKI: quantitative insulin sensitivity check index.

Control ob/ob mice exhibited significantly higher serum TBARS than wild type littermates (P < .01), which were significantly reduced after leptin administration as compared to the control (P < .01) and pair-fed (P < .05) ob/ob groups (Figure 1(a)). In addition, leptin decreased (P < .01) the high concentrations of MDA measured in the gastrocnemius muscle of control ob/ob mice, while this effect was not observed in the pair-fed group (Figure 1(b)). Serum and gastrocnemius TBARS levels were positively associated with body weight, FFA, insulin, and the HOMA index. Oppositely, TBARS levels were negatively associated with adiponectin and the QUICKI index both in serum and muscle. Importantly, a high positive relation were found between serum and gastrocnemius concentrations of TBARS (ρ = 0.63, P = .003) (Table 3).

Figure 1.

Figure 1

Leptin reduces TBARS concentrations in ob/ob mice. Thiobarbituric acid reactive substances (TBARS) presented as concentrations of malondialdehyde (MDA μM) in serum (a) and gastrocnemius muscle (MDA μM/mg prot) (b) of wild type (open), control ob/ob (closed), pair-fed ob/ob (gray) and leptin-treated ob/ob (striped) mice (n = 5 per group). Data are expressed as mean ± SEM. *P < .05 and **P < .01 by Kruskal-Wallis followed by Mann Whitney's U test.

Table 3.

Bivariate analysis of the correlations between TBARS concentrations in serum and the gastrocnemius muscle with anthropometric and biochemical variables in wild type and ob/ob mice.

Serum TBARS Gastrocnemius TBARS
ρ P ρ P
Body weight 0.57 .009 0.46 .040
Glucose 0.44 .055 0.38 .103
FFA 0.54 .015 0.59 .007
Glycerol 0.49 <.001 0.44 .053
TG 0.44 .054 0.44 .050
Insulin 0.49 .027 0.52 .020
Adiponectin −0.51 .022 −0.53 .016
QUICKI −0.48 .031 −0.48 .033
HOMA 0.53 .019 0.51 .025

Values are Spearman's correlation coefficients (ρ) and associated P values. TBARS: thiobarbituric acid reactive substances. FFA: free fatty acids. TG: triglycerides. HOMA: homeostasis model assessment. QUICKI: quantitative insulin sensitivity check index.

3.2. Leptin Induces Changes in Gene Expression—Effect of Leptin on Genes Invoved in Oxidative Stress and Inflammation

Differential gene expression profiles in gastrocnemius muscle of wild type and ob/ob groups were compared by microarray analysis. Only genes whose mRNA levels were changed 1.5-fold or higher and identified as significantly changed by statistical analysis were designated as differentially expressed genes. Applying these criteria, microarray data showed that 7,582 genes were differentially expressed by leptin deficiency and leptin administration in ob/ob mice. In particular, leptin deficiency altered the expression of 1,127 genes between wild type and control ob/ob mice. Of these, 580 were upregulated and 547 were downregulated in ob/ob mice. Leptin treatment modified the expression of 1,546 genes in ob/ob mice, upregulating 512 and repressing 1,034. In addition, leptin repressed 736 genes that were upregulated in gastrocnemius muscle of control ob/ob and increased the transcript levels of 846 downregulated genes. Functional enrichment analysis using GeneOntology and KEGG databases revealed that the set of genes with altered expression levels induced by leptin deficiency and administration represents a broad spectrum of biological processes. However, for the purpose of the present paper we focused on the effects of leptin on the set of genes encoding proteins involved in oxidative stress and inflammation. Table 4 shows that leptin deficiency and leptin administration altered the expression of a large number of genes involved in oxidative stress and inflammation. The biological processes mainly affected between control ob/ob mice and wild types included “response to oxidative stress” (P = .0006), “response to stress” (P = .0031) and “acute-phase response” (P = .023). Furthermore, several processes regulating proliferation, differentiation, and activity of lymphocytes were also significantly affected by leptin deficiency. Importantly, comparison of leptin-treated and control ob/ob groups showed that leptin administration altered the expression of genes implicated in the “positive regulation of lymphocyte activation” (P = .0003), “positive regulation of immune response” (P = .0032) and “response to stress” (P = .0187), as well as genes involved in the “chaperone cofactor dependent protein folding” (P = .0023).

Table 4.

Biological processes according to Gene Ontology (GO) and number of genes altered by leptin deficiency, leptin administration, and pair-feeding in the gastrocnemius muscle of wild type and ob/ob mice.

Category Genes in Category wild type vs ob/ob ob/ob vs leptin leptin vs pair-fed
Altered genes P value Altered genes P value Altered genes P value
GO:6950: response to stress 1156 61 .00314 69 .0187 22 .0757
GO:6952: defense response 1010 43 .182 47 .510 33 3.83 e −6
GO:6955: immune response 835 36 .186 45 .165 33 5.53 e −8
GO:45321: immune cell activation 230 9 .475 13 .270 6 .0974
GO:46649: lymphocyte activation 208 9 .359 13 .170 6 .0673
GO:6954: inflammatory response 199 4 .938 4 .984 2 .7590
GO:50776: regulation of immune response 148 9 .097 12 .0426 8 .00102
GO:6959: humoral immune response 123 7 .169 8 .211 4 .0891
GO:42110: T cell activation 112 5 .396 7 .263 5 .0191
GO:30098: lymphocyte differentiation 107 8 .0441 8 .123 4 .0597
GO:42113: B cell activation 101 3 .724 7 .188 3 .1610
GO:6800: oxygen and reactive oxygen species metabolism 92 11 .00056 7 .135 7 .00027
GO:50778: positive regulation of immune response 91 7 .0508 11 .0032 8 3.6 e −5
GO:51249: regulation of lymphocyte activation 89 7 .046 10 .00808 5 .0076
GO:19882: antigen presentation 81 9 .0029 9 .0125 8 1.53 e −5
GO:31098: stress-activated protein kinase signaling pathway 80 8 .00921 5 .313 1 .6690
GO:30333: antigen processing 78 11 .00013 13 5.65 e −5 8 1.16 e −5
GO:7254: JNK cascade 75 8 .00629 4 .461 1 .6450
GO:46651: lymphocyte proliferation 67 2 .712 5 .199 2 .2340
GO:6979: response to oxidative stress 65 9 .0006 7 .0303 7 2.99 e −5
GO:50863: regulation of T cell activation 62 5 .0779 6 .0667 5 .0016
GO:7249: I-kappaB kinase/NF-kappaB cascade 61 2 .663 3 .542 3 .0512
GO:51251: positive regulation of lymphocyte activation 58 6 .0196 10 .0003 5 .00118
GO:30217: T cell differentiation 54 5 .0481 6 .0380 4 .00638
GO:9266: response to temperature stimulus 54 12 4.78 e −7 13 7.96 e −7 1 .5260
GO:30183: B cell differentiation 50 2 .554 3 .410 2 .1500
GO:50670: regulation of lymphocyte proliferation 46 2 .509 3 .360 1 .4700
GO:50864: regulation of B cell activation 46 2 .509 5 .0606 2 .1310
GO:42087: cell-mediated immune response 44 1 .809 1 .876 2 .1220
GO:50777: negative regulation of immune response 43 3 .210 2 .599 1 .4480
GO:50870: positive regulation of T cell activation 43 5 .0203 6 .0137 5 .000294
GO:42088: T-helper 1 type immune response 41 1 .786 1 .857 2 .1080
GO:9408: response to heat 40 9 1.17 e −5 12 1.54 e −7 1 .4240
GO:45619: regulation of lymphocyte differentiation 36 6 .00186 5 .0242 4 .00144
GO:42100: B cell proliferation 32 1 .699 5 .0150 2 .0709
GO:19884: antigen presentation, exogenous antigen 31 9 1.17 e −6 9 7.62 e −6 8 6.81 e −9
GO:50851: antigen receptor-mediated signaling pathway 30 1 .676 3 .160 1 .3390
GO:50871: positive regulation of B cell activation 30 1 .676 5 .0115 2 .0633
GO:51250: negative regulation of lymphocyte activation 30 2 .304 1 .759 1 .3390
GO:50671: positive regulation of lymphocyte proliferation 29 2 .290 3 .149 1 .3300
GO:1909: immune cell mediated cytotoxicity 27 2 .262 2 .358 3 .00584
GO:45580: regulation of T cell differentiation 26 5 .00232 5 .00617 4 .00041
GO:30888: regulation of B cell proliferation 24 1 .594 3 .0975 1 .2820
GO:45621: positive regulation of lymphocyte differentiation 22 4 .00788 5 .00288 3 .00323
GO:19886: antigen processing, exogenous antigen via MHC class II 21 9 2.37 e −8 8 2.45 e −6 8 1.98 e −10
GO:45058: T cell selection 20 2 .167 1 .613 3 .00244
GO:50868: negative regulation of T cell activation 20 1 .528 1 .613 1 .2410
G O:42591: antigen presentation, exogenous antigen via MHC class II 19 6 4.42 e −5 6 .000157 6 1.47 e −7
GO:45582: positive regulation of T cell differentiation 19 4 .00456 5 .00143 3 .0021
GO:1910: regulation of immune cell mediated cytotoxicity 18 2 .141 2 .202 3 .00178
GO:19724: B cell mediated immunity 18 1 .491 1 .574 1 .2200
GO:45577: regulation of B cell differentiation 16 1 .452 1 .532 2 .0198
GO:46328: regulation of JNK cascade 16 1 .452 2 .168 1 .1980
GO:30890: positive regulation of B cell proliferation 14 1 .409 3 .0246 1 .1760
GO:45060: negative thymic T cell selection 14 1 .409 1 .485 1 .1760
GO:51085: chaperone cofactor dependent protein folding 13 2 .0809 4 .00234 3 .00066
GO:1912: positive regulation of immune cell mediated cytotoxicity 11 1 .338 1 .407 3 .00039
GO:48002: antigen presentation, peptide antigen 10 5 1.45 e −5 5 4.39 e −5 4 6.8 e −6
GO:48005: antigen presentation, exogenous peptide antigen 7 5 1.33 e −6 5 4.11 e −6 4 1.17 e −6
GO:45620: negative regulation of lymphocyte differentiation 6 2 .0184 1 .248 1 .0794
GO:46330: positive regulation of JNK cascade 4 1 .139 1 .173 1 .0537
GO:45581: negative regulation of T cell differentiation 2 1 .0723 1 .0905 1 .0272

P values reflect the significance of change in prevalence of genes in each category under the leptin deficiency (ob/ob), leptin administration (leptin) and pair-feeding (pair-fed) conditions in ob/ob mice to the expected prevalence of genes in each category. Statistically significant P values are highlighted in bold.

Noteworthy, leptin reduced the expression of several genes related to inflammatory conditions. DNA microarray analysis showed that 86 genes encoding proteins related to defense, stress, and inflammatory responses were altered in the gastrocnemius muscle of control ob/ob mice and modified by leptin administration. Leptin reduced the mRNA levels of various isoforms of the family of heat shock proteins (HSPs) (Dnajc16, Dnaja4, Dnajb4, Hspa2, Hspa4, and Hspb7), metallothioneins (Mt2, Mt4), crystallins (Cryab, Crybb1) and RNA binding proteins (RBMs) (Rbm9, Rbm22) in ob/ob mice (Table 5). In addition, histocompatibility 2, complement component factor B H2-Bf and several genes of the acute-phase response or inflammatory processes, such as kallikrein 5 (Klk5), and serine (or cysteine) proteinase inhibitor clade C member 1 (Serpinc1) and clade B member 1a (Serpinb1a), displayed an increased expression in ob/ob mice that was reduced by leptin administration. On the contrary, gene expression of Cryl1, Hsp105, Rbm5, and H2-Aa were enhanced in ob/ob mice after treated with leptin. Pair-feeding, which accounts for the decrease in food intake that is independent of the direct action of leptin, altered the expression of 1,960 genes, upregulating 984 while downregulating 976 genes. In the context of a food intake reduction as compared to the simple effect due to the caloric restriction, leptin administration further significantly altered the expression of genes involved in processes encompassing “immune response” (P = 5.53e−8) “defense response” (P = 3.83e−6), “response to oxidative stress” (P = 2.99e−5), “positive regulation of T cell activation” (P = .0003) and “positive regulation of immune cell mediated cytotoxicity” (P = .0004) (Table 4). In particular, the gene array analysis provided evidence for elevated Hspa4, Mt4, Crybb1, and Serpinb8 mRNA levels in the pair-fed group as compared to the leptin-treated ob/ob mice (Table 6). On the contrary, leptin increased the gene expression of H2-Ab1 and H2-Eb1 in ob/ob mice. To confirm the microarray data, the mRNA expression of several representative transcripts was analyzed by Real-Time PCR (Figure 2). In this sense, leptin administration reduced the mRNA levels of the muscle atrophy-related transcription factor forkhead box O1 (Foxo1) and of the E3 ubiquitin-ligases muscle atrophy F-box (MAFbx) and muscle RING finger 1 (MuRF1) in leptin-treated ob/ob mice, while no effect of leptin was evidenced on the mRNA levels of the transcriptional coactivator peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor-γ coactivator-1α   ( Pgc1 α). The expression of the selected genes was concordant with that of the microarray.

Table 5.

Genes involved in oxidative stress and inflammatory responses altered by leptin in the gastrocnemius muscle of ob/ob mice.

GeneBank Number Gene Symbol Gene Name Fold change Ratio
ob/ob leptin
Genes downregulated by leptin

NM_009804 Cat Catalase 1.47 1.13 0.77
NM_007705 Cirbp Cold inducible RNA binding protein 1.68 1.14 0.68
NM_009964 Cryab Crystallin, α B 1.32 1.15 0.87
NM_023695 Crybb1 Crystallin, β B1 2.21 1.39 0.63
NM_023646 Dnaja3 DnaJ (Hsp40) homolog, subfamily A, member 3 0.95 0.64 0.67
NM_021422 Dnaja4 Heat shock protein, DNAJ-like 4 0.88 0.30 0.34
NM_018808 Dnajb1 DnaJ (Hsp40) homolog, subfamily B, member 1 0.44 0.33 0.74
NM_026400 Dnajb11 DnaJ (Hsp40) homolog, subfamily B, member 11 1.11 0.93 0.84
NM_027287 Dnajb4 DnaJ (Hsp40) homolog, subfamily B, member 4 1.09 0.60 0.55
NM_019874 Dnajb5 DnaJ (Hsp40) homolog, subfamily B, member 5 1.03 0.73 0.72
NM_011847 Dnajb6 DnaJ (Hsp40) homolog, subfamily B, member 6 isoform c 0.70 0.47 0.67
NM_013760 Dnajb9 DnaJ (Hsp40) homolog, subfamily B, member 9 0.62 0.39 0.63
NM_007869 Dnajc1 DnaJ (Hsp40) homolog, subfamily C, member 1 0.82 0.52 0.63
NM_028873 Dnajc14 DnaJ (Hsp40) homolog, subfamily C, member 14 1.12 0.87 0.77
NM_172338 Dnajc16 DnaJ (Hsp40) homolog, subfamily C, member 16 1.15 0.66 0.57
NM_009584 Dnajc2 DnaJ (Hsp40) homolog, subfamily C, member 2 1.01 0.82 0.81
NM_008929 Dnajc3 DnaJ (Hsp40) homolog, subfamily C, member 3B 1.02 0.83 0.82
NM_016775 Dnajc5 DnaJ (Hsp40) homolog, subfamily C, member 5 0.74 0.50 0.67
NM_010344 Gsr Glutathione reductase 1 1.17 0.71 0.61
NM_008180 Gss Glutathione synthetase 1.13 0.88 0.78
NM_010357 Gsta4 Glutathione S-transferase, α 4 1.50 1.46 0.97
NM_010362 Gsto1 Glutathione S-transferase ο 1 1.42 1.15 0.81
NM_008198 H2-Bf Histocompatibility 2, complement component factor B 2.00 1.44 0.72
NM_013558 Hspa1l Heat shock 70kDa protein 1-like 1.60 1.04 0.65
NM_008301 Hspa2 Heat shock protein 2 1.49 0.98 0.65
NM_008300 Hspa4 Heat shock protein 4 0.92 0.30 0.32
NM_031165 Hspa8 Heat shock protein 8 0.91 0.57 0.62
NM_010481 Hspa9a Heat shock protein 9 1.03 0.88 0.86
NM_024441 Hspb2 Heat shock protein 2 1.45 1.21 0.83
NM_019960 Hspb3 Heat shock protein 3 1.66 1.27 0.77
NM_013868 Hspb7 Heat shock protein family, member 7 1.83 0.35 0.19
NM_008302 Hspcb Heat shock protein 1, β 0.86 0.69 0.80
NM_008416 Junb Jun-B oncogene 0.59 0.36 0.61
NM_010592 Jund1 Jun D proto-oncogene 1.49 0.94 0.63
NM_008456 Klk5 Kallikrein 5 2.23 1.43 0.64
NM_026346 MAFbx Muscle atrophy F box 0.65 0.43 0.67
NM_008209 Mr1 Histocompatibility-2 complex class 1-like 1.19 0.98 0.82
NM_008630 Mt2 Metallothionein 2 1.11 0.50 0.46
NM_008631 Mt4 Metallothionein 4 1.27 1.03 0.81
NM_008872 Plat Plasminogen activator, tissue 1.56 1.12 0.72
NM_029397 Rbm12 RNA binding motif protein 12 1.40 1.03 0.74
NM_026453 Rbm13 RNA binding motif protein 13 1.01 0.87 0.86
NM_026434 Rbm18 RNA binding motif protein 18 0.94 0.59 0.63
BC080205 Rbm22 RNA binding motif protein 22 1.14 0.75 0.66
BC040811 Rbm28 Rbm28 protein 0.69 0.49 0.71
NM_172762 Rbm34 RNA binding motif protein 34 1.01 0.67 0.66
NM_009032 Rbm4 RNA binding motif protein 4 1.04 0.81 0.78
NM_148930 Rbm5 RNA binding motif protein 5 0.69 0.63 0.91
NM_144948 Rbm7 RNA binding motif protein 7 0.81 0.74 0.91
NM_025875 Rbm8a RNA binding motif protein 8a 0.91 0.69 0.76
NM_175387 Rbm9 RNA binding motif protein 9 isoform 2 1.96 0.46 0.23
NM_025429 Serpinb1a Serine (or cysteine) proteinase inhibitor, clade B, member 1a 2.73 2.09 0.77
NM_080844 Serpinc1 Serine (or cysteine) proteinase inhibitor, clade C (antithrombin), member 1 4.98 1.93 0.39
NM_008871 Serpine1 Serine (or cysteine) proteinase inhibitor, clade E, member 1 2.12 0.97 0.46
NM_011340 Serpinf1 Serine (or cysteine) proteinase inhibitor, clade F, member 1 2.43 1.50 0.62
NM_009776 Serping1 Serine (or cysteine) proteinase inhibitor, clade G, member 1 1.41 1.15 0.81
NM_009776 Serping1 Serine (or cysteine) proteinase inhibitor, clade G, member 1 1.41 1.15 0.81
NM_013749 Tnfrsf12a Tumor necrosis factor receptor superfamily, member 12a 0.78 0.29 0.37

Genes upregulated by leptin

NM_030004 Cryl1 Crystallin λ 1 1.25 1.72 1.38
NM_016669 Crym Crystallin μ 1.37 1.64 1.19
NM_133679 Cryzl1 Crystallin, ζ (quinone reductase)-like 1 1.10 1.28 1.16
NM_008161 Gpx3 Glutathione peroxidase 3 isoform 2 0.47 0.54 1.15
NM_024198 Gpx7 Glutathione peroxidase 7 1.00 1.34 1.33
NM_010359 Gstm3 Glutathione S-transferase, μ 3 1.06 1.23 1.17
NM_010360 Gstm5 Glutathione S-transferase, μ 5 1.09 1.39 1.27
NM_013541 Gstp1 Glutathione S-transferase, π 1 0.87 1.04 1.20
NM_010361 Gstt2 Glutathione S-transferase, θ 2 1.21 1.70 1.40
NM_133994 Gstt3 Glutathione S-transferase, θ 3 1.53 1.69 1.11
NM_010363 Gstz1 Glutathione transferase zeta 1 (maleylacetoacetate isomerase) 1.13 1.24 1.10
NM_010378 H2-Aa Histocompatibility 2, class II antigen A, α 0.46 1.26 2.76
NM_010379 H2-Ab1 Histocompatibility 2, class II antigen A, β 1 0.37 1.04 2.84
NM_010382 H2-Eb1 Histocompatibility 2, class II antigen E β 0.43 1.03 2.40
NM_010395 H2-T10 Histocompatibility 2, T region locus 10 1.11 1.41 1.27
NM_013559 Hsp105 Heat shock protein 105 0.41 0.73 1.79
NM_008303 Hspe1 Heat shock protein 1 (chaperonin 10) 0.67 0.98 1.48
AK_052911 MuRF1 M muscle RING finger 1 0.20 0.28 1.43
XM_131139 Rbm15 RNA binding motif protein 15 0.81 1.34 1.66
NM_197993 Rbm21 RNA binding motif protein 21 0.67 0.73 1.08
BC029079 Rbm26 Rbm26 protein 0.75 1.19 1.59
AK087759 Rbm27 RNA binding motif protein 27 0.88 1.19 1.36
NM_148930 Rbm5 RNA binding motif protein 5 0.77 1.18 1.55
NM_011251 Rbm6 RNA binding motif protein 6 isoform a 0.80 0.97 1.21
NM_207105 Rmcs1 histocompatibility 2, class II antigen A, β 1 0.38 0.89 2.37
NM_011454 Serpinb6b Serine (or cysteine) proteinase inhibitor, clade B, member 6b 1.06 1.23 1.16
NM_009825 Serpinh1 Serine (or cysteine) proteinase inhibitor, clade H, member 1 0.65 0.99 1.53
NM_145533 Smox Spermine oxidase 0.41 1.23 3.00
AK080908 Sod1 Superoxide dismutase 0.58 0.62 1.07
NM_011723 Xdh Xanthine dehydrogenase 0.68 1.01 1.47

Differential expression of genes is indicated as fold changes with respect to the wild type group presenting only the genes which were significantly different (P < .05) between the leptin-treated and the ob/ob groups. Ratio: fold change value for leptin-treated between the ob/ob groups.

Table 6.

Genes involved in oxidative stress and inflammatory responses altered by leptin in gastrocnemius muscle of ob/ob mice independently of food intake restriction.

GeneBank Number Gene symbol Gene name Fold change
Genes downregulated by leptin

NM_023695 Crybb1 Crystallin, β B1 0.51
NM_021422 Dnaja4 Heat shock protein, DNAJ-like 4 0.63
NM_019739 Foxo1 Forkhead box O1 0.34
NM_008300 Hspa4 Heat shock protein 4 0.64
NM_013868 Hspb7 Heat shock protein family, member 7 0.34
NM_010592 Jund1 Jun D proto-oncogene 0.50
NM_008456 Klk5 Kallikrein 5 0.46
NM_008491 Lcn2 Lipocalin 2 0.34
NM_008631 Mt4 Metallothionein 4 0.63
NM_026346 MAFbx Muscle atrophy F box 0.37
AK_052911 MuRF1 M muscle RING finger 1 0.29
NM_011459 Serpinb8 Serine (or cysteine) proteinase inhibitor, clade B, member 8 0.38
NM_011459 Serpinb8 Serine (or cysteine) proteinase inhibitor, clade B, member 8 0.59
NM_008871 Serpine1 Serine (or cysteine) proteinase inhibitor, clade E, member 1 0.42

Genes upregulated by leptin

NM_009735 B2m β -2-microglobulin 1.92
NM_010361 Gstt2 Glutathione S-transferase, θ 2 1.94
NM_010379 H2-Ab1 Histocompatibility 2, class II antigen A, β 1 4.72
NM_010379 H2-Ab1 Histocompatibility 2, class II antigen A, β 1 3.66
NM_010386 H2-DMa Histocompatibility 2, class II, locus Dma 2.35
NM_010387 H2-DMb1 Histocompatibility 2, class II, locus Mb1 3.31
NM_010382 H2-Eb1 Histocompatibility 2, class II antigen E β 4.65
NM_013559 Hsp105 Heat shock protein 105 1,79
AK220167 Hspa4 MKIAA4025 protein 1,59
NM_207105 Rmcs1 Histocompatibility 2, class II antigen A, β 1 4.24
NM_207105 Rmcs1 Histocompatibility 2, class II antigen A, β 1 4.17
NM_009255 Serpine2 Serine (or cysteine) proteinase inhibitor, clade E, member 2 1.53
NM_009825 Serpinh1 Serine (or cysteine) proteinase inhibitor, clade H, member 1 2.21
NM_145533 Smox Spermine oxidase 4.67

Differential expression of genes is indicated as fold changes presenting only the genes which were significantly different (P < .05) between the leptin-treated and the pair-fed ob/ob groups.

Figure 2.

Figure 2

Real-Time PCR analysis of peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor coactivator 1α   (Pgc1a), forkhead box class O1 (Foxo1), muscle atrophy F box (MAFbx) and muscle RING finger 1 (MuRF1) in gastrocnemius muscle of wild type (open), control ob/ob (closed), pair-fed ob/ob (gray) and leptin-treated ob/ob (striped) mice (n = 5 per group). Data are presented as mean ± SEM of the ratio between gene expression and 18S rRNA. *P < .05 and **P < .01 by Kruskal-Wallis followed by Mann Whitney's U test.

4. Discussion

Obesity is accompanied by a chronic proinflammatory state associated not only with insulin resistance, but also with muscular atrophy [4, 5]. Our study provides evidence that leptin constitutes a negative regulator of oxidative stress and inflammation in the gastrocnemius, which is a representative skeletal muscle of the whole skeletal musculature. This statement is supported by findings reported herein: (a) leptin deficiency is accompanied by systemic and skeletal muscle oxidative stress, muscle inflammation, and reduced muscle mass; (b) systemic and skeletal muscle oxidative stress, muscle atrophy and inflammation of ob/ob mice are reversed by leptin administration independently of the effects of food intake inhibition. Therefore, leptin is able to prevent the muscle atrophy associated with obese and inflammatory states.

Skeletal muscle constitutes an important target for leptin playing a key role on the regulation of lipid and glucose metabolism [20]. Since obese ob/ob mice exhibit an increased oxidative stress and impaired immune response [14, 15] and a reduced skeletal muscle mass [21] compared with their lean littermates, we aimed to identify the genes related to inflammatory processes differentially altered by leptin in the gastrocnemius muscle of obese ob/ob mice. In particular, 86 transcripts encoding inflammation-related proteins were shown to be modified by exogenous leptin administration. However, it has to be taken into account that many of these genes are multifunctional and may have important functions in other biological processes. Among them, leptin repressed the high expression levels of acute-phase reactants and several members of the HSP and RBM families. In addition, confirming a previous study of our group [6], leptin treatment increased the reduced muscle weight of gastrocnemius muscle of ob/ob mice. Taken together, these data suggest that leptin may prevent the obesity-associated inflammatory state and the muscle mass loss related to inflammatory states in leptin-deficient ob/ob mice.

Leptin-deficient ob/ob and leptin receptor-deficient db/db mice display many abnormalities in the immune response similar to those observed in starved animals and malnourished humans [14, 15, 22]. In this respect, exogenous leptin replacement to ob/ob mice modulates T cell responses in mice and prevents starvation-induced immunosuppression, suggesting that lack of leptin is directly involved in these immune system abnormalities [23, 24]. In agreement with these studies, our findings show that leptin deficiency and administration differentially regulate biological processes related to the immune response as well as the T and B cell differentiation and activation in gastrocnemius muscle of ob/ob mice.

Oxidative stress is defined as the imbalanced redox state in which prooxidants overwhelm the antioxidant capacity, resulting in an increased production of reactive oxygen species (ROS), ultimately leading to oxidative damage of cellular macromolecules. The major ROS is the superoxide anion (•O2 ). Dismutation of •O2 by superoxide dismutase (SOD) produces hydrogen peroxide (H2O2), a more stable ROS, which, in turn, is converted to water by catalase and glutathione peroxidase (GPx) [25]. Oxidative stress is increased in diabetes [26, 27] with leptin administration reportedly improving insulin sensitivity in normal and diabetic rodents [2830]. However, the relationship between leptin and oxidative stress has not been clearly exhibited. Leptin stimulates in vitro ROS production by inflammatory cells [31] and endothelial cells [32] and the level of systemic oxidative stress in nonobese animals [33, 34], suggesting a “prooxidative” role of leptin. However, administration of recombinant leptin reduces the oxidative stress induced by a high-fat diet in mice [35]. In this sense, findings of our study show a high oxidative stress in diabetic ob/ob mice, as reflected by increased TBARS concentrations in serum and the gastrocemius muscle. These observations are in agreement with a large number of studies related to increased plasma TBARS or MDA in diabetic rats [36] and humans [37]. Lipid peroxidation is a common index of free radical mediated injury and induction of antioxidant enzyme is a common cellular response [38]. More importantly, leptin administration decreased serum and gastrocnemius TBARS concentrations as compared to control ob/ob mice, with TBARS levels in gastrocnemius muscle from pair-fed ob/ob animals remaining very similar to those of control ob/ob mice. In this sense, from a molecular perspective, our results further show that transcript levels of Sod1, Gpx3 and glutathione S-transferase π 1 Gstp1 are downregulated in control ob/ob mice as compared to wild type controls being upregulated after leptin treatment. Furthermore, leptin administration also upregulated Gpx7, glutathione S-transferase μ 5 (Gstm5) and glutathione S-transferase θ 2 (Gstt2). On the contrary, the high expression of catalase (Cat) was repressed by the exogenous injection of leptin to ob/ob mice. These findings are in line with previous observations showing the restoration of the defective antioxidant enzyme activity in plasma of ob/ob mice [39] and humans with a leptin gene mutation [40].

Acute-phase reactants have been suggested to contribute to the maintenance of the chronic low-grade inflammation state involved in the progression of obesity and related diseases [41]. Interestingly, our study provides evidence that genes of the acute-phase response were altered in gastrocnemius muscle of ob/ob mice, which were counteracted by exogenous leptin administration. Leptin reduced the elevated gene expression of tissue-type plasminogen activator (Plat) and lipocalin-2 (Lcn2), which are upregulated in many inflammatory conditions [42, 43], including human obesity [44]. In addition, a pivotal role for oxidative stress in the pathogenesis of muscle wasting in disuse and in a variety of pathological conditions is now being widely recognized [45]. A potential link between oxidative stress and muscle atrophy involves the redox regulation of the proteolytic system [46]. Moreover, various inflammatory cytokines induce oxidative stress [47] and muscle atrophy through the activation of the lysosomal [48, 49] and the ubiquitin-proteolysis system [50]. In this context, biological processes related to oxidative stress and inflammatory responses were altered in the gastrocnemius muscle of ob/ob mice and improved following leptin treatment. In spite of the usual upregulation of the E3 ubiquitin-ligases MAFbx and MuRF1 in most conditions associated with atrophy, their gene expression levels in ob/ob were lower as compared to wild type animals, although no statistically significant differences were observed. Contrarily to what would be expected, leptin administration prevented the increase of both MAFbx and MuRF1 mRNA expression levels induced by pair-feeding in ob/ob mice. A plausible explanation for this surprising finding may relate to the fact that in extreme conditions the energy homeostasis system is overriden whereby leptin is able to inhibit muscular protein degradation associated to food intake reduction. These data are in accordance with a previous study of our group evidencing that leptin replacement inhibits the ubiquitin proteolysis system activity in leptin-deficient mice [6]. Muscle atrophy is associated with increased expression of genes coding for RBM proteins which facilitate the translation, protection, and restoration of native RNA conformations during oxidative stress. It has been suggested that the gene expression of RBM proteins may increase as a compensatory mechanism in response to loss of muscle proteins [51, 52]. Other proteins involved in oxidative stress are metallothioneins, endogenous antioxidants [53] that have been shown to be overexpressed in muscle atrophy in rodents [5456]. In the present work, we have observed that administration of leptin inhibits the gene expression of several members of the RBM (Rbm9, Rbm22) and metallothioneins (Mt2, Mt4) families in the gastrocnemius of ob/ob mice, suggesting that leptin may modulate the inflammatory and oxidative stress responses and consequently, the muscle loss related to inflammatory states.

Genes involved in the chaperone system were also differentially expressed in ob/ob mice as compared to wild types and modified by leptin treatment. HSPs represent a family of molecular chaperones induced in response to cellular stress, responsible for maintaining the structure of proteins and contributing to the repair of damaged or malformed proteins in highly oxidative and lipotoxic conditions. As a result, HSPs are considered antiproteolytic proteins [57]. Muscle atrophy is also associated with an increased gene expression of HSPs [58]. In fact, HSPs are repressed in many rat models of skeletal muscle atrophy [54, 59, 60]. HSP70 is constitutively expressed in skeletal muscle, but its levels are increased in response to oxidative stress [61] with the induction of HSP70 expression by hyperthermia and during inactivity attenuating muscle atrophy [62, 63]. In this regard, a recent study has shown that HSP70 prevents muscle atrophy induced by physical inactivity through inhibition of the muscle atrophy-related transcription factor FoxO3a and the expression of MAFbx and MuRF1 [64]. Among the HSPs, HSP70 and αB-crystallin in particular, are considered negative regulators of muscle cell apoptosis [65, 66] and may inhibit the loss of nuclei taking place during muscle atrophy. In addition, ROS induce the activity of FoxO [67] and gene expression of members of the ubiquitin-proteolysis system in myotubes [68]. In this sense, our results provide evidence that leptin inhibits the increased gene expression of different members of the HSPs (Hspb7, Dnajc16, Hspa4, Cryab, and Crybb1) in the gastrocnemius muscle of ob/ob mice. Taken together, the elevated expression of HSPs in the control and pair-fed ob/ob groups suggests a high defense and stress response in these mice. Moreover, induction of HSPs may confer broader health benefits to patients who are insulin resistant or diabetic [69]. In mammals, caloric restriction has been shown to upregulate HSP induction [70, 71], while expression of HSP72 has been found to be low in skeletal muscle of patients with insulin resistance or type 2 diabetes [72, 73]. Figueiredo et al. [74] have recently shown that leptin downregulates HSP70 gene expression in chicken liver and hypothalamus but not in muscle, which was independent of food intake restriction. On the contrary, Bonior et al. [75] reported an increase in HSP60 gene expression in pancreatic cells by leptin.

Obesity is accompanied by a chronic proinflammatory state resulting in an increase in circulating cytokines and inflammatory markers. In this regard, inflammation produces metabolic alterations in skeletal muscle with both inflammatory response and insulin resistance being associated with muscle mass loss. Findings of our study provide evidence that systemic and skeletal muscle oxidative stress, muscle atrophy and the elevated expression of genes involved in oxidative stress and inflammation of ob/ob mice are reversed by leptin administration. Taken together, these data thereby support that leptin is able to prevent the muscle atrophy associated with obese and inflammatory states in ob/ob mice. Most obese people develop muscle atrophy in spite of exhibiting high leptin circulating concentrations, which may be explained by the leptin resistance present in these patients. Our paper sheds light on the relation between obesity and the loss of muscle mass associated to inflammatory states suggesting that leptin treatment may be an attractive therapeutic approach to prevent muscle loss associated with inflammatory diseases.

Acknowledgments

The authors would like to thank all the staff of the animal housing facilities for their technical expertise in animal care and handling and, in particular, to Javier Guillén and Juan Percaz. This paper was supported by grants from the Fundación Mutua Madrileña to GF; from the Instituto de Salud Carlos III, Fondo de Investigación Sanitaria (FIS) del Ministerio de Sanidad y Consumo to GF and JG-A; and from the Department of Health of the Gobierno de Navarra of Spain to GF and JG-A. CIBER de Fisiopatología de la Obesidad y Nutrición (CIBEROBN) is an initiative of the Instituto de Salud Carlos III, Spain. The funding bodies had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the paper.

References

  • 1.Fantuzzi G, Faggioni R. Leptin in the regulation of immunity, inflammation, and hematopoiesis. Journal of Leukocyte Biology. 2000;68(4):437–446. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Andersson CX, Gustafson B, Hammarstedt A, Hedjazifar S, Smith U. Inflamed adipose tissue, insulin resistance and vascular injury. Diabetes/Metabolism Research and Reviews. 2008;24(8):595–603. doi: 10.1002/dmrr.889. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Wang X, Hu Z, Hu J, Du J, Mitch WE. Insulin resistance accelerates muscle protein degradation: activation of the ubiquitin-proteasome pathway by defects in muscle cell signaling. Endocrinology. 2006;147(9):4160–4168. doi: 10.1210/en.2006-0251. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Schaap LA, Pluijm SMF, Deeg DJH, Visser M. Inflammatory markers and loss of muscle mass (Sarcopenia) and strength. American Journal of Medicine. 2006;119(6):526–529. doi: 10.1016/j.amjmed.2005.10.049. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Powers SK, Kavazis AN, McClung JM. Oxidative stress and disuse muscle atrophy. Journal of Applied Physiology. 2007;102(6):2389–2397. doi: 10.1152/japplphysiol.01202.2006. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Sáinz N, Rodríguez A, Catalán V, et al. Leptin administration favors muscle mass accretion by decreasing FoxO3a and increasing PGC-1α in ob/ob mice. PLoS ONE. 2009;4(9, article e6808) doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0006808. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Zhang Y, Proenca R, Maffei M, Barone M, Leopold L, Friedman JM. Positional cloning of the mouse obese gene and its human homologue. Nature. 1994;372(6505):425–432. doi: 10.1038/372425a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Friedman JM, Halaas JL. Leptin and the regulation of body weight in mammals. Nature. 1998;395(6704):763–770. doi: 10.1038/27376. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Frühbeck G, Gómez-Ambrosi J. Rationale for the existence of additional adipostatic hormones. FASEB Journal. 2001;15(11):1996–2006. doi: 10.1096/fj.00-0829hyp. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Pelleymounter MA, Cullen MJ, Baker MB, et al. Effects of the obese gene product on body weight regulation in ob/ob mice. Science. 1995;269(5223):540–543. doi: 10.1126/science.7624776. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Otero M, Lago R, Lago F, et al. Leptin, from fat to inflammation: old questions and new insights. FEBS Letters. 2005;579(2):295–301. doi: 10.1016/j.febslet.2004.11.024. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Mancuso P, Gottschalk A, Phare SM, Peters-Golden M, Lukacs NW, Huffnagle GB. Leptin-deficient mice exhibit impaired host defense in Gram-negative pneumonia. Journal of Immunology. 2002;168(8):4018–4024. doi: 10.4049/jimmunol.168.8.4018. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Loffreda S, Yang SQ, Lin HZ, et al. Leptin regulates proinflammatory immune responses. FASEB Journal. 1998;12(1):57–65. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Mandel MA, Mahmoud AAF. Impairment of cell-mediated immunity in mutation diabetic mice (db/db) Journal of Immunology. 1978;120(4):1375–1377. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Chandra RK. Cell-mediated immunity in genetically obese (C57BL/6J ob/ob) mice. American Journal of Clinical Nutrition. 1980;33(1):13–16. doi: 10.1093/ajcn/33.1.13. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Matthews DR, Hosker JP, Rudenski AS. Homeostasis model assessment: insulin resistance and β-cell function from fasting plasma glucose and insulin concentrations in man. Diabetologia. 1985;28(7):412–419. doi: 10.1007/BF00280883. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Katz A, Nambi SS, Mather K, et al. Quantitative insulin sensitivity check index: a simple, accurate method for assessing insulin sensitivity in humans. Journal of Clinical Endocrinology and Metabolism. 2000;85(7):2402–2410. doi: 10.1210/jcem.85.7.6661. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Conti M, Morand PC, Levillain P, Lemonnier A. Improved fluorometric determination of malonaldehyde. Clinical Chemistry. 1991;37(7):1273–1275. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Catalán V, Gómez-Ambrosi J, Rotellar F, et al. Validation of endogenous control genes in human adipose tissue: relevance to obesity and obesity-associated type 2 diabetes mellitus. Hormone and Metabolic Research. 2007;39(7):495–500. doi: 10.1055/s-2007-982502. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Ceddia RB. Direct metabolic regulation in skeletal muscle and fat tissue by leptin: implications for glucose and fatty acids homeostasis. International Journal of Obesity. 2005;29(10):1175–1183. doi: 10.1038/sj.ijo.0803025. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Trostler N, Romsos DR, Bergen WG, Leveille GA. Skeletal muscle accretion and turnover in lean and obese (ob/ob) mice. Metabolism. 1979;28(9):928–933. doi: 10.1016/0026-0495(79)90093-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Matarese G. Leptin and the immune system: how nutritional status influences the immune response. European Cytokine Network. 2000;11(1):7–14. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Lord GM, Matarese G, Howard JK, Baker RJ, Bloom SR, Lechler RI. Leptin modulates the T-cell immune response and reverses starvation—induced immunosuppression. Nature. 1998;394(6696):897–901. doi: 10.1038/29795. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Howard JK, Lord GM, Matarese G, et al. Leptin protects mice from starvation-induced lymphoid atrophy and increases thymic cellularity in ob/ob mice. Journal of Clinical Investigation. 1999;104(8):1051–1059. doi: 10.1172/JCI6762. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Fortuño A, San José G, Moreno MU, Díez J, Zalba G. Oxidative stress and vascular remodelling. Experimental Physiology. 2005;90(4):457–462. doi: 10.1113/expphysiol.2005.030098. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Hunt JV, Smith CCT, Wolff SP. Autoxidative glycosylation and possible involvement of peroxides and free radicals in LDL modification by glucose. Diabetes. 1990;39(11):1420–1424. doi: 10.2337/diab.39.11.1420. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Feillet-Coudray C, Rock E, Coudray C, et al. Lipid peroxidation and antioxidant status in experimental diabetes. Clinica Chimica Acta. 1999;284(1):31–43. doi: 10.1016/s0009-8981(99)00046-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Muzzin P, Eisensmith RC, Copeland KC, Woo SLC. Correction of obesity and diabetes in genetically obese mice by leptin gene therapy. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America. 1996;93(25):14804–14808. doi: 10.1073/pnas.93.25.14804. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Sivitz WI, Walsh SA, Morgan DA, Thomas MJ, Haynes WG. Effects of leptin on insulin sensitivity in normal rats. Endocrinology. 1997;138(8):3395–3401. doi: 10.1210/endo.138.8.5327. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Chinookoswong N, Wang J-L, Shi Z-Q. Leptin restores euglycemia and normalizes glucose turnover in insulin- deficient diabetes in the rat. Diabetes. 1999;48(7):1487–1492. doi: 10.2337/diabetes.48.7.1487. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Maingrette F, Renier G. Leptin increases lipoprotein lipase secretion by macrophages: involvement of oxidative stress and protein kinase C. Diabetes. 2003;52(8):2121–2128. doi: 10.2337/diabetes.52.8.2121. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Bouloumié A, Marumo T, Lafontan M, Busse R. Leptin induces oxidative stress in human endothelial cells. FASEB Journal. 1999;13(10):1231–1238. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Beltowski J, Wójcicka G, Marciniak A, Jamroz A. Oxidative stress, nitric oxide production, and renal sodium handling in leptin-induced hypertension. Life Sciences. 2004;74(24):2987–3000. doi: 10.1016/j.lfs.2003.10.029. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Balasubramaniyan V, Nalini N. Effect of leptin on peroxidation and antioxidant defense in ethanol-supplemented Mus musculus heart. Fundamental and Clinical Pharmacology. 2007;21(3):245–253. doi: 10.1111/j.1472-8206.2007.00476.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Sailaja JBK, Balasubramaniyan V, Nalini N. Effect of exogenous leptin administration on high fat diet induced oxidative stress. Pharmazie. 2004;59(6):475–479. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Gülen S, Dinçer S. Effects of leptin on oxidative stress in healthy and Streptozotocin-induced diabetic rats. Molecular and Cellular Biochemistry. 2007;302(1-2):59–65. doi: 10.1007/s11010-007-9426-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Hoeldtke RD, Bryner KD, McNeill DR, Warehime SS, Van Dyke K, Hobbs G. Oxidative stress and insulin requirements in patients with recent-onset type I diabetes. Journal of Clinical Endocrinology and Metabolism. 2003;88(4):1624–1628. doi: 10.1210/jc.2002-021525. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38.Harris ED. Regulation of antioxidant enzymes. FASEB Journal. 1992;6(9):2675–2683. doi: 10.1096/fasebj.6.9.1612291. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39.Watson AM, Poloyac SM, Howard G, Blouin RA. Effect of leptin on cytochrome P-450, conjugation, and antioxidant enzymes in the ob/ob mouse. Drug Metabolism and Disposition. 1999;27(6):695–700. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 40.Ozata M, Uckaya G, Aydin A, Isimer A, Ozdemir IC. Defective antioxidant defense system in patients with a human leptin gene mutation. Hormone and Metabolic Research. 2000;32(7):269–272. doi: 10.1055/s-2007-978634. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 41.Pickup JC, Mattock MB. Activation of the innate immune system as a predictor of cardiovascular mortality in Type 2 diabetes mellitus. Diabetic Medicine. 2003;20(9):723–726. doi: 10.1046/j.1464-5491.2003.00990.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 42.Kjeldsen L, Cowland JB, Borregaard N. Human neutrophil gelatinase-associated lipocalin and homologous proteins in rat and mouse. Biochimica et Biophysica Acta. 2000;1482(1-2):272–283. doi: 10.1016/s0167-4838(00)00152-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 43.Gabay C, Kushner I. Acute-phase proteins and other systemic responses to inflammation. The New England Journal of Medicine. 1999;340(6):448–454. doi: 10.1056/NEJM199902113400607. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 44.Catalán V, Gómez-Ambrosi J, Rodríguez A, et al. Increased adipose tissue expression of lipocalin-2 in obesity is related to inflammation and matrix metalloproteinase-2 and metalloproteinase-9 activities in humans. Journal of Molecular Medicine. 2009;87(8):803–813. doi: 10.1007/s00109-009-0486-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 45.Moylan JS, Reid MB. Oxidative stress, chronic disease, and muscle wasting. Muscle and Nerve. 2007;35(4):411–429. doi: 10.1002/mus.20743. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 46.Li Y-P, Chen Y, Li AS, Reid MB. Hydrogen peroxide stimulates ubiquitin-conjugating activity and expression of genes for specific E2 and E3 proteins in skeletal muscle myotubes. American Journal of Physiology. 2003;285(4):C806–C812. doi: 10.1152/ajpcell.00129.2003. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 47.Matthys P, Billiau A. Cytokines and cachexia. Nutrition. 1997;13(9):763–770. doi: 10.1016/s0899-9007(97)00185-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 48.Ebisui C, Tsujinaka T, Morimoto T, et al. Interleukin-6 induces proteolysis by activating intracellular proteases (cathepsins B and L, proteasome) in C2C12 myotubes. Clinical Science. 1995;89(4):431–439. doi: 10.1042/cs0890431. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 49.Deval C, Mordier S, Obled C, et al. Identification of cathepsin L as a differentially expressed message associated with skeletal muscle wasting. Biochemical Journal. 2001;360(1):143–150. doi: 10.1042/0264-6021:3600143. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 50.Li Y-P, Chen Y, John J, et al. TNF-α acts via p38 MAPK to stimulate expression of the ubiquitin ligase atrogin1/MAFbx in skeletal muscle. FASEB Journal. 2005;19(3):362–370. doi: 10.1096/fj.04-2364com. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 51.St-Amand J, Okamura K, Matsumoto K, Shimizu S, Sogawa Y. Characterization of control and immobilized skeletal muscle: an overview from genetic engineering. FASEB Journal. 2001;15(3):684–692. doi: 10.1096/fj.00-0150com. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 52.Wittwer M, Flück M, Hoppeler H, Müller S, Desplanches D, Billeter R. Prolonged unloading of rat soleus muscle causes distinct adaptations of the gene profile. FASEB Journal. 2002;16(8):884–886. doi: 10.1096/fj.01-0792fje. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 53.Nath R, Kumar D, Li T, Singal PK. Metallothioneins, oxidative stress and the cardiovascular system. Toxicology. 2000;155(1–3):17–26. doi: 10.1016/s0300-483x(00)00273-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 54.Stevenson EJ, Giresi PG, Koncarevic A, Kandarian SC. Global analysis of gene expression patterns during disuse atrophy in rat skeletal muscle. Journal of Physiology. 2003;551(1):33–48. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.2003.044701. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 55.Lecker SH, Jagoe RT, Gilbert A, et al. Multiple types of skeletal muscle atrophy involve a common program of changes in gene expression. FASEB Journal. 2004;18(1):39–51. doi: 10.1096/fj.03-0610com. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 56.Urso ML, Clarkson PM, Price TB. Immobilization effects in young and older adults. European Journal of Applied Physiology. 2006;96(5):564–571. doi: 10.1007/s00421-005-0109-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 57.Morimoto RI. Cells in stress: transcriptional activation of heat shock genes. Science. 1993;259(5100):1409–1410. doi: 10.1126/science.8451637. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 58.Lee C-K, Klopp RG, Weindruch R, Prolla TA. Gene expression profile of aging and its retardation by caloric restriction. Science. 1999;285(5432):1390–1393. doi: 10.1126/science.285.5432.1390. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 59.Lawler JM, Song W, Kwak H-B. Differential response of heat shock proteins to hindlimb unloading and reloading in the soleus. Muscle and Nerve. 2006;33(2):200–207. doi: 10.1002/mus.20454. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 60.Selsby JT, Rother S, Tsuda S, Pracash O, Quindry J, Dodd SL. Intermittent hyperthermia enhances skeletal muscle regrowth and attenuates oxidative damage following reloading. Journal of Applied Physiology. 2007;102(4):1702–1707. doi: 10.1152/japplphysiol.00722.2006. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 61.Liu Y, Gampert L, Nething K, Steinacker JM. Response and function of skeletal muscle heat shock protein 70. Frontiers in Bioscience. 2006;11(3):2802–2827. doi: 10.2741/2011. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 62.Naito H, Powers SK, Demirel HA, Sugiura T, Dodd SL, Aoki J. Heat stress attenuates skeletal muscle atrophy in hindlimb-unweighted rats. Journal of Applied Physiology. 2000;88(1):359–363. doi: 10.1152/jappl.2000.88.1.359. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 63.Selsby JT, Dodd SL. Heat treatment reduces oxidative stress and protects muscle mass during immobilization. American Journal of Physiology. 2005;289(1):R134–R139. doi: 10.1152/ajpregu.00497.2004. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 64.Senf SM, Dodd SL, McClung JM, Judge AR. Hsp70 overexpression inhibits NF-κB and Foxo3a transcriptional activities and prevents skeletal muscle atrophy. FASEB Journal. 2008;22(11):3836–3845. doi: 10.1096/fj.08-110163. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 65.Garrido C, Gurbuxani S, Ravagnan L, Kroemer G. Heat shock proteins: endogenous modulators of apoptotic cell death. Biochemical and Biophysical Research Communications. 2001;286(3):433–442. doi: 10.1006/bbrc.2001.5427. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 66.Kamradt MC, Chen F, Sam S, Cryns VL. The small heat shock protein αB-crystallin negatively regulates apoptosis during myogenic differentiation by inhibiting caspase-3 activation. The Journal of Biological Chemistry. 2002;277(41):38731–38736. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M201770200. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 67.Nakamura T, Sakamoto K. Forkhead transcription factor FOXO subfamily is essential for reactive oxygen species-induced apoptosis. Molecular and Cellular Endocrinology. 2008;281(1-2):47–55. doi: 10.1016/j.mce.2007.10.007. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 68.Gomes-Marcondes MCC, Tisdale MJ. Induction of protein catabolism and the ubiquitin-proteasome pathway by mild oxidative stress. Cancer Letters. 2002;180(1):69–74. doi: 10.1016/s0304-3835(02)00006-x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 69.McCarty MF. Induction of heat shock proteins may combat insulin resistance. Medical Hypotheses. 2006;66(3):527–534. doi: 10.1016/j.mehy.2004.08.033. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 70.Aly KB, Pipkin JL, Hinson WG, et al. Chronic caloric restriction induces stress proteins in the hypothalamus of rats. Mechanisms of Ageing and Development. 1994;76(1):11–23. doi: 10.1016/0047-6374(94)90003-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 71.Heydari AR, You S, Takahashi R, Gutsmann A, Sarge KD, Richardson A. Effect of caloric restriction on the expression of heat shock protein 70 and the activation of heat shock transcription factor. Developmental Genetics. 1996;18(2):114–124. doi: 10.1002/(SICI)1520-6408(1996)18:2<114::AID-DVG4>3.0.CO;2-C. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 72.Kurucz I, Morva A, Vaag A, et al. Decreased expression of heat shock protein 72 in skeletal muscle of patients with type 2 diabetes correlates with insulin resistance. Diabetes. 2002;51(4):1102–1109. doi: 10.2337/diabetes.51.4.1102. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 73.Bruce CR, Carey AL, Hawley JA, Febbraio MA. Intramuscular heat shock protein 72 and heme oxygenase-1 mRNA are reduced in patients with type 2 diabetes: evidence that insulin resistance is associated with a disturbed antioxidant defense mechanism. Diabetes. 2003;52(9):2338–2345. doi: 10.2337/diabetes.52.9.2338. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 74.Figueiredo D, Gertler A, Cabello G, Decuypere E, Buyse J, Dridi S. Leptin downregulates heat shock protein-70 (HSP-70) gene expression in chicken liver and hypothalamus. Cell and Tissue Research. 2007;329(1):91–101. doi: 10.1007/s00441-007-0414-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 75.Bonior J, Jaworek J, Konturek SJ, Pawlik WW. Leptin is the modulator of HSP60 gene expression in AR42J cells. Journal of Physiology and Pharmacology. 2006;57(7):135–143. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Mediators of Inflammation are provided here courtesy of Wiley

RESOURCES